| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Universität Tübingen, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tuberculina species are mitosporic parasites of rust fungi. It was demonstrated recently that Tuberculina represents the asexual life stage of the plant-parasitic genus Helicobasidium. Here we reveal the host specificities of Tuberculina and Helicobasidium species on rust fungal hosts by means of infection experiments and molecular analyses. We inoculated species of the rust genera Chrysomyxa, Coleosporium, Cronartium, Gymnosporangium, Puccinia, Tranzschelia and Uromyces with conidia and with basidiospores of Helicobasidium longisporum and H. purpureum and with conidia of Tuberculina maxima, T. persicina and T. sbrozzii. In addition we analyzed base sequences from the nuclear ITS region of 51 Tuberculina and Helicobasidium specimens collected in the field together with the sequences from the Tuberculina infections obtained by infection experiments. The resulting data show that at least six monophyletic lineages are within the Tuberculina/Helicobasidium-group that can be unambiguously distinguished by combining molecular and morphological characters and by specific host spectra of the Tuberculina-stage. This diversity opens up new vistas on the evolution of this exceptional mycoparasitic-phytoparasitic fungal group.
Key words: Helicobasidium, host specificity, infection experiments, ITS, Tuberculina, molecular phylogeny, mycoparasitism, Urediniomycetes
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the strong inhibitory effect of Tuberculina on rust spore production has resulted in extensive research dealing with Tuberculina as an agent in biological rust control (for review see Wicker 1981
), the relationship among Tuberculina, rusts and plants was the subject of controversy. Tuberculina species have been interpreted as mycoparasites specific to rusts (Kirulis 1940
, Tubeuf 1901
, Tulasne 1854
, Zambettakis et al 1985
), as nonspecific parasites on several substrates (Petrak 1956
, Schroeter 1889
) or even as specialized parasites on rust-infected plant tissues (Biraghi 1940
; Hulea 1939
; Marchal 1902
; Wicker and Woo 1969
, 1973
). Thus plant parasites and parasites of non-rust fungi were included in the genus adopting a concept based on morphological characters (Ellis 1893
, Patouillard and Gaillard 1888
). Other authors used a species concept based on host specificities, distinguishing Tuberculina species on different rust hosts (Spegazzini 1880
, 1884
) or even plant hosts (Gobi 1885
). However, Barkai-Golan (1959)
demonstrated that Tuberculina could not infect rust-free plants and we recently substantiated the mycoparasitic nature of Tuberculina persicina on rust fungal hosts by ultrastructural observations that reveal a specific and morphologically uncommon cellular interaction via large fusion pores with a direct cytoplasm-cytoplasm connection and interspecific transfer of Tuberculina-nuclei to rust hyphae (Bauer et al 2004
, Lutz et al 2004b
).
Even though several authors described Tuberculina species based on the occurrence on different hosts (e.g., Spegazzini 1880
, 1884
) and the vast majority of Tuberculina maxima specimens are described from Cronartium- and Gymnosporangium- hosts, no experimental proof for host specificity of any Tuberculina species was provided. On the contrary, Barkai-Golan (1959)
demonstrated that Tuberculina persicina specimens from one rust host are capable of infecting several other rust species.
In this report, we present both results of infection experiments and molecular data that reveal the host specificities of several Tuberculina and Helicobasidium lineages, respectively, on their rust fungal hosts. These findings yield new insights in the TuberculinaHelicobasidium life cycle and in the diversity of the group.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have gathered data on inoculated rust species, the species used as inocula, the results of the different inoculations, the respective kind of inoculum and the respective experimental approach of the different inoculations (TABLE I
).
|
We used two kinds of inocula: (i) We collected intensively sporulating basidiocarps of Helicobasidium longisporum and H. purpureum in the field, tore the fresh basidiocarps into pieces of about 4 square cm and tagged the pieces to pear trees at the same places where we had fixed the rust inocula before (cf. below); (ii) basidiospores from freshly collected basidiocarps (pieces of about 4 cm2 were used) or conidia were shaken vigorously by hand in tap water (75 mL). The conidia were either from freshly collected Tuberculina sporodochia or from sporodochia that were conserved at 18 C in a freezer (cf. Wicker and Wells 1968
) (in both cases we used about 20 sporodochia) or from Tuberculina or Helicobasidium cultures (about 3 g of fungal material were used). The inoculum was spread over the top and the underside of rust-infected leaves with a brush. In every case we inoculated the rusts with their hyperparasites as soon as the rust spermogonia were mature.
The rusts for inoculation were obtained in four different ways. Accordingly, four experimental settings were established. (i) Rust-infected plants growing in nature were used (Chrysomyxa rhododendri on Picea abies, Coleosporium tussilaginis on Pinus sylvestris, Cronartium ribicola on Pinus aristata, Gymnosporangium cornutum on Sorbus aucuparia, Puccinia sessilis on Allium ursinum, and Tranzschelia prunispinosae on Anemone ranunculoides). We chose places where we were not able to detect any Tuberculina infection in the previous growth season. We divided the places in isolated areas where we inoculated the rust infected plants and areas without inoculation for control. (ii) We inoculated pear trees growing in nature with Gymnosporangium sabinae to obtain heavy rust infections. To this end we attached freshly collected branches of Juniperus sp., which showed intensive infections with germinating and sporulating teliospores of Gymnosporangium sabinae to several distant trees where we were not able to detect any Tuberculina infection in the previous vegetation period. One rust-inoculated, isolated tree at each location served as control and was not inoculated with the hyperparasite. (iii) We transferred Euphorbia cyparissias plants that systemically were infected by Uromyces pisi s.l., young shoots of Vinca major infected with Puccinia vincae and little Pinus sylvestris trees infected with Coleosporium tussilaginis from nature to our greenhouse. The plants inoculated with the hyperparasite and control plants were cultivated in different houses. After inoculation the single plants were incubated 3 d under transparent plastic bags to provide high relative humidity. (iv) We cultivated Taraxacum officinale agg. in our greenhouse and infected the plants with Puccinia silvatica using the wire net method (Kakishima et al 1999
). Freshly collected leaves of Carex brizoides L. harboring sori of teliospores of the rust, which were incubated at room temperature 3 d in plastic bags at high humidity, served as inoculum. Inoculation with the hyperparasite and control were handled as in (iii).
Inoculated plants and the control then were observed until the respective rusts completed their life cycles on the respective host plant. If sporodochia were detected, the Tuberculina infection was verified microscopically and a part of the material was conserved for further examinations.
Field observations.
We checked several rust species growing in an area of 200 square m around several sporulating basidiocarps of Helicobasidium purpureum for Tuberculina infections during 2 y, and we introduced some additional plant species harboring young spermogonia of different rust species at that place (TABLE II
).
|
Molecular analyses.
We isolated genomic DNA from 41 herbarium specimens and from four cultures on artificial media of Tuberculina and Helicobasidium, respectively (TABLE III
). We followed the methods of isolation and crushing of fungal material, DNA extraction, amplification, purification of PCR products, sequencing and processing of raw data of Lutz et al (2004b)
. To ensure that the observed Tuberculina infections could be ascribed to the respective inocula and to infer the phylogeny of the sampled Tuberculina and Helicobasidium specimens, we amplified the ITS1/2 region of the rDNA including the 5.8S rDNA (ITS, about 600 bp) using the primer pair ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al 1990
). For amplification of the ITS region we adjusted the annealing temperature to 45 C. DNA sequences determined for this study were deposited in GenBank (TABLE III
).
|
DNA sequences were aligned under default settings with Clustal X (Thompson et al 1997
). The alignment subsequently was improved with Rascal (Thompson et al 2003
). We did not manipulate the alignment by hand or excluded any positions as recommended by Giribet and Wheeler (1999)
and Gatesy et al (1993)
, respectively. The final alignment (75 sequences; length 598 bp, 103 variable sites) and the published tree are deposited in TreeBase (http:// treebase.bio.buffalo.edu/treebase/) with the study accession number S1061 and the matrix accession number M1811. Sequence distances were computed with the MEGALIGN module of the Lasergene package (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wisconsin).
To estimate phylogenetic relationships we used a Bayesian approach of phylogenetic inference using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique as implemented in the computer program MrBayes 3.0b4 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001
). For Bayesian analysis, the data first were analyzed with MrModeltest 1.0b ( J.A.A. Nylander, Upsala University, Sweden; Posada and Crandall 1998
) to find the most appropriate model of DNA substitution. The hierarchical likelihood ratio test proposed the DNA substitution model of Hasegawa, Kishino and Yano (HKY, Hasegawa et al 1985
) with gamma distributed substitution rates (see Swofford et al 1996
). Thus, four incrementally heated simultaneous Markov chains were run over 2 000 000 generations using the HKY model of DNA substitution with gamma distributed substitution rates, random starting trees and default starting parameters of the DNA substitution model. Trees were sampled every 100 generations, resulting in an overall sampling of 20 001 trees. From these, the first 1001 trees were discarded (burn in = 1001). The trees (19 000)* remained static and were used to compute a 50% majority rule consensus tree to obtain estimates for the a posteriori probabilities of groups of species. This Bayesian approach of phylogenetic analysis was repeated 10 times to test the independence of the results from topological priors (cf. Huelsenbeck et al 2002
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Field observations.
We have provided results of our 2 y observation of the rust flora, including some experimentally introduced rust species, around Helicobasidium purpureum basidiocarps (TABLE II
).
Infection pattern.
Analyzing the pattern of infection and noninfection of the sampled rust species, the differences in the susceptibility of different rust hosts with respect to Helicobasidium and Tuberculina species and even to specimens of Tuberculina persicina became obvious. Tuberculina obtained from Helicobasidium purpureum infections were restricted to Puccinia spp., Tranzschelia prunispinosae and Uromyces pisi s.l., and in either case the inoculations resulted in Tuberculina persicina infections. Tuberculina persicina conidia from sporodochia on Puccinia silvatica could infect only Puccinia silvatica and Uromyces pisi s.l. For both inocula, we never obtained infections of Chrysomyxa, Coleosporium, Cronartium and Gymnosporangium species. The field observation is of the same tenor. Tuberculina persicina infections presumably caused by Helicobasidium purpureum basidiospores never were observed on Coleosporium and Gymnosporangium species but on several other rusts, whereat the host spectrum is extended to Melampsora, Ochropsora and other Puccinia, Tranzschelia and Uromyces species (TABLE II
). In contrast, Helicobasidium longisporum caused only Tuberculina persicina infections of Gymnosporangium spp. and Tuberculina persicina conidia from sporodochia on Gymnosporangium sabinae were successful only on Gymnosporangium spp. For both inocula, we never obtained infections of Chrysomyxa, Coleosporium, Cronartium, Puccinia, Tranzschelia and Uromyces species. Tuberculina maxima conidia from sporodochia on Gymnosporangium sabinae were successful only on the original host Gymnosporangium sabinae, never on Chrysomyxa, Coleosporium, Cronartium, Puccinia, Tranzschelia and Uromyces species. Puccinia vincae was susceptible only to Tuberculina sbrozzii conidia from sporodochia, which were collected on the same host, and not to Tuberculina maxima, T. persicina, Helicobasidium longisporum and H. purpureum.
Molecular analyses. The first aim of molecular analyses was to test whether the Tuberculina infections obtained in the infection experiments actually originated from the respective inocula. In fact we observed identical ITS base sequences for Helicobasidium purpureum (AY254189 [GenBank] , AY460132 [GenBank] ) and Tuberculina persicina inocula (AY460169 [GenBank] ) and the respective T. persicina infections (AY254190 [GenBank] , AY254191 [GenBank] , AY254192 [GenBank] , AY254193 [GenBank] , AY460167 [GenBank] , AY460168 [GenBank] , AY460174 [GenBank] , AY460175 [GenBank] ), H. longisporum (AY254187 [GenBank] , AY254188 [GenBank] ) and T. persicina inocula (AY460155 [GenBank] ) and the respective T. persicina infections (AY254194 [GenBank] , AY254195 [GenBank] , AY460152 [GenBank] , AY460153 [GenBank] ), T. maxima inoculum (AY460141 [GenBank] ) and the respective infection (AY460138 [GenBank] ), and T. sbrozzii inoculum (AY460171 [GenBank] ) and the respective infection (AY460172 [GenBank] ).
Furthermore, we inferred the phylogenetic relationships of the specimens used in the infection experiments together with specimens collected in the field and sequences from GenBank that cover most of the hitherto known diversity of the Helicobasidium/Tuberculina-group. The Bayesian phylogenetic analyses yielded consistent topologies. We present the consensus tree of one run to illustrate the results (FIG. 1
). The topology is consistent with recent analyses of ITS (Uetake et al 2002
), LSU (Lutz et al 2004b
) and combined ITS/LSU (Lutz et al 2004a
) sequence datasets, but more taxa are included and it provides higher resolution. The phylogenetic hypothesis reveals two major groups with considerable genetic distance. The first consists of Helicobasidium mompa and the sister taxa H. longisporum I and H. longisporum II (each with the mitosporic life stage Tuberculina persicina). The second group comprises two clusters of T. maxima, one composed of specimens with Gymnosporangium sabinae-hosts (designated as T. maxima II), the other with Cronartium-hosts (designated as T. maxima I), and a group of H. purpureum, T. persicina and T. sbrozzii specimens. While the a posteriori probabilities for the branching in the H. mompa/H. longisporum-group are ideal, the Tuberculina maxima II-group lacks any support and the sister-group relationship of the highly supported H. purpureum-group (a posteriori probability 100%) and of the moderately supported Tuberculina maxima I-group (87%) is supported only weakly (75%). Within the H. purpureum-cluster, all specimens of T. sbrozzii fall into one clade.
|
All Tuberculina specimens collected in the field observation area around H. purpureum basidiocarps cluster in the H. purpureum-group (cf. black stars in FIG. 1
). In contrast to the infection experiments, two sequences of Tuberculina specimens collected in the field observation area (AY460165
[GenBank]
, AY460170
[GenBank]
) show a divergence of 0.5% compared to that of the presumable inoculum (Helicobasidium purpureum AY254189
[GenBank]
) and compared to those of the other observed infections and a divergence of 0.4% compared to each other.
It is of interest to note that ITS sequences from specimens collected at distant places are identical in the groups H. mompa (the sampled sequences just represent many others from GenBank, which are identical), H. longisporum I, T. maxima II, and T. sbrozzii. In contrast, sequence variability ranges from identity to 1.3% divergence in H. purpureum and from identity to 0.7% divergence in H. longisporum II. In T. maxima I the specimens from North America (AY292435 [GenBank] , AY292436 [GenBank] , AY292437 [GenBank] , AY460136 [GenBank] ) possess identical ITS sequences and show 1.3% divergence compared to the European specimen (AY460135 [GenBank] ).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The combination of host specificities, morphological and molecular characters reveals more lineages within the Tuberculina/Helicobasidium-group than hitherto distinguished (in the case of Tuberculina see Ellis and Ellis 1988
; for Helicobasidium see Roberts 1999
, Uetake et al 2002
) and consequently demands a revision of the species concept within the group to cope adequately with the diversity. The genus Tuberculina should be restricted to rust parasites, and species delimitation requires both morphological and molecular characters, as well as information about the host spectrum. Taxonomical conclusions are in preparation.
Diversity and evolution of the Tuberculina/Helicobasidium-group.
Synopsis of host specificities, ecology, morphological and molecular characters reveals these seven groups (cf. FIG. 1
):
Our results further suggest that lineages might have evolved that have lost the Helicobasidium-stage (Tuberculina maxima I, T. maxima II and T. sbrozzii). T. maxima II is common in Germany, but we were not able to detect any referring Helicobasidium specimen. The same is true for T. maxima I in North America. Both species parasitize rusts that are perennial, and both species are proven to be capable of overwintering as perennial mycelia with their rust fungal hosts in plant tissues and as spores (Wicker and Wells 1968
, our observations). The capacity to overwinter might be due to the larger spores with thicker spore walls compared to Tuberculina persicina or T. sbrozzii. Thus, the soil-borne, perennial Helicobasidium-stage is not needed. In addition, Tuberculina sclerotia, the very structures that presumably mark the changeover from the Tuberculina- to the Helicobasidium-stage (Lutz et al 2004a
), are unknown for T. maxima. The loss of the Tuberculina-stage involves a loss of sexual reproduction and consequently should result in a clonal population structure, which might be reflected by the uniformity of the ITS base sequences. Without exception the ITS sequences of T. maxima II specimens collected from northern Germany to southern Austria are identical, just as the T. maxima I sequences from North American specimens are. In that context, T. maxima I AY460135
[GenBank]
from Europe has to be assigned to a clone of itself. The sequences of the T. sbrozzii specimens collected in England, France, Germany, Italy and Madeira are identical too, it should be noted. In addition, their host rusts Puccinia cribrata and P. vincae are perennial (Gäumann 1959
). T. sbrozzii possibly has evolved as clonal lineage accompanying P. vincae and closest relatives. The Tuberculina species that have lost the phytoparasitic Helicobasidium-stage still might be considered potential agents in biological rust control.
Our infection experiments finally reveal that not only Tuberculina conidia (cf. Barkai-Golan 1959
, Vladimirskaya 1939
, Wicker and Kimmey 1967
) but also both Helicobasidium conidia formed in culture and basidiospores serve the same purpose: the infection of rust hosts. This might explain the observation of Ikeda et al (2003)
that single basidiospore isolates of Helicobasidium mompa are not pathogenic with respect to plants; it also might explain the observation that, despite extensive research, no Helicobasidium infections of plants from inoculations with Helicobasidium basidiospores were reported.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Corresponding author. E-mail: matthias.lutz{at}uni-tuebingen.de
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, Iwasaki Y, Kano S, Yotsutani Y, Morinaga T. 2003b. Heterologous diploid nuclei in the violet root rot fungus, Helicobasidium mompa. Mycol Res 107:10601068.[Medline]
Barkai-Golan R. 1959. Tuberculina persicina (Ditm.) Sacc. attacking rust fungi in Israel. B Res Counc Israel/D 8: 4146.
Bauer R, Lutz M, Oberwinkler F. 2004. Tuberculina- rusts: a unique basidiomycetous interfungal cellular interaction with horizontal nuclear transfer. Mycologia 96: 960967.
Biraghi A. 1940. Osservazioni e considerazioni su Tuberculina sbrozzii Cav. et Sacc. associata a Puccinia vincae Berk. Bollettino della Stazione di Patologia Vegetale 20: 7180.
Buddin W, Wakefield EM. 1924. Some observations on the growth of Rhizoctonia crocorum (Pers.) DC. in pure culture. Ann Appl Biol 11:292309.
Cavara F, Saccardo PA. 1889. Tuberculina sbrozzii nov. spec. parassita delle foglie di Vinca major L. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano 6:323328.
Duggar BM. 1915. Rhizoctonia crocorum (Pers.) DC. and R. solani Kühn (Corticium vagum B. & C.), with notes on other species. Ann Mo Bot Gard 2:403458.
Ellis JP. 1893. Description of some new species of fungi. Journal of Mycology 7:274278.
Ellis MB, Ellis JP. 1988. Microfungi on miscellaneous substrates. London, Sydney, Portland: Croom Helm, Timber Press. 244 p.
Farr DF, Rossman AY, Palm ME, McCray EB. 2003. Fungal Databases, Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved October 31, 2003, from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/.
Gatesy J, DeSalle R, Wheeler W. 1993. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:152157.[Medline]
Gäumann E. 1959. Die Rostpilze Mitteleuropas. Bern: Buechler. 1407 p.
Giribet G, Wheeler WC. 1999. On gaps. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13:132143.[Medline]
Gobi C. 1885. Über den Tubercularia persicina Ditm. genannten Pilz. Mémoires de lAcadémie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg Série 7, 32:126.
Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T-A. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160174.[Medline]
Hering TF. 1962. Host range of the violet root rot fungus, Helicobasidium purpureum Pat. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 45: 488494.
Hubert EE. 1935. Observations on Tuberculina maxima, a parasite of Cronartium ribicola. Phytopathology 25:253261.
Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst Biol 51:673688.[Medline]
, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics Applications Note 17:754755.
Hulea A. 1939. Contributions à la connaissance des champignons commensaux des Urédinées. Bulletin de la Section Scientifique de lAcadémie Roumaine 22:196214.
Ikeda K, Nakamura H, Matsumoto N. 2003. Mycelial incompatibility operative in pairings between single basidios-pre isolates of Helicobasidium mompa. Mycol Res 107: 847853.[Medline]
Itô K. 1949. Studies on "Murasakimompa" disease caused by Helicobasidium mompa Tanaka. Bulletin of the Government Forest Experiment Station 43:1126.
Kakishima M, Yokoi M, Harada Y. 1999. Puccinia carici-adenocauli, a new rust fungus on Carex, and its anamorph, Aecidium adenocauli. Mycoscience 40:503507.
Katsumata H, Ogata T, Matsumoto N. 1996. Population structure of Helicobasidium mompa in an apple orchard in Fukushima. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 62:490491.
Kirulis A. 1940. Mikroskopiskas senes ka augu slimibu da-bigie ienaidnieki latvija. Arbeiten der Landwirtschaf-tlichen Akademie Mitau/Lauksaimniecibas 1:479536.
Lutz M, Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. 2004a. Tuberculina-Thanatophytum/Rhizoctonia crocorum-Helicobasidium: a unique mycoparasitic-phytoparasitic life strategy. Mycol Res 108:227238.[Medline]
, Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Triebel D. 2004b. Tuberculina: rust relatives attack rusts. Mycologia, 96:614626.
Maier W, Begerow D, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F. 2003. Phylogeny of the rust fungi: an approach using nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Can J Bot 81: 1223.
Marchal E. 1902. Le Tuberculina persicina. Bulletin de la Société Centrale Forestière de Belgique 9:332333.
Mielke JL. 1933. Tuberculina maxima in western North America. Phytopathology 23:299305.
Patouillard N, Gaillard A. 1888. Champignons du Vénézué-la et principalment de la région du Haut-Orénoque, récoltés en 1887 par M. A. Gaillard. B Soc Mycol Fr 4: 92129.
Petrak F. 1956. Beiträge zur türkischen Pilzflora. Sydowia 10:101111.
Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817818.
Roberts P. 1999. Rhizoctonia-forming fungi. Kent: Whitstable Litho Printers Ltd. 239 p.
Schroeter J. 1889. Die Pilze Schlesiens. Vol 3. Lehre: Cramer. 814 p.
Spegazzini C. 1880. Fungi argentini. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 10:533.
. 1884. Fungi guaranitici. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 17:119134.
Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable B, eds. Molecular systematics. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. p 407514.
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:48764882.
, Thierry JC, Poch O. 2003. Rascal: rapid scanning and correction of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 19:11551161.
Tubeuf C. 1901. Über Tuberculina maxima, einen Parasiten des Weymouthskiefern-Blasenrostes. Arbeiten aus der Biologischen Abteilung für Land- und Forstwirtschaft am Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte 2:169173.
Tulasne RL. 1854. Second mémoire sur les Urédinées et les Ustilaginées. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Série 4, 2:77196.
Uetake Y, Arakawa M, Nakamura H, Akahira T, Sayama A, Cheah L-H, Okabe I, Matsumoto N. 2002. Genetic relationships among violet root rot fungi as revealed by hyphal anastomosis and sequencing of the rDNA ITS regions. Mycol Res 106:156163.
, Nakamura H, Ikeda K, Arakawa M, Matsumoto N. 2003. Helicobasidium mompa isolates from sweet potato in continuous monoculture fields. J Gen Plant Pathol 69:4244.
Viennot-Bourgin G. 1949. Les champignons parasites. Paris: Masson et Cie. 1850 p.
Vladimirskaya ME. 1939. A parasite of crop plant rust, Tuberculina persicina (Ditm.) Sacc. Bulletin of Plant Protection 1:103110.
White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press. p 315322.
Wicker EF. 1981. Natural control of white pine blister rust by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathology 71:9971000.
, Kimmey JW. 1967. Mode and time of infection of western pine blister rust cankers by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathology 57:1010.
, Wells JM. 1968. Overwintering of Tuberculina maxima on white pine blister rust cankers. Phytopathology 58:391.
, Woo JY. 1969. Differential response of invading Tuberculina maxima to white pine tissues. Phytopathology 59:16.
, . 1973. Histology of blister rust cankers parasitized by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathol Z 76:356366.
Zambettakis C, Sankara P, Métivier A. 1985. Darluca filum, Tuberculina costaricana et Verticillium lecanii, hyperparasites de Puccinia arachidis, considérés comm éléments dune lutte intégrée. B Soc Mycol Fr 101:165181.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Aime, P. B. Matheny, D. A. Henk, E. M. Frieders, R. H. Nilsson, M. Piepenbring, D. J. McLaughlin, L. J. Szabo, D. Begerow, J. P. Sampaio, et al. An overview of the higher level classification of Pucciniomycotina based on combined analyses of nuclear large and small subunit rDNA sequences Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 896 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |