Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.98.1.121
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.
Mycologia, 98(1), 2006, pp. 121-130.
© 2006 by The Mycological Society of America

Systematics of the genus Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera: morphological and phylogenetic diversity in north temperate and neotropical taxa


Fernando A. Fernández

     Field Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496

Andrew N. Miller

     Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, 607 E. Peabody Dr, Champaign, Illinois 61820

Sabine M. Huhndorf 1

     Field Museum of Natural History, Department of Botany, Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496

François M. Lutzoni

     Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, North Carolina, 27708

Stefan Zoller

     Physics Institute, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Chaetosphaeria is a common saprobic pyrenomycete genus with simple, homogeneous teleomorphs and complex, diverse anamorphs. As currently circumscribed in the literature, the genus encompasses 30 species distributed in four ‘natural groups’, and includes morphological entities in 11 anamorphic genera. Species frequently have been defined primarily based on characters of the anamorphs resulting in species with almost indistinguishable teleomorphs. This study aimed to assess the value and significance of morphological characters in resolving phylogenetic relationships in Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera. Phylogenetic relationships of 42 taxa, representing 29 species distributed in Chaetosphaeria and five related genera, were estimated with partial sequences of the nuclear LSU rDNA and ß-tubulin genes. Sequences were analyzed with maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Phylogenetic analyses of these two genes combined revealed two major lineages. The Chaetosphaeria lineage includes 21 species possessing both typical and new sexual and asexual morphologies. The lineage contains a strongly supported monophyletic clade of 13 species and eight paraphyletic taxa; the latter includes C. innumera, the type species of the genus. The second major lineage includes groupings concordant with the morphological circumscriptions of the genera Melanochaeta, Melanopsammella, Striatosphaeria, Zignoëlla and the new genus Tainosphaeria.

Key words: anamorph, ß-tubulin, phylogeny, rDNA, taxonomy, teleomorph


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Chaetosphaeria Tul. & Tul. and its allied genera are commonly found worldwide occurring as saprobic pyrenomycetous ascomycetes which reproduce both sexually and asexually on extensively decomposed plant substrates. Since its original description (Tulasne and Tulasne 1863Go), the genus has been repeatedly redefined (Saccardo 1883Go; Booth 1957Go, 1958Go; Müller and von Arx 1962Go; Gams and Holubova-Jechova 1976Go; Réblová 1999Go, 2000Go). The circumscription and phylogeny of the genus recently has been reviewed (Réblová 2000Go, Réblová and Winka 2000Go). It currently encompasses 30 species distributed in four natural groups, which also includes morphological entities in 11 anamorphic genera (Réblová 2000Go). Taxonomic opinions at the family level have placed the genus in the Trichosphaeriaceae (Dennis 1978Go), Lasiosphaeriaceae (Barr 1990Go), and Chaetosphaeriaceae (Réblová et al 1999Go).

In general Chaetosphaeria teleomorphs are simple and relatively homogeneous, while their anamorphs are complex and diverse. Therefore, species identification is based primarily on characters of the anamorphs (Gams and Holubova-Jechova 1976Go, i.e. in genera such as Chloridium, Codinaea, Dictyochaeta), resulting in species with almost indistinguishable teleomorphs in many instances. Species identification can become even more challenging when morphological information on anamorphs is not available. When anamorph data are available from culture, there is the possibility of encountering altered or aberrant morphologies. In addition, some anamorphic taxa connected to Chaetosphaeria are monophyletic.

Closely allied genera have been distinguished and sometimes segregated from Chaetosphaeria based on teleomorph characters alone or in combination with anamorph characters. The preferred teleomorph character used in generic delimitation has been ascospore morphology: ascospore pigmentation in Melanochaeta E. Müll., Harr & Sulmont, ascospore disarticulation in Melanopsammella Höhn. and ascospore surface ornamentation in Striatosphaeria Samuels & E. Müll. Preliminary molecular phylogenetic studies of Chaetosphaeria and allied taxa determined that ascospore pigmentation is a homoplasious morphological character in the group (Fernández et al 1998Go, 1999aGo, Fernández et al bGo). Relevant data have revealed ascospore morphology to be phylogenetically informative only at the species level.

Previous analyses of the nuclear large subunit (LSU) rDNA and ß-tubulin genes have provided concordant phylogenies for Chaetosphaeria and some of its allied genera (Fernández et al 1999bGo). The studies presented here expand on the previous unpublished data and attempt to improve the phylogenetic framework for the genus Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera by analyzing partial sequence data from the LSU and ß-tubulin genes from a diverse group of temperate and tropical taxa. The main goal of this study was to assess the value and significance of morphological characters in resolving phylogenetic relationships in these selected taxa, which is necessary for a taxonomic revision of Chaetosphaeria and related genera. Questions we considered were: (i) Does the anamorph have predictive value in these taxa? and (ii) Does the ascospore morphology reflect relatedness?


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Taxon sampling.— – Taxa in this study are listed (TABLE IGo), along with their geographical localities, collection or culture numbers and GenBank accession numbers. Two members of the Sordariales, Cercophora newfieldiana, and Lasiosphaeria ovina were used as outgroups because morphologically both genera have been traditionally considered as closely allied to Chaetosphaeria (Barr 1990Go) and they have been shown previously to have phylogenetic affinities to Chaetosphaeria based on molecular data (Fernández et al 1999aGo, Huhndorf et al 2004Go, Miller and Huhndorf 2004Go). All voucher specimens are deposited in the Field Museum Mycology Herbarium (F). Cultures of multispore isolates were obtained following the techniques of Huhndorf et al (2004)Go and are stored at the Field Museum. Cultures with an origin of USA or Puerto Rico are available through ATCC or CBS. Images were captured and photographic plates produced following the methods of Huhndorf and Fernández (1998)Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. List of taxa used in the molecular analyses. All sequences are from the large subunit nrDNA and ß-tubulin genes unless indicated

 
DNA isolation, PCR amplification, sequencing and sequence alignment.— – DNA isolation was performed as outlined in Fernández et al (1999a)Go. Portions of the 5' end of LSU rDNA and the 3' end of ß-tubulin genes (ca. 1.4 and 1.0 kb, respectively) were amplified with reagents in a Repli-pack Reagent set (Boehringer Mannheim Corp., Indianapolis, Indiana) in this manner: 2.5 µL of 10x reaction buffer with 25 mM MgCl2(100 mM Tris, 500 mM KCl, pH 8.3), 5 µL of 8 mM dNTPs, 2.5 µL each of 10 µM primers LR0R and LR7 for the LSU rDNA (Moncalvo et al 1993Go) and primers BT1819R and BT2916 for the ß-tubulin gene (Miller and Huhndorf 2005Go), 0.25 µL (1.25 units) of Taq DNA polymerase, 2 µL of the undiluted DNA extract and 32.75 µL of double distilled sterile water for a 50 µL total reaction volume. PCR was performed with these thermal cycling parameters: initial denaturation at 95 C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 C for 1 min, annealing at 50 C for 1 min and extension at 72 C for 1 min. A final extension step of 10 min at 72 C was added. Amplified products were separated from unincorporated nucleotides and primers with a Geneclean III kit (Bio 101 Inc., Vista, California).

Sequencing was performed on both strands with primers LROR, LR3, LR3R, LR5, LR6 (Rehner and Samuels 1994Go, Vilgalys and Hester 1990Go, Vilgalys and Sun 1994Go) and LRFF1 (Huhndorf et al 2004Go) for the LSU rDNA and T22 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997Go) Bt1a (Glass and Donaldson 1995Go), BT1819R, BT2916 and Bt1283 (Miller and Huhndorf 2005Go) for the ß-tubulin gene. Sequencing reactions were performed with the ABI Prism Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer Corp.). Sequenced products were precipitated with a 70% ethanol/5 mM MgCl2 precipitation solution. Sequences were generated with an ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were assembled and aligned with Sequencher version 3.0 (Gene Codes Corp.). Alignment was checked by eye and corrected manually when necessary. The alignment of the combined LSU and ß-tubulin data sets is deposited in TreeBase (accession SN2098).

Phylogenetic analyses.— – All phylogenetic analyses were performed with PAUP* 4.0b8 and 4.0b10 (Swofford 1998Go, 2001Go) compiled for the Apple/Macintosh platform. A total of nine ambiguously aligned regions were detected and delimited in the LSU rDNA with the method outlined in Lutzoni et al (2000)Go. Five sequences (SMH 1267, 1725, 2250, 2893, 3854) representing three species contained a single splicesomal intron in the LSU rDNA (Bhattacharya et al 2000Go). Both datasets initially were analyzed separately. Two maximum parsimony analyses were performed on the LSU rDNA. In one analysis, ambiguously aligned regions were excluded, nucleotide substitutions within the remaining unambiguously aligned sites were equally weighted, and gaps were treated as missing data. In a second analysis, gaps were treated as a fifth character. Also, the nine ambiguously aligned regions along with the single spliceosomal intron splice site were included as 10 unequivocally coded characters, each subjected to a specific step-matrix derived from pairwise comparisons of sequences using the program INAASE 2.2b (Lutzoni et al 2000Go). The unambiguously aligned portion of the alignment was subjected to a specific symmetric stepmatrix as previously described (Fernández et al 1999aGo). Two maximum parsimony analyses, one with equally weighted and another with unequally weighted nucleotide substitutions, also were performed on the ß-tubulin data. Intron sequence data were excluded. Exons in the ß-tubulin data set were partitioned into first, second, and third codon positions, which were subjected to a specific stepmatrix following the same weighing scheme as previously described by Fernandez et al (1999a)Go.

A heuristic search with 1000 random-addition sequence replicates was implemented for each analysis, with the branch-swapping algorithm set to TBR, the MULPARS option was in effect, and zero-length branches were collapsed. Support for internodes was estimated by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates with a heuristic search consisting of two random-addition sequence replicates for each bootstrap replicate. Conflicts between the two data sets were assumed to be significant when conflicting clades both had ≥70% bootstrap support. The combined dataset included 29 species plus two outgroup species and a total of 435 parsimony informative characters. A total of 1000 random-addition sequence replicates were implemented as previously described. The internode support was estimated by 1000 bootstrap replicates with heuristic searches consisting of 50 random-addition sequence replicates for each bootstrap replicate.

A heuristic maximum likelihood tree search was performed on the combined dataset with PAUP* 4.0b8 (Swofford 1998Go). Constant characters were excluded. Likelihood model parameters for the combined data set were estimated with Modeltest 3.5 (Posada and Crandall 1998Go). A general-time-reversible likelihood model (Tavaré 1986Go) with among site rate variation following a gamma shape distribution (GTR+G) was selected. In a first step, 100 random-addition sequence replicates were performed without branch swapping, saving the best tree of each replicate. The topologies of the resulting 100 trees were compared and none were found to be identical. Therefore all 100 trees from this first analysis were used as starting points for a second round of heuristic searches, with TBR branch swapping and a limit of 15 000 rearrangements per random addition replicate.

Bayesian posterior probabilities for each internode were calculated with a Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMCMC3) sampling method as implemented in the program MrBayes, version 3.0b4 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001Go). The combined data set was assumed to have four distinct partitions (LSU, ß-tubulin 1st, 2nd, 3rd codon positions). To determine which model of nucleotide substitution with the least number of parameters best fit each of these partitions, hierarchical likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were performed with Modeltest 3.5 (Posada and Crandall 1998Go). For the LSU data set, a Tamura-Nei-93 likelihood model (Tamura and Nei 1993Go) including a proportion of invariable sites and among site rate variation following a gamma shape distribution (TrNef+I+G) was selected. This model also was selected for first position codons for the ß-tubulin dataset. Second position codons were subjected to a Jukes and Cantor model (Jukes and Cantor 1969Go) with a proportion of invariable sites and equal among site rate variation ( JC+I), while a transversional model (Modeltest 3.5) with among site rate variation following a gamma shape distribution (TVM+G) was selected for third position codons.

Five independent MrBayes analyses were run for 5 000 000 generations each for the combined dataset. Four Markov chains were run with trees sampled every 100th generation, resulting in 50 000 total trees per run (250 000 total trees). Log-likelihood scores were plotted against generation time with Excel 2004 (Microsoft Corp.) to determine the number of generations before the chains reached stationarity (i.e. burn-in phase). The first 10 000 generations represented the burn-in phase in all runs so the first 10 000 trees were excluded from further analysis. A majority rule consensus tree with the remaining 40 000 trees from one of these runs was computed with the SUMT command in MrBayes. The resulting posterior probability support values for bipartitions were considered significant at ≥95%.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses of each dataset resulted in trees with similar topologies and overall higher bootstrap support values in the unequally weighted analyses (not shown). Also, the number of equally most parsimonious trees was reduced from 36 in the equally weighted to six in the unequally weighted analyses for the LSU rDNA dataset. Both the equally and the unequally weighted analyses of the ß-tubulin dataset yielded a single most parsimonious tree. Comparisons of bootstrap support for clades in both trees show no conflicts. The LSU dataset had 19 branches with more than 70% bootstrap support, the ß-tubulin dataset had 14 branches and the combined dataset had 20 branches. The LSU dataset alone provided the support for the putative sister lineage, the Melanopsammella clade and clade A. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on the combined dataset resulted respectively in a single most parsimonious tree of 3033 steps (data not shown) and one most likely tree (-ln = 9172) (data not shown). Both trees have similar topologies. MP and ML analyses concur on two major lineages: the Chaetosphaeria lineage, represented by Chaetosphaeria innumera (the type species of the genus) along with 20 additional species; and a putative sister lineage which contains five genera, Melanochaeta, Melanopsammella, Striatosphaeria, Tainosphaeria F. A. Fernández & Huhndorf 2005 and Zignoëlla Sacc. 1878. The Chaetosphaeria lineage received higher support from the Bayesian MCMCMC analysis (posterior probability = 100) than from the MP bootstrap analysis (57%) (FIG. 1Go). The lineage contains a strongly supported (BS = 84, PP = 100) monophyletic clade of 13 species, which is further subdivided into two well supported sister groups: a large clade (A) composed of 10 different species and a small clade (B) composed of three species (FIG. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Phylogram based on a Bayesian MCMCMC analysis of the combined LSU and ß-tubulin dataset. The phylogram represents the majority rule consensus tree of 40 000 trees and has an arithmetic mean likelihood value of (–12648.37). Branch lengths are averaged over all trees. Numbers above the branches indicate bootstrap support based on 1000 replicates. Thickened branches represent significant posterior probabilities (≥95%) generated from Bayesian analyses. Images of ascospores. 1a. C. caesariata, 1b. C. capitata, 1c. C. chlorotunicata, 1d. C. lignomollis; 2a. C. chalaroides, 2b. C. conirostris, 2c. C. spinosa, 2d. C. raciborskii; 3a. C. decastyla, 3b. C. cubensis, 3c. C. tropicalis, 3d. C. sylvatica, 3e. C. lateriphiala; 4a. C. callimorpha, 4b. C. hebetiseta, 4c. C. longiseta, 4d. C. luquillensis; 5a. C. minuta, 5b. C. innumera, 5c. C. myriocarpa, 5d. C. pygmaea; 6a. Z. ovoidea, 6b. Z. pulviscula, 6c. T. crassiparies, 6d. S. codinaeophora; 7a. M. vermicularioides, 7b. M. gonytrichii, 7c. M. aotearoae, 7d. M. hemipsila. Images of anamorphs. 1e. C. caesariata (Chloridium-like), 1f. C. capitata (Exserticlava), 1g. C. chlorotunicata (Exserticlava), 1h. C. lignomollis (Kylindria DiCosmo, S.M. Berch & W.B. Kendr.); 2e. C. chalaroides (Chalara), 2f. C. conirostris (Craspedodidymum Hol.-Jech.), 2g. C. spinosa (Phialophora-like), 2h. C. raciborskii (Craspedodidymum-like); 3f. C. decastyla (Cacumisporium Preuss), 3g. C. cubensis (Catenularia Grove), 3h. C. tropicalis (Phaeostalagmus W. Gams), 3i. C. sylvatica (Phaeostalagmus), 3j. C. lateriphiala (Zanclospora S. Hughes & W.B. Kendr.); 4e. C. callimorpha (Codinaea Maire), 4f. C. hebetiseta (Chloridium), 4g. C. longiseta (Dictyochaeta), 4h. C. luquillensis (dematiaceous phialidic); 5e. C. minuta (Zanclospora), 5f. C. innumera (Chloridium), 5g. C. myriocarpa (Chloridium-like); 6e. Z. ovoidea (Menispora Pers.), 6f. T. crassiparies (Codinaea), 6g. S. codinaeaphora (Dictyochaeta); 7e. M. vermicularioides (Chloridium), 7f. M. gonytrichii (Gonytrichum), 7g. M. hemipsila (Sporoschisma). Bars = 10 µm.

 
In clade A there are two well supported internal clades. One consists of C. capitata and C. chlorotunicata, which consistently were found to be well supported sister species by MP bootstrap and Bayesian analyses (FIG. 1Go). The second clade contains C. raciborskii, C. spinosa and C. conirostris and had high Bayesian support and bootstrap support of 69% (FIG. 1Go). Phylogenetic affinities among C. caesariata (in Réblová 1999Go as Umbrinosphaeria caesariata (Cooke & Peck) Réblová), C. lignomollis, C. decastyla and C. chalaroides were not well supported by either analysis within clade A. C. cubensis similarly does not exhibit clear phylogenetic relationships to the other species in clade A (FIG. 1Go). Chaetosphaeria tropicalis, C. sylvatica and C. lateriphiala group together in a clade (clade B) with strong bootstrap and Bayesian support.

Relationships among the remaining eight Chaetosphaeria species outside the lineage containing clades A and B are uncertain (FIG. 1Go). C. longiseta is the most divergent species in this group. C. luquillensis and C. minuta come together but this clade is unsupported (FIG. 1Go). Similarly, C. callimorpha and C. hebetiseta come together but also without significant support (FIG. 1Go). Chaetosphaeria innumera, C. myriocarpa and C. pygmaea were revealed as a monophyletic group with high posterior probability (99%, FIG. 1Go), but without bootstrap support ≥50%.

In contrast the putative sister lineage to Chaetosphaeria, is strongly supported (BS = 98 %, PP = 100%). Within this lineage three monophyletic groups were found that correspond to the morphological circumscriptions of three existing genera: Melanopsammella, Melanochaeta and Zignoëlla. Tainosphaeria crassiparies and Striatosphaeria codinaeaphora come together but with poor support. This clade is sister to the Zignoëlla clade showing high posterior probability. Melanopsammella is a sister group to Melanochaeta, but without support (FIG. 1Go). In the MP tree (not shown) Melanochaeta joins Zignoëlla, Tainosphaeria and Striatosphaeria in a clade that received bootstrap support (74%).

Spliceosomal introns were found in five taxa representing three species of Chaetosphaeria: C. longiseta, C. tropicalis and C. sylvatica. Details on their occurrence and molecular significance have been discussed previously (Bhattacharya et al 2000Go). Specimens of C. tropicalis (SMH 1267, SMH2250; TABLE IGo) are from disparate geographical areas but have identical intron sequences. Intron sequences for both specimens of C. longiseta show a total of eight base pair changes: seven transitions and one transversion, plus one insertion/deletion polymorphism. Intron sequences for C. tropicalis and C. longiseta are the same length. Comparisons among intron sequences revealed different levels of sequence similarity, reflecting of their level of phylogenetic relatedness (Bhattacharya et al 2000Go). No group 1 introns were found in nuclear rDNA in the specimens sequenced for this study.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Relationships within Chaetosphaeria – A phylogenetic scheme for Chaetosphaeria had been proposed previously based on analyses of morphology and nuclear ribosomal sequence data from northern European species (Réblová and Winka 2000Go). Our analyses of sequence data from 17 known species and 12 new species of temperate and neotropical Chaetosphaeria and allied genera provide new perspectives on phylogenetic relationships within the group. Morphological interpretation of the two-gene molecular phylogeny presents Chaetosphaeria as an assemblage of species groups with varying degrees of overlap in their teleomorph and anamorph characters. Analyses presented here show Chaetosphaeria as a morphologically complex genus with a distinct monophyletic group of species with diverse morphologies (clade A + B), and as a highly divergent group of paraphyletic, mostly poorly supported species (that includes the type species) with relatively uniform teleomorphs. Given the diverse phylogenetic spectrum of the genus, predominance of particular teleomorph and anamorph characters can be observed in the different parts of the trees (FIG. 1Go). One-septate, short-fusiform ascospore morphology predominates in the paraphyletic or typical species that originated early in the diversification of Chaetosphaeria (e.g. C. myriocarpa, C. pygmaea, C. minuta). Species with 3-septate ascospores originated early and late in the evolution of this genus (e.g. C. innumera, C. hebetiseta, C. tropicalis). In the well supported monophyletic clade A, ascospores that are multi-septate and hyaline or pigmented are present in C. caesariata, C. capitata, C. chlorotunicata, C. lignomollis, C. raciborskii, C. spinosa and C. decastyla. One outlier is C. chalaroides, which has 1-septate short-fusiform ascospores typical of the basal species (FIG. 1Go). A similar morphological trend of reduced ascospore septation in basal species was observed in a phylogenetic study of temperate species (Réblová and Winka 2000Go).

In the anamorph, two general developmental patterns are observed in Chaetosphaeria. One pattern shows aseptate to multiseptate conidia that are broadly attached to an integrated conidiogenous cell and are produced at endogenous conidiogenous loci (e.g. Exserticlava S. Hughes and Chalara [Corda] Rabenh. anamorphs of C. chlorotunicata and C. chalaroides, respectively). The second pattern shows aseptate to 1-septate, "enteroblastic conidia" produced from a narrow conidiogenous locus in a discrete or integrated conidiogenous cell (e.g. Dictyochaeta Speg. and some Chloridium Link anamorphs). While previous data suggested that anamorph developmental patterns reflect phylogenetic relatedness in Chaetosphaeria (Réblová 2000Go) the data presented here only partially support this observation. The data (FIG. 1Go) do show some patterns regarding the location, arrangement, shape, and proliferation mode of conidiogenous cells, but there are exceptions. For example the first pattern of conidial development is observed in some of the species that are part of clade A: C. capitata, C. chlorotunicata, C. decastyla and C. chalaroides. Others (e.g. C. lignomollis, C. caesariata and C. spinosa) produce anamorphs fitting the typical patterns of enteroblastic conidiogenesis (Fernández and Huhndorf 2005Go). This pattern of conidiogenesis is present predominantly in species that make up the basal grade (i.e. C. innumera, C. hebetiseta, C. longiseta and C. myriocarpa). It should be noted that endogenous conidial formation does not occur in any of the species that make up the basal grade (FIG. 1Go) but does occur outside the genus (i.e. Melanochaeta).

The relative simplicity of Chaetosphaeria teleomorphs and the intra- and inter-specific morphological character plasticity in the anamorphs suggest a versatile holomorph design within a constrained general morphological framework in these species. Simple and plastic morphologies might let these species reproduce in a wider range of environmental conditions and perhaps exploit a wider range of substrates. It also would allow asexual reproduction to proceed under varying degrees of nutritional and/or environmental constraints, with noticeable effects on morphological features of reproductive structures. Evidence of intra-specific morphological versatility is evident in the Dictyochaeta anamorphs of C. callimorpha (Booth 1957Go), C. longiseta and others (Réblová 2000Go) with morphologically similar conidia produced in a single apical conidiogenous locus on long conidiophores and/or in a sympodially proliferating conidiogenous cell bearing several conidiogenous loci on short conidiophores. The large number of existing morphospecies described under the anamorphic genus Dictyochaeta (Kuthubutheen and Nawawi 1991Go) suggests a high success level of the polyphialidic morphological design. These potential attributes pose enormous challenges to attempts to delimit morpho-species based on anamorph characters in the presence of relatively uniform teleomorph characters across species. These conditions appear to be predominant among species forming the basal grade of Chaetosphaeria. Inter-specific overlap of morphological features among anamorphic genera can be far-reaching and would explain the morphological continua suggested for anamorphs of Chaetosphaeria: Catenularia-Chloridium (Kendrick 1980Go), Chloridium-Dictyochaeta-Cylindrotrichum pro parte-Cacumisporium (Réblová 2000Go). Although discrete morphological units are distinguished in those continua, phylogenetic relationships among most of them are unclear.

Relationships within the Chaetosphaeriaceae – Chaetosphaeria occurs as a poorly bootstrap-supported clade but with high Bayesian posterior probability. The analyses also show several strongly supported clades corresponding to existing named genera: Zignoëlla, Melanochaeta and Melanopsammella. These taxa, together with single representatives of Striatosphaeria and Tainosphaeria form a strongly supported clade that appears to be a sister group to Chaetosphaeria.

Teleomorphs in Zignoëlla strongly resemble those of Chaetosphaeria. The segregation of Zignoëlla from Chaetosphaeria was proposed based on position of ascomata on the substrate and production of Menispora anamorphs (Cannon 1997Go). Our analyses confirm the close phylogenetic relationships between Z. ovoidea and Z. pulviscula based on their teleomorphs and anamorphs. The diagnostic characters are found in the general morphology of the macro-conidial synanamorph: discrete cylindrical phialides, with recurved or straight apices, borne along the conidiophore axis and hyaline, non-septate or 3-septate conidia, with non-cellular, often subterminal setula (when present) at both ends. It can be speculated that anamorphs with morphologies similar to those of Menispora and possibly other closely related anamorphic taxa would have phylogenetic placement in Zignoëlla. For example, Z. ovoidea (as Chaetosphaeria ovoidea) and the anamorph Menispora tortuosa form a strongly supported monophyletic group (Réblová and Winka 2000Go). M. tortuosa might be the anamorph of a putative, third species of Zignoëlla if its distinguishing characters (e.g. densely clustered phialides on branches along the mid-conidiophore axis) prove to be autapomorphic. Other Menispora morphospecies could represent new Zignoëlla species as well.

Some groupings in this lineage agree with morphological circumscriptions of genera based on putative synapomorphies in the teleomorph such as distinctive ascomal setae and ascospore pigmentation in Melanochaeta (Müller et al 1969Go), and ascospore cell fragmentation tendency in Melanopsammella (Höhnel 1919Go). In Melanochaeta, analyses corroborate the close phylogenetic relationships between M. aotearoae and M. hemipsila based on morphology. These two taxa share some distinctive morphological characters such as capitate setae on the ascoma, incompletely brown-pigmented ascospores (versicolorous), and a distinctive endophialidic (Sporoschisma Berk. & Broome) anamorph (Hughes 1966Go, Müller et al 1969Go, Müller and Samuels 1982Go). A third species, M. garethjonesii Sivichai & Hywel-Jones, produces uniformly pigmented ascospores and conidiophores distinct from those in M. aotearoae and M. hemipsila (Sivichai et al 2000Go).

Melanopsammella is resolved as part of the most basal divergence in the MP analysis (not shown). It currently encompasses four species: M. chloroconia (W. Gams & Hol.-Jech.) Réblová, M.E. Barr & Samuels 1999, M. inaequalis (Grove) Höhn. 1919, M. vermicularioides and M. gonytrichii. The genus exhibits the simplest morphologies in the lineage: relatively small setose ascomata, small, cylindrical asci and fusiform, 1-septate ascospores that often disarticulate at the septum. Ascospore disarticulation, which can be a variable character in Melanopsammella, is homoplastic. For example M. vermicularioides (No. SMH3883) has ascospores that do not readily disarticulate, although it produces the typical anamorph for that species. On the other hand, C. preussii W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., which possesses ellipsoid, 1-septate disarticulating ascospores, has phylogenetic affinities in Chaetosphaeria, closely related to C. pygmaea and C. myriocarpa (Réblová and Winka 2000Go).

In Melanopsammella, conidiophores are macronematous and mononematous, bearing a terminal, discrete, apical phialide and/or lateral phialides in whorls, with multiple conidiogenous loci in a single phialide, corresponding to morphologies in the Chloridium virescens (Pers.) W. Gams & Hol.-Jech. anamorph of M. vermicularioides and the Gonytrichum Nees & T. Nees anamorph of M. gonytrichii. At first glance, gross morphology in the Gonytrichum and Chloridium virescens anamorphs is different and could be interpreted logically as indicative of polyphyly. However, the complex lateral branching observed in the Gonytrichum morphology becomes simplified in culture, with conidiophores resembling the C. virescens morphology (Gams and Holubová-Jechová 1976Go, Réblová 2000Go). This is a good example of how a cultural anamorph (Seifert and Samuels 2000Go) can be phylogenetically informative when compared to a naturally occurring anamorph.

Melanopsammella, Striatosphaeria and Tainosphaeria share anamorphs presenting percurrent proliferation of conidiogenous cells. Close phylogenetic relationships among Zignoëlla, Striatosphaeria and Tainosphaeria (FIG. 1Go) may coincide with the occurrence of setulose conidia in their anamorphs. This observation agrees with the grouping of anamorphs with setulose conidia represented by Codinaea sensu stricto and Menispora (Réblová 2000Go). It also supports the distinction of Dictyochaeta anamorphs from Codinaea and representative anamorphs of some Chaetosphaeria species. Ontogeny of setulae in anamorphs of Striatosphaeria, Tainosphaeria and Zignoëlla could be a phylogenetically informative morphological character. For example setulae observed in conidia of the Dictyochaeta anamorphs of C. montana Réblová and C. longiseta are located terminally and appear to be extensions of end cells. Conversely setulae in conidia of M. glauca, and probably in other Menispora species, are located subterminally, unfold from the concave side of the conidium when placed in water (Hughes and Kendrick 1963Go) and appear as non-cellular, unilateral extensions of the conidium wall. These subtle differences in the conidiogenesis and development in the anamorphs may be phylogenetically informative.

The putative phylogenetic placement of Tainosphaeria in the lineage sister to Chaetosphaeria is reflected in some of its shared morphological characters. Its setulose, aseptate conidia are reminiscent of those described for the anamorphs Dictyochaeta simplex (S. Hughes & W. B. Kendr.) Hol.-Jech. (Holubová-Jechová 1984Go) and Codinaeopsis gonytrichoides (Shearer & J. L. Crane) Morgan-Jones (Morgan-Jones 1976Go). It also resembles Codinaea aristata Maire in the terminal integrated conidiogenous cell, the conspicuous collaret and the terminally setulate conidia. Tainosphaeria also shares similar hyaline, 3-septate, ascospores with Zignoëlla and some species of Chaetosphaeria. The genus is distinguished by relatively thick-walled (22–33 µm) ascomata and conidiophores with single integrated terminal phialides exhibiting multiple percurrent proliferations. Similar morphologies of conidiogenous cells were observed in the anamorph of Striatosphaeria codinaeaphora on the natural substrate (F. A. Fernández personal observations) and in Melanopsammella (Réblová et al 1999Go).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The inclusion of the phylogenetic framework presented here into the existing classification for Chaetosphaeria is problematic. The wide diversity of morphologically distinct anamorphs in Chaetosphaeria has not been viewed as problematic because characters that have conformed to the original taxonomic ranking have centered on the teleomorph. This has led to the generalized assumption that in Chaetosphaeria and allied taxa, teleomorph characters define genera and anamorph characters define species.

The lack of a well-supported clade that includes C. innumera, the type species of the genus, advises against establishing Chaetosphaeria sensu stricto at this time. Based on our diverse, but still biased taxon sampling, we accept a widely defined Chaetosphaeria with additional species that further expand the circumscription of the genus. Some of these Chaetosphaeria species might represent ‘phylogenetic windows’ providing glimpses of useful synapomorphies. However, some of these taxa hardly provide enough morphological variation to define a species, let alone define a genus. These problems are discussed in detail by Lumbsch (2002)Go. Some interesting questions can be considered: Is the larger number of species in Chaetosphaeria relative to its allied taxa the result of biased taxon sampling? Or is Chaetosphaeria phylogenetically and morphologically more speciose than the other genera as inferred by the combined two-gene phylogenies?


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This project was supported by a National Science Foundation PEET (Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy) Grant (DEB-9521926) to the Field Museum of Natural History. Support for Huhndorf’s 1995–1996 fieldwork in Puerto Rico was provided by the National Research Council Resident Research Associate Post-Doctoral Program in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin. We thank Dr D. Jean Lodge for generously allowing us the use of her laboratory and for all logistical arrangements in Puerto Rico, Drs. Jill Thompson and Jess Zimmerman for access to the forest grid at the El Verde Research Area and F. Candoussau for the loan of M. vermicularioides.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication December 14, 2004.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: shuhndorf{at}fmnh.org


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Barr ME. 1990. Prodomus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon 39:43–184.

Bhattacharya D, Lutzoni F, Reeb V, Simon D, Nason J, Fernández F. 2000. Widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the rDNA genes of Ascomycetes. Mol Biol Evol 17:1971–1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Booth C. 1957. Studies of Pyrenomycetes. I.–Four species of Chaetosphaeria, two with Catenularia conidia. II. Melanopsamma pomiformis and its Stachybotrys conidia. Mycol Pap 68. 27 p.

———. 1958. The genera Chaetosphaeria and Thaxteria in Britain. The Naturalist, Hull 1958:83–90.

Cannon PF. 1997. Two new genera of Ascomycota, and other new or interesting fungi from Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve and its environs. Systema Ascomycetum 15:121–133.

Dennis RWG. 1978. British Ascomycetes. J. Cramer, Vaduz. 585 p.

Fernández FA, Lutzoni FM, Huhndorf SM. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Chaetosphaeria. Inoculum 49:19.

———, ———, ———. 1999a. Teleomorphanamorph connections: the new pyrenomycetous genus Carpoligna and its Pleurothecium anamorph. Mycologia 91:251–262.

———, ———, ———. 1999b. A multifaceted approach to determining phylogenetic relationships in the genus Chaetosphaeria. XVI International Botanical Congress. p 26 (addendum).

———, Huhndorf SM. 2005. New species of Chaetosphaeria, Melanopsammella and Tainosphaeria gen. nov. from the Americas. Fung Divers 18:15–57.

Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V. 1976. Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Stud Mycol No. 13. 99 p.

Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1323–1330.[Abstract]

Höhnel F. 1919. Mycologische Fragmente. Annales Mycologici 17:35–174.

Holubová-Jechová V. 1984. Lignicolous Hyphomycetes from Czechoslovakia 7. Chalara, Exochalara, Fusichalara and Dictyochaeta. Folia Geobot. Phytotax 19:387–438.

Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. Program available from http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/mrbayes3/info.php[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hughes SJ. 1966. New Zealand Fungi 6. Sporoschisma Berk. & Br. New Zealand J Bot 4:77–85.

———, Kendrick WB. 1963. Microfungi IX. Menispora Persoon. Can J Bot 41:693–718.

Huhndorf SM, Fernández FA. 1998. Neotropical ascomycetes 7. Caudatispora biapiculata sp. nov. from Puerto Rico. Sydowia 50:200–204.

———, Miller AN, Fernández FA. 2004. Molecular systematics of the Sordariales: the order and the family Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. Mycologia 95:368–387.

Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HM., ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York, NY: Academic Press. p 21–132.

Kendrick B. 1980. The generic concept in hyphomycetes-a reappraisal. Mycotaxon XI:339–364.

Kuthubutheen AJ, Nawawi A. 1991. Key to Dictyochaeta and Codinaea species. Mycol Res 95:1224–1229.

Lumbsch HT. 2002. How objective are genera in Euascomycetes? Perspect Plant Ecol, Evo Syst 5:91–101.

Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst Biol 49:628–651.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miller AN, Huhndorf SM. 2004. A natural classification of Lasiosphaeria based on nuclear LSU rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 108:26–34.[CrossRef][Medline]

———, ———. 2005. Multi-gene phylogenies indicate ascomal wall morphology is a better predictor of phylogenetic relationships than ascospore morphology in the Sordariales (Ascomycota, Fungi). Mol Phylo Evol 35:60–75.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moncalvo JM, Rehner SA, Vilgalys R. 1993. Systematics of Lyophyllum section Difformia based on evidence from culture studies and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 85:788–794.[CrossRef]

Morgan-Jones G. 1976. Notes on Hyphomycetes X. Codinaeopsis gen. nov. Mycotaxon 4:166–170.

Müller E, von Arx JA. 1962. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11(2):1–922.

———, Harr J, Sulmont P. 1969. Deux Ascomycetes dont le stade conidien presente des conidies phaeophragmiees endogenes. Rev Mycol (Paris) 33:369–378.

———, Samuels GJ. 1982. Anamorphs of pyrenomycetous ascomycetes III. The Sporochisma and Chalara anamorphs of Melanochaeta aoteroae. Sydowia 35:155–161.

O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molec Phylogenetics Evol 7:103–116.

Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Réblová M. 1999. Studies in Chaetosphaeria sensu lato III. Umbrinosphaeria gen. nov. and Miyoshiella with Sporidesmium anamorphs. Mycotaxon 71:13–43.

———. 2000. The genus Chaetosphaeria and its anamorphs. Stud Mycol 45:149–168.

———, Barr ME, Samuels GJ. 1999. Chaetosphaeriaceae, a new family for Chaetosphaeria and its relatives. Sydowia 51:49–70.

———, Winka K. 2000. Phylogeny of Chaetosphaeria and its anamorphs based on morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 92:939–954.[CrossRef]

Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. 1994. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98:625–634.

Saccardo PA. 1883. Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Syll Fung 2:1–815.

Seifert KA, Samuels GJ. 2000. How should we look at anamorphs? Stud Mycol 45:5–18.

Sivichai S, Hywel-Jones NL, Somrithipol S. 2000. Lignicolous freshwater Ascomycota from Thailand: Melanochaeta and Sporoschisma anamorphs. Mycol Res 104:478–485.[CrossRef]

Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

———. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.[Abstract]

Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect Math Life Sci 17:57–86.

Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. 1863. Selecta Fungorum Carpologica. Selecta Fungorum Carpologia 2:1–319.

Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, Sun BL. 1994. Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4599–4603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fernández, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoller, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS