Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982-995.
© 2006 by The Mycological Society of America

Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview


P. Brandon Matheny 1
Judd M. Curtis

     Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610

Valérie Hofstetter

     Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

M. Catherine Aime

     USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350

Jean-Marc Moncalvo

     Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada

Zai-Wei Ge
Zhu-Liang Yang

     Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China

Jason C. Slot

     Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609

Joseph F. Ammirati

     University of Washington, Biology Department, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195

Timothy J. Baroni

     Department of Biological Sciences, SUNY Cortland, Box 2000, Cortland, New York 13045-0900

Neale L. Bougher

     Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia

Karen W. Hughes

     Botany Department, 437 Hesler Biology Building, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1100

D. Jean Lodge

     International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service – FPL, PO Box 1377 Luqillo, PR 00773-1377

Richard W. Kerrigan

     Sylvan Research, 198 Nolte Drive, Kittanning, Pennsylvania 16201

Michelle T. Seidl

     Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Inc., 1400 12th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98004

Duur K. Aanen

     Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Matthew DeNitis

     127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604

Graciela M. Daniele

     Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Casilla de Correo 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina

Dennis E. Desjardin

     Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132

Bradley R. Kropp

     Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322

Lorelei L. Norvell

     Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309

Andrew Parker

     127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153-9720

Else C. Vellinga

     Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102

Rytas Vilgalys

     Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

David S. Hibbett

     Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

An overview of the phylogeny of the Agaricales is presented based on a multilocus analysis of a six-gene region supermatrix. Bayesian analyses of 5611 nucleotide characters of rpb1, rpb1-intron 2, rpb2 and 18S, 25S, and 5.8S ribosomal RNA genes recovered six major clades, which are recognized informally and labeled the Agaricoid, Tricholomatoid, Marasmioid, Pluteoid, Hygrophoroid and Plicaturopsidoid clades. Each clade is discussed in terms of key morphological and ecological traits. At least 11 origins of the ectomycorrhizal habit appear to have evolved in the Agaricales, with possibly as many as nine origins in the Agaricoid plus Tricholomatoid clade alone. A family-based phylogenetic classification is sketched for the Agaricales, in which 30 families, four unplaced tribes and two informally named clades are recognized.

Key words: Basidiomycota, fungi, phylogeny, mycorrhiza, systematics, rpb1, rpb2


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The Agaricales or euagarics clade (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetidae) is the largest clade of mushroom-forming fungi and includes more than half of all known species of the homobasidiomycetes (Hibbett et al 1997Go, Hibbett and Thorn 2001Go). More than 9000 species and roughly 350 genera have been ascribed to the order, which contains 26 families (Kirk et al 2001Go). A consensus higher-level classification in the Agaricales has been difficult to achieve because competing systems circumscribe genera and families (or even orders) in different ways (Bas 1998Go, Jülich 1981Go, Kirk et al 2001Go, Kühner 1980Go, Singer 1986Go). Results from molecular phylogenetic studies have provided numerous fresh perspectives on the evolution and classification of the group, yet produced their own unique problems.

The foundation for a classification of mushrooms was built by Fries (1821–1832Go–1828Go–1857–1863Go–1874Go), who emphasized macroscopic features, such as hymenophore type—gilled, poroid, ridged, veined, spinose, papillate, and smooth—to group the mushroom-forming fungi into higher-level taxa. Fries relied on spore deposit color—white, pink, brown, purple-brown and black—to divide the gilled mushrooms (agarics) into several series. Fries’ macroscopic system, which initially recognized 12 genera of fleshy mushroom-forming fungi, was taxonomically practical. It was relatively unchallenged until Fayod (1889)Go surveyed the anatomy and microscopic features of many agarics and consequently recognized 108 genera.

Singer and Kühner, two recent influential agaric systematists, sustained Fayod’s momentum in different ways. Each of their family-level classifications is depicted as a cladogram and illustrated opposite each other for comparison (SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 1). Kühner (1980)Go investigated the utility of cytological characters and used these to help shape a notable departure from previous classifications. Singer (1986)Go primarily integrated anatomical characters and spore micromorphology but observed a greater diversity of agarics from the neotropics and the southern hemisphere. Many others have influenced higher-level classification of mushrooms and their allies or proposed various evolutionary hypotheses for the Agaricales during the past 50 y (e.g. Heim 1971Go; Horak 1968Go; Jülich 1981Go; Kühner and Romagnesi 1953Go; Moser 1983Go; Pegler and Young 1969Go, 1971Go; Petersen 1971Go). However, because of the synoptic scope found in Singer (1986)Go and Kühner (1980)Go, and their opposing views, these systems are integral for a molecular phylogenetic evaluation of gilled mushrooms and their allies.

Singer (1986)Go, whose legacy The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy remains the most encompassing and detailed classification of agarics, employed a broad concept of the order. This treatment contained not only gilled mushrooms but also many elements of the Boletales and certain taxa (gilled and poroid) of the Russulales and Polyporales. He exercised a narrow generic concept in practice (Singer 1991Go) and as a result recognized 192 genera in the suborder Agaricineae alone, which roughly parallels the euagarics clade (Hibbett et al 1997Go; Moncalvo et al 2000Go, 2002Go), or what is referred to here as the Agaricales.

Kühner (1980)Go divided Singer’s Agaricales into five orders: Tricholomatales (including some gilled taxa of the Polyporales), Agaricales sensu stricto, Pluteales, Russulales and Boletales. Three of the orders—Tricholomatales, Agaricales and Pluteales—conform mostly to our Agaricales (the euagarics clade) or Singer’s Agaricineae. Kühner’s treatment of multiple orders of agarics is not widely recognized, but neither has it been evaluated explicitly by molecular data. In contrast to Singer he employed a broad generic concept, recognizing 75 genera distributed across his three orders of euagaric fungi.

Overemphasis on spore deposit color, fruit body form and some anatomical and cytological traits, in hindsight, led to the establishment of many artificial groups and unexpected phylogenetic consequences. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal RNA sequences has transfigured the circumscription of the Agaricales in the past decade, reaffirming some ideas of earlier workers while shattering others. Some of the important revelations of these studies showed that fruit body form and hymenophore type have been phylogenetically misleading (Hibbett et al 1997Go), that many families and genera of agarics were not monophyletic (Moncalvo et al 2000Go, 2002Go) and that ecological traits have been underused in diagnosis of natural groups (Moncalvo et al 2002Go). Other broad molecular phylogenetic studies (Bodensteiner et al 2004Go; Larsson, Larsson and Kõljalg 2004Go; Binder et al 2005Go) have demonstrated evolutionary relationships among nongilled basidiomycetes, such as resupinate and cyphelloid forms, with members of the Agaricales. Other molecular studies have united non-gilled and gasteroid representative in various clades with gilled relatives (Binder et al 1997Go, Hallen et al 2003Go, Matheny and Bougher 2006Go, Peintner et al 2001Go). In some instances the priority of popular family and generic level names has been contested (Norvell 2001Go; Redhead et al 2001aGo, 2001bGo). Some classification systems (Kirk et al 2001Go) began to incorporate findings of early research, but adjustments are necessary because more groups have been studied in detail and more molecules sequenced.

Here we present an analysis of 1090 DNA sequences for 146 genera and 238 species of euagarics and assemble them in a supermatrix of 5611 characters from six gene regions, rpb1, rpb1-intron2, rpb2, 18S, 25S and 5.8S rRNA, in an effort to assess the phylogeny of the Agaricales. We want to know (i) whether the phylogeny of the Agaricales can be resolved by analysis of multiple gene data, (ii) whether inclusive clades of Agaricales can be identified and what characters diagnose them, (iii) whether traditional family and ordinal level groupings are supported and (iv) whether insights can be gained into the evolution of the ectomycorrhizal (EM) habit, an important ecological trait of the mushroom-forming fungi.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Taxon sampling, DNA isolation, PCR, sequencing and dataset assembly.— – Ninety-four out of 192 genera (49%) of the Agaricineae sensu Singer (1986)Go are represented in this study (SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE I). However Singer’s Agaricineae excludes numerous nongilled genera of the euagarics clade. Many resupinate and sequestrate taxa now are known to have evolved among the euagarics (Binder et al 2005Go, Hibbett et al 1997Go, Larsson et al 2004Go), so the number of genera (347) estimated by Kirk et al (2001)Go is a more reasonable figure at the moment. In this context our datasets are represented by 146 (42%) genera of euagaric fungi.

Standard protocols and published primers were used for extraction of DNA, PCR, sequencing and annotation of sequence chromatograms (Frøslev et al 2005Go, Matheny 2005Go, Matheny et al 2002Go, White et al 1990Go). Two hundred seventy-four taxa and their GenBank accession numbers are provided (SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE I). In total 1090 sequences were analyzed (284 25S, 274 18S, 266 5.8S, 136 rpb2, 130 rpb1 and 129 rpb1-intron 2) with the vast majority (76%) generated as new. The bulk of the remaining 24% of sequences was presented previously in Aime and Phillips-Mora (2005)Go, Binder et al (2005Go, 2006)Go, Binder and Hibbett (2002)Go, Matheny (2005)Go and Moncalvo et al (2000Go, 2002)Go. Separate gene regions were aligned initially with Clustal X (Thompson et al 1997Go). Subsequent new sequences were aligned manually in MacClade 4.0 (Maddison and Maddison 2000Go). Separate partitions of each gene region were introduced into one nexus file via the PAUP* data editor (Swofford 2003Go) and put together in interleaved format for phylogenetic analysis. Taxa for which gene regions were not sequenced were coded as missing. Simulation studies show that the addition of taxa, despite large amounts of missing data, can benefit phylogenetic reconstructions (Wiens 2006Go).

Phylogenetic analyses.— – Three datasets were analyzed: (I) a nrDNA-only matrix of 274 taxa, (II) a six-gene region supermatrix of 250 taxa and (III) a six-gene region supermatrix of 175 taxa. Alignments are available from the lead author on request. For dataset III, 75 taxa with nrDNA regions only were excluded to ascertain any sensitivity to missing data. All datasets were analyzed with parallel and single-processor versions of MrBayes 3.1.1 (Altekar et al 2004Go, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003Go). The parallel version operated on a Linux cluster with AMD Opteron 246 processors. We executed independent runs starting the analyses with random trees and sampling every 100 or 1000 generations, depending on the length of the analysis, and using six chains. Analyses were run 2 000 000–10 000 000 generations under a general-time-reversible (GTR) model plus a proportion of invariable sites and gamma distributed substitution rate heterogeneity parameters. Gene regions of dataset II also were partitoned by rRNA region, rpb1-intron 2 and codon position, allowing a GTR model and rate heterogeneity parameters to be optimized separately for 10 partitions.

A total of 1000 MP bootstrap replicates was performed with the subtree-pruning-regrafting (SPR) branch-swapping algorithm with the MULTREES option off. Five to 10 random additions of taxa were done holding one tree per step during stepwise addition. One tree was saved per bootstrap replicate. These parameters have been shown to reduce computational expense without a reduction in performance for large datasets (DeBry and Olmstead 2000Go, Salamin et al 2003Go). MP results refer to the MP bootstrap 50% majority rule consensus tree, plus other groups compatible with this tree.

Six-gene region dataset.— – Analysis of nuclear rRNA gene sequences in dataset I (SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 2) supported use of the Atheliales and Boletales as outgroups for a subsequent analysis of dataset II with a focus on relationships in the Agaricales. These taxa from the initial analysis were confirmed outside the Agaricales: Epithele typhae (Polyporales), Waitea circinata ("Corticiales") and Clavaria purpurea, Cyphellostereum leave and Rickenella fibula (Hymenochaetales). The generic composition of six clades of Agaricales plus a polyphyletic assortment of hygrophoroid taxa are summarized (SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 2).

Taxon sampling of dataset I was reduced to 253 taxa in dataset II. Three taxa, Pachylepyrium carbonicola, Volvariella volvacea and Rhodocybe aureicystidiata, subsequently were omitted after intial analyses of dataset II. Thus a final total of 250 taxa were analyzed. Seventy-four euagaric taxa were maintained in dataset II despite representation by nrDNA regions only to maximize taxonomic coverage. This matrix was supplemented with 130 rpb1 and 136 rpb2 exon sequences between conserved domains A–C and 5–7, respectively. The conserved intron region of rpb1-intron 2 (Matheny et al 2002Go) also was included as a sixth gene region for 129 taxa. Fibulorhizoctonia sp. (Atheliales) was chosen to root the analyses.

Scoring of ectomycorrhizal character state.— – Two hundred fifty taxa were scored for the presence or absence of an ectomycorrhizal (EM) state in MacClade 4.0 (Maddison and Maddison 2000Go). No attempt was made to distinguish between facultative versus obligatory formations. De Román, Claveria and De Miguel (2005)Go and Singer (1986)Go were used as primary references for character coding. In addition Bougher and Malajczuk (1985)Go and Norvell (1998)Go were referenced to score the EM status of Descolea and Phaeocollybia, respectively. Character states were mapped under parsimony on the Bayesian trees with the highest likelihood score produced from analyses of dataset II (uniform model and partitioned models) and charted in MacClade. The states of four taxa, Neohygrophorus angelesianus, Clitocybe subvelosa, Lyophyllum sp., Cantharocybe gruberi and Boletinellus merulioides, were coded ambiguously due to uncertainty over their EM status.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Six major clades of Agaricales.— – These clades are recovered in the combined Bayesian analysis of protein-coding and rRNA gene sequence data (FIG. 1Go). Representatives from each of the major clades are depicted (FIG. 2Go). After exclusion of introns and ambiguously aligned regions 5611 sites were included, of which 2108 were parsimony informative. A 50% majority rule consensus cladogram was produced from a stationary set of 6662 trees that had been estimated from a single model and sampled every 1000 generations from a run of 10 000 000 generations. In every analysis trees sampled from independent runs (<10 000 000 generations) failed to converge on a similar set of likelihood scores (the average standard deviation of split frequencies was more than 0.01). Future analyses of multilocus datasets of Agaricales with large numbers of taxa should consider running Bayesian analyses longer than 10 000 000 generations, fine-tune MCMC heating parameters or consider employing a user-specified starting tree. Despite this analytical challenge, runs from each analysis produced consistent results that are enumerated below. Attention is drawn to major inconsistencies where they occur.


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Fifty percent majority-rule Bayesian cladogram of the Agaricales, six major clades and outgroups produced from combined rpb1, rpb1-intron2, rpb2, 18S, 25S and 5.8S nucleotide sequences for a supermatrix of 250 taxa (dataset II). Posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are indicated above branches. MP bootstrap values ≥40% are shown below branches. Italicized support values are derived from analyses of datasets I and III and are indicated as such. MP refers to a branch that is present in the combined MP bootstrap consensus tree of dataset II, plus other groups compatible with that tree but with less than 40% bootstrap support. Thickened black branches refer to taxa with an EM habit; thickened gray branches represent an equivocal state; thin black branches represent the non-EM state.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Representatives of the Agaricales. a. Plicaturopsis crispa. b. Podoserpula pusio (photo by Heino Lepp). c. Pterula echo (photo by Dave McLaughlin). d. Camarophyllus borealis. e. Ampulloclitocybe clavipes. f. Resupinatus applicatus. g. Mycena aff. pura. h. Crucibulum laeve (photo by Mark Steinmetz courtesy Mykoweb). i. Nolanea sp. j. Volvariella gloiocephala. k. Crepidotus fimbriatus. l. Basidiospores with germ pore of Psilocybe squamosa (photo by Roy Halling). m. Camarophyllopsis hymenocephala (photo by D. Jean Lodge). n. inverse lamellar trama and pleurocystidia of Pluteus (photo from D.E. Stuntz slide teaching collection). o. Clitocybe subditopoda. p. Cortinarius bolaris. q. Cylindrobasidium evolvens. r. Tricholoma columbetta.

 
Six major clades, 30 families, four tribes and two informally named clades are labeled (FIG. 1Go) and cross-referenced (SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE II) to traditional and phylogenetic classifications of Kirk et al (2001)Go, Kühner (1980)Go, Moncalvo et al (2002)Go and Singer (1986)Go. The names of families and tribes applied in this study are intended to be provisional. A subordinal level classification might be suitable within the Agaricales, as in the Boletales (Binder and Bresinsky 2002Go), but at the moment we opt for an informal clade-based classification because three of the major clades (Plicaturopsidoid, Pluteoid and Marasmioid) failed to receive consistent significant support. Two genera (FIG. 1Go) are unresolved with respect to these major lineages: Infundibulicybe and Macrocystidia. The former is the sister group of the Tricholomatoid clade, the latter lies in the Pluteoid clade based on the tree with the best likelihood score from the partitioned analysis of dataset II.

Plicaturopsidoid clade (I).—early-diverging members of the Agaricales. – Bayesian analyses consistently recover this small cluster of six taxa with diverse fruit body morphology, including gilled, club, coralloid, pilate-stipitate and resupinate forms. The monophyly of the group receives significant support in Bayesian analysis of dataset III, which included all six representatives. All Bayesian analyses place the clade sister of the remaining Agaricales. Two supported subgroups are recovered. One (labeled the Atheliaceae p. p.) includes Podoserpula (the pagoda fungus), Plicaturopsis and Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii. Podoserpula has a club-like form but with interdigitated Plicaturopsis-like pileoli and a merulioid hymenial surface similar to Plicaturopsis. Donk (1964)Go considered Podoserpula allied to genera such as Serpula and Coniophora in the Coniophoraceae, taxa now shown to represent early diverging lineages in the Boletales (Binder and Bresinsky 2002Go). Sclerotium rolfsii is a resupinate anamorph of Athelia rolfsii and an important plant pathogen (Okabe and Matsumoto 2003Go). The second group includes a gilled member of the Hygrophoraceae, Camarophyllopsis hymenocephala, and club and coralloid elements of the Clavariaceae, which were shown to be related to the Agaricales in Pine et al (1999)Go. The nuclear status of spores in the Clavariaceae is not known, but Camarophyllopsis (= Hygrotrama) (Arnolds 1986Go) has multinucleate spores, which is inferred as a derived condition (Kühner 1980Go). In the MP bootstrap tree the Clavariaceae is drawn into the Hygrophoroid clade but with weak support.

The ecologies of other members of the Plicaturopsidoid clade are obscure for the most part, yet no EM taxa are currently known. The group includes presumably mostly saprotrophic elements. Podoserpula is probably a saprotroph occurring on or near old rotting stumps (Bougher and Syme 1998Go).

Pluteoid clade (II).— – The Pluteoid clade appears to include four agaric or gasteromycete families: the Pluteaceae, Amanitaceae, Pleurotaceae and Limnoperdonaceae, plus several orphan gilled genera. This grouping is poorly supported, and not all constituents are consistently resolved together. Analyses of datasets I and III place the Pleurotaceae and Tricholomopsis outside the Pluteoid clade. Nonetheless previous studies of rDNA placed the minute uniloculate gasteromycete, Limnoperdon, near the gilled genus Melanoleuca (Binder et al 2006Go, Bodensteiner et al 2004Go), while others placed Melanoleuca and Pluteus sister of Amanitaceae (Moncalvo et al 2000Go, 2002Go). Thus it is not surprising to see these taxa as part of a larger monophyletic group in analyses of more extensive character sampling (FIG. 1Go).

From an anatomical perspective many taxa of the Pluteoid clade exhibit conspicuous hymenial cystidia (Pluteus, Volvariella, Hohenbuehelia, Cantharocybe, Tricholomopsis and Melanoleuca) and others share salmon pink to reddish brown spores with complex spore walls (Pluteaceae and Limnoperdonaceae). Taxa with multinucleate spores are found in the Pluteaceae and Amanitaceae, but uninucleate spores appear to characterize the Pleurotaceae, Tricholomopsis and some Pluteaceae (Duncan and Galbraith 1972Go, Kühner 1980Go, Mueller and Ammirati 1993Go). Most taxa are decomposers except for the EM lineage Amanita and its sequestrate relatives. Pleurotus and Hohenbuehelia are characterized in part by their ability to attack and consume nematodes (Thorn et al 2000Go). Kühner (1980Go, 1984)Go predicted a close relationship between the Macrocystidiaceae and Pluteaceae based on similar spore characters (smooth complex spore wall, pigmentation and cyanophily) but distinguished the former by the noninverse lamellar trama. Kühner’s prediction is supported by analysis of rRNA data alone (SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 2) but unresolved by the combined analysis (FIG. 1Go). Only rRNA data are available for Macrocystidia. Future studies should address the monophyly of Melanoleuca and Volvariella.

Hygrophoroid clade (III).— – Bayesian analysis of dataset II significantly supports this inclusive clade characterized by most members of the Hygrophoraceae (excluding Neohygrophorus and Camarophyllopsis) and several genera of the Tricholomataceae (Singer 1986Go) and Tricholomatales (Kühner 1980Go). Contrary to prior morphological-based classifications, club and coralloid fungi of the Pterulaceae and Typhulaceae are related to the Agaricales and nested in the Hygrophoroid clade. Most members of the Hygrophoroid clade exhibit slenderly clavate basidia and uninucleate spores, but some species of Hygrocybe and Hygrophorus possess multinucleate spores (Kühner 1977Go, 1980Go). The position of the Hygrophoroid clade (FIG. 1Go) is poorly resolved; however multilocus analyses of rRNA genes (Binder and Hibbett 2002Go) indicated a strongly supported position for the Hygrophoraceae (two exemplars) as the group sister of 12 other Agaricales. The Plicaturopsidoid clade was not sampled in that study.

The Hygrophoraceae is monophyletic provided several genera of the Tricholomataceae are admitted and Camarophyllopsis and Neohygrophorus excluded. Camarophyllopsis (= Hygrotrama) has a hymeniform pileipellis, multinucleate spores and nonelongated basidia (Kühner 1980Go), while Neohygrophorus has amyloid spores and a unique reaction to weak potassium hydroxide solution (Hesler and Smith 1963Go, Redhead et al 2000Go), traits that are rare or absent in the Hygrophoraceae. Both Chromosera and Chrysomphalina are allied to a narrowly defined Hygrocybe. Both Pseudoarmillariella and Chrysomphalina exhibit thickened hymenia (Norvell, Redhead and Ammirati 1994Go), a trait similar to other Hygrophoraceae.

Ampulloclitocybe clavipes, formerly Clitocybe clavipes (Harmaja 2002Go [syn. Clavicybe], Redhead et al 2002bGo) has unambiguous affinities with hygrophoroid taxa rather than with other clitocyboid species in the Tricholomatoid clade. Monophyletic groups of hygrophoroid taxa appear to correspond best to narrow generic concepts employed by Singer (1986)Go rather than the various broad concepts used by Hesler and Smith (1963)Go, Kühner (1980)Go, Arnolds (1990)Go and Boertmann (1996)Go. For instance Hygrocybe s. str., Hygrophorus s. str. and Camarophyllus all are supported as autonomous monophyletic groups.

The majority of Hygrophoraceae is saprotrophic. Many Hygrocybe s. lat. species are important indicators of habitat quality and are sensitive to application of fertilizers (Boertmann 1996Go). These species can be so prolific in grassland environments that Arnolds (1980)Go refers to such settings as "waxcap grasslands". However other ecological traits are found in the family, such as the lichenized lineage Lichenomphalia (Oberwinkler 1984Go, Redhead et al 2002bGo) and the EM lineage Hygrophorus s. str. (Hesler and Smith 1963Go, Singer 1986Go, Horak 1990Go).

A second inclusive monophyletic group in the Hygrophoroid clade includes the families Pterulaceae and Typhulaceae, plus at least three gilled genera of the Tricholomataceae, Phyllotopsis, Sarcomyxa and Xeromphalina. This cluster of taxa receives significant support, but Xeromphalina is placed with weak support as the sister group of the Mycenaceae in the MP bootstrap tree. Nonetheless most agarics in this group are saprotrophic although several species of Typhula are grass pathogens (Hsiang and Wu 2000Go). Fungal cultivars of the ant Apterostigma pilosum have been identified as relatives of Pterula and Deflexula (Munkacsi et al 2004Go). The approximately 200 species known in the Typhulaceae and Pterulaceae (Kirk et al 2001Go) warrant much more phylogenetic scrutiny.

Marasmioid clade (IV).— – The Marasmioid clade is a taxonomically diverse group dominated by white-spored saprotrophic gilled fungi but also includes cyphelloid, resupinate and club-like forms. Almost one-third of the genera (43% or 30%) sampled in this study are concentrated in this clade. The Marasmioid clade is not strongly supported based on analyses of dataset II, but 39 taxa cluster together with a significant posterior probability (PP) in analysis of dataset III when 75 taxa with missing protein-coding data are excluded. Seven families and clades are recovered as monophyletic: the Omphalotaceae, Marasmiaceae, the hydropoid clade, Cyphellaceae, Physalacriaceae, Lachnellaceae (the Nia clade) and Schizophyllaceae. All receive significant support values. These families are consistently recovered together across Bayesian analyses with the exception of the Schizophyllaceae. Two genera, Hemimycena and Pleurotopsis, might represent a seventh lineage. Elements within the Marasmioid clade have been the target of much recent phylogenetic activity (Bodensteiner et al 2004Go, Mata et al 2004Go, Aime and Phillips-Mora 2005Go, Wilson and Desjardin 2005Go, Binder et al 2006Go).

The vast majority of species decomposes wood or leaf litter. Some are primary colonizers of these substrates. Several are pathogens of green plants or algae (e.g. Armillaria, Moniliophthora, Mycaureola), and Schizophyllum commune can act as an infectious agent of humans (Rihs et al 1996Go, Sigler et al 1999Go). The EM habit appears not to have evolved in this group, although mycorrhizal formation has been attributed to Rhodocollybia butyracea (see De Román et al 2005Go) and Armillaria, in which endomycorrhizae are formed with orchids (Singer 1986Go).

Tricholomatoid clade (V).— – The Tricholomatoid clade includes four families, the Tricholomataceae s. str., Lyophyllaceae, Entolomataceae and Mycenaceae, plus the Catathelasma clade. The union of these five clades receives significant Bayesian support. Circumscription of the Tricholomataceae has been controversial and difficult to define based on gross morphological characters and 25S rRNA data (Smith et al 1979Go, Thorn et al 2000Go, Kirk et al 2001Go). The results (FIG. 1Go) suggest more narrow limits for the family. The Tricholomataceae s. str. appears to be composed of two monophyletic tribes, the Tricholomateae and Clitocybeae. Because C. nebularis appears widely accepted as lectotype of Clitocybe (e.g. Harmaja 2003Go, Kuyper 1995Go, Redhead et al 2002aGo), we accept the clade composed of at least Clitocybe s. str., Collybia and Lepista as the tribe Clitocybeae Fayod. The Entolomataceae is recovered as monophyletic. The unique spore form and pinkish spore deposit led early investigators to accept the Entolomataceae as a monophyletic entity (Pegler and Young 1979Go, Singer 1986Go), yet molecular studies using 25S rRNA data alone have not supported the monophyly of the family (Moncalvo et al 2000Go, 2002Go). Species that exhibit siderophilous granulated basidia (Clémençon 1978Go, 2004Go) are restricted to the Tricholomatoid clade, which could be a synapomorphy for an inclusive Lyophyllaceae (Jülich 1981Go, Hofstetter et al 2002Go) plus Entolomataceae grouping. The genus Mycena is polyphyletic, as indicated in Moncalvo et al (2002)Go, and represented by three separate lineages, the Mycenaceae s. str., typified by M. galericulata (Redhead 1985Go), and at least two separate lines in the Marasmioid clade. Although data (FIG. 1Go) indicate the basal position of the Mycenaceae in the Tricholomatoid clade, other Bayesian analyses place it basal to the Marasmioid clade. The Catathelasma clade is poorly known but significantly supported. At present it includes the partial-veiled Clitocybe subvelosa, endemic to western North America (Smith and Stuntz 1950Go, Bigelow 1985Go), the EM genus Catathelasma and Callistosporium, a genus of decomposers. Analysis of only rRNA data place Callistosporium in the Entolomataceae. The genera Dendrocollybia and Neohygrophorus cannot be aligned with any existing family in the Tricholomatoid clade.

The ecologies of lineages in the Tricholomatoid clade are diverse. The group includes mycoparasites in the genera Collybia, Dendrocollybia, Asterophora, Lyophyllum s. lat., and in the Entolomataceae (Vizzini and Girlanda 1997Go, Czederpiltz et al 2001Go, Hughes et al 2001Go, Hofstetter et al 2002Go). Some groups have unique nitrogen requirements, such as the ability to reduce nitrate (e.g. Clitocybe nebularis) or are associated with high concentrations of urea (e.g. Nolanea) (Bresinsky and Schneider 1975Go, Harmaja 1978Go, Largent 1994Go). Others (Ossicaulis, Hypsizygus) produce brown rot (Redhead and Ginns 1985Go) or are involved in bryophyte parasitism (Lyophyllum s. lat.) (Redhead 1981Go) or termite associations (Termitomyces) (Aanen et al 2002Go, Rouland-Lefevre et al 2002Go). Mycorrhizal formation by species of Entoloma s. str. also has been reported (Kobayashi et al 2005Go). Several species exhibit associations with rosaceous plants (Kobayashi et al 2003Go).

The Tricholomatoid clade appears sister of an inclusive group of mostly dark-spored taxa, the Agaricoid clade (see below). Analysis III produces a significant PP (0.97) for the union of these two inclusive clades. Of the 11 EM origins (FIG. 1Go) nine are concentrated in the Tricholomatoid + Agaricoid clade alone. Gross morphologies in both groups are dominated by gilled pileate-stipitate forms but also include secotioid or truffle-like forms (sequestrate).

Agaricoid clade (VI).— – Fourteen families and tribes of primarily dark-spored agarics and gasteromycetes cluster together in the Agaricoid clade with significant support from Bayesian analyses (FIG. 1Go). The same group also is resolved in the MP bootstrap tree but with poor support. The Agaricoid clade includes the Cystodermateae, Nidulariaceae, Agaricaceae, Hydnangiaceae, Psathyrellaceae, Bolbitiaceae, Cortinariaceae s. str., Gymnopileae, Panaeoleae, Tubarieae, Crepidotaceae, Inocybaceae, Strophariaceae s. str. and the Hymenogastraceae. The current configuration of lineages of the Cortinariaceae and Strophariaceae sensu Singer (1986)Go warrants the recognition of smaller monophyletic groups. Indeed Bayesian analyses of datasets II and III significantly support the sister relationship between Cortinarius and the Bolbitiaceae, a separate cluster of Inocybaceae and Crepidotaceae and the union of Hymenogastraceae and Strophariaceae s. str. Although not illustrated in our trees, the type of Hymenogaster (H. builliardii) is nested within the Hymenogastraceae clade (Peintner et al 2001Go). A recent 25S rRNA only analysis suggested a rather inclusive treatment of the Strophariaceae (Gulden et al 2005Go).

Most members of the Agaricoid clade are characterized by pigmented, multinucleate basidiospores and an open-pore type of hilum (Pegler and Young 1969Go; Kühner 1980Go, 1984Go). The clade is essentially that of Kühner’s narrow concept of the Agaricales but unequivocally includes the Hydnangiaceae (multinucleate, white-spored Laccaria and sequestrate allies), the gasteromycete groups, Nidulariaceae and Lycoperdales, and several other sequestrate forms (Krüger et al 2001Go, Peintner et al 2001Go). No links to resupinate taxa have been established, but a few cyphelloid lineages are included (viz. Pellidiscus [Crepidotaceae] and Phaeosolenia) (Bodensteiner et al 2004Go). Many taxa in the Agaricoid clade possess basidiospores with an apical germ pore (e.g. most Psathyrellaceae, many Agaricaceae, Panaeoleae, many Bolbitiaceae), but the phylogenetic distribution of these taxa is diffuse. A germ pore is not present among taxa in the other major clades of the Agaricales. In addition no members of the clade exhibit amyloid spores with the exception of some species of Cystoderma. Hallucinogenic compounds, namely psilocybin, can be found in several lineages of the Agaricoid clade—Conocybe, Copelandia, Gymnopilus, Inocybe s. str., Panaeolina, Panaeolus (Benjamin 1995Go).

As many as six EM origins are inferred in the Agaricoid clade and include the Hydnangiaceae, Cortinariaceae s. str., Inocybaceae, the genera Descolea and Phaeocollybia and elements of the Hymenogastraceae. The remaining taxa are primarily saprotrophic (Vellinga 2004Go, Watling and Gregory 1987Go) but include some lineages in the Agaricaceae that are symbiotic with ants (Chapela et al 1994Go, Mueller et al 1998Go).

Independent origins of the ectomycorrhizal (EM) habit in the Agaricales.— – At least 5000 species of Basidiomycota and some Ascomycota form a predominantly EM symbiosis with land plants (Malloch et al 1980Go). Hacskaylo (1971)Go, Malloch (1987)Go and Bruns and Shefferson (2004)Go hypothesize the symbiosis evolved repeatedly. Others (viz. Hibbett et al 2000Go) also suggest independent origins have occurred but that subsequent losses (reversals) took place in some lineages. A third hypothesis (Weiss et al 2004Go) entails the ancient shared ancestry of the state followed by numerous losses. A parsimony reconstruction of evolution of the EM habit in the Agaricales suggests a minimum of 11 origins of the EM state with no unambiguous reversals (FIG. 1Go). Indeed all but two of the EM origins are concentrated in the Tricholomatoid/Agaricoid clade. These two separate origins occurred in Hygrophorus s. str. and in the Amanitaceae.

Maintenance of the EM state appears stable in diverse and species-rich EM lineages of Agaricales. For example Amanita (est. 500 spp.), Cortinarius (est. 2000 spp.), Hebeloma and allies (est. 280 spp.), Hydnangiaceae (est. 30 spp.), Hygrophorus s. str. (est. 100 spp.), Inocybaceae (est. 500 spp.), Phaeocollybia (est. 80 spp.) and Tricholoma (est. 200 spp.) represent species-rich lineages in which the EM state is maintained. The mechanisms of this stability are unexplored, but it seems that reversals to saprotrophy or biotrophy are constrained in these groups. However we caution that these results could be sensitive to outgroup choice, method of ancestral state reconstruction, character coding definition, incomplete knowledge of the life histories of many Agaricales and/or taxon sampling (Hibbett et al 2000Go, Hibbett and Binder 2002Go, Bruns and Shefferson 2004Go, Hibbett 2004Go).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Shlomit Klopman and Ron McGuire for bioinformatic support at Clark University. We also thank Lisa Bukovnik and staff at Duke University for sequencing support, Manfred Binder, Zheng Wang, Maj Padamsee and David McLaughlin for donation of materials, Dennis Oliver of the WTU herbarium for curatorial support and Brian Perry for taxonomic assistance. We thank Roy Halling, Heino Lepp, Dave McLaughlin, Mark Steinmetz and Mykoweb (http://www.mykoweb.com/) for use of photographs. Ideas about the historical classification of agarics were drawn from an unpublished paper titled "Development of Classification of the Macrobasidiomycetes" by D.E Stuntz (University of Washington no date). Financing was provided by National Science Foundation grants DEB 0228657 for the Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life project, DBI 0320875, NSF 0090301 Research Coordination Network: a phylogeny for kingdom fungi to M. Blackwell, J.W. Spatafora and J.W. Taylor, as well as numerous grants awarded to other co-authors.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication August 1, 2006.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: pmatheny{at}clarku.edu


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Aanen DK, Eggleton P, Rouland-Lefevre C, Guldberg-Frøslev T, Rosendahl S, Boomsma J. 2002. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proc Nat Acad Sci, USA 99: 14887–14892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aime MC, Phillips-Mora. 2005. The causal agents of witches’ broom and frosty pod rot of cacao (chocolate, Theobroma cacao) form a new lineage of Marasmiaceae. Mycologia 97:1012–1022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Altekar GS, Dwarkadas S, Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2004. Parallel metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20: 407–415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Arnolds E. 1980. De oecologie en sociologie van Wasplaten (Hygrophorus subgenus Hygrocybe sensu lato). Natura 77:17–44.

———. 1986. Notes on Hygrophoraceae IX Camarophyllopsis Herink, an older name for Hygrotrama Sing. Mycotaxon 25:639–644.

———. 1990. Tribus Hygrocybeae. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC, eds., Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. p 70–111.

Bas C. 1998. Orders and families in agarics and boleti. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC, eds. Flora agaracina neerlandica: critical monographs on families of agarics and boletii occurring in the Netherlands. Vol. 1. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. p 40–49.

Benjamin DR. 1995. Mushrooms: poisons and panaceas. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co. 422 p.

Bigelow HE. 1985. North American species of Clitocybe. Part II. Beih Nova Hedwigia 81:281–471.

Binder M, Besl H, Bresinsky A. 1997. Agaricales oder Boletales? Molekularbiologische Befunde zur Zuordnung einiger umstrittener Taxa. Z Mykol 63:189–196.

———, Bresinsky A. 2002. Derivation of a polymorphic lineage of Gasteromycetes from boletoid ancestors. Mycologia 94:85–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, Hibbett DS. 2002. Higher-level Phylogenetic relationships of Homobasidiomycetetes (mushroom-forming fungi) inferred from four rDNA regions. Mol Phylogenet Evol 22:76–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

———, ———, Larsson KH, Larsson E, Langer E, Langer G. 2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Syst Biodivers 3:113–157.[CrossRef]

———, ———, Wang Z, Farnham W. 2006. Evolutionary relationships of Mycaureola dilseae (Agaricales), a basidiomycete pathogen of a subtidal rhodophyte. Am J Bot 93:547–556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bodensteiner P, Binder M, Moncalvo JM, Agerer R, Hibbett DS. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of cyphelloid homobasidiomycetes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:501–515.[CrossRef][Medline]

Boertmann D. 1996. The genus Hygrocybe. Fungi of Northern Europe 1:5–184.

Bougher NL, Malajczuk N. 1985. A new species of Descolea (Agaricales) from Western Australia, and aspects of its ectomycorrhizal status. Aust J Bot 33:619–627.[CrossRef]

———, Syme K. 1998. Fungi of southern Australia. Perth: University of Western Australia Press. 391 p.

Bresinsky A, Schneider G. 1975. Nitratreduktion durch Pilze und die Verwertbarkeit des Merkmals für die Systematik. Biochem System Ecol 3:129–135.[CrossRef]

Bruns TD, Shefferson RP. 2004. Evolutionary studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi: recent advances and future directions. Can J Bot 82:1122–1132.[CrossRef]

Chapela IH, Rehner SA, Schultz TR, Mueller UG. 1994. Evolutionary history of the symbiosis between fungus-growing ants and their fungi. Science 266:1691–1694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clémençon H. 1978. Siderophilous granules in the basidia of Hymenomycetes. Persoonia 10:83–96.

———. 2004. Cytology and plectology of the Hymenomycetes. Bibliothec Mycol 199:iii–488.

Czederpiltz DLL, Volk TJ, Burdsall HH. 2001. Field observations and inoculation experiments to determine the nature of the carpophoroids associated with Entoloma abortivum and Armillaria. Mycologia 93:841–851.[CrossRef]

DeBry RW, Olmstead RG. 2000. A simulation study of reduced tree-search effort in bootstrap resampling analysis. Syst Biol 49:171–179.[CrossRef][Medline]

De Román M, Claveria V, De Miguel AM. 2005. A revision of the descriptions of ectomycorrhizas published since 1961. Mycol Res 109:1063–1104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Donk MA. 1964. Conspectus of the families of Aphyllophorales. Persoonia 3:199–324.

Duncan EG, Galbraith MH. 1972. Post-meiotic events in the Homobasidiomycetidae. Trans Br Mycol Soc 58:387–392.

Fayod V. 1889. Prodrome d’une histoire naturelle des Agaricinées. Annls Sci Nat Bot Sér 7,9:181–411.

Fries E. 1821–1832. Systema mycologicum, sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species hucusque cognitas. Gryphiswaldiae.

———. 1828. Elenchus fungorum. Vols. I & II. Germany: Greifswald.

———. 1857–63. Monographia hymenomycetum sueciae. Vols. I & II. Uppsala: C.A. Leffler.

———. 1874. Hymenomycetes europaei. Uppsala: Berling. 755 p.

Frøslev TG, Matheny PB, Hibbett DS. 2005. Lower level relationships in the mushroom genus Cortinarius (Basidiomycota, Agaricales): a comparison of RPB1, RPB2, and ITS phylogenies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37: 602–618.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gulden G, Stensrud Ø, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Kauserud H. 2005. Galerina Earle: a polyphyletic genus in the consortium of dark-spored agarics. Mycologia 97:823–837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hacskaylo E. 1971. The role of mycorrhizal associations in the evolution of the higher basidiomycetes. In: Petersen RH, ed. Evolution in the higher basidiomycetes: an international symposium. Knoxville: University of Tennesee Press. p 217–237.

Hallen HE, Watling R, Adams GC. 2003. Taxonomy and toxicity of Conocybe lactea and related species. Mycol Res 107:969–979.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harmaja H. 1978. The division of the genus Lepista. Karstenia 18:49–54.

———. 2002. Amylolepiota, Clavicybe and Cystodermella, new genera of Agaricales. Karstenia 42:39–48.

———. 2003. Notes on Clitocybe s. lato (Agaricales). Ann Bot Fennici 40:213–218.

Heim R. 1971. The interrelationships between the Agaricales and Gasteromycetes. In: Petersen RH, ed. Evolution in the higher basidiomycetes. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. p 505–534.

Hesler LR, Smith AH. 1963. North American species of Hygrophorus. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. 416 p.

Hibbett DS, Pine EM, Langer E, Langer G, Donoghue MJ. 1997. Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12002–12006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, Gilbert LB, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature 407:506–508.[CrossRef][Medline]

———, Thorn RG. 2001. Basidiomycota: Homobasidiomycetes. In: McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA, eds. The Mycota. VIIB. Systematics and Evolution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 121–168.

———, Binder M. 2002. Evolution of complex fruiting-body morphologies in homobasidiomycetes. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1963–1969.[Medline]

———. 2004. Trends in morphological evolution in homobasidiomycetes inferred using maximum likelihood: a comparison of binary and multistate approaches. Syst Biol 53:889–903.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hofstetter V, Clémençon H, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo JM. 2002. Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 106:1043–1059.[CrossRef]

Horak E. 1968. Synopsis generum Agaricalium (Die Gattungstypen der Agaricales). Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 13:1–741.

———. 1990. Monograph of the New Zealand Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales). NZ J Bot 28:255–309.

Hsiang T, Wu C. 2000. Genetic relationships of pathogenic Typhula species assessed by RAPD, ITS-RFLP and ITS sequencing. Mycol Res 104:16–22.[CrossRef]

Hughes KW, Petersen RH, Johnson JE, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Thomas T, McGhee LL. 2001. Infrageneric phylogeny of Collybia s. str. based on sequences of ribosomal ITS and LSU regions. Mycol Res 105:164–172.[CrossRef]

Jülich W. 1981. Higher taxa of basidiomycetes. Bibliothec Mycol 85:5–485.

Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. 2001. Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Surrey, UK: CAB International. 655 p.

Kobayashi H, Degawa Y, Yamada A. 2003. Two new records of entolomatoid fungi associated with rosaceous plants from Japan. Mycoscience 44:331–333.[CrossRef]

———, Yamada A, Tokumasu S, Kakishima M. 2005. Mycorrhizal morphology in Rosaceae and Ulmaceae produced by entolomatoid fungi in Japan. Abstract from the Mycological Society of American and Mycological Society of Japan Joint Meeting, Hilo, Hawaii, 30 Jul–5 Aug 2005. 144 p.

Krüger D, Binder M, Fischer M, Kreisel H. 2001. The Lycoperdales. A molecular approach to the systematics of some gasteroid mushrooms. Mycologia 93:947–957.[CrossRef]

Kühner R. 1977. Variation of nuclear behaviour in the homobasidiomycetes. Trans Br Mycol Soc 68:1–16.

———. 1980. Les Hyménomycètes agaricoïdes. Bull Soc Linn Lyon 49: Numéro spécial. 1027 p.

———. 1984. Some mainlines of classification in the gill fungi. Mycologia 76:1059–1074.[CrossRef]

———, Romagnesi H. 1953. Flore analytique des champignons supérieurs (agarics, bolets, chanterelles). Paris: Masson. 556 p.

Kuyper TW. 1995. 5. Clitocybe. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC, eds. Flora agaricina neerlandica. Vol. 3. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. p 42–62.

Largent DL. 1994. Entolomatoid fungi of the western United States and Alaska. Eureka, California: Mad River Press. 277 p.

Larsson KH, Larsson E, Kõljalg U. 2004. High phylogenetic diversity among corticioid basidiomycetes. Mycol Res 108:983–1002.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

Malloch DW. 1987. The evolution of mycorrhizae. Can J Plant Path 9:398–402.

———, Pirozynski KA, Raven PH. 1980. Ecological and evolutionary significance of mycorrhizal symbioses in vascular plants (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 2113–2118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mata JL, Hughes KW, Petersen RH. 2004. Phylogenetic placement of Marasmiellus juniperinus. Mycoscience 45:214–221.

Matheny PB. 2005. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:1–20.[CrossRef][Medline]

———, Bougher NL. 2006. The new genus Auritella from Africa and Australia (Inocybaceae, Agaricales): molecular systematics, taxonomy and historical biogeography. Mycol Prog 5:2–17.[CrossRef]

———, Liu YJ, Ammirati JF, Hall BD. 2002. Using RPB1 sequences to improve phylogenetic inference among mushrooms (Inocybe, Agaricales). Am J Bot 89:688–698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moncalvo JM, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Johnson J, Vilgalys R. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst Biol 49:278–305.[CrossRef][Medline]

———, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, Jame TY, Aime MC, Hofstetter V, Verduin SJW, Larsson E, Baroni TJ, Thorn RG, Jacobsson S, Clémençon H, Miller Jr OK. 2002. One hundred seventeen clades of euagarics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:357–400.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moser MM. 1983. Keys to agarics and boleti. London: Roger Phillips. 535 p.

Mueller GM, Ammirati JF. 1993. Cytological studies in Laccaria (Agaricales). II. Assessing phylogenetic relationships among Laccaria, Hydnangium and other Agaricales. Am J Bot 80:322–329.[CrossRef]

Mueller UG, Rehner SA, Schultz TR. 1998. The evolution of agriculture in ants. Science 281:2034–2038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Munkacsi AB, Pan JJ, Villesen P, Mueller UG, Blackwell M, McLaughlin DJ. 2004. Convergent coevolution in the domestication of coral mushrooms by fungus-growing ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1777–1782.[Medline]

Norvell LL. 1998. Observations on the development, morphology and biology of Phaeocollybia. Mycol Res 102:615–630.[CrossRef]

———. 2001. An informal poll for MSA members: should the type of Coprinus be changed? Inoculum 52:5.

———, Redhead SA, Ammirati JF. 1994. Omphalina sensu lato in North America 1–2. 1: Omphalina wynniae and the genus Chrysomphalina. 2: Ompahlina sensu Bigelow. Mycotaxon 50:379–407.

Oberwinkler F. 1984. Fungus-alga interactions in basidiolichens. Beih Nova Hedwig 79:739–774.

Okabe I, Matsumoto N. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Sclerotium rolfsii (teleomorph Athelia rolfsii) and S. delphinii based on ITS sequences. Mycol Res 107:164–168.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pegler DN, Young TWK. 1969. Ultrastructure of basidiospores in Agaricales in relation to taxonomy and spore discharge. Trans Br Mycol Soc 52:491–513.

———, ———. 1971. Basidiospore morphology in the Agaricales. Beih Nova Hedwig 35:1–210.

———, ———. 1979. Spore form and phylogeny of Entolomataceae (Agaricales). Sydow Beih. 8:290–303.

Peintner U, Bougher NL, Castellano MA, Moncalvo JM, Moser MM, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R. 2001. Multiple origins of sequestrate fungi related to Cortinarius (Cortinariaceae). Am J Bot 88:2168–2179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Petersen RH, ed. 1971. Evolution in the higher basidiomycetes. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. 562 p. 13 pl.

Pine EM, Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of cantharelloid and clavarioid Homobasidiomycetes based on mitochondrial and nuclear rDNA sequences. Mycologia 91:944–963.[CrossRef]

Redhead SA. 1981. Parasitism of bryophytes by agarics. Can J Bot 59:63–67.

———. 1985. Proposal to conserve Mycena (Tricholomataceae, Agaricales). Taxon 34:303–307.[CrossRef]

———, Ginns JH. 1985. A reappraisal of agaric genera associated with brown rots of wood. Trans Mycol Soc Jap 26:349–381.

———, Ammirati JF, Norvell LL, Seidl MT. 2000. Notes on western North American snowbank fungi. Mycotaxon 76:321–328.

———, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo JM, Johnson J, Hopple JS. 2001a. Coprinus Pers. and the disposition of Coprinus species sensu lato. Taxon 50:203–241.[CrossRef]

———, ———, ———, ———, ———. 2001b. Proposals to conserve or reject. Proposals to conserve Psathyrella (Fr.) Quél. with a conserved type and to reject the name Pselliophora P. Karst. (Basidiomycetes: Psathyrellaceae). Taxon 50:275–277.[CrossRef]

———, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Lutzoni F. 2002a. Phylogeny of agarics: partial systematics solutions for bryophilus omphalinoid agarics outside of the Agaricales (euagarics). Mycotaxon 82:151–168.

———, Lutzoni F, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R. 2002b. Phylogeny of agarics: partial systematics solutions for core omphalinoid genera in the Agaricales (euagarics). Mycotaxon 83:19–57.

Rihs JD, Padhye AA, Good CB. 1996. Brain abscess caused by Schizophyllum commune: an emerging basidiomycete pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 34:1628–1632.[Abstract]

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rouland-Lefevre C, Diouf MN, Brauman A, Neyra M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Termitomyces (family Agaricaceae) based on the nucleotide sequence of ITS: a first approach to elucidate the evolutionary history of the symbiosis between fungus-growing termites and their fungi. Mol Phylogenet Evol 22:423–429.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salamin N, Chase MW, Hodkinson TR, Savolaine V. 2003. Assessing internal support with large phylogenetic matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27:528–539.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sigler L, Bartley JR, Parr DH, Morris AJ. 1999. Maxillary sinusitis caused by medusoid form of Schizophyllum commune. J Clin Microbiol 37:3395–3398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Singer R. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books. 981 p. 88 pl.

———. 1991. Toward a definition of the genus in mycological taxonomy. Mycol Helvetica 6:92–94.

Smith AH, Smith HV, Weber NS. 1979. How to know the gilled mushrooms. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers. 334 p.

———, Stuntz DE. 1950. New or noteworthy fungi from Mt Rainier National Park. Mycologia 62:80–134.

Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The Clustal X Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acid Res 25:4876–4882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thorn RG, Moncalvo JM, Reddy CA, Viglays R. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis and the distribution of nematophagy support a monophyletic Pleurotaceae within the polyphyletic pleurotoidlentinoid fungi. Mycologia 92:241–252.[CrossRef]

Vellinga EC. 2004. Ecology and distribution of lepiotaceous fungi (Agaricaceae)—a review. Nova Hedwig 78:273–299.[CrossRef]

Vizzini A, Girlanda M. 1997. Squamanita umbonata (Sums.) Bas, a mycoparasite of Inocybe oblectabilis (Britz.) Sacc.—preliminary note. Allionia 35:171–175.

Watling R, Gregory NM. 1987. 5 / Strophariaceae & Coprinaceae pp. In: Gregory NM, Watling R, eds. British fungus flora: agarics and boleti. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden. p 1–121.

Weiss M, Selosse MA, Rexer KH, Urban A, Oberwinkler F. 2004. Sebacinales: a hitherto overlooked cosm of heterobasidiomycetes with a broad mycorrhizal potential. Mycol Res 108:1003–1010.[CrossRef][Medline]

White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315–322.

Wiens JJ. 2006. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J Biomed Inform 39:34–42.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wilson AW, Desjardin DE. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in the gymnopoid and marasmioid fungi (Basidiomycetes, euagarics clade). Mycologia 97:667–679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MycologiaHome page
P. S. da Silva, V. G. Cortez, and R. M. B. da Silveira
New species of Stropharia from Araucaria angustifolia forests of southern Brazil
Mycologia, July 1, 2009; 101(4): 539 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
Y. Ogura-Tsujita, G. Gebauer, T. Hashimoto, H. Umata, and T. Yukawa
Evidence for novel and specialized mycorrhizal parasitism: the orchid Gastrodia confusa gains carbon from saprotrophic Mycena
Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2009; 276(1657): 761 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. Ertz, J. D. Lawrey, M. Sikaroodi, P. M. Gillevet, E. Fischer, D. Killmann, and E. Serusiaux
A new lineage of lichenized basidiomycetes inferred from a two-gene phylogeny: The Lepidostromataceae with three species from the tropics
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2008; 95(12): 1548 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
D. E. Desjardin, A. W. Wilson, and M. Binder
Durianella, a new gasteroid genus of boletes from Malaysia.
Mycologia, November 1, 2008; 100(6): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. D. Lawrey, P. Diederich, M. Sikaroodi, and P. M. Gillevet
Remarkable nutritional diversity of basidiomycetes in the Corticiales, including a new foliicolous species of Marchandiomyces (anamorphic Basidiomycota, Corticiaceae) from Australia
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2008; 95(7): 816 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
K. Sotome, T. Hattori, Y. Ota, C. To-anun, B. Salleh, and M. Kakishima
Phylogenetic relationships of Polyporus and morphologically allied genera
Mycologia, July 1, 2008; 100(4): 603 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. Porras-Alfaro, J. Herrera, R. L. Sinsabaugh, K. J. Odenbach, T. Lowrey, and D. O. Natvig
Novel Root Fungal Consortium Associated with a Dominant Desert Grass
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2008; 74(9): 2805 - 2813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
P. B. Matheny, E. C. Vellinga, N. L. Bougher, O. Ceska, P.-A. Moreau, M. A. Neves, and J. F. Ammirati
Taxonomy of displaced species of Tubaria
Mycologia, July 1, 2007; 99(4): 569 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matheny, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS