Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Erratum for Hirooka et al., Mycologia 97 (5) 1058-1066.
Erratum for Osmundson et al., Mycologia 97 (5) 949-972.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Mycologia, 97(6), 2005, pp. 1379.
© 2005 by The Mycological Society of America

Errata

"Morphological and molecular systematics of Rocky Mountain alpine Laccaria" by Todd W. Osmundson, Cathy L. Cripps and Gregory M. Mueller, Mycologia 97(5):949–972 was placed in Biochemistry/Physiology in the Table of Contents; it should have appeared in Systematics.

In the article "Neonectria castaneicola and Neo. rugulosa in Japan" by Hirooka et al, Mycologia 97(5):1058–1066, abbreviations for Neonectria (Neo.) and Nectria (N.) were printed in error. Revised information is provided below.

RESULTS

Page 1062. The first sentence under Colony growth should read: Both Neo. castaneicola and Neo. rugulosa grew at a range of 5 to 35 C with an optimum temperature of 25 C.

Page 1062. The first sentence of the second paragraph under Comparison of DNA sequences and Molecular phylogenetic relationship should read: Based upon the results shown (FIG. 3) Clade I (bootstrap 100%), Clade II (bootstrap 95%), Clade II (bootstrap 100%) includes Nectria rugulosa and N. veuillotiana-groups (Neo. castaneicola, Neo. jungneri, Neo. rugulosa and Neo. veuillotiana), N. coccinea/galligena and N. mammoidea-groups (Neo. coccinea, Neo. discopora, Neo. galligena and Neo. ramulariae), N. radicicola-groups (Neo. radicicola), respectively.

Page 1062 and 1063. The last sentence of the second paragraph under Comparison of DNA sequences and Molecular phylogenetic relationship should read: Thus these three clades correlate with five groups by Rossman et al (1999) classified based upon N. coccinea/galligena, N. mammoidea, N. rugulosa, N. radicicola and N. veuillotiana groups.

DISCUSSION

Page 1064. The tenth sentence in the second paragraph should read: Nectria rugulosa-group (Neo. castaneicola and Neo. rugulosa) and N. veuillotiana-group were distinguished by Rossman et al (1999) based upon the morphology of the surface of ascospore and presence of microconidia even though their structure of perithecial wall was same.

FIG. 5.

Page 1065. The small circle printed below Neo. castaneicola should be deleted.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS