| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Universität Tübingen, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Dagmar Triebel
Botanische Staatssammlung München, Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Molecular sequence data together with ultrastructural features were used to infer the phylogenetic position of Tuberculina species. Additional ultrastructural characteristics were used to determine their mode of nutrition. We investigated ultrastructural morphology of the type species Tuberculina persicina and determined base sequences from the D1/ D2 region of the nuclear large-subunit ribosomal DNA of the three commonly distinguished Tuberculina species, T. maxima, T. persicina and T. sbrozzii. Analyses of sequence data by means of a Bayesian method of phylogenetic inference using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique reveal the basidiomycetous nature of Tuberculina. Within the Urediniomycetes, Tuberculina clusters as a sister group of Helicobasidium, closely related to the rusts (Uredinales). This phylogenetic position is supported by the uredinalean architecture of septal pores in Tuberculina. In addition, we present aspects of the ultrastructural morphology of the cellular interaction of Tuberculina and rusts showing a unique interaction with large fusion pores, revealing the mycoparasitic nature of Tuberculina on its close relatives, the rusts.
Key words: cellular interaction, molecular phylogeny, mycoparasitism, nuc-LSU rDNA, septal pore morphology, systematics, ultrastructure, Urediniomycetes
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
as Tubercularia persicina. His morphological characterization, with some additions, remains valid: Members of the genus Tuberculina are characterized by the formation of hemispherical lilac to violet sporodochia. They consist of palisade-like arranged, short, moderately thick conidiogenous cells, each of which bears one globose, smooth conidium at the tip. The sporodochia break through the surface of higher plants and emit a powdery mass of conidia. Sometimes spherical sclerotium-like structures are formed. In addition, Tuberculina is known to exist only in association with rusts as first postulated by Saccardo (1880) and later elaborated by Tubeuf (1901) and others. Saccardo (1880) excluded Tubercularia persicina Ditmar from the genus Tubercularia Tode : Fr., which should have pleurogenous conidiogenesis and thread-like conidiogenous cells, and described the new genus Tuberculina Sacc. for species with acrogenous conidiogenesis, short and broad conidiogenous cells which are parasitic on the aecial stage of rust fungi.
The three Tuberculina species, T. maxima, T. persicina and T. sbrozzii, commonly are recognized (e.g., von Arx 1981, Ellis and Ellis 1988). They are distributed worldwide, living in association with more than 150 rust species from at least 15 genera. However, up to 45 species were described with the authors following strikingly different species concepts. Adopting a concept based on morphological characters, plant parasites (e.g., T. solanicola Ellis parasitic on fruits of Solanum melongena L. [Ellis 1893]) and parasites of non-rust fungi (e.g., T. ovalispora Pat. parasitic on Darluca filum [Biv.] Castagne [Patouillard and Gaillard 1888]) were included in the genus. Other authors used a species concept based on host specificities, distinguishing Tuberculina species on different rust hosts (Spegazzini 1880, 1884) or even plant hosts (Gobi 1885).
After controversial discussions whether Tuberculina-like fungi should be treated as smuts, rusts, ascomycetes or hymenomycetes, the genus presently is assigned mostly to the Fungi Imperfecti because no stages of sexual reproduction are known.
Research on Tuberculina was motivated by two main factors: 
-taxonomy (e.g., Cooke 1888, Patouillard and Gaillard 1888, Spegazzini 1880, 1884, 1911) and the use of Tuberculina as a biological agent in rust control (see review by Wicker 1981). As a result, aspects of the biology, such as hibernation (Wicker and Wells 1968), dispersal (Tubeuf 1901), conditions for germination of conidia (Cornu 1883, Gobi 1885, Lechmere 1914, Mielke 1933), mode and time of infection (Weissenberg and Kurkela 1979, Wicker and Kimmey 1967, Wicker and Wells 1970), host specificities (Barkai-Golan 1959, Hubert 1935) or conditions for artificial cultivation (Vladimirskaya 1939) were clarified. However, fundamental questions concerning the biology of the genus remain unanswered. Thus, the relationship among plants, rusts and Tuberculina remains unresolved. Tuberculina species have been interpreted as mycoparasites specific to rusts (Tubeuf 1901, Zambettakis et al 1985), as nonspecific parasites on several substrates (Petrak 1956, Schroeter 1889) or even as specialized parasites on rust-infected plant tissues (Hulea 1939, Wicker and Woo 1969, 1973). Also, the mode of nutrition and interaction, respectively, is unidentified. Finally, the evolution and systematic position of the genus is totally obscure, including questions on delimitation of species and of the genus itself.
Ultrastructural characters of septal pore morphology played an important role in the arrangement of basidiomycetes (Bandoni 1984, Bauer et al 1997, Bauer and Ober winkler 1994, Ober winkler and Bauer 1989, Wells 1994), and they correspond well to phylogenetic hypotheses generated from molecular data (e.g., Bauer et al 2001, Swann et al 2001).
In this report, we present both molecular and ultrastructural data that reveal the basidiomycetous nature of Tuberculina and show that it is related closely to Helicobasidium Pat., therefore belonging to the rust group. The actual mycoparasitic nature of the genus is indicated on an ultrastructural level by a remarkable cellular interaction between Tuberculina and rust hyphae.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
. All three commonly distinguished Tuberculina species, T. maxima, T. persicina and T. sbrozzii, and the rust hosts of the respective Tuberculina specimens were included in the molecular analyses.
|
) of Tuberculina, Puccinia and Helicobasidium, respectively. The fungal material was isolated from the herbarium specimens by five times picking up spores from the surfaces of either Tuberculina sporodochia or rust sori with a fine needle and depositing the spores directly in 1.5 mL tubes. Dry spores were crushed at room temperature by shaking the samples 3 min at 30 Hz (Mixer Mill MM 300, Retsch, Haan, Germany) in the tubes together with one tungsten carbide ball (3 mm diam). To extract DNA, we used the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
To infer the phylogenetic position of Tuberculina within the Basidiomycota, we amplified the 5'- end (about 625 bp) of the nuclear large-subunit ribosomal DNA (nuc-LSU rDNA), comprising the domains D1 and D2 (Guadet et al 1989). Amplification was done by PCR (Mullis and Faloona 1987, Saiki et al 1988) using the primer pair NL1 and NL4 (O’Donnell 1992, 1993) or LR6 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), respectively. The selected DNA region is especially useful in resolving relationships over a broad scale of organisms (Begerow et al 1997, Fell et al 2000), and the D2 domain has proven to have the lowest levels of homoplasy within the LSU rDNA (Hopple and Vilgalys 1999). Amplification parameters were as described in Vogler and Bruns (1998), but we adjusted the annealing temperature to 50 C and reduced the extension time of the last nine cycles to 2.5 min. PCR products were purified with the QIAquickTM Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) followed by an ethanol precipitation. Both strands of dsDNA were sequenced directly by cycle sequencing (modified after Sanger et al 1977) with NL1 and NL4-reverse as forward and NL4 and LR6 as reverse primers and the ABI PRISM Big DyeTM Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Warrington, England) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Electrophoresis was performed on an automated sequencer (ABI 373A Stretch, PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). The sequences of both strands were combined and proofread with the help of SequencherTM 4.1 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan). DNA sequences determined for this study were deposited in GenBank. Accession numbers are given in TABLE I. To obtain a reliable hypothesis on the phylogenetic position of the Tuberculina specimens that we sampled, we also used sequences from GenBank, representing all groups of Urediniomycetes (including the respective rust hosts of the analysed Tuberculina specimens) as designated by Swann et al (2001) and some representatives of Ustilaginomycetes and Hymenomycetes (GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses): Agaricostilbum pulcherrimum (AJ406402), Agaricus arvensis (U11910), Auricularia auriculajudae (L20278), Bensingtonia sp. (AF444770), Boletus rubinellus (L20279), Calocera viscosa (AF011569), Chionosphaera apobasidialis (AF393470), Colacogloea peniophorae (AF189898), Cronartium ribicola (AF426240), Doassansia epilobii (AF007523), Entyloma ficariae (AY081013), Eocronartium muscicola (L20280), Erythrobasidium hasegawianum (AF189899), Helicobasidium mompa (L20281), Helicogloea variabilis (L20282), Herpobasidium filicinum (AF426193), Insolibasidium deformans (AF522169), Kondoa myxariophila (AF189904), Kriegeria eriophori (syn. Zymoxenogloea eriophori) (L20288), Kurtzmanomyces tardus (AF393467), Melampsora lini (L20283), Microbotryum violaceum (AF009866), Mixia osmundae (AB052840), Naohidea sebacea (AF522176), Pachnocybe ferruginea (L20284), Sakaguchia dacryoidea (AF444723), Septobasidium carestianum (L20289), Sporobolomyces dracophylli (AF189982), Tranzschelia prunispinosae (AF426224), Tremella mesenterica (AF011570), Urocystis ranunculi (AF009879), Ustilago hordei (L20286), Ustilentyloma fluitans (AF009882).
DNA sequences were aligned with the MEGALIGN module of the LASERGENE package (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wisconsin). Further manual alignment was done in Se-Al version 2.0a10 (A. Rambaut, University of Oxford, England). The final alignment (40 sequences; length: 550 bp; after exclusion of the sites 40–55, 379–396, 404–424, 482–497: 289 variable sites) and the tree obtained is deposited in TreeBase (http://treebase.bio.buffalo.edu/treebase/) with the study accession number S955. Sequence distances were computed with the MEGALIGN module of the LAS-ERGENE package. A Bayesian method of phylogenetic inference using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique (Larget and Simon 1999, Mau et al 1999) as implemented in the computer program MrBayes 3.064 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) was used to analyze the dataset. This method allows estimating the probabilities (a posteriori probabilities) for groups of taxa to be monophyletic given the DNA alignment. The power of this method recently was demonstrated in computer simulation by Alfaro et al (2003) and yielded good results in current molecular studies on fungal systematics (e.g., Maier et al 2003). For bayesian analysis, the data first were analyzed with Mr-Modeltest 1.0b ( J.A.A. Nylander, Upsala University, Sweden, Posada and Crandall 1998) to find the most appropriate model of DNA substitution. Hierarchical likelihood ratio tests and Akaike information criterion resulted in GTR+I+G. Thus, four incrementally heated simultaneous Markov chains were run over 2 000 000 generations using the general time reversible model of DNA substitution with gamma distributed substitution rates (Gu et al 1995, Rodriguez et al 1990) and estimation of invariant sites, random starting trees and default starting parameters of the DNA substitution model (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). Trees were sampled every 100 generations, resulting in an overall sampling of 20 000 trees. From these, the first 1000 trees were discarded (burn in = 1000). The trees computed after the process remained static (19 000 trees) were used to compute a 50% majority rule consensus tree to obtain estimates for the a posteriori probabilities of groups of species. This Bayesian approach of phylogenetic analysis was repeated 10 times to test the reproducibility of its results. The unrooted phylograms from the MCMC analyses were rooted with the species belonging to the Ustilaginomycetes as outgroup species, because the trichotomy of the Basidiomycota had been demonstrated by several authors (Begerow et al 1997, Berres et al 1995, Swann and Taylor 1993, 1995).
Light and electron microscopy. –
For light (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Tuberculina persicina on Tranzschelia prunispinosae was prepared in two different ways. In one method, samples were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) at room temperature overnight. After six transfers in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, samples were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer for 1 h in the dark, washed in distilled water and stained in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate for 1 h in the dark. After five washes in distilled water, samples were dehydrated in acetone, with 10 min changes at 25%, 50%, 70%, 95% and three times in 100% acetone. Samples were embedded in Spurr’s plastic (Spurr 1969) and sectioned with a diamond knife. Semithin sections were stained with new fuchsin and crystal violet, mounted in Entellan and examined by light microscopy. Ultrathin serial sections were mounted on formvar-coated, single-slot copper grids, stained with lead citrate at room temperature for 5 min and washed with distilled water. They were examined with a transmission electron microscope (EM 109, Zeiss, Germany) operating at 80 kV.
In the second method, samples were prepared by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution. Infected areas of leaves were removed with a 2 mm cork borer. To remove air from intercellular spaces, samples were infiltrated with distilled water containing 6% (v/v) (2.5 M) methanol for approximately 5 min at room temperature. Single samples were placed in an aluminum holder and frozen immediately in the high-pressure freezer HPM 010 (Balzers Union, Liechtenstein) as described in detail by Mendgen et al (1991). Substitution medium (1.5 ml per specimen) consisted of 2% osmium tetroxide in acetone, which was dried over calcium chloride. Freeze substitution was performed at –90 C, –60 C and –30 C, 8 h for each step, with a Balzer’s freeze substitution apparatus FSU 010. The temperature was raised to approximately 0 C during a 30 min period, and samples were washed in dry acetone another 30 min. Infiltration with an Epon/Araldite mixture (Welter et al 1988) was performed stepwise: 30% resin in acetone at 4 C for 7 h, 70% and 100% resin at 8 C for 20 h each and 100% resin at 18 C for approximately 12 h. Samples then were transferred to fresh medium and polymerized at 60 C for 10 h. Finally, samples were processed as described above for chemically fixed samples, except that the ultra-thin sections were additionally stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate for 1 h.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
The different runs of Bayesian phylogenetic analysis that were performed yielded consistent topologies. We present the consensus tree of one run to illustrate the results (FIG. 1). The phylogenetic hypothesis obtained by analyzing parts of the nuc-LSU rDNA of an assortment of basidiomycetes together with Tuberculina maxima, T. persicina, T. sbrozzii, and their respective rust hosts revealed the expected trichotomy of the sampled basidiomycetes with the monophyla Ustilaginomycetes, Hymenomycetes and Urediniomycetes. Within the Urediniomycetes, the Microbotr yum group, rust group, Agaricostilbum group and Erythrobasidium group were supported with a posteriori probabilities of 100%. Together with Mixia osmundae and Helicogloea variabilis, these groups represent all major groups of Urediniomycetes (after Swann et al 2001). The phylogenetic relationships among these groups were not resolved.
|
) was not resolved. Within Tuberculina, T. maxima appeared basal, in opposition to the sister taxa (a posteriori probability of 100%) T. sbrozzii and the cluster of T. persicina (a posteriori probability of 99%).
Septal pore architecture of Tuberculina persicina and Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae. –
Septal wall morphology and septal pore architecture in Tuberculina persicina essentially was identical to that of Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae. In both species, the septa had a trila-mellate nature and the simple pores were surrounded by microbodies in a more or less circular arrangement (FIGS. 10–11). Mature pores in both species were plugged by osmiophilic material. Usually an organelle-free zone surrounding the septal pores at both sides was more distinct in Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae than in Tuberculina persicina (cf. FIG. 11 and FIG. 10). In addition, sometimes the pore lips in Tub-erculina persicina, but not in Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae, were slightly swollen and more or less abruptly flattened toward the margin.
|
). During differentiation of the sporodochia, the epidermis of the leaves ruptured and the conidial mass of Tuberculina was exposed (FIGS. 2–3). Within the leaf tissue, hyphae of Tuberculina and those of Tranzschelia were mixed (FIGS. 4–5). Hyphae of both Tuberculina and Tranzschelia were without clamps but could be distinguished from each other by the number of nuclei per hyphal cell, the diameter of the nuclei and the thickness of the cell walls (FIGS. 4–5). Hyphae of Tuberculina generally were multinucleate, whereas those of Tranzschelia usually were mononucleate (binucleate hyphal rust cells occurred only at the base of the aecia). Diameter of the nuclei and thickness of the cell walls of the rust were roughly twice as large (or more) compared to those of Tuberculina (FIGS. 4–5). Interaction stages between Tuberculina persicina and Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae frequently were found in the leaves in neighboring areas of the aecia, especially at the base of the aecia. In these interaction stages, the protoplasts of both, the Tuberculina and the rust hyphal cell, were fused via a large pore, measuring 0.5–1 µm diam (FIGS. 6–9). By both fixation techniques, the general fusion pore architecture was recognizable. In high-pressure frozen samples, however, fusion pore morphology had a more regular appearance and was more distinct than after conventional fixation (cf. FIGS. 8–9 and FIGS. 6–7). Thus, in high-pressure frozen interaction stages the plasma membranes of the Tuberculina and the rust cell closely followed the contour of the respective cell wall (FIGS. 8–9), whereas in conventionally fixed interaction stages, plasma membranes often were folded irregularly (FIGS. 6–7). For all interaction stages, prepared by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution, it clearly was evident that the membrane of the fusion pore was continuous with the plasma membranes of both the Tuberculina and the rust cells (FIG. 9).
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
assigned the fungus that he described to Tubercularia Tode : Fr. Saccardo (1880) confined Tubercularia to anamorphs of the genus Nectria (Fr.) Fr. (which is the current concept, see also Rossman 2000) and Tuberculina to anamorphs of rust parasites. Few subsequent researchers regarded Tuberculina as anamorphic ascomycetes (e.g., Frank 1880, Kirk et al 2001). Tulasne (1854) and Lutrell (1979) even proposed ascomycetous teleomorphs (Sphaeria loepophaga Tul. and Anhellia Racib., respectively). Location and mode of sporulation as well as the morphology of hyphae inspired some workers to treat Tuberculina species as rusts and to create new species (Corda 1842, Desmazières 1847, Spegazzini 1880) and genera (Mayr 1890). Other researchers even considered Tuberculina as a stage of asexual rust reproduction (Cunningham 1889; Ravenelia sessilis Berk., Griffiths 1902; Gymnoconia riddelliae Griffiths, Plowright 1885; Puccinia vincae, Spegazzini 1888; "Tuberculina paraguayensis Speg.", Vuillemin 1892a; Aecidiconium barteti Vuill., 1892b; Endophyllum sempervivi [Alb. & Schwein.] de Bary). Gobi (1885) investigated morphology, sporogenesis, and dispersal and germination of spores and assigned the genus to the smuts. His point of view was followed by the majority of researchers of that time (e.g., Plowright 1889, Schroeter 1889, Wildeman 1908). Although considering the same features, Morini (1886) assigned Tuberculina to the Tremellineae. Buddin et al (1927) were the first to observe that Helicobasidium produces ‘‘small raised tubercles, which eventually become pustules of conidia of the type which is characteristic of the genus Tuberculina.’’ For that reason, Tuberculina was assigned to Helicobasidium by some researchers (von Arx 1981, Carmichael et al 1980, Kendrick and Watling 1979). However, the obvious lack of striking features for phylogenetic placement of the genus has prompted most recent researchers (e.g., Hawksworth et al 1995, Sundheim 1986, Wicker 1981) to follow Fuckel (1870) in treating Tuberculina as Fungi Imperfecti.
Our phylogenetic analyses of nuc-LSU rDNA sequences, however, demonstrate clearly that Tuberculina species are members of the basidiomycetes, positioned within the rust group as sister to Helicobasidium. This phylogenetic hypothesis agrees well with ultrastructural data. As shown in this study, the trilamellate nature of the septa, in which a thin electron-transparent middle lamella is sandwiched between thick electron-opaque layers, indicates that Tuberculina is basidiomycetous (Kregervan Rij and Veenhuis 1971). In addition, the septal pore apparatus in Tuberculina persicina essentially is identical to that of its host fungus Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae. In both species, it is composed of a simple pore surrounded by microbodies in a more or less circular arrangement. This type of septal pore apparatus is common among the members of the rust group (see Bauer 1987, Bauer and Ober winkler 1994, Boehm and Mc-Laughlin 1989, Khan and Kimbrough 1982, Littlefield and Heath 1979) and occurs also in Helicobasidium (Bourett and McLaughlin 1986). In addition, both Tuberculina and the members of the rust group have clampless hyphae.
The close phylogenetic proximity of Tuberculina and Helicobasidium raises questions on the relation of the genera, especially since we know that cultures of Helicobasidium on artificial media produce Tuberculina-like conidia. That observation was repeated several times (Arai et al 1987, Buddin and Wakefield 1927, 1929, Fukushima 1998, Sayama et al 1994, Valder 1958) but without definitive conclusions or further investigations. However, Tuberculina is reported to be the anamorphic stage of Helicobasidium, justified by the quoted observations in several compendia (Carmichael et al 1980, Hawksworth et al 1995). This is in contrast to our molecular analyses, in which all three commonly distinguished Tuberculina species are included, as well as two of probably three distinguishable Helicobasidium species (see Reid 1975, Roberts 1999). Tuberculina is separated from Helicobasidium, and there is no record for conidia formation by Helicobasidium in nature, apart from one report (Patouillard 1886), which could not be con-firmed by subsequent researchers (Buddin and Wakefield 1927).
Association between Tuberculina and rusts. –
Tulasne (1854) interpreted the exclusive occurrence of Tuberculina in association with rusts as argument for the mycoparasitic nature of the genus. His reasoning was followed by most researchers (Buchenauer 1982, Kirulis 1940, Lindau 1910, Tubeuf 1901, Zambettakis et al 1985), adding as arguments the heavy impairment of rust spore production in the presence of Tuberculina (Spaulding 1929, Tubeuf 1917), infection experiments showing that rust-free plants could not be infected by Tuberculina (Barkai-Golan 1959) and presumable structures of parasitic interaction (Gruyer 1921, Sappin-Trouffy 1896, Thirumalachar 1941). Disagreeing with that, Marchal (1902) was the first to propose a commensal relationship. Tuberculina was interpreted as saprophyte living in rust-damaged plant tissues. This point of view was encouraged by the presumable occurrence of Tuberculina in rust-free plant tissues in nature (Gobi 1885) and in artificial culture (Wicker and Woo 1969, 1973), experiments of dual cultures of Tuberculina and rusts where no interaction could be recognized (Wicker 1979), and investigations by light microscopy, where no interaction of rust and Tuberculina was found (D’Oliveira 1941, Hulea 1939) except the digestion of plant cells (Wicker 1979).
Our ultrastructural observations demonstrate a specific and morphologically uncommon interaction between Tuberculina persicina and Tranzschelia pruni-spinosae. Interaction results in a large fusion pore between Tuberculina and its host rust with a direct cytoplasm-cytoplasm connection. The plasma membranes of Tuberculina and its host form a continuum. Existence of such an unusual structure of interaction indicates the mycoparasitic nature of Tuberculina.
Moreover, our ultrastructural observations confirm those authors who assumed that Tuberculina is restricted to the haploid rust stage and the following stage on the same host plant (e.g., D’Oliveira 1941, Lechmere 1914). In addition, the mycoparasitic nature and the distinctive cellular interaction of Tuberculina provide a good taxonomic boundary for the genus Tuberculina. It definitely should be restricted to rust parasites.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Part 212 in the series Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes from the Botanical Institute, University of Tübingen. 
2 Corresponding author. E-mail: matthias.lutz{at}uni-tuebingen.de
|
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Arai S, Fukushima C, Tanaka Y, Harada Y. 1987. On conidia-forming isolates of Helicobasidium mompa Tanaka from apple and mulberry trees. Ann Phytopath Soc Japan 53:9.
Arx JA von. 1981. The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Vaduz: Cramer. 424 p.
Bandoni RJ. 1984. The Tremellales and Auriculariales: an alternative classification. Trans Mycol Soc Japan 25: 489–530.
Barkai-Golan R. 1959. Tuberculina persicina (Ditm.) Sacc. attacking rust fungi in Israel. B Res Counc Israel 8 (D): 41–46.
Bauer R. 1987. Uredinales—germination of basidiospores and pycnospores. Stud Mycol 30:111–125.
———, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Piepenbring M, Berbee ML. 2001. Ustilaginomycetes. In: McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA, eds. The mycota. Vol 7. Part B. Systematics and evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. p 57–83.
———, Oberwinkler F. 1994. Meiosis, septal pore architecture, and systematic position of the heterobasidiomy-cetous fern parasite Herpobasidium filicinum. Can J Bot 72:1229–1242.
———, ———, Vánky K. 1997. Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Can J Bot 75: 1273–1314.
Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F. 1997. Phylogenetic studies on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. Can J Bot 75: 2045–2056.
Berres ME, Szabo LJ, McLaughlin DJ. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in auriculariaceous basidiomycetes based on 25S ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 87:821–840.
Boehm EWA, McLaughlin DJ. 1989. Phylogeny and ultra-structure in Eocronartium muscicola: meiosis and basidial development. Mycologia 81:98–114.
Bourett TM, McLaughlin DJ. 1986. Mitosis and septum formation in the basidiomycete Helicobasidium mompa. Can J Bot 64:130–145.
Buchenauer H. 1982. Chemical and biological control of cereal rusts. In: Scott KJ, Chakravorty AK, eds. The rust fungi. London, New York: Academic Press. p 247–279.
Buddin W, Wakefield EM. 1927. Studies on Rhizoctonia crocorum (Pers.) DC. and Helicobasidium purpureum (Tul.) Pat. T Brit Mycol Soc 12:116–140.
———, ———. 1929. Further notes on the connection between Rhizoctonia crocorum and Helicobasidium purpureum. T Brit Mycol Soc 14:97–99.
Carmichael JW, Kendrick WB, Conners IL, Sigler L. 1980. Genera of Hyphomycetes. Edmonton, Alberta: The University of Alberta Press. 386 p.
Cooke MC. 1888. Some exotic fungi. Grevillea 16:15–16.
Corda AKJ. 1842. Icones fungorum huc usque cognitorum. Vol 5. Prag: Apud Fridericum Ehrlich. 92 p.
Cornu M. 1883. Sur quelques champignons parasites des urédinées. B Soc Bot Fr 30:222–224.
Cunningham DD. 1889. Notes on the life-history of Ravenelia sessilis B. and Ravenelia stictica B. et Br. Scientific Memoires by Medical Officers of the Army of India 4: 21–35.
D’Oliveira B. 1941. Relações fisiologicas da Darluca filum Cast. e da Tuberculina spp. com as Uredineas e os seus hospedeiros. Bol Soc Portug Ciênc Nat 13:344–347.
Desmazières JBHJ. 1847. Quatorzième notice sur les plantes cryptogames récemment découvertes en France. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Série 3, 8:9–37.
Ditmar F. 1817. Die Pilze Deutschlands: Tubercularia persicina. In: Sturm J, ed. Deutschlands Flora in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Nürnberg: Lange. p 99–100.
Ellis JP. 1893. Description of some new species of fungi. Journal of Mycology 7:274–278.
Ellis MB, Ellis JP. 1988. Microfungi on miscellaneous substrates. London, Sydney, Portland: Croom Helm, Timber Press. 244 p.
Fell JW, Boekhout T, Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Statzell-Tall-man A. 2000. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int J Syst Evol Micr 50:1351–1371.
Frank AB. 1880. Die Krankheiten der Pflanzen. Breslau: Eduard Trewendt. 844 p.
Fuckel L. 1870. Symbolae mycologicae. Wiesbaden: Julius Niedner. 433 p.
Fukushima C. 1998. Environmental factors important for the occurrence of the violet and white root rots (Helicobasidium mompa Tanaka and Rosellinia necatrix (Hatrig) Berlese) in apple orchards and their control methods. Bulletin of the Aomori Apple Experiment Station 30:98–112.
Gobi C. 1885. Ü ber den Tubercularia persicina Ditm. genannten Pilz. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.- Pétersbourg Série 7, 32:1–26.
Griffiths D. 1902. Concerning some West American fungi. B Torrey Bot Club 29:290–301.
Gruyer P. 1921. Observations sur la biologie du Tuberculina persicina Ditm. B Soc Mycol Fr 37:131–133.
Gu X, Fu YX, Li WH. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol Biol Evol 12:546–557.[Abstract]
Guadet J, Julien J, Lafay JF, Brygoo Y. 1989. Phylogeny of some Fusarium species, as determined by large-subunit rRNA sequence comparison. Mol Biol Evol 6:227–242.[Abstract]
Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN. 1995. Dictionary of the fungi. 8th ed. Cambridge: University Press. 616 p.
Hopple JS, Vilgalys R. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in the mushroom genus Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for the large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and monophyly. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13:1–19.[Medline]
Hubert EE. 1935. Observations on Tuberculina maxima, a parasite of Cronartium ribicola. Phytopathology 25:253–261.
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics Applications Note 17:754–755.
Hulea A. 1939. Contributions à la connaissance des champignons commensaux des Urédinées. Bulletin de la Section Scientifique de l’Académie Roumaine 22:196–214.
Khan SR, Kimbrough JW. 1982. A reevaluation of the basidiomycetes based upon septal and basidial structures. Mycotaxon 15:103–120.
Kendrick B, Watling R. 1979. Mitospores in basidiomycetes. In: Kendrick B, ed. The whole fungus. Vol 2. Ottawa: National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museum of Canada, Kananaskis Foundation. p 473–546.
Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. 2001. Dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Wallingford: CAB International. 650 p.
Kirulis A. 1940. Mikroskopiskas senes ka augu slimibu dabigie ienaidnieki latvija. Arbeiten der Landwirtschaf-tlichen Akademie Mitau/Lauksaimniecibas 1:479–536.
Kreger-van Rij NJB, Veenhuis M. 1971. A comparative study of the cell wall structure of basidiomycetous and related yeasts. J Gen Microbiol 68:87–95.
Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750–759.
Lechmere E. 1914. Tuberculina maxima Rostrup. Ein Parasit auf dem Blasenrost der Weymouthskiefer. Naturwissen-schaftliche Zeitschrift für Forst- und Landwirtschaft 12: 491–498.
Lindau G. 1910. Fungi imperfecti: Hyphomycetes 2. In: Dr. L. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamne-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. 2nd ed. Vol 1/9. Leipzig: Eduard Kummer. 983 p.
Littlefield LJ, Heath MC. 1979. Ultrastructure of rust fungi. New York: Academic Press. 277 p.
Luttrell ES. 1979. Deuteromycetes and their relationships. In: Kendrick B, ed. The whole fungus. Vol 1. Ottawa: National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museum of Canada, Kananaskis Foundation. p 241–264.
Maier W, Begerow D, Weiß M, Oberwinkler F. 2003. Phylogeny of the rust fungi: an approach using nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Can J Bot 81: 12–23.
Marchal E. 1902. Le Tuberculina persicina. Bulletin de la Société Centrale Forestière de Belgique 9:332–333.
Mau B, Newton MA, Larget B. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1–12.[Medline]
Mayr H. 1890. Die Waldungen von Nordamerika. München: Rieger. 488 p.
Mendgen K, Welter K, Scheffold F, Knauf-Beiter G. 1991. High pressure freezing of rust infected plant leaves. In: Mendgen K, Lesemann DE, eds. Electron microscopy of plant pathogens. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. p 31–42.
Mielke JL. 1933. Tuberculina maxima in western North America. Phytopathology 23:299–305.
Morini F. 1886. La Tubercularia persicina Ditm. è un’ Ustilaginea? Malpigia 1:114–124.
Mullis KB, Faloona FA. 1987. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Method Enzymol 155:335–350.[Medline]
Oberwinkler F, Bauer R. 1989. The systematics of gasteroid, auricularioid heterobasidiomycetes. Sydowia 41:224–256.
O’Donnell KL. 1992. Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers are highly divergent in the phytopathogenic ascomycete Fusarium sambucinum (Gibberella pulicaris). Curr Genet 22:213–220.[Medline]
———. 1993. Fusarium and its near relatives. In: Reynolds DR, Taylor JW, eds. The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. Wallingford: CAB International. p 225–233.
Patouillard N. 1886. Helicobasidium et Exobasidium. B Soc Bot Fr 33:335–337.
———, Gaillard A. 1888. Champignons du Vénézuéla et principalment de la région du Haut-Orénoque, récoltés en 1887 par M. A. Gaillard. B Soc Mycol Fr 4:92–129.
Petrak F. 1956. Beiträge zur türkischen Pilzflora. Sydowia 10:101–111.
Plowright CB. 1885. Diseases of plants. The Gardners’ Chronicle 24:108–109.
———. 1889. A monograph of the British Uredineae and Ustilagineae. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench. 347 p.
Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
Reid DA. 1975. Helicobasidium compactum in Britain. T Brit Mycol Soc 64:159–162.
Roberts P. 1999. Rhizoctonia-forming fungi. Whitstable, Kent: Whitstable Litho Printers Ltd. 239 p.
Rodríguez F, Oliver JL, Marín A, Medina JR. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Bio 142:485–502.[Medline]
Rossman AY. 2000. Towards monophyletic genera in the holomorphic Hypocreales. Stud Mycol 45:27–34.
Saccardo PA. 1880. Conspectus generum fungorum Italiae inferiorum, nempe ad Sphaeropsideas, Melanconieas et Hyphomyceteas pertinentium, systemate sporologico dispositorum. Michelia commentarium mycologicum fungos in primis italicos illustrans curante PA Saccardo. Vol 2 (6):1–38.
Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Ehrlich HA. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–491.
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. P Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467.
Sappin-Trouffy P. 1896. Recherches Mycologiques. 1. Parasites des Urédinées. Le Botaniste 5:44–52.
Sayama A, Kobayashi K, Ogoshi A. 1994. Morphological and physiological comparisons of Helicobasidium mompa and H. purpureum. Mycoscience 35:15–20.
Schroeter J. 1889. Die Pilze Schlesiens. Vol 3. Lehre: Cramer. 814 p.
Spaulding P. 1929. White-pine blister rust: a comparison of European with North American conditions. Technical Bulletin of the United States Department of Agriculture 87:1–58.
Spegazzini C. 1880. Fungi argentini. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 10:5–33.
———. 1884. Fungi guaranitici. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 17:119–134.
———. 1888. Fungi guaranitici. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 26:5–74.
———. 1911. Mycetes argentinenses. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 13:328–467.
Spurr AR. 1969. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultra Mol Struct R 26: 31–43.
Sundheim L. 1986. Use of hyperparasites in biological control of biotrophic plant pathogens. In: Fokkema NJ, Heuvel J, eds. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 333–347.
Swann EC, Frieders EM, McLaughlin DJ. 2001. Urediniomycetes. In: McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA, eds. The Mycota. Vol 7. Part B. Systematics and evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p 37–56.
———, Taylor JW. 1993. Higher taxa of basidiomycetes: an 18s rRNA gene perspective. Mycologia 85:923–936.
———, ———. 1995. Phylogenetic perspectives on basidiomycete systematics: evidence from the 18s rRNA gene. Can J Bot 73 (Suppl. 1):862–868.
Thirumalachar MJ. 1941. Tuberculina on Uromyces hobsoni Vize. The Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 20: 107–110.
Tubeuf C. 1901. Über Tuberculina maxima, einen Parasiten des Weymouthskiefern-Blasenrostes. Arbeiten aus der Biologischen Abteilung für Land- und Forstwirtschaft am Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte 2:169–173.
———. 1917. Über das Verhältnis der Kiefern-Peridermien zu Cronartium. Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Forst- und Landwirtschaft 15:268–307.
Tulasne RL. 1854. Second mémoire sur les Urédinées et les Ustilaginées. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Série 4, 2:77–196.
Valder PG. 1958. The biology of Helicobasidium purpureum Pat. T Brit Mycol Soc 41:283–308.
Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus spp. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
Vladimirskaya ME. 1939. A parasite of crop plant rust, Tuberculina persicina (Ditm.) Sacc. Bulletin of Plant Protection 1:103–110.
Vogler DR, Bruns TD. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among the pine stem rust fungi (Cronartium and Peridermium spp.). Mycologia 90:244–257.
Vuillemin P. 1892a. Aecidiconium, genre nouveau d’Urédinées. CR Hebd Acad Sci 115:966–969.
———. 1892b. Sur l’existence d’un appareil conidien chez les Urédinées. CR Hebd Acad Sci 115:895–896.
Weissenberg K, Kurkela T. 1979. Tuberculina maxima on Pinus sylvestris infected by Melampsora pinitorqua. Eur J Forest Pathol 9:238–242.
Wells K. 1994. Jelly fungi, then and now! Mycologia 86:18–48.
Welter K, Müller M, Mendgen K. 1988. The hyphae of Uromyces appendiculatus within the leaf tissue after high pressure freezing and freeze substitution. Protoplasma 147:91–99.
Wicker EF. 1979. In vitro dual culture of Tuberculina maxima and Cronartium ribicola. Phytopathol Z 96:85–189.
———. 1981. Natural control of white pine blister rust by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathology 71:997–1000.
———, Kimmey JW. 1967. Mode and time of infection of western pine blister rust cankers by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathology 57:1010.
———, Wells JM. 1968. Overwintering of Tuberculina maxima on white pine blister rust cankers. Phytopathology 58:391.
———, ———. 1970. Incubation period for Tuberculina maxima infecting the western white pine blister rust cankers. Phytopathology 60:1693.
———, Woo JY. 1969. Differential response of invading Tuberculina maxima to white pine tissues. Phytopathology 59:16.
———, ———. 1973. Histology of blister rust cankers parasitized by Tuberculina maxima. Phytopathol Z 76:356–366.
Wildeman É. 1908. Flore du Bas- et du Moyen-Congo, études de systématique et de géographie botaniques. Bruxelles: Musée royal de l’Afrique Centrale. 368 p.
Zambettakis C, Sankara P, Métivier A. 1985. Darluca filum, Tuberculina costaricana et Verticillium lecanii, hyperparasites de Puccinia arachidis, considérés commélé-ments d’une lutte intégrée. B Soc Mycol Fr 101:165–181.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. C. Aime, P. B. Matheny, D. A. Henk, E. M. Frieders, R. H. Nilsson, M. Piepenbring, D. J. McLaughlin, L. J. Szabo, D. Begerow, J. P. Sampaio, et al. An overview of the higher level classification of Pucciniomycotina based on combined analyses of nuclear large and small subunit rDNA sequences Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 896 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. C. Evans and C. A. Ellison The biology and taxonomy of rust fungi associated with the neotropical vine Mikania micrantha, a major invasive weed in Asia Mycologia, July 1, 2005; 97(4): 935 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lutz, R. Bauer, D. Begerow, and F. Oberwinkler Tuberculina-Helicobasidium: Host specificity of the Tuberculina-stage reveals unexpected diversity within the group Mycologia, November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1316 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
