Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.97.4.777
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.
Mycologia, 97(4), 2005, pp. 777-787.
© 2005 by The Mycological Society of America

Haploid vegetative mycelia of Armillaria gallica show among-cell-line variation for growth and phenotypic plasticity


Robert B. Peabody 1
Diane Cope Peabody
Maura Geens Tyrrell
Emily Edenburn-MacQueen
Richard P. Howdy
Kevin M. Semelrath

     Biology Department, Stonehill College, Easton, Massachusetts 02357

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Vegetative mycelial cells of Armillaria are expected to have diploid nuclei. Cells from a single mycelium therefore would not be expected to differ from one another for ecologically relevant quantitative traits. We isolated two sets of basidiome cell lines (from spores and stipe cells) and one set of vegetative cell lines (from an attached rhizomorph) from a single contiguous Armillaria gallica mycelium. We isolated a second set of vegetative cell lines from the soil 20 cm from the above basidiomerhizomorph complex. In all four sets of cell lines in situ DAPI-DNA measurements showed cells are haploid and quantitative-trait analyses of cell lines grown at different water potentials revealed high levels of among-cell-line genetic variation for both growth and phenotypic plasticity. Haploidy and the existence of ecologically relevant genetic variation within vegetative individuals are unexpected and mean that a process similar to evolutionary adaptation could take place within the soma of a genetic individual. We believe this is a key to understanding how large A. gallica mycelia survive exposure to variation in ecological conditions during lives that potentially span several tree (host) generations.

Key words: basidiomycete, genetic mosaicism, indeterminate fungal growth, long-lived species, natural selection, phenotypic plasticity


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Armillaria gallica Marxmuller & Romagnesi is a basidiomycete fungal pathogen of weakened trees in temperate and boreal forests of eastern North America, Europe and Japan (Kile et al 1991Go). The discovery that single A. gallica individuals colonize habitats larger than 15 hectares and remain genetically stable for lives that span several centuries (Smith et al 1992Go, Hodnett and Anderson 2000Go) raises the question of how these individuals can tolerate exposure to potentially broad ranges of ecological conditions.

In arborescent plants and clonal organisms, genetic mosaicism produced by high rates of somatic mutation has been proposed as a mechanism that might explain how long-lived individuals keep up with short-term fluctuations in pest populations and environmental conditions (Gill 1986Go, Gill et al 1995Go). Estimated mutation rates in natural populations of A. gallica (Hodnett and Anderson 2000Go) are much too low for a mutation-based model of mosaicism to explain longevity in this species, however. A different model that has the potential to work for A. gallica has been proposed by Peabody et al (2000, FIG. 1Go). In this model genetic mosaicism is produced by Armillaria’s two-diploidization-two-haploidization life cycle (Korhonen 1980Go, Grillo et al 2000Go, Peabody et al 2000Go) and the model does not require high rates of somatic mutation. Instead the model relies on alleles that first were brought together when compatible spores mated during the life cycle’s first diploidization and later recombined during the life cycle’s first (cryptic) haploidization (FIG. 1Go).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. In Armillaria gallica, successive generations of spores are separated by two cycles of diploidization and haploidization. Although the existence of a cryptic haploidization within Armillaria’s life cycle has been demonstrated (Peabody et al 2000Go, Grillo et al 2000Go), its mechanism and timing within the life cycle are unknown.

 
A difficulty with applying this recombination-based model of mosaicism to problems of longevity is that both studies confirming two-diploidization-two-haploidization life cycles in Armillaria species (Grillo et al 2000Go, Peabody et al 2000Go) were based on cells isolated from short-lived basidiomes. Basidiomes presumably are less likely to encounter broad ranges of environmental conditions than are long-lived vegetative mycelia that potentially last for centuries (Smith et al 1992Go, Hodnett and Anderson 2000Go). And, while basidiome spore production may be important for long-range dispersal (Kile et al 1991Go), vegetative stages of the life cycle appear to be more important in colonizing new food sources (Guillaumin and Legrand 2001Go, Ferguson et al 2003Go). If the evolutionary significance of mosaicism in indeterminate growth of long-lived fungal individuals is to be understood, vegetative stages of the life cycle clearly should be studied.

We studied quantitative traits because these continuously variable traits often are related directly to an organism’s biological fitness (de Meester 1996Go, Freeman and Herron 2004Go). Growth, in particular, was selected because it is one of the most widely accepted components of fitness in fungi (Brasier 1999Go) that access resources primarily by growing indeterminately through their environment. Water potential was chosen as an environmental variable because soil moisture is considered to be one of the most important factors affecting the establishment and survival of genetic individuals in nature (Anderson et al 1979Go, Kile 1986Go, Worrall 1994Go, Ferguson et al 2003Go). Our particular values of water potential represent wet (–1.0 MPa) through dry (–4.5 MPa) forest soils that have been reported to affect A. gallica growth in nature (Whiting and Rizzo 1999Go). Spore cell lines and stipe cell lines were chosen for study because an earlier study analyzed their growth patterns when exposed to variation in pH, temperature and host species (Peabody et al 2003Go). It also was important to study spores because they provide a baseline for the amount of variation to be expected in a haploid, genetically variable life-cycle stage that has undergone meiosis. Rhizomorph cell lines and soil mycelium cell lines represent potentially long-lived vegetative stages of the life cycle and are therefore of key importance to our hypothesis (i.e. vegetative cell lines within single A. gallica individuals are characterized by ecologically-relevant quantitative-trait variation that affects growth in response to variation in water potential).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Origin of cell lines.— – We used established techniques (Peabody et al 2000Go, Peabody et al 2003Go) to isolate 40 cells that produced 40 cell lines (10 spore cell lines, 10 stipe cell lines, 10 rhizomorph cell lines, 10 soil mycelium cell lines). Spores, stipe cells and rhizomorph cells were collected from a single, contiguous mycelium (a basidiome attached to a rhizomorph) growing 1 m from the base of a white ash tree (Fraxinus americana) at 493 Leonard Street, Raynham, Massachusetts, (41°55'02''N, 071°00'18''W, ~13 m elevation) on 31 Oct 2001. Because of the physical connection of the source of these three cell lines, it is likely that they are part of a single genetic individual. The 10 soil mycelium cells were isolated from a strawberry plant acting as bait and growing in the soil 20 cm from that same basidiome. At this point it is not possible to say whether the 30 cell lines isolated from the basidiomerhizomorph structure (i.e. spore cell lines, stipe cell lines, rhizomorph cell lines) and the 10 cell lines isolated from the strawberry plant (i.e. soil mycelium cell lines) all are isolates of a single genetic individual or isolates of two closely spaced but separate genetic individuals.

Spores represent cells that have completed the first and second diploidization-haploidization events in the life cycle; stipe cells represent short-lived, basidiome cells that have completed the first diploidization-haploidization event but not the second. Rhizomorph cells and soil mycelium cells represent potentially long-lived, vegetative stages of the life cycle that have completed the first diploidization-haploidization event of the life cycle but not the second (FIG. 1Go).

In situ nuclear DAPI-DNA measurements.— – Established methods of DAPI-DNA staining and microspectrophotometry (Peabody and Peabody 1985Go, 1987Go) were used to quantify relative amounts of nuclear DNA in ethanol-preserved samples for all 40 cell lines (10 measurements were made for each of the 40 cell lines). To provide a basis for comparison to cells that are known to be haploid, we also measured nuclei from 30 ethanol-preserved spores from the same basidiome that produced spore and stipe cell lines. To provide a basis for comparison to cells that are known to be diploid with replicated DNA (i.e. 4C) (Peabody and Peabody 1985Go), we measured 30 nuclei of ethanol-preserved prophase I basidia taken from the same basidiome.

Quantitative trait analyses: growth of cell lines.— – After isolation from nature, each cell was transferred to its own 1.5% malt-extract agar (MEA) plate and allowed to grow and establish its own cell line. All 40 cell lines were transferred to fresh 1.5% MEA plates and grown 25 d in randomized positions in the dark at 23 C. These plates served as sources of inocula for inoculum plates (i.e. plates used later as sources of inoculum for experimental plates in the growth study).

Quantitative trait analyses: control for environmental history of inocula.— – Many factors other than experimental treatments can affect the growth of mycelia during growth experiments. Factors known to affect growth include variables such as age of inocula, variation in water/nutrient content of media, degree of injury to mycelia in inoculum plugs and relative positions of inoculum plugs within parent mycelia. Many unknown factors also might affect the growth of mycelia during an experiment. Precautions were taken at each step to control for all known variables that affect growth, and our experimental design (see below) helped to control for unknown variables.

After 25 d in the dark at 23 C, each of 10 uniform inoculum plugs (mycelium-agar cylinders, ht = 6 mm, d = 6 mm) of each of the 40 cell lines was transferred from the actively growing margin of the colony to a separate, fresh 1.5% MEA plate and grown in a randomized position 23 d in the dark at 23 C. This created a grid of 100 separate inoculum plates for each cell set (spore cell lines, stipe cell lines, rhizomorph cell lines and soil mycelium cell lines). Whenever we refer to a 100 plate (10 x 10) grid, either a "100 plate inoculum grid" (as in this section) or a "100 plate experimental treatment grid" (as in the next section), we are referring to 10 separate, independent replicate plates for each of the 10 different cell lines. This procedure controls for variations in environmental history among inoculum plugs and produces experimental treatment grids of 100 independent plates (see next section) suitable for analysis by ANOVA.

Quantitative trait analyses: experimental design of growth studies.— – The 100 plate (10 x 10) experimental treatment grids used to compare levels of ecologically relevant, quantitative-trait genetic variation in all four sets of cell lines were set up as follows: uniform inoculum plugs from the growing edge of colonies in the 100 independent inoculum plates were used to inoculate 100 experimental plates (containing 1% malt-extract agar modified with KCl [Whiting and Rizzo 1999Go] to produce the desired water potential). There was a one-to-one correspondence between the 100 inoculum plates and the 100 experimental plates in each grid. This procedure was repeated for all four sets of cell lines. This produced four different grids of 100 plates each, or a total of 400 plates. One set of 400 plates was grown in media at each of these four water potentials: –1.0, –1.5, –2.5 and –4.5 MPa (see next section) to produce a total of 1600 experimental plates. Because all 100 plates within an experimental treatment grid are independent, unknown variations peculiar to any particular plate in the grid are taken into account by ANOVA.

Mycelial areas were measured by image analysis (Peabody et al 2003Go) after 18 d in the dark at 23 C. During this time the smallest mycelia had begun to show measurable growth but the largest mycelia had not begun to show reduced growth due to depletion of nutrients. Two-way mixed model ANOVA (cell line = random factor, water potential treatment = fixed factor) was used to test for: (i) cell effect, which tests for among-cell-line genetic variation in growth; (ii) treatment effect, which tests for phenotypic plasticity (or the effect of different water potentials); and (iii) cell x treatment effect, which tests for among-cell-line genetic variation in phenotypic plasticity or gene-environment interaction. All statistical computations in this study were carried out by StatView 5.0.1.

Quantitative trait analyses: preparation of growth media with different water potentials.— – The four water potentials used were –1.0, –1.5, –2.5 and –4.5 MPa. One percent malt-extract agar contributes 0.48 MPa to growth media (Whiting and Rizzo 1999Go). To reach water potentials of –1.0, –1.5, –2.5 and –4.5 MPa respectively, 8.43 g, 16.78 g, 33.78 g and 67.40 g of KCl were added per L of water (Robinson and Stokes 1955Go, Whiting and Rizzo 1999Go). In other studies water potentials have been adjusted with KCl, NaCl or sucrose and empirical results suggest that all three osmotica have similar effects on fungal growth (Whiting and Rizzo 1999Go).

Quantitative trait analyses: reliability of growth studies.— – In our lab we found the results of Armillaria growth studies to be consistent and repeatable. To demonstrate this we randomly selected six cell lines and asked four different pairs of individuals to independently conduct four replicates of the same growth study (different from the water potential study reported in this paper). In each study one set of six replicate plates for each of the six cell lines was exposed to one treatment (treatment 1) while another set of six replicate plates for the same six cell lines was exposed to a different treatment (treatment 2). With the exception of expected chance variation, the four studies produced identical results for cell effects, treatment effects and cell x treatment effects. Relative growth for all six cell lines was identical in the first three studies and in five out of six cell lines in the fourth study. When mean values for growth of cell lines were ranked the differences among rankings in the four different studies were not significant. (Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation for cell line vs. rank produced P values of P = 0.4993 and P = 0.7426 for treatments 1 and 2, respectively; Kendall’s coefficient of rank correlation for cell line vs. rank produced P values of P = 0.4719 and P = 0.7284 for treatments 1 and 2, respectively).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Ploidy of cell lines: in situ nuclear DAPI-DNA measurements.— – All measurements were made from a single ethanol-preserved basidiome or from ethanol-preserved cell lines that were isolated from this same basidiome. All data are listed and shown (TABLE IGo, FIG. 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Growth at different water potentials and DAPI-DNA quantities of A. gallica cell lines

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Prophase I basidia establish the DAPI-DNA content of diploid replicated nuclei (4C) at 219.0 arbitrary units (a.u.). DAPI-DNA values of the 40 cell lines used in this study fall within (or near) the range expected for haploid cells (1–2C, 54.7–109.5 a.u.). None of the cell lines approached the 4C value expected for diploid replicated nuclei. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals.

 
We measured the relative nuclear DAPI-DNA content of 30 prophase I basidia. Because this stage is known to contain diploid nuclei that have completed DNA synthesis (Peabody and Peabody 1985Go), they establish the 4C value at 219.0 arbitrary units (a.u.), by inference the 2C value at 109.5 a.u. and the 1C value at 54.7 a.u. Diploid nuclei therefore should fall within the 2–4C (109.5–219.0 a.u.) range depending on the stage of DNA synthesis and haploid nuclei should fall within the 1–2C (54.7–109.5 a.u.) range depending on the stage of DNA synthesis. To check this assertion, we collected and measured 30 preserved spores (different from the spores used to establish spore cell lines) from the above basidiome. These spores had a mean DAPI-DNA content of 86.8 a.u. with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 78.9–94.7 a.u., which falls within the 1–2C range expected for haploid nuclei.

Of the 20 potentially long-lived, vegetative cell lines (i.e. soil mycelium cell lines m1–m12 and rhizomorph cell lines r1–r11), 19 have 95% CIs that fall primarily within the 1–2C range (TABLE IGo, FIG. 2Go). One soil mycelium cell line, m3, has a 95% CI (109.8–139.0 a.u.) that falls just outside the 1–2C range (54.7–109.5 a.u.). It statistically is not unexpected that 1 out of 20 95% CIs would fall outside the expected range. None of the 20 vegetative cell lines (including soil mycelium cell line m3) has a 95% CI that even approaches the 2C–4C (i.e. diploid) midpoint of 164.2 a.u. or the 4C (i.e. diploid, replicated) value of 219.0 a.u. When the 30 preserved spores (mean = 86.8 a.u., SD = 22.0, n = 30) are compared to lumped data for vegetative cell lines by one-way ANOVA, they do not differ from either rhizomorph cell lines (overall mean for 10 rhizomorph cell lines = 80.4 a.u., SD = 29.3, N = 100 total measurements, P = 0.2677) or soil mycelium cell lines (overall mean for 10 soil mycelium cell lines = 91.3 a.u., SD = 29.8, N = 100 total measurements, P = 0.4311). DAPI-DNA data therefore are consistent with the interpretation that all 20 vegetative cell lines used in this study are haploid.

Of the 20 cell lines isolated from a basidiome, all 10 stipe cell lines (i.e. t2–t11) and six of 10 spore cell lines (i.e. s4, s5, s6, s8, s11 and s12) have 95% CIs that fall within the 1–2C range that would be expected for haploid cells (TABLE IGo, FIG. 2Go). Four spore cell lines have 95% CIs that fall below the 1–2C range (i.e. s3, s9, s10 and s14). Although this is more than would be expected statistically, it is possible that spore-cell-line nuclei all happened to be haploid and unreplicated when they were measured. This interpretation is supported by the facts that: (i) 100 spore-cell-line measurements had a mean of 51.3 a.u., which is close to the inferred 1C value of 54.7 a.u.; and (ii) the standard deviation for these same 100 measurements (spore-cell-line SD = 19.9 a.u.) is smaller than the standard deviations for the three sets of cell lines that overlapped more closely with the 1–2C range and therefore are likely to represent mixtures of unreplicated and replicated nuclei (i.e. stipe-cell-line SD = 31.6 a.u., rhizomorph-cell-line SD = 29.3 a.u., and soil-mycelium-cell-line SD = 29.8 a.u.). DAPI-DNA data therefore are consistent with the interpretation that spore cell lines and stipe cell lines in this study are haploid.

Quantitative trait analyses.— – Cell effects, treatment effects and cell treatment effects were significant for all four sets of cell lines (P values ranged from P < 0.0001 to P < 0.0005, TABLE IIGo). This means that: (i) all four sets of cell lines possess among-cell-line, quantitative-trait genetic differences for loci affecting growth (note that both sets of vegetative cell lines are just as variable as spore cell lines and stipe cell lines, i.e. all cell-effect P values are < 0.0001); (ii) all four sets of cell lines are phenotypically plastic (i.e. their growth is affected by water potential); and (iii) all four sets of cell lines possess among-cell-line, quantitative-trait genetic differences for loci affecting phenotypic plasticity (i.e. the effect of water potential on growth differs from cell line to cell line).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II. Genetic variation for growth and phenotypic plasticity

 
ANOVA P values concisely summarize the statistical significance of cell effects, treatment effects and cell treatment effects, but reaction norms (FIGS. 3A–DGo and 4Go) are helpful for visualizing patterns of phenotypic variation. Significant cell effects are reflected by differences in the vertical position of reaction norm lines (FIG. 3A–DGo). Note for example, on the rhizomorph graphs (FIGS. 3CGo and 4Go), that cell line r2 grew significantly more than r11 at all water potentials, and more than r3 at water potentials of –2.5, –1.5 and –1.0 MPa (Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference [PLSD] P values are provided below, nine lines down). Significant treatment effects are reflected by the positive slope of all reaction norm lines; for example, on the rhizomorph graph (FIG. 3CGo), growth is greater at higher water potentials than it is at lower water potentials for all possible comparisons of different water potential pairs (PLSD, P < 0.0001). Significant cell treatment effects are reflected by the fact that reaction norm lines do not all show similar changes in growth as water potentials change from dry (–4.5 MPa) to wet (–1.0 MPa) (FIG. 3A–DGo). For example, on the rhizomorph graph (FIG. 4Go), notice that r2 grew more than r3 at the three wetter water potentials (i.e. –1.0 MPa, P < 0.0001 [all probabilities are from PLSD]; –1.5 MPa, P = 0.0348; and –2.5 MPa, P = 0.0078) but not at the driest water potential (i.e. –4.5 MPa, P = 0.5752). Conversely, r3 grew more than r11 at the two drier water potentials (–4.5 MPa, P = 0.0003; and –2.5 MPa, P = 0.0230) but not at the two wetter water potentials (i.e. –1.5 MPa, P = 0.0985; and –1.0 MPa, P = 0.1329). This indicates that an increase in water potential above –4.5 MPa causes more of an increase in the growth of cell line r2 than it does in the growth of r3 or r11.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Reaction norms showing mean mycelial areas of four sets of A. gallica cell lines after 18 d growth. A. Spore cell lines (n = 9 rather than 10 because one entire set of cell lines became contaminated). B. Stipe cell lines (n = 10). C. Rhizomorph cell lines (n = 10). D. Soil mycelium cell lines (n = 10).

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Reaction norms for rhizomorph cell lines r2, r3 and r11 show that the effect of water potential on growth differs from cell line to cell line. For example, although r2 and r3 are different at a water potential of –1.0 MPa (PLSD P < 0.0001), they are not different at a water potential of –4.5 MPa (P = 0.5752), and although r3 and r11 are not different at a water potential of –1.0 MPa (P = 0.1329), they are different at a water potential of –4.5 MPa (P = 0.0003).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Haploidy of cell lines.— – Although vegetative mycelial cells of Armillaria are expected to have diploid nuclei in nature (Ullrich and Anderson 1978Go, Franklin et al 1983Go, Korhonen 1983Go, Kim et al 2000Go), in situ nuclear DAPI-DNA measurements demonstrated that all 40 cell lines (including the 20 vegetative cell lines) were haploid (TABLE IGo).

Quantitative-trait variation.— – Life span estimates for mycelia analyzed in this study could not be made because agricultural activity limits growth in soils surrounding the collection site. Nevertheless, if they are old, these individuals are likely to have been exposed to a wide range of conditions during the past two centuries because the collection site was a mixed pine-hardwood forest until the mid-1800s, farmland from the mid-1800s until 1977 and has been a residential lot since then. Investigators addressing the ability of long-lived species to survive exposure to changing environmental conditions have considered the possible significance of somatic-mutation-based mosaicism in clonal organisms and plants (Gill 1985, Gill et al 1995Go); recombination-based mosaicism in fungi (Peabody et al 2000Go, Peabody et al 2003Go); and phenotypic plasticity in a wide range of organisms (Andrews 1992Go, de Meester 1996Go, Schlichting and Pigliucci 1998Go, Peabody et al 2003Go). Armillaria gallica has been shown to be both genetically mosaic (Peabody et al 2000Go) and phenotypically plastic (Pearce and Malajczuk 1990Go, Schwarze et al 2000Go, Baumgartner and Rizzo 2001Go, Peabody et al 2003Go).

In most organisms populations adapt over time as fit individuals contribute disproportionate numbers of genes to future generations. In long-lived species of plants and fungi capable of indeterminate growth, however, this view of the individual and of individual fitness may be too narrow (Gill 1985, Gill et al 1995Go, Rayner et al 1995Go, Davidson et al 1996Go, Rayner 1997Go, Rayner et al 1999Go). In the case of fungal individuals in particular, it might be more accurate to think of individuals as "continuous, indeterminately growing . . . interactive trajectories . . .(that), purely by responding to local circumstances, and without any central administration" (Rayner 1997Go) are able to re-configure themselves during their lives in ways that let them adapt to changing conditions.

This view describes A. gallica individuals almost perfectly, with genetic mosaicism serving as the proximate mechanism that provides dynamic mycelial boundaries with the potential for differential cell-line growth within different parts of a single mycelium. For loci affecting growth and phenotypic plasticity, mosaicism may cause alleles to be grouped together in different combinations within different mycelial cell lines. Consider rhizomorph cell lines r2, r3 and r11 (FIG. 4Go), for example. In conditions approximating dry forest soil (i.e. –4.5 MPa) the growth of cell line r3 is similar to that of r2 and exceeds that of r11. In contrast, in conditions approximating wet forest soil (i.e. –1.0 MPa) the growth of cell line r3 is now similar to that of r11 and less than that of r2. If a large, mosaic mycelium were bounded by dry soil on one side and wet soil on the other, the contribution of cell line r3 to the overall indeterminate growth of the entire mycelium would be variable. On the dry side, r3 would undergo mitosis as rapidly as r2 and these two cell lines would have the potential to contribute more cells than r11 to the future mycelium on that side. On the wet side, r3 would undergo mitosis more slowly than r2 and would have the potential to contribute fewer cells than r2 and the same number of cells as r11 to the future mycelium on that side.

Armillaria gallica has been shown to possess among-cell-line genetic variation for response to variation in several environmental variables (i.e. pH, temperature, host species [Peabody et al 2003Go]; water potential [this study]). Given differences in cell-line genotypes and in values of environmental variables, some cell lines might grow and reproduce more effectively in one portion of a mycelium while other cell lines might grow and reproduce more effectively in another. Differential cell-line growth has the potential to change allele frequencies locally within an individual and let dynamic mycelial boundaries re-configure themselves in response to local conditions. In this scenario genetic mosaicism in conjunction with selection among cell lines might produce genetically different sectors within an individual. However, because bulk flow takes place within basidiomycetes (Moore 1998Go), successful cell lines within the mycelium might support one another’s growth as well as the growth of cell lines that are less well suited to current conditions. In this scenario, genetic mosaicism in concert with bulk flow might be expected to maintain the level of genetic uniformity within individuals that has been reported by Smith et al (1992)Go and Hodnett and Anderson (2000)Go. Using either of these models, we think genetic mosaicism has the potential to explain how A. gallica individuals tolerate extensive spatial and temporal variation in ecological conditions during their lives.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The National Science Foundation, Alden Trust, and Stonehill College’s SURE program supported this research. D. Gill, D. Hibbett, K. Korhonen, D. Pfister and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an early draft. C. Whiting provided helpful suggestions for water potential media preparation. C. Covello drew FIG. 1Go.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication April 13, 2005.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: rpeabody{at}stonehill.edu


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Anderson JB, Ullrich RC, Roth LF, Filip GM. 1979. Genetic identification of clones of Armillaria mellea in coniferous forests in Washington. Phytopathology 69:1109–1111.

Andrews JH. 1992. Fungal life-history strategies. In: Carroll GC, Wicklow DT, eds. The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. p 119–145.

Baumgartner K, Rizzo DM. 2001. Ecology of Armillaria spp. in mixed-hardwood forests of California. Plant Dis 85: 947–951.[CrossRef]

Brasier CM. 1999. Fitness, continuous variation and selection in fungal populations: an ecological perspective. In: Worrall JJ, ed. Structure and dynamics of fungal populations. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 307–339.

Davidson FA, Sleeman BD, Rayner ADM, Crawford JW, Ritz K. 1996. Context-dependent macroscopic patterns in growing and interacting fungal networks. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:873–880.[CrossRef]

de Meester L. 1996. Evolutionary potential and local genetic differentiation in a phenotypically plastic trait of a cyclical parthenogen, Daphnia magna. Evolution 50: 1293–1298.[CrossRef]

Ferguson BA, Dreisbach TA, Parks CG, Filip GM, Schmitt CL. 2003. Coarse-scale population structure of pathogenic Armillaria species in a mixed-conifer forest in the Blue Mountains of northeast Oregon. Can J For Res 33:612–623.[CrossRef]

Franklin AL, Filion WG, Anderson JB. 1983. Determination of nuclear DNA content in fungi using mithramycin: vegetative diploidy in Armillaria mellea confirmed. Can J Microbiol 29:1179–1183.

Freeman S, Herron JC. 2004. Evolutionary analysis. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. 802 p.

Gill DE. 1986. Individual plants as genetic mosaics: ecological organisms versus evolutionary individuals. In: Crawley MJ, ed. Plant ecology. London: Blackwell Scientific. p 321–343.

———, Chao L, Perkins SL, Wolf JB. 1995. Genetic mosaicism in plants and clonal animals. An Rev Ecol Syst 26: 423–444.

Grillo R, Korhonen K, Hantula J, Hietala AM. 2000. Genetic evidence for somatic haploidization in Armillaria tabescens. Fung Genet Biol 30:135–145.

Guillaumin J-J, Legrand P. 2001. Evolution of Armillaria genets over eight years (1992–2000). In: Laflamme G, Berube JA, Bussieres G, eds. Root and butt rots of forest trees, proceedings of the IUFRO working party 7.02.01. Quebec City, Canada: Canadian Forest Service. p 267–275.

Hodnett B, Anderson JB. 2000. Genomic stability of two individuals of Armillaria gallica. Mycologia 92:894–899.[CrossRef]

Kile GA. 1986. Genotypes of Armillaria hinnulea in wet sclerophyll eucalypt forest in Tasmania. Trans Br Mycol Soc 87:312–314.

———, McDonald GI, Byler JW. 1991. Ecology and disease in natural forests. In: Shaw CG, Kile GA, eds. Armillaria root disease, agriculture handbook No. 691. Washington: Forest Service, USDA. p 102–121.

Kim M-S, Klopfenstein NB, McDonald GI, Arumuganathan K, Vidaver AK. 2000. Characterization of North American Armillaria species by nuclear DNA content and RFLP analysis. Mycologia 92:874–883.[CrossRef]

Korhonen K. 1980. The origin of clamped and clampless basidia in Armillariella ostoyae. Karstenia 20:23–27.

Korhonen K. 1983. Observations on nuclear migration and heterokaryotization in Armillaria. Cryptogamie, Mycologie 4:79–85.

Moore D. 1998. Fungal morphogenesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 469 p.

Peabody DC, Peabody RB. 1985. Widespread haploidy in monokaryotic cells of mature basidiocarps of Armillaria bulbosa, a member of the Armillaria mellea complex. Exp Mycol 9:212–220.

Peabody RB, Peabody DC. 1987. Haploid monokaryotic basidiocarp tissues in species of Armillaria. Can J Bot 65: 69–71.

———, ———, Sicard KM. 2000. A genetic mosaic in the fruiting stage of Armillaria gallica. Fung Genet Biol 29: 72–80.[CrossRef]

Peabody DC, Peabody RB, Tyrrell MG, Towle MJ, Johnson EM. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary potential in somatic cells of Armillaria gallica. Mycol Res 107:408–412.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pearce MH, Malajczuk N. 1990. Factors affecting growth of Armillaria luteobubalina rhizomorphs in soil. Mycol Res 94:38–48.

Rayner ADM. 1997. Evolving boundaries: the systemic origin of phenotypic diversity. J Transfig Math 3:13–22.

———, Ramsdale M, Watkins ZR. 1995. Origins and significance of genetic and epigenic instability in mycelial systems. Can J Bot (Suppl):S1214–S1248.

———, Watkins ZR, Beeching JR. 1999. Self-integration-an emerging concept from the fungal mycelium. In: Gow NAR, Robson GD, Gadd GM, eds. The fungal colony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 1–24.

Robinson RA, Stokes RH. 1955. Electrolyte solutions. New York: Academic Press. 571 p.

Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. 1998. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers. 340 p.

Schwarze FWMR, Baum S, Fink S. 2000. Resistance of fibre regions in wood of Acer pseudoplatanus degraded by Armillaria mellea. Mycol Res 104:1126–1132.[CrossRef]

Smith M, Bruhn JN, Anderson JB. 1992. The fungus Armillaria bulbosa is among the largest and oldest living organisms. Nature 356:428–431.[CrossRef]

Ullrich RC, Anderson JB. 1978. Sex and diploidy in Armillaria mellea. Exp Mycol 2:119–129.[CrossRef]

Whiting EC, Rizzo DM. 1999. Effect of water potential on radial growth of Armillaria mellea and Armillaria gallica isolates in culture. Mycologia 91:627–635.[CrossRef]

Worrall JJ. 1994. Population structure of Armillaria species in several forest types. Mycologia 86:401–407.[CrossRef]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peabody, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Semelrath, K. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS