Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.70
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.
Mycologia, 97(1), 2005, pp. 70-76.
© 2005 by The Mycological Society of America

DNA fingerprinting analysis of vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus caelatus


C.E. McAlpin 1

     National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, ARS, Peoria, Illinois 61604

B.W. Horn

     National Peanut Laboratory, USDA, ARS, Dawson, Georgia 31742

D.T. Wicklow

     National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, USDA, ARS, Peoria, Illinois 61604


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Forty-three isolates of Aspergillus caelatus, whose vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs) have been identified, were assessed by DNA fingerprinting using a repetitive sequence DNA probe (pAF28) cloned from A. flavus. Thirteen distinct DNA finger-print groups or genotypes were identified among the 43 isolates. Twenty-four isolates belonging to VCG 1 produced identical DNA fingerprints and included isolates from the United States and Japan. Four other DNA fingerprint groups had multiple isolates sharing identical fingerprints corresponding to VCGs 2, 3, 12 and 13. Eight of the 13 fingerprint groups corresponding to VCGs 4–11 were represented by a single isolate with a unique fingerprint pattern. These results provide further confirmation that the pAF28 probe can distinguish VCGs of species within Aspergillus section Flavi based on DNA fingerprint patterns and that the probe can be used to estimate the number of VCGs in a sample population. Most of the A. caelatus isolates produced fewer restriction fragments and weakly hybridized with the repetitive DNA probe pAF28 compared to hybridization patterns obtained with A. flavus, suggesting less homology of the probe to A. caelatus genomic DNA.

Key words: genotypic diversity, hybridization patterns, probe, Southern blot, vegetative compatibility group


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Aspergillus caelatus is a newly described species belonging to Aspergillus section Flavi (Horn 1997Go). The species has been isolated from agricultural soils across the southern United States (Horn and Dorner 1998Go) from tea plantation soils in Japan (Peterson et al 2000Go) and from peanut seeds associated with insect-damaged pods in southwestern Georgia (Horn and Greene 1995Go, Horn et al 1996Go). A. caelatus shares several morphological characteristics with A. tamarii, but the metabolite profiles of the two species are quite different. All A. caelatus strains that have been tested produce kojic acid and no detectable cyclopiazonic acid, whereas Aspergillus tamarii produces cyclopiazonic acid and lesser amounts of kojic acid; neither species produces aflatoxins (Horn et al 1996Go). A. caelatus and A. tamarii show 65% DNA complementationarity, and the DNA sequences differ at three internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and at two nucleotides of the 5' end of the large subunit ribosomal DNA (lsu-rDNA) (Peterson 2000Go).

Vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs) and molecular analysis techniques such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) have become widespread as a means of studying genetic diversity of fungal populations and as useful tools for tracking isolates in nature. VCG analysis based on complementation between nitrate-nonutilizing (nit) mutants was used to study Aspergillus flavus populations in a Georgia peanut field (Horn and Greene 1995Go, Horn et al 1996Go), in an Arizona cotton field (Bayman and Cotty 1991Go, 1993Go) and in corn from Georgia (Papa 1986Go).

McAlpin and Mannarelli (1995)Go constructed the repetitive sequence DNA probe pAF28 from A. flavus NRRL 6541 that could hybridize to a homologous region of the A. flavus genome. Strains of A. flavus producing unique DNA fingerprints with the pAF28 probe are distinguished as different genotypes. The DNA probe was used successfully by McAlpin et al (2002)Go in identifying A. flavus strains as belonging to the VCGs previously determined by Horn and Greene (1995)Go and Papa (1986)Go. The probe also has been used to characterize the genotypic diversity within a population of A. flavus (Wicklow et al 1998Go) and Aspergillus parasiticus (McAlpin et al 1998Go) from an Illinois cornfield as well as the diversity of A. flavus from a peanut field in Georgia (McAlpin et al 2002Go). The pAF28 probe is highly discriminatory and was shown to be an effective tool for epidemiologic tracking of A. flavus isolates by tracing the origin and transmission of clinical and environmental strains causing invasive cutaneous aspergillosis in low-birth-weight infants in a neonatal intensive care unit and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in hematology-oncology patients ( James et al 2000Go). The probe also has been used to estimate the genotypic diversity of the domesticated yellow-green aspergilli, Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus sojae, used in the production of traditional Oriental fermented beverages or foods, including soy sauce, miso and sake (Wicklow et al 2002Go), and to distinguish among aflatoxin-producing clonal populations of Aspergillus bombycis isolated from silkworm-rearing facilities (Goto et al 2003Go).

The ability of the pAF28 probe to approximate the number of VCGs in A. flavus provides us with an opportunity to perform another test of the pAF28 probe’s ability to match DNA fingerprints with VCG determinations using a different species in section Flavi. In this study we examined the ability of the repetitive DNA probe using RFLP analysis to distinguish 43 A. caelatus strains, 32 of which were from a single peanut field in Georgia and have been categorized into 10 VCGs (Horn and Greene 1995Go). Non-toxigenic strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus, when applied to peanut field soils, successfully compete with native aflatoxin-producing strains and thereby reduce aflatoxin contamination of peanuts (Dorner et al 1992Go, 1998Go). Because A. caelatus does not produce any known mycotoxins, it might have a similar biocontrol potential in peanut fields. Therefore it is important that we determine the genotypic diversity of the Georgia population, identify the most prevalent genotype and verify if similar DNA fingerprints represent a single VCG designation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Fungal strains.— – The A. caelatus strains used in this study were obtained from the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois) and are listed in TABLE IGo with their corresponding VCG designations. The cultures include 32 isolates from soil and peanut seed samples collected from a field in southwestern Georgia (Horn and Greene 1995Go); eight isolates from soil samples collected from tea fields in Japan (Peterson et al 2000Go); two isolates from soil collected in agricultural fields in northern Louisiana (NRRL 26015) and central Mississippi (NRRL 26017) received from P.J. Cotty; and NRRL 26303 isolated from a peanut seed in Texas, and received from H.W. Schroeder. All 43 isolates were analyzed by DNA fingerprinting using a repetitive sequence DNA probe pAF28 cloned from A. flavus (McAlpin and Mannarelli 1995Go). The DNA finger-print group assignment of each isolate was compared with its VCG designation as determined by complementation tests using nit mutants (Horn and Greene 1995Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Aspergillus caelatus isolates and their vegetative compatibility group designation
 
Media and cultural conditions.— – Mycelia of A. caelatus were obtained by inoculating 500 mL flasks containing 200 mL of yeast extract-peptone-dextrose broth (YEPD) (McAlpin and Mannarelli 1995Go) with a conidial/hyphal suspension (ca. 105 CFU/mL) from 5–7 d old cultures, then incubating 24 h at 32 C on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm. Mycelia were harvested by filtering through sterile Whatman No. 1 filter paper in a Büchner funnel, rinsing twice with sterile distilled water, transferring to a 50 mL Sarstedt tube, freezing at –80 C and lyophilizing at least 24 h.

DNA isolation and fingerprinting. — – DNA was isolated and purified based on the method of Raeder and Broda (1985)Go which was slightly modified (McAlpin and Mannarelli 1995Go). DNA from each of the A. caelatus isolates was digested with Pst I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Indiana) as specified by the manufacturer and Southern blots were made with a vacuum blotter (Model 785, BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, California). Probes were labeled and DNA fingerprints were observed using the DIG Nonradioactive Nucleic Acid Labeling, Hybridization and Detection System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Membranes were exposed to X-ray films (BioMax MR, Eastman Kodak Imaging Systems, Rochester, New York) at room temperature 1–3 h.

DNA fingerprint analyses. — – DNA hybridization bands representing different molecular weights were compared based on the presence or absence of fragments at a specific position. Banding patterns of strains were compared to determine the similarity or dissimilarity of the bands using the Dice coefficient (Nei and Li 1979Go). Using the NTSYS Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (Rohlf 1997Go), the similarity matrix was obtained and cluster analysis with the SAHN program was made. The SAHN program identifies which strains show identical fingerprints but does not necessarily imply phylogenetic relationships. Phenetic analysis was performed to generate a phenogram using the unweighted-pair-group arithmetic average (UPGMA).

Vegetative compatibility group analyses. — – The 32 isolates of A. caelatus from a single Georgia peanut field (TABLE IGo) previously were categorized into 10 VCGs (Horn and Greene 1995Go). For the additional 11 isolates from Japan, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, nit mutants were created and complementary nit mutants within each isolate were paired on a nitrate medium to ensure self compatibility (Horn and Greene 1995Go). Complementary nit mutants of the 11 strains were paired in all combinations and also were paired with tester nit mutants representing VCGs 1–10.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The pAF28 DNA probe was evaluated for its ability to distinguish among strains of A. caelatus and was found to differentiate successfully the 32 Georgia isolates according to the 10 VCGs reported by Horn and Greene (1995)Go. Three new VCGs (11–13) were identified among five isolates from Japan, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas based on pairings of complementary nit mutants (TABLE IGo); VCGs 11–13 also demonstrated unique fingerprint groups. All strains belonging to the same VCG produced nearly identical DNA fingerprints. VCG 1 (Lanes 2–7, 9–19, 21–24) was the dominant genotype or VCG, which included strains from the United States and a tea field in Kochi Prefecture, Japan (FIG. 1AGo). Two isolates from a tea field in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, NRRL 25576 and 25577, had very similar fingerprints with strains in VCG 1 except for a few minor bands equivalent to 82% similarity but were incompatible vegetatively with VCG 1; therefore, VCG 12 was created to accommodate these strains (FIG. 1BGo).



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A. DNA fingerprints of Aspergillus caelatus isolates belonging to the same vegetative compatibility group have nearly identical fingerprints. (Lane 1 = Lambda; Lanes 2–7, 9–19, 21–24 = VCG 1; Lanes 8 and 20 = NRRL 19997, reference strain.) B. Aspergillus caelatus isolates belonging to vegetative compatibility groups 2–13 and size marker (Lambda). (Lane 1 = Lambda; Lanes 2–5 = VCG 2; Lanes 6–8 = VCG 3; Lanes 9–10 = VCG 12; Lanes 11–12 = VCG 13; Lanes 13–20 = VCGs 4–11).

 
VCG 2 (Lanes 2–5) was represented by four isolates (NRRL 26115, 26116, 26118, 26127), VCG 3 (Lanes 6–8) by three isolates (NRRL 26124, 26126, 26130), VCG 12 (Lanes 9–10) by two isolates (NRRL 25576, 25577), and VCG 13 (Lanes 11–12) by two isolates (NRRL 26017 and 26306) (FIG. 1BGo). VCGs 4–11 (Lanes 13–20) were represented by single isolates (NRRL 26101, 26102, 26103, 26108, 26117, 26119, 26125, 26015), each with a unique DNA fingerprint (FIG. 2Go). The phenogram from UPGMA analysis compared the DNA fingerprint patterns of the 43 isolates with corresponding similarity coefficients of the clustered strains (FIG. 2Go).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. UPGMA analysis of 32 isolates of Aspergillus caelatus from a Georgia peanut field, one isolate each from Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, and eight isolates from Japan using the Dice similarity coefficient calculated from hybridization bands with pAF28 DNA probe. The similarity coefficients of the clustered strains correspond with the DNA fingerprint patterns of the isolates belonging to the same vegetative compatibility group. Unique isolates do not share similar coefficients. The phenogram was generated using NTSYS-pc 2.01.

 
The majority of isolates produced relatively few bands. Based on the three classes of hybridization patterns described by Goodwin et al (1992)Go, the bands produced by the pAF28 probe with A. caelatus genomic DNA were classified as moderately repetitive, having 5–19 fragments with 100% of the isolates. No highly repetitive (20 or more fragments) or low copy (1–4 fragments) patterns were detected. Many of the A. caelatus isolates hybridized weakly with the pAF28 repetitive DNA sequence and hybridization bands were difficult to decipher, requiring repeated Southern blots with more genomic DNA and longer film exposures to get darker bands.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
A. caelatus isolates belonging to the same fingerprint group exhibited 100% similarity and were considered to be of the same genotype. Isolates within the same fingerprint group and sharing DNA profiles at greater than or equal to 80% similarity have been considered to belong to the same VCG (McAlpin et al 1998Go, McAlpin et al 2002Go). In this study, NRRL 25576 and 25577 from Japan were compatible and shared 82% similarity with the VCG 1 isolates. These two isolates belong to the same DNA fingerprint group based on the criterion used previously (Xia et al 1993Go, Wicklow et al 1998Go) and were clustered together in the same phenetic subgroup with VCG 1 (FIG. 2Go); however, they were incompatible with all of the VCG 1 strains. Isolates belonging to the same fingerprint group (similarity coefficient of 80% or more) may not necessarily be compatible because vegetative compatibility is governed by multiple vegetative incompatibility (het) loci. Heterokaryon formation can occur only between strains with identical alleles at each of the loci controlling vegetative compatibility (Caten 1971Go, Croft 1987Go). A. caelatus strains within a VCG are usually quite similar with respect to morphology and other characters (Horn et al 1996Go). Therefore it is possible that the morphologically and genotypically similar isolates NRRL 25576 and 25577 have developed genetic changes in vegetative compatibility and that enough genetic divergence has occurred to impede heterokaryon formation (Anagnostakis and Waggoner 1981Go, Gordon and Okamoto 1991Go). Isolation due to differences in ecological niches may be responsible for differences in compatibility systems between genotypically similar strains as a result of accumulated mutations that restrict gene flow (Brasier and Hansen 1992Go, Harlton et al 1995Go). Such highly similar clonal genotypes can be inferred to represent the same clonal lineage (Anderson and Kohn 1995Go).

Most of the A. caelatus isolates produced fewer restriction fragments and weakly hybridized with the repetitive DNA probe pAF28 compared to hybridization patterns obtained with A. flavus, suggesting less homology of the probe to A. caelatus genomic DNA. The pAF28 probe has been sequenced and it was determined that this 6.3 kb genomic insert from A. flavus encodes a retrotransposon-like element designated as AfRTL-1 (Okubara et al 2003Go), which includes motifs and open reading frames characteristic of mobile transposable elements of the gypsy class and similar retrotansposons reported in other fungi. The reduced ability of the pAF28 probe to bind with altered genomic DNA resulting from deletions and other types of mutations might explain the low intensity of the banding patterns in A. caelatus, as has been proposed for A. bombycis genotypes with faint banding patterns (Goto et al 2003Go).

VCG 1 was the dominant genotype of A. caelatus in this study and included isolates from both the United States and Japan. The presence of identical genotypes among isolates from two geographically distant countries suggests a strong clonal component in its lineage (Kistler 1997Go). The six A. caelatus isolates from a mature tea plantation in Kochi Prefecture belong to VCG 1, while two genotypically similar isolates from a tea plantation in Shizouka Prefecture belong to VCG 12. These A. caelatus cultures were included among 57 isolates of Aspergillus section Flavi obtained from 27 of the 136 soil samples collected from tea fields in 10 Prefectures of Japan (Ito et al 1999Go). The prevalent microbial (fungal) populations in tea field soils are presumed to have become adapted to the edaphic environment of established tea plantations, which includes a negative rhizosphere effect, inhibitory compounds from decomposing leaf litter (Pandey and Palni 1996Go), and decades of annual NPK fertilizer applications resulting in soil acidification (Ito et al 1999Go). Clonal populations of A. caelatus VCG 1 and VCG 12 likewise might have become adapted to this long established and relatively undisturbed edaphic environment. The failure to demonstrate the presence of more than one A. caelatus genotype (VCG) among isolates from tea plantations in Kochi and Shizuoka Prefectures could point to: (i) an overall lack of A. caelatus genotypic diversity in Japan; (ii) the superior competitive ability of a founding population of VCG 1. The production of sclerotia would contribute to long-term survival while Aspergillus conidia function in dispersal and substrate colonization, thus precluding the establishment of potential competitors. Papa (1986)Go theorized that while wind dispersal of A. flavus conidia would allow for considerable mixing of genotypes within a given area, the amount of inoculum associated with measures of genotypic diversity could be maintained through the formation and overwintering of sclerotia. Persistent asexual reproductive structures such as conidia or sclerotia may remain stationary, producing an uneven distribution of genotypes in uncultivated native soils, but become spatially rearranged or mixed within fields when soil is cultivated (Gordon et al 1992Go, Anderson and Kohn 1995Go). While only A. caelatus VCG 1 was recorded from soil samples collected at different points with a tea plantation in Kochi Prefecture, Horn and Greene (1995)Go recorded VCG 1 along with nine other genotypes (VCGs) of A. caelatus from a single field cultivated to peanuts in southwestern Georgia. Fields where peanuts are grown also are planted with rotation crops such as corn, cotton and soybean, which require different tillage practices, fertilizers and pesticides. When considered together, these agronomic practices represent major and varied disturbances affecting soil microbial communities. The disruption of established microbial communities and the presence of a greater variety of crop residues for fungal colonization could present opportunities for less competitive genotypes to enter such crop fields. A. caelatus is not known from any natural ecosystem. Additional collections of A. caelatus from other areas of the world are necessary to characterize more fully the distribution of VCGs.

This research provided evidence that DNA finger-printing using the repetitive DNA probe pAF28 can match DNA fingerprints with VCGs in A. caelatus, a species of Aspergillus from section Flavi. Some strains belonging to the same fingerprint group were incompatible with one another and therefore only 12 of the 13 VCGs were detected in A. caelatus by RFLP analysis. Species-specific retrotransposon-like repeated sequences represented by pAF28 have been shown to be highly reproducible and reliable for characterizing genetic populations in A. fumigatus Fresenius (Girardin et al 1993Go, Neuveglise et al 1996Go), A. flavus (Wicklow et al 1998Go, James et al 2000Go, McAlpin et al 2002Go), A. parasiticus (McAlpin et al 1998Go), domesticated koji strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus (Wicklow et al 2002Go) and A. bombycis isolates from silkworm cultivation (Goto et al 2003Go).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr Tetsuhisa Goto for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication June 28, 2004.

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: mcalpice{at}ncaur.usda.gov


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Anagnostakis SL, Waggoner PE. 1981. Hypovirulence, vegetative compatibility and the growth of cankers of chestnut blight. Phytopathology 71:1198–1202.

Anderson JB, Kohn LM. 1995. Clonality in soilborne, plant-pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 33:369–391.[CrossRef]

Bayman P, Cotty PJ. 1991. Vegetative compatibility and genetic diversity in the Aspergillus flavus population of a single field. Can J Bot 69:1707–1711.[CrossRef]

———, ———. 1993. Genetic diversity in Aspergillus flavus: association with aflatoxin production and morphology. Can J Bot 71:23–31.

Brasier CM, Hansen EM. 1992. Evolutionary biology of Phytophthora. Part II. Phylogeny, speciation and population structure. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:173–200.

Caten CE. 1971. Heterokaryon incompatibility in imperfect species of Aspergillus. Heredity 26:299–312.[CrossRef][Medline]

Croft JH. 1987. Genetic variation and evolution in Aspergillus. In: Rayner ADM, Brasier CM, Moore D, eds. Evolutionary biology of the fungi. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. p 311–323.

Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Blankenship PD. 1992. Use of a bio-competitive agent to control preharvest aflatoxin in drought stressed peanuts. J Food Prot 55:888–892.

———, ———, ———. 1998. Effect of inoculum rate of biological control agents on preharvest aflatoxin contamination of peanuts. Biol Cont 12:171–176.

Girardin H, Latge JP, Srikantha T, Morrow B, Soll DR. 1993. Development of DNA probes for fingerprinting Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 31:1547–1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goodwin SB, Drenth A, Fry WE. 1992. Cloning and genetic analyses of two highly polymorphic, moderately repetitive nuclear DNAs from Phytophthora infestans. Curr Genet 22:107–115.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gordon TR, Okamoto D. 1991. Vegetative compatibilty of groupings in a local population of Fusarium oxysporum. Can J Bot 69:168–172.

———, ———, Milgroom MG. 1992. The structure and interrelationship of fungal populations in native and cultivated soils. Mol Ecol 1:241–249.[CrossRef]

Goto T, Wicklow DT, McAlpin CE, Peterson SW. 2003. Aspergillus bombycis genotypes (RFLP) from silkworm cultivation. Mycoscience 44:209–215.

Hamann A, Fuller F, Osiewacz HD. 2000. Yeti, a degenerate gypsy-like LTR retrotransposon in the filamentous ascomycete Podospora anserina. Curr Genet 38:132–140.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harlton CE, Levesque CA, Punja ZK. 1995. Genetic diversity in Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii and related species. Phytopathology 85:1269–1281.[CrossRef]

Horn BW. 1997. Aspergillus caelatus, a new species in section Flavi. Mycotaxon 61:185–191.

———, Dorner JW. 1998. Soil populations of Aspergillus species from section Flavi along a transect through peanut-growing regions of the United States. Mycologia 90:767–776.[CrossRef]

———, ———. 1995. Vegetative compatibility within populations of Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii from a peanut field. Mycologia 87:324–332.[CrossRef]

Horn BW, Greene RL, Sobolev VS, Dorner JW, Powell JH, Layton RC. 1996. Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii. Mycologia 88:574–587.[CrossRef]

Ito Y, Peterson SW, Goto T. 1999. Properties of Aspergillus tamarii, A. caelatus and related species from acidic tea field soils in Japan. Mycopathologia 144:169–175.

James MJ, Lasker BA, McNeil MM, Shelton M, Warnock DW, Reiss E. 2000. Use of repetitive DNA probe to type clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus from a cluster of cutaneous infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 38:3612–3618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kistler HC. 1997. Genetic diversity in the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology 87:474–479.[CrossRef]

McAlpin CE, Mannarelli B. 1995. Construction and characterization of a DNA probe for distinguishing strains of Aspergillus flavus. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1068–1072.[Abstract]

———, Wicklow DT, Platis CE. 1998. Genotypic diversity of Aspergillus parasiticus in an Illinois cornfield. Plant Dis 82:1132–1136.[CrossRef]

———, ———, Horn BW. 2002. DNA fingerprinting analysis of vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus from a peanut field in Georgia. Plant Dis 86:254–258.[CrossRef]

Nei M, Li W-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neuveglise C, Sarfati J, Latge JP, Paris S. 1996. Afut1, a retrotransposon-like element from Aspergillus fumigatus. Nucleic Acid Res 24:1428–1434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Okubara PA, Tibbot BK, Tarun AS, McAlpin CE, Hua ST. 2003. A genomic clone of Aspergillus flavus encoding a retrotransposon-like sequence. Mycol Res 107:841–846.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pandey A, Palni LMS. 1996. The rhizosphere effect of tea on soil microbes in a Himalayan monsoonal location. Biol Fertil Soils 21:131–137.

Papa KE. 1986. Heterokaryon incompatibility in Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia 78:98–101.

Peterson SW. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in Aspergillus based on rDNA sequence analysis. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, eds. Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers. p 447–458.

———, Horn BW, Ito Y, Goto T. 2000. Genetic variation and aflatoxin production in Aspergillus tamarii and A. caelatus. In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, eds. Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers. p 447–458.

Raeder U, Broda P. 1985. Rapid isolation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1:17–20.

Rohlf FJ. 1997. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.01. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.

Wicklow DT, McAlpin CE, Peterson SW. 2002. Common genotypes (RFLP) within a diverse collection of yellow-green aspergilli used to produce traditional Oriental fermented foods. Mycoscience 43:289–297.[CrossRef]

Wicklow DT, McAlpin CE, Platis CE. 1998. Characterization of the Aspergillus flavus population within an Illinois maize field. Mycol Res 102:263–268.[CrossRef]

Xia JQ, Correll JC, Lee FN, Marchetti MA, Rhoads DP. 1993. DNA fingerprinting to examine microgeographic variation in Magnaporthe grisea (Pyricularia grisea) in two rice fields in Arkansas. Phytopathology 83:1029–1035.[CrossRef]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McAlpin, C.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wicklow, D.T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS