| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biology Department, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6 Canada
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Classification of isolates into mycelial compatibility groups (MCGs) is used routinely in many laboratories as a quick marker for genotyping Sclerotinia sclerotiorum within populations. Scoring each new sample requires optimization of standardized conditions to support adequate growth of all paired isolates. Appropriate conditions for growth are especially important because diverse compatibility reactions are difficult to categorize and score (e.g. in samples from populations with high genetic diversity, such as those that receive immigration from genetically diverse sources or those that deviate from strict clonality). The current standard medium for MCG testing can be inhibitory to isolates from some samples, confounding scoring of compatibility. We identified two foci for optimization: (i) choice of medium, in this experiment, Pattersons medium amended with red food coloring (termed modified Pattersons medium, MPM, the current standard medium) versus potato dextrose agar (PDA) and (ii) amount of McCormicks red food coloring amended to the growth medium. The red food coloring often yields a red reaction line in incompatible interactions; alternative incompatible reactions are a line of thick or thin hyphae. Based on results to date, self-self pairings of S. sclerotiorum are compatible and are a reliable standard for scoring compatible self-nonself mycelial interactions. PDA amended with 75 µl/L of McCormicks red food coloring was identified as optimal for isolates inhibited by MPM from a highly diverse, recombining population sample. This precisely amended PDA was also suitable for isolates from highly clonal populations that were not inhibited by MPM or by higher concentrations of red food coloring. Under the optimized, standardized conditions all paired isolates grew together and produced interactions that could be scored in repeatedly identifiable categories, compatible or incompatible. Workers are advised to optimize conditions before screening a new population sample.
Key words: MCG, VCG, vegetative compatibility
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an initial description of mycelial interactions in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum we reported relatively high mycelial incompatibility, with 21 strains incompatible with all other isolates and the remaining 10 strains forming four mycelial compatibility groups (MCGs) of two to three strains each (Kohn et al 1990). All self-self pairings were compatible. All MCGs were transitive (i.e., isolates A, B and C represented one MCG, and isolate A was compatible with isolate B, isolate B was compatible with isolate C, isolate A was compatible with isolate C). From each apothecium produced from four strains, all sibling ascospores were mycelially compatible with each other and with the parent homothallic isolate. This is consistent with selfed (homothallic), sexual reproduction, the results of which are indistinguishable from asexual reproduction in a haploid organism such as S. sclerotiorum. MCG determination was on a defined medium originally developed for vegetative compatibility testing in S. minor, Pattersons medium (Patterson 1985
), with the modification of 6 drops of McCormicks red food coloring per liter of medium (termed modified Pattersons medium, MPM). After acclimatization 7 d on MPM blocks of inoculum cut from the growing margin were confronted, two to a 9 cm Petri dish, 3.5 cm apart and incubated in the dark at room temperature. Pairings were evaluated 4, 7 and 14 d after inoculation. Compatible pairings formed one confluent colony. Incompatible pairings produced a visible reaction in the interaction zone, such as a red line visible on the colony reverse, or a line of fluffy, aerial mycelium or thin mycelium on the colony surface. Microscopically, challenging hyphae in compatible interactions did not necessarily anastomose but were able to overgrow each other. In incompatible interactions that resulted in macroscopic red reaction lines, deterioration of hyphae was observed within and adjacent to the interaction zone. Genetic regulation of vegetative compatibility is not yet elucidated in S. sclerotiorum, but if other ascomycetes such as Neurospora crassa and Podospora anserina are a guide, it is expected to be multigenic (Glass et al 2000
).
After demonstrating that MCG and DNA fingerprint were linked in clonal populations of S. sclerotiorum, we, and others, have deployed MCG typing in population studies of both S. sclerotiorum and S. minor (Kohn et al 1991
, Kohli et al 1992
, Kohli et al 1995
, Cubeta et al 1997
, Carpenter et al 1999
, Carbone and Kohn 2001
, Hambleton et al 2002
, Phillips et al 2002
, Durman et al 2003
, Hollowell et al 2003
, Kull et al 2004
, Atallah et al 2004
, Sexton and Howlett 2004
). A population sample should be a repeatable design, such as random or nonrandom sampling in transects or quadrats, that will entirely depend on the objectives of the study. At least 30 isolates from a site are advised. The sample is efficiently genotyped by pairing subsamples of 1012 isolates in all combinations including self-self, then pairing representatives of MCGs in the subsamples until all isolates in the sample have been placed in MCGs. In clonal populations, MCGs are transitive and each MCG is associated with one DNA fingerprint or with fingerprints that differ by fewer than five hybridizing bands; no fingerprint is associated with more than one MCG. In clonal populations a few MCGs are frequently sampled with many additional less frequent MCGs or singleton genotypes (Kohli et al 1995
, Hambleton et al 2002
). Even with some evidence of recombination MCGs still can be identified and each might be associated with a single fingerprint or microsatellite or AFLP genotype (Atallah et al 2004
, Sexton and Howlett 2004
, Kohn et al unpubl). In a highly recombinant population, except for isolates from adjacent plants, the expectation is that each isolate sampled is either incompatible with all other isolates or is part of an intransitive MCG and each isolate either has a unique fingerprint or a fingerprint associated with more than one MCG. An apothecium resulting from outbreeding, rather than self-fertilization, should show segregation of three or more MCGs among sibling, single-spore progeny. Although some clones have been sampled over wide geographical areas and repeatedly since 1989 (Kohn et al 1991
, Hambleton et al 2002
), there is population subdivision. Population subdivision has been identified with population genetic, phylogenetic and coalescent analyses of multilocus DNA sequences. Each population is isolated genetically in that it receives limited immigration from other populations and members of a population share a common evolutionary origin. Each population includes clonal (frequency > 1) and singleton genotypes identified by MCG typing, DNA fingerprinting and microsatellite screening that are different from genotypes in other populations (Carbone and Kohn 2001
, Phillips et al 2001, Malvarez unpubl). In our experience the only isolates presenting difficulties in MCG typing have been those from South America and areas in the western United States (Malvarez unpubl). We were able to use the original, standard MCG protocol without difficulty to group a sample of uniformly slower growing isolates from a divergent, apparently inbreeding population of the wild plant, Ranunculus ficaria, from Norway (Kohn 1995
). There were no difficulties using the standard protocol in MCG typing isolates from a population with some recombination from North Carolina (Cubeta et al 1997
, Kohli and Kohn 1998
).
Under the standard protocol for MCG typing, inoculum is cut from 1 cm behind the growing hyphal front because hyphal tips were shown to provide less repeatable results. As a rule, self-self pairings are the basis for determining a compatible interaction in self-nonself pairings. Scoring of reactions as compatible or incompatible in highly to moderately clonal populations has been repeatable among several workers across different laboratories, the litmus test for any method. One caveat is that unusually slow growing or parasitized isolates must be eliminated from screening. With sampling of more geographically diverse populations, however, several problems became apparent, especially when we began to screen populations with greater genotypic diversity, a lack of transitivity within MCGs and disassociation of DNA fingerprint and MCG, consistent with outbreeding and recombination, rather than clonality. Although reactions were repeatable, three main problems were encountered: (i) inconsistency in medium preparation as some laboratory personnel were generous with the 6 drops of red food coloring while others were parsimonious; (ii) apparent inhibition by MPM of hyphal growth in some isolates; leading to (iii) difficulty in scoring as even self-self confrontations could fail to grow together, obscuring the distinction between compatible and incompatible interactions. In incompatible reactions a wide diversity of interactions were observed, including three types of reaction that could occur without the easy-to-score red reaction line: a zone of sparse hyphae between paired isolates, a zone of abundant aerial hyphae, or a zone demarcated by sclerotia. The key to scoring always has been comparison with self-self pairings.
This report presents criteria for optimizing mycelial compatibility testing in S. sclerotiorum. The features studied were the composition of the medium and the concentration of McCormicks red food coloring. While an optimized procedure is provided we hasten to point out that each new geographical region or host sampled might yield isolates that differ from the phenotypic norms for agricultural isolates of S. sclerotiorum from the soybean, bean, lettuce and canola growing areas of North America. With each new sample one should determine that the medium, food coloring concentration and potentially other factors such as temperature and distance between inoculum blocks are optimal for ease and repeatability of scoring. The experiment presented here offers a framework for optimization of MCG testing in any sample of isolates.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven isolates were used to validate the optimized procedure and demonstrate repeatability among isolates from the highly clonal population on soybean and canola characterized in previous studies (Kohn et al 1991
, Kohli et al 1995
, Carbone and Kohn 2001
, Hambleton et al 2002
, Kull et al 2004
) and a moderately recombining pea and lentil population from Washington state (Kohn et al unpublished, Mavarez et al unpublished). From the clonal population were four isolates that had been easily scored with the original MCG protocol employing MPM amended with 6 drops of food coloring: 1980 from bean in Lincoln, Nebraska, the S. sclerotiorum genome sequence isolate, clone 2 (Kohn unpublished); LMK 211 from canola in Harriston, Ontario, in 1989, clone 2 (Kohn et al 1991
) and used as a standard in all DNA fingerprinting in the Kohn laboratory; LMK 199. from canola in Harriston in 1989, clone 1(Kohn et al 1991
); 19434 from soybean in Harriston in 2002 (Hambleton et al 2002
), clone 1. From Quincy, Washington, seven isolates from pea were used: SS02-5, 12, 33, 41, 57, 87 and 22.
To compare treatments and optimize the protocol, isolates 1027, 1029 and 1047 were paired in all combinations. All pairings were repeated with each of six treatments. The test media were PDA (Difco) and modified Pattersons medium (MPM: 0.68 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSo4·7H2O, 0.15 g/L KCl, 1.0 g/L NH4NO3, 18.4 g/L D-glucose, 0.5 g/L yeast extract, 15.0 g/L agar, 1.0 L glass distilled H2O, desired concentration of McCormicks red food coloring, 200 µL M.P.F.Y.E. trace element solution (Vogel 1964) contains: 95 mL glass distilled H2O, 5.0 g citric acid monohydrate, 5.0 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 1.0 g Fe(NH4)2 (SO4)2·6H2O, 0.25 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.05 g MnSO4·1H2O, 0.05 g H3BO4, 0.05 g Na2MoO4·2H2O, optional: add 1 mL CHCL3 as a preservative to store at room temperature, 2023 C). Treatment 1 was Pattersons medium, that is 0 µL/L McCormicks red food coloring (McCormick Corp., Dallas, Texas) and treatments 34 were MPM with each of three different concentrations of red food coloring: 75 µL/L, 150 µL/L, and 275 µL/L. Treatments 56 were PDA with two different concentrations of McCormicks red food coloring: 0 µL/L and 75 µL/L.
Isolates were grown on PDA 5 d at room temperature (2023 C) in the dark. Isolates were acclimated on each of the six treatment media an additional 5 d at room temperature in the dark. Inoculum was a 4 mm3 block cut from at least 1 cm inside the growing edge of the colony. Inoculum blocks were confronted 3.5 cm apart on the test medium in all self-self and non-self combinations. Reactions were scored 47 d after inoculation on test media.
To validate the optimization protocol and test repeatability, the 11 isolates first were classified in MCGs with the above procedure on MPM with 6 drops of McCormicks red food coloring. Each isolate was grown in serial culture in 32 cm race tubes in the dark at room temperature (2023 C) with two replicates. Subcultures were made at three points, after 2, 4 and 69.5 m (395481 d depending on growth rate) to the end point of the experiment. To type MCGs the progenitor isolates and each subculture were confronted in pairs in all combinations on PDA amended with 75 µL/L McCormicks red food coloring as described above.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We strongly recommend that if self-self interactions appear to be incompatible, i.e. if a reaction line is produced in the interaction zone, one should suspect inhibition by the food coloring and repeat the pairings on PDA without red food coloring. Because self-self interactions are likely to be fully compatible, they offer the standard against which self-nonself pairings can be evaluated.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Corresponding author. E-mail: kohn{at}utm.utoronto.ca
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carbone I, Kohn LM. 2001. A microbial population-species interface: nested cladistic and coalescent inference with multilocus data. Mol Ecol 10:947964.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carpenter MA, Frampton C, Stewart A. 1999. Genetic variation in New Zealand populations of the plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. NZ J Crop Hort Sci 27:1321.
Cubeta MA, Cody BR, Kohli Y, Kohn LM. 1997. Clonality in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on infected cabbage in eastern North Carolina. Phytopathology 87:10001004.[CrossRef]
Durman SB, Menendez AB, Godeas AM. 2003. Mycelial compatibility groups in Buenos Aires field populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Sclerotiniaceae). Aust J Bot 51:421427.[CrossRef]
Glass NL, Jacobson DJ, Shiu PK. 2000. The genetics of hyphal fusion and vegetative incompatibility in filamentous ascomycete fungi. Annu Rev Genet 34:165186.[CrossRef][Medline]
, Kuldau GA. 1992. Mating type and vegetative incompatibility in filamentous ascomycetes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:201224.
Hambleton S, Walker C, Kohn LM. 2002. Clonal lineages of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum previously known from other crops predominate in 19992000 samples from Ontario and Quebec soybean. Can J Plant Pathol 24:309315.
Hollowell JE, Shew BB, Cubeta MA, Wilcut JW. 2003. Weed species as hosts of Sclerotinia minor in peanut fields. Plant Dis 87:197199.[CrossRef]
Kohli Y, Kohn LM. 1998. Random association among alleles in clonal populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Fungal Genet Biol 23:139149.[CrossRef][Medline]
, Brunner LJ, Yoell H, Milgroom MG, Anderson JB, Morrall RAA, Kohn LM. 1995. Clonal dispersal and spatial mixing in populations of the plant-pathogenic fungus, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol Ecol 4:6977.
, Morrall RAA, Anderson JB, Kohn LM. 1992. Local and trans-Canadian distribution of clones of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on canola. Phytopathology 82:139153.
Kohn LM. 1995. The clonal dynamic. Can J Bot 73: S1231S1240 Suppl. 1 EH.[CrossRef]
, Stasovski E, Carbone I, Royer J, Anderson JB. 1991. Mycelial incompatibility and molecular markers identify genetic-variability in field populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopathology 81:480485.[CrossRef]
Kull LS, Pedersen WL, Palmquist D, Hartman GL. 2004. Mycelial compatibility grouping and aggressiveness of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis 88:325332.[CrossRef]
Leslie JF. 1993. Fungal vegetative compatibility. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:127150.
Patterson CL. 1985. The comparative biology, epidemiology, and control of lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor and S. sclerotiorum, and the genetic analysis of vegetative and sexual compatibility in S. minor [Doctoral dissertation]. Davis: University of California. 69 p.
Phillips DV, Carbone I, Gold SE, Kohn LM. 2002. Phylogeography and genotype-symptom associations in early and late season infections of canola by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopathology 92:785793.[CrossRef]
Saupe SJ. 2000. Molecular genetics of heterokaryon incompatibility in filamentous ascomycetes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:489502.
Sexton AC, Howlett BJ. 2004. Microsatellite markers reveal genetic differentiation among populations of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum from Australian canola fields. Curr Genet 46(6):357365.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |