Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.98.1.1
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glockling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beakes, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glockling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beakes, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Glockling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beakes, G. W.
Mycologia, 98(1), 2006, pp. 1-15.
© 2006 by The Mycological Society of America

An ultrastructural study of development and reproduction in the nematode parasite Myzocytiopsis vermicola


Sally L. Glockling 1

     Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115-2861

Gordon W. Beakes

     Department of Biology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

An isolate of Myzocytiopsis vermicola, a holocarpic parasite of Rhabditis nematodes, was studied with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to follow development during infection, asexual and sexual reproduction. Nematodes became infected after attachment of apical cystospore buds to the nematode cuticle. Apical buds were packed with vesicles with dense fibrillar contents, which were absent from the thallus. Some thalli developed into sporangia while others became paired gametangial cells. Zoospore cleavage was often intrasporangial, although during the early stages of an epidemic partially differentiated zoospores usually were released via an exit tube into a fine vesicle. Packets of tripartite tubular hairs (TTH) were not observed in the cytoplasm of either developing or mature sporangia. TEM of sectioned material and whole mounts of zoospores revealed biflagellate zoospores, some without hairs and others with a proximal row of very short hairs on the anterior flagellum. Gametangial contact was via a short, walled fertilization tube and surplus antheridial and oogonial nuclei remained in their respective gametangial cells until disintegration of the periplasm. The mature oospores had a scalloped, electron opaque, epispore wall layer. These observations will be discussed in relation to the likely phylogenetic position of the Myzocytiopsidales within the oomycetes.

Key words: infection, nematode parasite, oomycete, phylogeny, ultrastructure, zoosporogenesis


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Myzocytiopsis vermicola has a special place in the history of holocarpic nematode parasites because it was the first species to be discovered. It was described initially as Myzocytium proliferum var. vermicolum, (Zopf 1884Go) but later was given its own binomial, Myzocytium vermicolum by Fischer (1892)Go. The zoospores were reported to be oval with a shorter anterior flagellum and a longer posterior flagellum (Karling 1981Go). An isolate from littoral, marine, Rhabditis nematodes resulted in a comprehensive account of the species that included observations with video microscopy to record zoospore release into a vesicle and permitted the recognition of two morphologically distinct types of zoospore (Newell et al 1977Go). These authors also described a short septal papillum involved in the fertilization process, which supported Dangeard’s (1903)Go observation of a narrow fertilization tube in this species. Dick (1997)Go amalgamated most nematophagous species of Myzocytium and Lagenidium into a new genus, Myzocytiopsis (family Myzocytiopsidaceae), making M. lenticularis (Barron) Dick the type species.

Due to their host-dependent nature these biflagellate parasites of nematodes have been little studied, and until recently only nominal fine structural accounts of their reproductive development have been available (Saikawa and Anazawa 1985Go, Glockling 1994Go, Dick 1995Go, Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). The genus Myzocytiopsis displays much variation in spore type and infection methods (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). Myzocytiopsis vermicola is one of three species that produces biflagellate zoospores that develop a succession of apical adhesive buds after zoospore encystment. These cystospores adhere to the nematode cuticle and initiate a new infection. The other two adhesive-spored species are M. humicola (Barron and Percy) M.W. Dick and M. glutinospora (Barron) M.W. Dick (Barron and Percy 1975Go, Barron 1976Go). M. glutinospora morphologically is comparable to M. vermicola but is reported to have pyriform zoospores with subapical flagellar insertion and zoospore release in the absence of a retaining vesicle (Barron 1976Go). The other species, M. humicola, is characterized by its smooth oospore wall and pyriform zoospores (Barron and Percy 1975Go). M. subuliformis (P.A.Dang.) M.W. Dick also has infection spores with an adhesive tip, but this species has no motile stage (aplanosporic) and produces elongate tapered aplanospores (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go).

Although it is possible to grow some species of holocarpic nematode parasites in pure culture (Glockling and Dick 1997Go), we were unable to grow this particular isolate of M. vermicola. This study will concentrate on details that are considered to be of phylogenetic significance such as general morphology and structure, zoospore base and rootlet arrangement, sporangial cleavage and the fertilization process. This first detailed account of thallus development in this little studied family within the oomycetes (Peronosporomycetes, Dick 2001Go) will enable structural features and differentiation to be compared with that previously documented in saprolegnialean and peronosporalean species.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Preparation of cultures.— – A sample of horse dung was collected from a farm in Rockford, Illinois, (elevation 740 ft, 42.271°N, 89.094°W) in Oct 2001. The sample was mixed with distilled water and a few drops were pipetted onto three Petri dishes of weak cornmeal agar (15 g L–1). The population of rhabditid nematodes increased in the cultures and M. vermicola infected nematodes in two of the plates. Selected specimens were removed for light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A second collection of horse dung from the same location was made in May 2003. This collection also yielded M. vermicola and let us photographically record zoospore release and make whole mount preparations of zoospores.

Light microscopy/zoospore release sequence.— – An infected nematode containing mature sporangia was mounted on a slide and covered with a cover slip. Still images of a mature sporangium exit tube were captured with a Nikon E600 microscope with phase contrast (40x) optics and DXM1200 digital camera. Images were captured from before zoospore release until after zoospore release and encystment.

Preparation of samples for transmission electron microscopy.— – Specimens were prepared for TEM using techniques previously described (Beakes and Glockling 1998Go). Infected nematodes on the agar surface were covered with a 2 mm2 plastic sheet, cut out and encased in molten agar that was allowed to set before immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. After a buffering step in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, specimens were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide before being dehydrated in a graduated acetone series. Specimens were embedded in Epon resin and polymerized at 65 C for 24 h. Blocks were sectioned with a Reichert-Jung Super Nova ultramicrotome and collected on Formvar-coated copper slot grids. Sections were viewed and photographed on a Hitachi H-600 TEM. Negatives were developed and scanned into Adobe Photoshop with an Epson 2450 photo scanner.

Zoospore whole mounts.— – Sporulating specimens from the first and second isolates were washed and placed in a cavity slide in sterile water. Some water containing zoospores was collected with a tapered glass tube and placed on Formvar and carbon-coated copper slot grids. The grids were exposed briefly to osmium vapor and allowed to dry. Grids were taped to a glass slide and shadowed with gold palladium using an evaporator (Kinney Vacuum Co., Boston, Massachusetts).


    OBSERVATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The main stages in the life history of this nematode parasite are summarized diagrammatically (FIG. 1Go). In Petri dish cultures asexual reproduction (FIG. 1a–hGo) occurred almost exclusively at the onset of infection and continued while nematode populations were high. A typical infected nematode containing a chain of ovoid thalli with lateral discharge tubes is illustrated (FIG. 2Go). Although zoospores were released into vesicles early in infections, later zoospores were released directly through the discharge tube without evidence of a vesicle (FIG. 2a–cGo). Sexual reproduction, which resulted in thick-walled oospores (FIGS. 1i–kGo, 47Go), occurred mainly in older cultures when the epidemic was in decline.


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1a–k. Diagramatic representation of the life cycle of M. vermicola. a. Cysts. b. Budded cystospores. c. Attachment of budded cystospores to the nematode cuticle. d. Thalli inside the nematode host. e. Mature sporangia with protruding exit tubes. f. Sporangium containing cleaved zoospores. g. Zoospore release from open sporangial exit tube. h. Motile biflagellate zoospores. i. Antheridial and oogonial copulation. j. Developing oospores inside oogonia. k. Mature oospores. Bars = 15 µm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2a–c. Light microscopy of fully differentiated zoosporangia within an infected host, showing a sequence of zoospore release. a. Mature sporangia containing differentiated and differentiating zoospores. b. Exit tube of middle sporangium dissolves and fully differentiated motile zoospores exit directly. c. Released zoospores rapidly disperse from the locality of the sporangium although a few spores remain inside the sporangium after the initial burst of spore release. Frame b was taken ~90 seconds after a, and c was taken ~4 seconds after b. Bar = 20 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 40–48. Sexual reproduction and mature oospores. 40. Phase contrast light micrograph of a pair of gametangia, now showing empty ovoid antheridial cell (arrow) and developing round oosphere (asterisked) in oogonial cell. Bar = 10 µm. 41. Developing oosphere inside an oogonium showing expanding dense body vesicles, central mitochondria (m) and the surrounding nucleate periplasm. Bar = 2 µm. 42. Antheridium containing expanding DBV showing thin walled fertilization tube (ft) protruding into the oosphere cytoplasm. Bar = 0.5 µm. 43. Detail of the oosphere margin showing a cluster of peripheral vesicles with dense membranes (arrows) and an excluded periplasmic nucleus (N). Bar = 1 µm. 44. Remains of walled fertilization tube and maturing oospore surrounded by residual degenerating periplasm. Note dense, lipid-rich cytoplasm and still prominent oogonium wall (OW). Bar = 1 µm. 45. Remnants of fully disintegrated fertilization tube (arrow). Bar = 1 µm. 46. Low power TEM of characteristic arrangement and shape of discharged antheridia (asterisks) and oogonia containing mature oospores. Bar = 5 µm. 47. Phase contrast light micrograph of two adjacent mature oospores showing uneven scalloped wall and refractile ooplast vacuoles (asterisks). Bar = 3 µm. 48. Wall layers of a maturing oospore showing thickened, undulating exospore wall layer (asterisk) with external material filling the depressions (arrows) and smooth outer layer (arrows). The oogonial wall (OW) is present. Bar = 0.5 µm.

 
Cystospore maturation, infection and protothallus formation.— – Discharged zoospores usually stopped swimming after 5–10 min, always shuddering just before rounding up and encysting. A median profile of a newly encysted zoospore shows that it is irregularly ovoid and delimited by a thin primary cyst coat (FIG. 3Go, arrows). Internalized axonemes were observed in this cyst and along the side of the nucleus in another encysting zoospore (FIG. 4Go) indicating that flagellar retraction, rather than shedding of flagella had occurred. Pregermination cystospores were thicker walled, ovoid, and had a distinct polarity in the distribution of organelles around the central nucleus (FIG. 7Go). Mitochondria were located toward the bud-forming side of the spore whereas dense body vesicles (DBV) were concentrated on the opposite side (FIG. 7Go), an arrangement that becomes more pronounced in elongate budded spores (FIG. 6Go). During early stages in cystospore formation the amorphous bodies in the DBV were associated with the vesicle membrane (FIG. 7Go) and lacked the fingerprint lamellations seen in zoospore DBV (FIG. 39Go). A single Golgi body, which was associated with the cystospore nucleus (FIG. 5Go) and oriented toward the bud side of the spore, produced distinctive apical vesicles (av), which ultimately accumulated in the tips of developing buds (FIGS. 8–10Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 3–15. Cystospore and protothallus structure. 3. Nonmedian LS profile of a newly encysted zoospore with thin outer wall layer (arrows), dense body vesicles and retracted flagellar axoneme (a). Bar = 0.5 µm. 4. Detail of newly encysted zoospore cytoplasm showing the thin cyst wall (arrow), kinetosome (k) and an internalized flagellar axoneme (a). Bar = 0.5 µm. 5. Nucleus associated cystospore Golgi body (G) producing apical vesicles (av). Bar = 0.2 µm. 6. Near median LS profile of an in situ germinated cystospore with two apical buds. The polarized distribution of organelles in the main body of the spore is well shown, with a basal vacuole (V), central nucleus (N) and apical mitochondria. Bar = 2 µm. 7. Section of pregermination cystospore with fully differentiated wall layer showing central nucleus (N), polarized distribution of mitochondria (m) and dense body vesicles (DBV). Bar = 0.5 µm. 8. Section through developing apical bud of a germinating cystospore, which is filled with Golgi-generated apical vesicles (av). Bar = 0.3 µm. 9. Detail of the periphery of an apical bud of a germinated cystospore showing wall coated with an outer fibrillar layer (arrow) and an underlying apical vesicle (av). Bar = 0.1 µm. 10. Section showing the attachment of an apical bud to the outer nematode cuticle (asterisk). Note collar of associated fibrillar material (arrow). Apical vesicles (av) and a mitochondrion (m) are located close to the bud apex. Bar = 0.2 µm. 11. Profile through a newly formed "protothallus" inside the nematode and adjacent empty cystospore bud (C). The point of nematode cuticle penetration is arrowed. Bar = 0.5 µm. 12. LS profile of a uninucleate (N) "protothallus" showing developing vacuole (V). Note space between thallus wall and host cytoplasm. Bar = 0.5 µm. 13. Expanding multinucleate (N) thallus containing small, dense body vesicles, mitochondria and lipid droplets (L). Even at this preseptum stage encystment vesicles are present as well as the arrays of transitory tubular cisternae (arrows). Bar = 2 µm. 14. Part of the peripheral cytoplasm of a young preseptum thallus showing several nuclear profiles (N) and a localized concentration of electron opaque tubular cisternae (arrows). Bar = 2 µm. 15. (a) shows some cisternae in parallel arrays reminiscent of Golgi cisternae. (b) High power detail of the electron opaque peripheral tubular cisternae (TC) and associated vesicles. Bar on b also for a = 1 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 28–39. Zoospore differentiation and structure. 28. Detail through cytoplasm in a cleaving zoosporangium showing the beginning of flagellar axoneme differentiation. The paired kinetosomes are aligned at 180 degrees and axoneme (a) delimited by an arc-shaped cleavage vesicle associated with the basal plates. An encystment vesicle (ev) is nearby. Bar = 0.2 µm. 29. Detail of a developing flagellar axoneme (a) delimited by an enveloping cleavage cisterna (asterisk) running parallel to the outer plasma membrane. Bar = 0.5 µm. 30. Detail of rootlet strap of six microtubules and associated striate fan to which it is connected by fibers (arrow) from an almost fully differentiated zoospore initial. Bar = 0.2 µm. 31. Detail of posterior rootlet of seven microtubules (arrows) from an almost fully differentiated zoospore initial. Bar = 0.2 µm. 32. Section of zoospores with fully differentiated flagella (arrows) within an open sporangial exit tube, which is protruding through the nematode cuticle. Bar = 2 µm. 33. (a) Newly discharged zoospores after escape from sporangium. (b) TEM of a shadowed, ovoid zoospore showing both flagella without visible mastigoneme hairs. Bar a = 1 µm, b = 5 µm. 34. Higher magnification of shadowed preparation showing a single row of short hairs (arrows) decorating the basal portion of the anterior flagellum. Bar = 0.5 µm. 35. Detail of LS section through anterior flagellum showing transitional helix region (TH) and single row of short mastigoneme hairs (arrow) from a differentiated zoospore within a zoosporangium. Bar = 0.2 µm. 36. Near median LS section through a mature zoospore showing ventral flagellar boss, pyriform nucleus (N) and dorsal array of dense body vesicles. Bar = 1 µm. 37. Detail of an almost fully differentiated zoospore showing near median LS section of the paired kinetosomes and associated electron opaque interconnecting material (asterisk). The transitional plates delimiting the flagellar bases are arrowed, but the transitional helices are not clearly resolved. Bar = 0.2 µm. 38. (a) Typical organelle zonation in mature zoospore with a row of ventral encystment vesicles (arrows), perinuclear mitochondria and dorsal array of dense body vesicles. Inset (b) shows high power detail of one of the ventral encystment vesicles. Bars a = 1 µm and b = 20 nm. 39. High power detail of zoospore dense body vesicles (DBV) showing characteristic fingerprint lamellations of the inclusion material. Bar = 0.2 µm.

 
One of the characteristic features of this species is that the cystospores germinate to produce a chain of 1–6 bud-like outgrowths (FIGS. 6, 8Go). The bud wall was continuous with the anterior cyst wall (FIG. 8Go) and each bud expanded to ca. 0.5 µm diam. Buds were filled with av, almost to the exclusion of every other organelle, except for a single, centrally located, mitochondrion; the nucleus remained in the main cystospore body (FIG. 6Go). The bud wall had a distinctive, ca. 50 nm thick, outer layer (FIG. 9Go, arrow), which we presumed to be adhesive material that enables these spores to stick to the nematode cuticle. Infection by M. vermicola relies on a passing nematode making contact with one of these sticky cystospore buds (FIG. 10Go). A collar of fibrillar material was present around the contact point between the apical bud and pitted nematode cuticle (FIG. 10Go, arrow).

The host cuticle was breached by a relatively narrow penetration hypha (FIG. 11Go, arrows), followed by the migration of the cystospore cytoplasm through the chain of buds and into the expanding "protothallus", which probably is enveloped by the invaginated host plasma membrane rather than puncturing it (FIG. 11Go). This uninucleate "protothallus" (FIG. 12Go) had characteristically dense cytoplasm containing mitochondria and small vacuoles but completely lacking av (FIGS. 11, 12Go). These relatively thick-walled "protothalli" became typically constricted with the oldest compartment adjacent to the point of penetration quickly becoming vacuolate (FIGS. 12Go, 16Go). At this early stage of infection the host protoplast appeared to have retracted from around the protothallus but still remained connected to it by fine protoplasmic strands (FIGS. 16, 17Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 16–27. Thallus development and zoospore differentiation. 16. Developing lobed protothallus showing vacuolated (V) first-formed segment adjacent to the evacuated cystospore bud (arrow). Bar = 1 µm. 17. Detail of the periphery of the protothallus shown in 16. Note the strands of membranous material connecting the thallus wall to the host cytoplasm (arrows). Bar = 0.5 µm. 18. Near median profile of a multi nucleate (N), expanding sporangium showing the expanding central dense body vesicles (DBV). Bar = 2 µm. 19. Slightly more advanced sporangium in which granules in the central vacuolar DBV system are detaching from the membrane and beginning to disperse. Note the regular position of nuclei (N), small DBV and mitochondria (m) in the peripheral cytoplasm. Bar = 2 µm. 20. More or less fully expanded sporangium with a developing exit tube, large, central vacuole system (V) containing dispersed globular granules and evenly spaced peripheral nuclei (N). Bar = 2 µm. 21. Section through a fully differentiated sporangium showing lateral exit tube (arrow) and the peripherally distributed, uninucleate, mounded masses of cytoplasm delimited by fully expanded central vacuole (V). Bar = 2 µm. 22. Detail of the exit tube apex in a mature zoosporangium showing distinctive plug of fibrillar material at the tip of some tubes (asterisk). Bar = 0.5 µm. 23. Detail of vesicles (arrows) with their granular contents that become aligned along cleavage planes to delimit zoospore initials. Bar = 0.3 µm. 24. Detail of the expanding electron translucent, cleavage furrows (arrows) delimiting each uninucleate zoospore initial. Bar = 0.5 µm. 25. Detail of maturing septa (a, b) separating differentiating thalli. Note the tripartite structure with two wall layers separated by a zone containing fibrillar material (asterisk). As the thalli mature (b) the septal space becomes more prominent but adjacent thalli still remain connected by the original outer thallus wall (arrow). Bars = 0.5 µm. 26. Peripheral cytoplasm of maturing zoospangium showing central vacuole system (V) and developing cleavage furrows delimiting the individual zoospore initials. Encystment vesicles (arrows) are becoming concentrated around spore periphery. Bar = 1 µm. 27. Section through zoosporangium showing zoospores separated by electron-lucent cleavage furrows. Bar = 1 µm.

 
Thallus development.— – The constricted thallus soon became divided into separate ovoid to spherical zoosporangial compartments by a series of septa (FIG. 25Go). These rapidly enlarge to form the typically beaded thallus, which is characteristic of this species and which eventually may fill almost the entire body of the moribund host (FIGS. 1dGo, 2Go). Young septa were characteristically double-layered with a zone of amorphous material sandwiched between the two layers of wall (FIG. 25a, bGo, asterisk). As the thalli enlarge and become increasingly rounded these layers also become more obviously separated (FIG. 25bGo) although individual sporangia remain bound by the original outer thallus wall layer (FIG. 25Go, arrow). Young thalli were multinucleate (FIGS. 13, 14Go, 18, 19Go) but mitotic stages were never observed. Paired centrioles were present at the apex of each nucleus, which also had an associated Golgi body.

The cytoplasm contained scattered lipid globules, small DBV and mitochondria throughout (FIG. 13Go). The peripheral cytoplasm in young thalli contained localized regions packed with abundant tubular cisternae (FIG. 14Go, arrows) with uniformly electron opaque contents (FIG. 15Go). Some of these cisternae appeared to be oriented perpendicularly to the plasma membrane (FIG. 13Go, arrows), while others were organized in parallel stacks reminiscent of a Golgi-endoplasmic reticulum complex (FIG. 15aGo). Some cisternae expanded slightly at their ends, and the whole complex was interspersed with more expanded vesicles of similar density (FIG. 15bGo).

As thalli enlarged and matured a conspicuous central vacuole system developed, derived from the expansion and coalescence of some of the DBV fraction (FIGS. 18–21Go). This expanding vacuolar system contained variable amounts of electron opaque, globular material. The vacuolar inclusions initially formed conspicuous hemispherical aggregates associated with the membrane (FIG. 18Go) but at more advanced stages appeared to disperse into discrete globules within the vacuole (FIGS. 19, 20Go). The formation of this central vacuole system eventually resulted in the peripheral concentration of the nucleate cytoplasm (FIG. 20Go), which is rich in scattered DBV and mitochondria. Also during the period of thallus expansion, distinctive encystment vesicles first appeared in the cytoplasm. These were small (ca. 150–200 nm diam) spherical vesicles with a moderately opaque outer matrix and an irregular more electron-lucent core containing granular material (FIGS. 28, 38bGo). These vesicles eventually became aligned close to expanding cleavage and axonemal vesicle systems (FIGS. 26Go, 28Go).

Fully expanded thalli were recognized by the presence of a single lateral discharge tube (FIGS. 1eGo, 2Go, 21Go), which breached the nematode cuticle. At maturity the tips of some of these discharge tubes were filled with a plug of moderately electronopaque, fibrillar material (FIG. 22Go). At this stage the peripheral cytoplasm was organized into uneven masses delimited by the expanded central vacuole system (FIG. 21Go).

Zoospore cleavage and release.— – During the final stages of thallus maturation the concentrated peripheral cytoplasm is converted into fully differentiated zoospores. This process, although usually occurring intrasporangially during later stages in an infection, also can occur in a transient external vesicle derived from the expanded apical plug material. Observations of living thalli revealed that the large central vacuole collapsed suddenly, either during intrasporangial cleavage or shortly before the partially differentiated mass of cytoplasm was released into a vesicle. Ultra-structural observations of differentiating thalli also confirmed that the relative timing of cleavage furrow and flagellum development varied vis a vis the collapse and assimilation of the central vacuole system. In most thalli observed zoospore differentiation was completed inside the sporangium (FIG. 27Go) and the fully differentiated zoospores escaped via the opened discharge tube without the restraint of a transient vesicle (FIG. 2a–cGo). Zoospores that remained inside the sporangium encysted and developed adhesive buds in situ (FIG. 6Go).

During the early stages of intrasporangial cleavage the large central vacuole system usually was maintained (FIG. 21Go) as additional cleavage cisternae became aligned around the developing uninucleate spore initials (FIGS. 23, 24, 26Go). These cleavage cisternae appeared to arise from the alignment and coalescence of vesicles, which have a thin electron-lucent outer region with a moderately opaque core (FIG. 23Go). Individual vesicle components fused and expanded (FIG. 24Go) to form a system of electron-lucent cleavage furrows delimiting individual zoospore initials (FIG. 27Go). Ultimately this coalescence process appeared to result in the assimilation of the plasmalemma and the vacuole tonoplast into the zoospore initial membranes in the fully cleaved sporangium (FIG. 27Go). Concurrently cisternae also delineated the differentiating flagella axonemes (FIGS. 28, 29Go). Flagellum differentiation was initiated when an axonemal cleavage cisterna capped the transitional plate of each of the paired kinetosomes before the generation of the axonemal tubules. As the axonemes were assembled they continued to be enveloped by the expanding cleavage cisternum (FIG. 29Go, asterisk), which eventually is assimilated into the cleavage vesicle system during the final stages of zoospore differentiation (FIG. 27Go). Each zoospore initial contained a nucleus surrounded by a cluster of mitochondria and a peripheral zone rich in DBV (FIGS. 26, 27Go). At this stage the DBV inclusions are reticulate and have characteristic fingerprint lamellations (FIG. 39Go).

The differentiated zoospores.— – Zoospores that were released into an external vesicle before their escape had a fairly short swimming phase after the rupture of the vesicle. In contrast zoospores that were directly released from the sporangium (FIG. 2a–cGo) remained motile for a much longer period (ca. 30 min), as did the zoospores that remained trapped inside the open sporangium. Zoospores were ovoid (FIG. 33aGo) with a shallow ventral grove from which the flagella emerged. Shadow-cast preparations of zoospores from the first isolation revealed a zoospore with laterally inserted flagella (FIG. 33bGo). The posterior flagellum tapered to an acroneme at its tip, while the anterior flagellum was blunter (FIG. 33bGo). Whole mounts of several zoospores from the second isolation showed an anterior flagellum decorated with a single row of short proximal hairs (FIG. 34Go, arrows). These corresponded to a single row of short (50 nm) hairs decorating one side of the anterior flagellum that were seen in longitudinal TEM sections (FIG. 35Go, arrow).

As with other "secondary type" zoospores a water expulsion vacuole discharged into a ventral groove. The flagella originated from a more or less central boss (FIG. 36Go) on the ventral side of the spore, with the kinetosomes angled at about 170 degrees to each other (FIG. 37Go). The transitional helix (TH), which lay immediately above the transitional plate, appeared to be of a double helical type (although individual subunits were not well resolved) of about 8–12 gyres (FIG. 35Go). The kinetosomes were associated with electron-opaque plaques of material that surround and interconnect their bases (FIG. 37Go, asterisk). A posterior rootlet strap of six or seven microtubules was seen in TS in differentiating zoospores (FIGS. 30, 31Go, arrows). Fibers linked the microtubules in this strap to a striate, wedge-shaped fan between the kinetosomes (FIG. 30Go, arrow). These features were never resolved in postrelease zoospores. In differentiated zoospores (FIGS. 32, 36, 38Go) the spherical ev accumulated adjacent to the plasma membrane on the ventral side of the spore, particularly along the shoulder of the ventral groove (FIG. 38aGo, arrows). The DBV in zoospores now had prominent fingerprinting (FIG. 39Go) and were mainly in the dorsal region of the spore with the mitochondria mainly concentrated around the dorsal side of the nucleus (FIGS. 36, 38Go).

Gametangial copulation and oospore formation.— – In M. vermicola gametangia arise from alternate thallus segments in mature infections (FIG. 40Go). In this species male and female gametangia were usually morphologically distinct, with ovoid antheridia and more or less spherical oogonia (FIGS. 1iGo, 40, 46Go). The mature male thallus produces an antheridial tube that penetrates into the oogonium until it contacts and penetrates the differentiated oosphere (FIG. 41Go). The male thallus at this stage (FIG. 42Go) was packed with mitochondria, large DBV and gametic nuclei. A thin wall delimited the young fertilization tube and its tip was packed with small vesicles with opaque granular contents. As the antheridial contents migrated into the oogonium, the antheridial cell became increasingly empty and vacuolated, except for a few residual peripheral nuclei. At later stages the fertilization tube became thicker walled (FIG. 44Go, arrows) and the antheridial contents began to disintegrate so that by the time the oospores are mature the male thallus is an empty shell (FIGS. 40, 45, 46Go).

At the time of fertilization the contents of the oogonium had differentiated into a uninucleate oosphere surrounded by vacuolated periplasm containing excluded oogonial nuclei (FIGS. 41, 43Go). The oosphere is defined by a thin, electron-opaque membrane, which is underlain in localized regions by clusters of electron-lucent vesicles (FIG. 43Go, arrows). The oosphere cytoplasm contained a large number of what appear to be expanding DBV (FIG. 41Go), which, as described in other oomycetes, coalesce to form the refactile ooplast visible in mature oospores (FIG. 47Go, asterisks). As with the formation of the somatic vacuole in differentiating thalli, the electron-opaque globules disintegrate and disperse as the vacuole enlarges. However, by the time the thick oospore wall had formed, the cytoplasm did not fix well and appeared opaque and packed with large lipid globules (FIGS. 44, 46Go). The surrounding periplasm does not persist and disappears by the time the oospore is mature (FIGS. 46, 48Go).

As the oospore matures a thick, multilayered, wall develops that gives the mature oospores their distinctive reticulate appearance (FIG. 1kGo). In light microscopy maturing oospores appear to have a thick, regularly scalloped wall (FIG. 47Go). In TEM view the scalloping is an undulating, electron-opaque "epispore wall" layer (FIG. 48Go). The depressions between the scallops were filled with an electron-lucent, loosely fibrillar, material, so that the outer margin of the oospore is actually smooth (FIG. 48Go, arrows) and not uneven as it appears in living spores (FIG 47Go). Inside of the electron-opaque epispore layer is a relatively thin electron-lucent endospore layer, which was delimited by the plasma membrane (FIG. 48Go).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This is the first detailed developmental and ultra-structural study of a member of the recently established order the Myzocytiopsidales (Dick 1997Go, 2001Go). Members of the Myzocytiopsidales are parasites of nematodes that traditionally were considered to be part of the holocarpic Lagenidiales (Sparrow 1973Go, 1976Go). Sparrow recognized that oomycete fungi could be divided into two main "galaxies", which Dick (2001)Go has renamed the Saprolegniomycetidae and the Peronosporomycetidae. Recent molecular analyses show that some terrestrial and marine holocarpic Lagenidium species cluster in the Pythiales with most species forming a sister clade to the main, plant parasitic peronosporaceous genera such as Phytophthora and Pythium (Cook et al 2001Go). 18S sequence data for two culturable Myzocytiopsis species, indicate this genus is a polyphyletic assemblage, with species clustering in both the major oomycete clades (Glockling and Embley unpublished data). Myzocytiopsis vermicola has morphological and structural traits in common with the Saprolegniomycetidae and in particular the Peronosporomycetidae, although it also possesses a number of unique features.

Zoospore discharge into transient restraining vesicles has been reported for other members of the Myzocytiopsidaceae (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go, Dick 2001Go), Lagenidium (renamed Salilagenidium by Dick, 2001Go) callinectes (Gotelli 1974Go) and Pythium species (Lunney and Bland 1976Go) and is a characteristic feature of the Peronosporomycetidae (Beakes 1987Go, 1994Go). However in some thalli of M. vermicola the zoospores differentiate completely before being discharged from the sporangium in a pattern commonly seen in saprolegniaceous oomycetes such as Saprolegnia (Beckett et al 1974Go, Beakes 1994Go) and Achlya (Money et al 1988Go) and marine genera such as Halipththoros (Overton et al 1983Go) and Eurychasma (Kuepper and Muller 1999Go).

On encystment the zoospores of M. vermicola retract their flagella rather than shedding them. This is characteristic of primary zoospores as opposed to secondary zoospores, which usually shed their flagella (Holloway and Heath 1977Go). Newell et al (1977)Go reported that their marine isolate of M. vermicola showed two morphologically distinct types of zoospore. The first-formed zoospores in a number of marine genera such as L. callinectes, Lagenisma (Schnepf et al 1978Go), Petersenia (Pueschel and van der Meer 1985Go) and Haliphthoros (Overton et al 1983Go) all appear to retract flagella. Of interest, zoospores in all these species are more pyriform than reniform. Flagellar retraction has been reported in a typical secondary zoospore of Phytophthora palmivora var nicotiana (Reichle 1969Go) so this behavior may not be exclusively associated with saprolegniaceous species.

The rather ill defined electron-opaque outer coat of the cystospore in M. vermicola appears to be derived from peripheral encystment vesicles. There is however no evidence of either a tripartite outer cyst coat decorated with spines or the large ventral K bodies that are associated with cystospores of Saprolegnia species (Beakes 1987Go, Lehnen and Powell 1989Go). However the encystment vesicles of M. vermicola do appear more structured than those typically found in most peronosporalean species (Beakes 1987Go, Gubler and Hardam 1988). In most saprotrophic and plant pathogenic oomycetes the zoospores are the main infective spores, which on making contact with the host discharge a ventral pad of adhesive material derived from a K-body or ventral vesicle systems (Lehnen and Powell 1989Go, Gubler and Hardman 1988Go). One of the unusual features of many Myzocytiopsis species is that they produce encysted zoospores that undergo further differentiation to produce budded infection cystospores (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). In the M. vermicola spore the surface of the terminal bud has a more electron-opaque fibrillar outer coating, which appears to be the material that forms the localized adhesive pad when the bud makes contact with the host cuticle. This is reminiscent of the situation in plant pathogens such as Blumeria, where material coating the conidium flows to the site of contact with the leaf surface (Carver et al 1999Go). The cystospore buds were densely filled with vesicles with dense fibrillar contents closely resembling those reported in M. glutinospora and M. humicola (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). The cystospores of M. vermicola and M. humicola previously have been compared to those of another holocarpic nematode parasite, Gonimochaete pyriforme G.L.Barron, but their development and structure appears different although they probably have the same function (Barron 1973Go, Saikawa and Anazawa 1985Go, Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). These vesicles probably contain the necessary enzymes to aid penetration of the tough nematode cuticle. The presence of a single mitochondrion in each adhesive bud either may provide energy for these processes or could serve as a reservoir for the calcium ions needed to trigger the exocytosis of these lytic vesicles.

The newly formed protothalli always were walled indicating infection does not involve the injection of protoplast as had been described in some other nematophagous pathogens such as Haptoglossa (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go). Although the quality of host cytoplasm fixation in the immediate vicinity of the invading pathogen was not good, it is possible that the host plasma membrane invaginates rather than being ruptured indicating infection may be more analogous to haustorium formation than to protoplast injection across the host membrane as described in Olpidium (Lesemann and Fuchs 1970Go). The protothalli have a distinctive host-pathogen interface, in which the walled pathogen is surrounded by a space bridged by narrow strands of membrane. This is reminiscent of plasma membrane of cells pulling away from tight junctions such as plasmodesmata. Although the effect may be a consequence of fixation induced shrinkage (of either the thallus or surrounding host cytoplasm) it does suggest that tight connections have been established between host and parasite. This may be important in establishing nutrient transfer in such a specialized obligate pathogen.

The septa, which divide the thallus into segments, were similar to those reported in other Myzocytiopsis species, including M. lenticularis. Although a double structure is produced like that observed in many saprolegnialean species (Beckett et al 1974Go), no vesicular material is trapped between the layers. Furthermore the septa differ from the callose-like plugs described in most peronosporalean species (Hemmes 1983Go).

As in other oomycete fungi the dense body vesicles (DBV) with electron-opaque contents are part of the cell’s vacuolar storage system (Beakes 1980Go, 1994Go). In M. vermicola, the provacuoles in young thalli are associated with rather large amorphous electron-opaque granules that form hemispherical aggregates attached to the tonoplast membrane. A similar organization of vacuolar granules has been illustrated in Phytophthora chlamydospores (Hemmes 1983Go). These granules eventually seem to disperse within the vacuole in a similar fashion to those described in germinating Saprolegnia oospores (Beakes 1980Go). The nonvacuolar, cytoplasmic DBV fraction eventually becomes incorporated into the zoospore initials, where the inclusions acquire their characteristic fingerprint substructure as described in many peronosporalean species (Hemmes 1983Go). In Phytophthora at this lamellate stage these vesicles contain phosphorylated mycolaminarins (Bartnicki-Garcia and Wang 1983Go).

Our study suggests that zoospore formation in M. vermicola can be considered a biphasic process. It begins with the concentration of the nucleate cytoplasm in a peripheral mass because of the formation of the large central vacuole. This is similar to the situation in the Saprolegniaceae where the large central vacuolar system, derived from the expansion and coalescence of dense body vesicles, cleaves out a peripheral array of zoospore initials (Gay and Greenwood 1966Go, Gay et al 1971Go, Money et al 1987Go). Partially differentiated zoospores form as a result of the fusion of the tonoplast with the plasma membrane, followed by the separate differentiation of the flagella. In Achlya, high molecular weight mycolaminarins released from the central vacuole are responsible for maintaining internal osmotic pressure within the sporangium because of the semipermeable nature of the sporangial wall (Money et al 1988Go). In Myzocytiopsis the central vacuole collapsed, presumably as a result of the centrifugal fusion of the tonoplast with the plasma membrane. Rather than individual zoospore initials, this results in the formation of a somewhat irregular mass of multinucleate cytoplasm that pulls away from the thallus wall. This release of mycolaminarins however would serve to provide the necessary internal pressure to drive the flow of partially differentiated cytoplasm into the extrasporangial vesicle or the flow of differentiated zoospores from the open exit tube (Money et al 1988Go).

The second phase of the process in Myzocytiopsis involves the cleavage of the cytoplasmic mass into individual zoospore initials and is similar to that reported in a number of Phytophthora species (Hohl and Hamamoto 1967Go, King and Butler 1968Go, Hyde et al 1991aGo). Individual zoospore initials are delimited by a series of cleavage cisternae, although the precise ontogeny of these vesicles is still uncertain and the exact timing of their disposition appears to be variable. In most accounts the Golgi system has been implicated in the synthesis of cleavage vesicles or cisternae (Hohl and Hamamoto 1967Go, Lunney and Bland 1974Go, Hyde et al 1991aGo, bGo). In Phytophthora parasitica a central vacuole has been reported to collapse before cleavage furrows are formed (Hohl and Hamamoto 1967Go), whereas in P. cinnamomi the mass of cytoplasm becomes delimited by cleavage cisternae without any apparent involvement of a central vacuolar system (Hyde et al 1991aGo). In M. vermicola the cleavage vesicles concurrently delimit the developing flagella as has been reported in Phytophthora species (Hohl and Hamamoto 1967Go, King and Butler 1968Go, Hyde et al 1991aGo, bGo). In many Pythium species, zoospore differentiation occurs within the extrasporangial vesicle (Lunney and Bland 1974Go). Because of the obligately parasitic nature of Myzocytiopsis and the scarcity of specimens, only chemical fixation could be used in this study. In Phytophthora this is known to result in a markedly different preservation of the cleavage vesicle system compared with cryofixation techniques (Hyde et al 1991bGo). In conventionally fixed material developing cleavage furrows seem to be defined by the coalescence of arrays of somewhat inflated vesicles as described here (Hyde et al 1991aGo). In contrast, in freeze substituted sporangia, cleavage planes are defined by a narrow cisternal system with electron-opaque contents (Hyde et al 1991bGo), so the system described here could be an artifact of chemical fixation.

The absence of packages of tripartite tubular hairs (TTH) in the differentiating cytoplasm of the mature sporangia is a notable feature of zoospore differentiation in this species. In most oomycetes packets of TTH form in cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum; these packets often are associated with mitochondria early in sporangium differentiation, typically preceding septum formation (Beakes 1994Go, Gay and Greenwood 1966Go, Heintz, 1971Go). TTH packets have been seen in developing sporangia of M. intermedia (Barron) M.W.Dick (Glockling and Beakes 2000Go) and M. bolata (Glockling 1994Go, Dick 1995Go). Zoospores of M. vermicola appear either bald or with a single row of short hairs, which is reminiscent of the arrangement described in the insect pathogen Crypticola clavulifera (Frances et al 1989Go). A marine isolate of M. vermicola produces dimorphic zoospores (Newell et al 1977Go), but it is not known whether dimorphism was linked to differences in flagellar ornamentation. However the lack of mastigoneme hairs on zoospores may be a feature of nematode parasites because Haptoglossa dickii also lacks such hairs (Beakes and Glockling 1998Go).

Sexual reproduction in this isolate of M. vermicola was not observed frequently in our cultures and always occurred when infection was in decline, as reported in M. glutinospora (Barron 1976Go). During sexual reproduction the antheridial protoplasm migrates into the oogonium by means of a short fertilization tube. The tube does not appear to be fully walled at first and is filled with small vesicles that either may be secreting enzymes or depositing wall materials. Ultrastructural studies of fertilization tubes in Phytophthora capsici showed a somewhat similar distribution of small vesicles (Hemmes and Bartnicki-Garcia 1975Go, Hemmes 1983Go). Although we observed only a few thalli at the oosphere stage it is nevertheless clear that oosphere differentiation in M. vermicola is periplasmic, a key characteristic of the Peronosporomycetidae. This contradicts previous conclusions based solely on light microscopic observations that species in this genus lack differentiation into an oosphere and periplasmic layer (Karling 1981Go). In the maturing oosphere the DBV appear to be coalescing into larger units (the ooplast) as described in other developing oospores (Beakes 1980Go, 1981Go, Hemmes 1983Go). The mature oospore wall of M. vermicola appears to have an uneven, scalloped, outline and is similar to the oospore in M. glutinospora, which has been described as "echinate" (Barron 1976Go). This contrasts with the usually smooth oospore walls in most peronosporaceous oomycetes (Beakes 1981Go, Hemmes 1983Go, Hemmes and Stasz 1984Go). The only species with somewhat similar uneven oospore walls that has been described at the ultrastructural level is Albugo candida (Beakes 1981Go). In M. vermicola the shallow spines seem to be the result of an undulating electron-opaque layer. However it is clear from our ultrastructural observations that the depressions between the spines are filled with an external matrix material. This could represent material laid down from the periplasm and thus be a true exospore layer as has been described in Albugo (Beakes 1981Go).

Overall this structural study of M. vermicola indicates that this species has many more features in common with the Peronosporomycetidae than with the Saprolegniomycetidae. This suggests that many members of the holocarpic Myzocytiopsidales are likely to be members of the Peronosporomycetidae as suggested by recent molecular studies (Cook et al 2001Go). However several features are similar to those in the Saprolegniomycetidae, which might indicate that this species may be relatively primitive. In this respect the similarity in the rather complex oospore wall with those of Albugo is of interest because this genus represents the most basal member of the peronosporalean lineage so far sequenced (Petersen and Rosendahl 2001Go). This study also suggests that the family Myzocytiopsidaceae as defined by Dick (2001)Go is unlikely to represent a natural grouping within the oomycetes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
SLG thanks the Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University for providing financing and NSF (grant No. DEB0213076) for use of light microscopy equipment for this study. We thank Gabriel Holbrook, NIU, for making the collections of horse dung from which M. vermicola was isolated, and Bob Bailey, NIU, for assistance with shadow-casting. We are grateful to Michael Dick and Steve Newell for their helpful comments during this research.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication December 1, 2005.

Current address: Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, UK.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: S.Glockling{at}sussex.ac.uk


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 OBSERVATION
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Barron GL. 1973. Nematophagous fungi: a new Gonimochaete. Can J Bot 51:2451–2453.

———. 1976. Nematophagous fungi: three new species of Myzocytium. Can J Microbiol 22:752–762.[Medline]

———, Percy JG. 1975. Nematophagous fungi: a new Myzocytium. Can J Bot 53:1306–1309.

Bartnicki-Garcia S, Wang MC. 1983. Biochemical aspects of morphogenesis in Phytophthora. In: Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH, eds. Phytophthora: its biology, taxonomy, ecology and pathology. St Paul: Am Phytopath Soc. p 121–137.

Beakes GW. 1980. Electron microscopic study of oospore maturation and germination in an emasculate isolate of Saprolegnia ferax 3. Changes in organelle status and associations. Can J Bot 58:209–227.

———. 1981. Ultrastructural aspects of oospore differentiation. In: Hohl HR, Turian G, eds. The fungal spore: morphogenetic controls. London and New York: Academic Press. p 71–94.

———. 1987. Oomycete phylogeny: ultrastructural perspectives. In: Rayner ADM, Brasier CM, Moore D, eds. The evolutionary biology of fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 405–421.

———. 1994. Sporulation of lower fungi. In: Gow NAR, Gadd GM, eds. The growing fungus. London: Chapman and Hall. p 339–366.

———, El-Hamalawi ZA, Erwin DC. 1986. Ultrastructure of mature oospores of Phytophthora megasperma f. sp.medicaginis: preparation protocols and effects of MTT vital staining and permanganate pre-treatment. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 86:195–206.

———, Glockling SL. 1998. Injection tube differentiation in gun cells of a Haptoglossa species which infects nematodes. Fungal Gen Biol 24:45–68.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beckett A, Heath IB, McLaughlin DJ. 1974. An atlas of fungal ultrastructure. London: Longmans.

Carver TLW, Kunoh H, Thomas BJ, Nicholson RL. 1999. Release and visualization of the extracellular matrix of conidia of Blumeria graminis. Mycol Res 103:547–560.[CrossRef]

Cook KL, Hudspeth DSS, Hudspeth MES. 2001. A cox2 phylogeny of representative marine peronosporomycetes (Oomycetes). Nova Hedwigia 122:231–243.

Dangeard PA. 1903. Sur le nouveau genre Protascus. Compte Rendus Academie des Sciences, Paris 136: 627–628.

Dick MW. 1995. Sexual reproduction in the Peronosporomycetes (chromistan fungi). Can J Bot 7:712–724.

———. 1997. The Myzocytiopsidaceae. Mycol Res 101: 878–882.[CrossRef]

———. 2001. Straminipilous Fungi. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications. 670 p.

Fischer A. 1892. Phycomycetes. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterrichs Und Der Schweiz. Rabenhorst. Kryptogamen Fl 1:1–490.

Frances SP, Sweeney AW, Humber RA. 1989. Crypticola clavulifera gen. et sp. nov. and Lagenidium giganteum: oomycetes pathogenic for dipterans infesting leaf axils in an Australian Rain Forest. J Invert Pathol 54:103–111.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gay JL, Greenwood AD. 1966. Structural aspects of zoospore production in Saprolegnia ferax with particular reference to the cell and vacuolar membranes. In: Madelin MF, ed. The fungus spore. London: Butterworths. p 95–110.

———, ———, Heath IB. 1971. The formation of vacuoles (vesicles) during oosphere development and zoospore germination in Saprolegnia. J Gen Microbiol 65: 233–241.

Glockling SL. 1994. Predacious and Parasitoidal Fungi in Association with Herbivore Dung in Deciduous Woodlands [Doctoral thesis]. University of Reading, Reading, UK.

———, Dick MW. 1997. New species of Chlamydomyzium (Myzocytiopsidales) and pure culture of Myzocytiopsis. Mycol Res 101:883–896.[CrossRef]

———, Beakes GW. 2000. A review of the biology and infection strategies of biflagellate zoosporic parasites of nematodes. Fung Divers 4:1–20.

Gotelli DM. 1974. The morphology of Lagenidium callinectes II. Zoosporogenesis. Mycologia 66:846–858.[CrossRef]

Gubler F, Hardman AR. 1988. Secretion of adhesive material during encystment of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores, characterized by immunogold labeling with monoclonal antibodies to components of peripheral vesicles. J Cell Sci 90:225–235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heintz CE. 1971. An ultrastructural analysis of zoosporogenesis in Pythium middletonii. In: Ainsworth CG, Webster J, eds. Abstracts of the First International Mycological Congress, Exeter: IMC. 43 p.

Hemmes DE. 1983. Cytology of Phytophthora. In: Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH, eds. Phytophthora: its biology, taxonomy, ecology and pathology. St Paul, Minnesota: American Phytopathological Society. p 9–40.

———, Bartnicki-Garcia S. 1975. Electron microscopy of gametangial interaction and oospore development in Phytophthora capsici. Archives of Microbiology 103:91–112.[CrossRef]

———, Stasz TE. 1984. Ultrastructure of dormant, converted, and germinating oospores of Pythium ultimum. Mycologia 76:924–935.[CrossRef]

Hohl HR, Hamamoto ST. 1967. Ultrastructural changes during zoospore formation in Phytophthora parasitica. Amer J Bot 54:1131–1139.[CrossRef][Medline]

Holloway SA, Heath IB. 1977. An ultrastructural analysis of the changes in organelle arrangement and structure between the various spore types of Saprolegnia. Can J Bot 55:1328–1339.

Hyde GJ, Gubler F, Hardham AR. 1991a. Ultrastructure of zoosporogenesis in Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mycol Res 95:577–591.

———, Lancelle S, Hepler PK. 1991b. Freeze substitution reveals a new model for sporangial cleavage in Phytophthora, a result with implications for cytokinesis in other eukaryotes. J Cell Science 100:735–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karling JS. 1981. Predominantly Holocarpic and Eucarpic Simple Biflagellate Phycomycetes. 2nd ed. New York: J Cramer.

Kuepper FC, Muller DG. 1999. Massive occurrence of the heterokont and fungal parasites Anisolpidium, Eurychasma and Chytridium in Pylaiella littoralis (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae). Nova Hedwigia 69:381–389.

King JE, Butler RD. 1968. Structure and development of flagella of Phytophthora infestans. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 51:689–697.

Lehnen LJ, Powell MP. 1989. The role of kineotosome-associated organelles in the attachment of encysting secondary zoospores of Saprolegnia ferax to substrates. Protoplasma 149:163–174.[CrossRef]

Lesemann DE, Fuchs WH. 1970. Die ultrastrucktur des penetrations-vorganges von Olpidium brassicae. Arch Mikrobiol 71:20–30.[CrossRef]

Lunney CZ, Bland CE. 1974. An ultrastructural study of zoosporogenesis in Pythium proliferum de Bary. Protoplasma 88:85–100.[CrossRef]

———, Bland CE. 1976. Ultrastructural observations of mature and encysting zoospores of Pythium proliferum de Bary. Protoplasma 90:119–137.[CrossRef]

Money NP, Beakes GW, Webster J, Wakely G. 1987. Rudimentary flagella in sporangiospores of Achlya. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 89:108–114.

———, Webster J, Ennos R. 1988. Dynamics of sporangial emptying in Achlya intricata. Experiment Mycol 12: 13–27.

Newell SY, Cefalu R, Fell JW. 1977. Myzocytium, Haptoglossa, and Gonimochaete (fungi) in littoral marine nematodes. Bull Marine Sci 27:177–207.

Overton SV, Tharp TP, Bland CE. 1983. Fine structure of swimming, encysting and germinating spores of Halipthoros milfordensis. Can J Bot 61:1165–1177.[CrossRef]

Petersen AB, Rosendahl S. 2001. Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes (Oomycetes) based on partial sequences of the large ribosomal subunit (LSU rDNA). Mycol Res 104:1295–1303.

Pueschel CM, van der Meer JP. 1985. Ultrastructure of the fungus Petersenia palmariae (Oomycetes) parasitic on the alga palmaria mollis. (Rhodophyceae). Can J Bot 63:409–418.

Reichle RE. 1969. Retraction of flagella of Phytophthora palmivora var. nicotiana zoospores. Archiv fur Mikrobiol 66:340–347.[CrossRef]

Saikawa M, Anazawa T. 1985. Electron microscopy of an endoparasitic fungus, Gonimochaete pyriforme, infecting nematodes. Can J Bot 63:893–898.

Schnepf E, Deichgraber G, Drebes G. 1978. Development and ultrastructure of the marine, parasitic oomycete, Lagenisma coscindisci (Lagenidiales): encystment of primary zoospores. Can J Bot 56:1309–1314.

Sparrow FK. 1973. Lagenidiales. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS, eds. The fungi—an advanced treatise. Vol 4. New York: Academic Press. p 158–164.

———. 1976. The present status and classification of biflagellate fungi. In: Gareth-Jones EBG, ed. Recent Advances in Aquatic Mycology. London: Elek Press. p 213–222.

Zopf W. 1884. Zur Kenntniss Der Phycomyceten I. Zur Morphologie Und Biologie Der Ancylisteen Und Chytridiaceen, Zurgeich ein Beitrag zur Phytopathologie. Nova acta der Ksl. Leop.-carol. Deuts. Akad. Naturf 46:141–236.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glockling, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beakes, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Article