Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.
Mycologia, 96(3), 2004, pp. 452-462.
© 2004 by The Mycological Society of America

Differential morphogenesis of the extraradical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus grown monoxenically on spatially heterogeneous culture media


Bert Bago 1

     Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CSIC/ UV/GV), Camí de la Marjal s/n, 46470 Albal (Valencia), Spain

Custodia Cano
Concepción Azcón-Aguilar

     Departamento de Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain

Julie Samson
Andrew P. Coughlan
Yves Piché

     Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière (CRBF), Pavillon Charles-Eugène-Marchand, Université Laval, Québec, G1K 7P4 Canada


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

A new in vitro experimental system was developed to study the morphogenesis of discrete regions of a single extraradical mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices, growing simultaneously in six different agar-based media. The media were (i) unamended water agar (WA), (ii) WA+PO43– (PO43–), (iii) WA+NO3 (NO3), (iv) WA+NH4+ (NH4+), (v) WA+NH4++MES (NH4++MES) and (vi) minimal medium (M, complete nutrients). Each medium was amended with the pH indicator bromocresol purple. The extraradical mycelium of the fungus showed between-treatment differences in morphogenesis, architecture, formation of branched absorbing structures (BAS) and sporulation. Extraradical hyphae that developed in WA or PO43– compartments exhibited an economic development pattern, in which runner hyphae radially extended the external colony. Extraradical hyphal growth in the NO3 compartments was characterized by increased formation of runner hyphae, BAS and spores and an alkalinization of the medium. In the two NH4+-amended media (NH4+, NH4++MES), sporulation was suppressed and considerable morphological changes were noted. These results show the plasticity of G. intraradices that lets it efficiently exploit an heterogeneous substrate.

Key words: branched absorbing structures (BAS), Glomus intraradices, monoxenic culture, nitrogen source, pH, sporulation


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
More than 80% of land plants are estimated to form arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations (Smith and Read 1997Go) with soil-borne fungi in the phylum Glomeromycota (Schüssler et al 2001Go). The wide environmental tolerance of many taxa suggests that they have the capacity to adapt to different environmental conditions.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are obligate biotrophs, being unable to complete their life cycle in the absence of a host plant (Azcón-Aguilar et al 1998Go). After contact with a suitable host, inter- and/ or intracellular colonization of the root cortex occurs (Bonfante-Fasolo 1984Go, 1987Go, Smith and Smith 1997Go). Establishment of the symbiosis allows the completion of the AM fungal life cycle. This involves formation of an extraradical hyphal phase that colonizes the soil in the vicinity of the host root. These hyphae form characteristic structures including branched absorbing structures (BAS, formerly named arbuscule-like structures, ALS; Bago et al 1998bGo, cGo), spore-associated BAS (BAS-s; Bago et al 1998bGo, cGo) and spores. The extraradical mycelial network increases the nutrient uptake surface of the host plant and allows a more efficient extraction of phosphorus, nitrogen and certain micronutrients (Smith and Read 1997Go).

Several studies have highlighted the metabolic capacities of the AM extraradical phase (reviewed by Jakobsen 1995Go; see also Bago et al 1996Go, 2002Go, 2003Go, Olsson et al 2002Go). However, little is known about the effect of the heterogeneous soil environment on the extraradical mycelium (ERM) and its subsequent effects on nutrient uptake by AM fungi. Friese and Allen (1991)Go were the first to study extraradical hyphal architecture in rhizospheric soil. However recent studies by Bago et al (1998aGo, bGo, cGo) using AM monoxenic cultures (in vitro dual AM fungus and root-organ cultures) indicated that the AM extraradical mycelium is more complex than was reported by Friese and Allen (1991)Go. Cui and Caldwell (1996aGo, bGo) showed that extraradical AM hyphae are equally efficient in transporting soil phosphate and nitrate, irrespective of the patchiness of the substrate. Therefore, we hypothesize that hyphal development and colony architecture of AM fungi vary on a microscale to maximize growth and nutrient uptake within heterogeneous substrates. Such responses have been shown to occur with other soil-borne fungi such as ectomycorrhizal (Bending and Read 1995Go) and saprophytic fungi (Bailey et al 2000Go, Fomina et al 2003Go, Ritz 1995Go). In particular, the work by Bailey et al (2000)Go indicates that fungal colony development in a given substrate depends mainly on nutrient distribution and availability but that it also is influenced by the intrinsic morphogenesis of the fungal colony, which includes the radial density of hyphal growth, aggregation into strands and the degree of branching and anastomosing. Our hypothesis also is supported by a recent study that shows the differential growing strategy of various AM fungi when colonizing and exploiting a given substrate (Smith et al 2000Go). The aim of the present work was to study morphological and developmental changes to the architecture of the extraradical mycelium of Glomus intraradices Smith and Schenk subjected to different nutritional conditions in a patchy environment.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Experimental system and biological material. – Under sterile conditions the top of a 60 mm Petri plate was placed in the middle of a 150 mm Petri plate and six tops from 35 mm Petri plates were arranged around it (FIG. 1aGo). The central (60 mm) plate was filled with 20 mL of sterilized (121 C, 20 min) minimal medium (Chabot et al 1992Go). The nutrient content of this medium (in mg/L of distilled water and molecular amounts) was: MgSO4·7H2O, 731 (29.6 mM); KNO3, 80 (7.9 mM); Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 288 (12.2 mM) (total N content = 45.23 mg/L); KCl, 65 (8.71 mM); KH2PO4, 4.8 (1.37 mM); Na-FeEDTA, 8 (4.36mM); KI, 0.75 (4.51 mM); MnCl2·4H2O, 6 (30.3 mM); ZnSO4·7H2O, 2.65 (9.2 mM); H3BO3, 1.5 (24.3 mM); CuSO4·5H2O, 0.13 (0.52 mM); Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.0024 (9.9 µM); glycine, 3 (3.99 mM); thiamine, 0.1 (29.7 µM); pyridoxine, 0.1 (48.6 µM); nicotinic acid, 0.5 (0.4 mM); myoinositol, 50 (27.7 mM); and sucrose, 10 g/L (29.2 mM). The central plate, referred to as the culture compartment (FIG. 1aGo, CC), was used to establish the mycorrhizal symbiosis. This consisted of a monoxenic culture (Bécard and Fortin 1988Go) of the AM fungus Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith (DAOM 197198, Biosystematic Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada), grown with a carrot (Daucus carota L.) root-organ culture (clone DC-2). Monoxenic cultures were started by placing a 5 cm-long root in the culture compartment. A cube of medium from a previous monoxenic culture, containing approximately 100 spores, fragments of mycorrhizal roots and external hyphae, was placed near the root apex.



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. a. An overview of the experimental system showing different hyphal compartments after 1 wk of culture. CC, culture compartment; HC, hyphal compartment; Interm., bromocresol-free water-agar (WA) medium. b. Profuse sporulation within the bromocresol-free, intermediate WA medium. c, d. Extraradical hyphal development in the HC containing the WA treatment. Note the economic fungal growth pattern, with branching events forming 45° angles between runner hyphae (rh, c) and the formation of small, compact BAS at regular intervals (BAS, d). This pattern is similar to that shown by G. intraradices extraradical hyphae growing in PO43– medium (e, f). Bars: a, 15 mm; b, 1 mm; c, e, 2 mm; d, f, 500 µm.

 
The six 35 mm plates, referred to as the hyphal compartments (FIG. 1aGo, HC), were filled with 7 mL of one of six different sterilized (121 C, 20 min) culture media. These media consisted of 0.8% Bacto-Difco agar in distilled water either (i) unamended (water agar [WA]) or amended with (ii) 4.8 mg/L KH2PO4, (iii) 326 mg/L KNO3 (45.23 mg/L total nitrogen), (iv) 214 mg/L (NH4)2SO4 (45.23 mg/L total nitrogen), (v) 214 mg/L (NH4)2SO4 in a MES solution (10 mM, pH = 6) and (vi) nutrients to provide the same composition of the minimal medium. All six hyphal compartment media were amended (1%) with a solution (1% in distilled, sterile water; Bago et al 1996Go) of the pH indicator bromocresol purple to follow pH changes during the study (Bago et al 1996Go). After autoclaving, pH values of the different culture media were: minimal medium, 5.7; PO43–, 6.0; NO3, 6.0; NH4+, 6.2; NH4++MES, 5.8; and WA, 6.2. Samples (n = 5) of the six media in which neither roots nor the fungus were cultured (referred to as color controls) were maintained under identical conditions as the cultures.

The space between the six hyphal compartments and the culture compartment was filled with bromocresol purple-free WA (pH 6.0) (FIG. 1aGo, Interm), so that hyphae that grew out of the culture compartment could develop in WA medium and then into the different test media. Ten replicates were set up and the plates incubated in the dark at 25 C for 84 d. Roots periodically were cut to prevent them developing in the surrounding WA media or HC.

Observation and measurements of fungal growth. – At the end of the experiment, mean total runner hyphal length was calculated using a 2 x 2 mm grid (Marsh 1971Go) and the total numbers of BAS and spores were determined. All measurements were done under a Nikon AFX stereomicroscope. Microphotographs (Kodak 100 ISO film) of hyphal morphology and extraradical structures in the different culture media were taken with a Leica DMRB microscope fitted with a Leica MPS-60. Results were analyzed statistically using the Fisher’s Protected LSD test (P ≤ 0.05).

pH measurements. – Nondestructive pH measurements of the HCs were made according to Bago et al (1996)Go. Absorbance of the culture media contained in each HC was measured (Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer, UV 1603), without removing them from the Petri plates, at two wavelengths, 589 and 429 nm. The ratio between the two measured absorbances (i.e., A589/A429) was obtained, and the pH of the medium, y, was calculated using



    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Culture development and pH changes. – All six bromocresol purple amended culture media initially had a similar pH (approximately 6, see Methods) and were reddish-orange. However, after 7 d of incubation the color changed to yellow in the NH4+ HC, both in the color controls (plates that contained no root or fungus) and in plates that contained roots and AM fungus, indicating a strong acidification of the medium in these HC. Because this drop in pH took place before fungal development in the HC, the extraradical mycelium developing in NH4+ treatments initially faced acidic conditions. By contrast, in color control plates of NH4+ + MES, color remained unchanged.

After 28 d, extraradical hyphae extensively had colonized the 10 culture compartments. Approximately 14 d later, extraradical hyphae crossed over the plastic boundary of the culture compartments and developed in the external, bromocresol-free WA media (TABLE IGo). Extraradical hyphae also began to develop in the different HC. We observed an alkalinization (color change to purplish-violet) in the NO3 HC colonized by extraradical hyphae. A similar but weaker color change occurred in the minimal medium (which also contained NO3 as the sole nitrogen source). No detectable color (pH) changes occurred in compartments containing PO43– or WA after colonization by extraradical hyphae or in those containing the buffered NH4+ medium (NH4+ + MES). Unbuffered ammonium-amended compartments (NH4+) remained yellow (acidic) throughout the experiment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Estimate of extraradical mycelium development in four representative Petri plates after 42 d of culture
 
After 84 d, spectrophotometric pH measurements of the HC confirmed the above observations (TABLE IIGo). Results showed that hyphae developing in compartments containing NO3 raised the pH of the medium by 0.5 (minimal medium) and 1.0 (NO3) compared to their respective color control plates. The yellow observed in NH4+HC, where some extra-radical hyphae were developing, corresponded to a pH decrease of 0.4 when compared to the color control plates but of 1.3 pH units when compared to the initial pH of the medium (before the incubation period, see Methods). The pH of the rest of the HC did not differ by more than 0.1 from the pH of their respective color control plates, except for WA compartments, which showed a decrease of 0.3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II. Runner hyphal length, structures/cm of runner hyphae and pH of the media in the different hyphal compartments of the experimental system after 84 d of culture
 
Fungal development and hyphal morphogenesis. – After the 84 d culture period, extraradical hyphae had developed extensively in the bromocresol-free WA surrounding the HC and this WA medium contained a high number of BAS and spores (FIG. 1bGo). This contrasted with the reduced fungal development in the HC, particularly in the NH4+ treatments (see below).

When developing in WA (FIG. 1cGo, d), PO43– (FIG. 1eGo, f) or NO3 (FIG. 2eGo, f), the extraradical mycelium was highly organized. The mycelium consisted of thick (10–15 µm diam), leading runner (Friese and Allen 1991Go, Bago et al 1998bGo) hyphae that branched at approximately 45° (FIG. 1cGo, e) to produce thinner (1–7 µm diam), higher order, runner hyphae, resulting in a radial extension of the mycelium (FIG. 1eGo). Under this developmental pattern, runner hyphae showed apical dominance and constituted the framework of the colony. Branched absorbing structures (BAS) and spore-associated BAS (BAS-s; Bago et al 1998bGo, cGo) developed at relatively regular intervals on second and higher order runner hyphae (FIGS. 1d, f, Go2fGo). Spores also were produced commonly by BAS-s (Bago et al 1998bGo) along runner hyphae (FIG. 2c–fGo).



View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Morphological features of G. intraradices external mycelium developing in minimal medium (a–d) and NO3 (e, f) media. a. Extraradical hyphae growing in minimal medium show a diffuse growth pattern (arrow). On first contact with the minimal medium (b) extraradical hyphae lose apical dominance (arrow) and hyphae frequently appear undulate and tangled (c). However, with time recovery of apical dominance is noted (d) and large BAS are formed (arrows). In contrast to this, when developing in NO3 medium runner hyphae show a clear apical dominance and profuse sporulation (e). Under such nutrient conditions small, compact BAS, BAS-s and spores are formed (f) by the runner hyphae at regular intervals. Bars: a, e, 3 mm; b, d, 1 mm; c, 500 µm; f, 250 µm.

 
In contrast to this well-organized developmental pattern, on initial contact with the minimal medium, extraradical hyphae showed a more diffuse growth pattern (FIG. 2a–cGo). Apical dominance was lost, and the mycelium frequently appeared tangled or interwoven (FIG. 2a, b,Go arrows; FIG. 2cGo). Leading runner hyphae were barely distinguishable (FIG. 2a, bGo) and BAS were less compact, merging within the profusely branched fungal colony. However, after 1–2 wk apical dominance recovered (FIG. 2dGo). Highly branched, leading runner hyphae re-appeared, and BAS formed at regular intervals (FIG. 2dGo, arrows).

Mycelial architecture was altered markedly when the fungus developed in the acidic NH4+ medium (FIG. 3aGo–d). Leading runner hyphae still branched at approximately 45° (FIG. 3aGo), but branches were thicker (approximately 10–12 µm diam versus 5–7 µm in other treatments, see above) and colony architecture appeared disrupted. Cytoplasmic protrusions occurred at different sites, especially at apices, which frequently appeared lysed (FIG. 3bGo, c, arrows). Runner hyphae occasionally formed short ramifications at irregular intervals (possibly atrophied BAS; FIG. 3bGo, white arrows). Coils of hyphae, which consisted of closely aligned, cytoplasm-filled hyphae, were observed in some of the replicates (FIG. 3c, dGo). In the MES-amended compartments, morphological changes also were evident but were different than those observed in NH4+ treatment (FIG. 3e, hGo); upon contact with the NH4+ + MES medium, the leading runner hyphae lost apical dominance (FIG. 3eGo, arrow) and branched so profusely that it was impossible to follow its growing pattern (FIG. 3hGo). Extraradical hyphae became much thinner and interwoven (FIG. 3hGo) and growth was restricted to the medium closest to the boundary of the HC, while the center of the compartment remained almost uncolonized.



View larger version (181K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Morphological features of G. intraradices external mycelium developing in NH4+ (a–d) and NH4+ + MES (e, h) media. When developing in NH4+ hyphal compartments extraradical hyphae showed a certain apical dominance on first contact with the culture medium and branching at 45° angles was observed (a). However, the fungus soon lost apical dominance and formed coarse hyphae (b) with frequent cytoplasmic protrusions, especially at the apices (black arrows). Rarely, atrophied BAS were observed (white arrows) (c). Coils of hyphae, which frequently bound together, were formed occasionally (d). On initial contact with the NH4+ + MES medium G. intraradices external hyphae also lost apical dominance (e, arrow), however, they branched profusely. Hyphae became thin and tangled (h) and BAS were impossible to distinguish and quantify. Bars: a, f, g, 3 mm; b, c, 100 µm; d, 50 µm; e, 5 mm; h, 500 µm.

 
BAS that formed in compartments containing minimal medium (FIG. 2dGo) were 1.5–2 times larger than in the other treatments and less compact than those that developed in WA (FIG. 1dGo), PO43– (FIG. 1fGo) and NO3 (FIG. 2fGo) compartments. In NH4+ + MES treatments, BAS were indistinguishable due to the profuse branching of the fungus (FIG. 3hGo; see TABLE IIGo, footnote iv), and as outlined above in NH4+ compartments BAS were rare (TABLE IIGo) and atrophied (FIG. 3bGo). The formation of BAS was stimulated most in NO3, whereas WA, minimum medium and PO43–, treatments showed an intermediate degree of BAS formation (TABLE IIGo).

Sporulation was increased significantly in the NO3 treatment (TABLE IIGo, FIG. 2eGo). This effect also was observed in preliminary tests using similar experimental conditions but with monoxenic cultures of G. intraradices on untransformed tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) root organs. Sporulation was lower in WA compartments, further reduced in minimal medium and PO43–, and suppressed in NH4+ compartments (either buffered or unbuffered, TABLE IIGo). Although variable in all the media tested, spore size was particularly heterogeneous in minimal medium (FIG. 2cGo; 84% of them ranged from 15 to 40 µm, 14%, from 40 to 65 µm). However, spores looked viable and their lipid contents appeared similar irrespective of size. In all replicates, G. intraradices preferentially sporulated (1053 ± 330 spore/cm2) in the bromocresol-free WA medium surrounding the HC (FIGS. 1b, c,Go 3eGo). The morphological features described throughout were consistent in the 10 replicate plates.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The evolution of a mycelial habit in fungi let them develop diverse feeding strategies and exploit a wide range of substrates (Kendrick 1992Go). Indeed, fungi exhibit marked phenotypic plasticity, quickly adapting to changing conditions, and their hyphae are particularly well suited to heterogeneous environments. In particular, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi exhibit two distinct mycelial phases: an intraradical phase (intraradical mycelium, IRM), developing under relatively homogeneous conditions in the root cortex (Smith and Read 1997Go), and an extraradical phase (extraradical mycelium, ERM), developing under temporally and spatially heterogeneous conditions in the soil. Intraradical hyphae alter their morphology, physiology and probably their genetic expression to meet the constraints imposed by host root cells (Smith and Smith 1997Go). This prevents rejection of the association and allows establishment of a fully functional symbiosis. The extraradical mycelium of AM fungi also might be expected to adapt its growth pattern and metabolic capabilities to explore and exploit different soil microenvironments (Bago 2000Go).

The extent of spread of the extraradical AM hyphae depends on the fungal species and environmental conditions (van Bruggen et al 2000Go, Smith et al 2000Go) ranging from soil phosphorus concentration (Abbott et al 1984Go, Abbott and Robson 1985Go) to atmospheric CO2 (Klironomos et al 1998Go). Cui and Caldwell (1996aGo, bGo) demonstrated that the AM fungal ERM facilitates the acquisition of phosphate by plants growing in enriched soil patches. The results presented here demonstrate that different zones of the same AM ERM can develop differently to explore and exploit the surrounding substrate. These morphogenetic changes are localized (and sometimes transient) within the fungal colony and are influenced directly by the presence of a nutrient (or combination of nutrients). It is interesting to note that the growth of some hyphae into one hyphal compartment (HC) did not influence hyphal morphogenesis of the rest of the colony. The plasticity of the ERM might be an important strategy for adaptation and survival in a diverse range of ecosystems and within heterogeneous substrates. Although the experimental system used (monoxenic AM cultures) is somewhat artificial, our results, as well as those of other previously published studies that also used monoxenic cultures, seem to reflect accurately the morphogenetic processes known to occur in AM fungi when growing in soil.

When growing with little NO3, PO43–) or no (WA) nutrients, extraradical AM hyphae exhibited a well organized and economic development pattern, probably designed to maximize exploration and exploitation of the medium and allow the production of spores outside the zone of influence of the colonized root. This pattern, similar to that described by Bago et al (1998aGo, bGo), is based on the formation of runner hyphae, which radially extend the fungal colony, and from which small, compact branched absorbing structures (BAS) develop at regular intervals. These latter structures have been proposed as preferential nutrient uptake structures (Bago et al 1998cGo). Thus, while runner hyphae rapidly extend the colony to find either zones with more nutrition within the substrate or a new host root to colonize, BAS immediately form to absorb nutrients and spores develop in older parts of the fungal colony that probably have switched from assimilative to reproductive metabolism. The spore contents are mainly carbonaceous compounds (stored as lipids and glycogen; Beilby and Kidby 1980Go, Jabaji-Hare 1988Go, Bonfante et al 1994Go), which are acquired by the intraradical hyphae from the host plant (Shachar-Hill et al 1995Go) and transported toward the extraradical mycelium (Pfeffer et al 1999Go, Bago et al 2002Go, 2003Go). However, spore formation also requires other nutrients, one of the most important being nitrogen, a principal component of chitin, which is abundant in the spore wall. The idea that nitrogen is taken up by the fungus (probably via BAS) from the culture medium during assimilative growth is supported by the enhanced BAS production observed on extraradical hyphae growing in NO3-amended media. A further indication of NO3 uptake by the fungus in the HC comes from the observed alkalinization of the NO3-containing media (NO3, minimal medium), which also was observed by Bago et al (1996)Go. The absence of pH changes in PO43– medium suggests that other mechanisms apart from symport/antiport were active on the fungal hyphae in this treatment (e.g., organic acid excretion), which could balance the otherwise expected alkalinization of the culture medium.

Fungal sporulation can be enhanced by increasing the C:N ratio of the culture media (Delatorre and Cardenascota 1996Go, Engelkes et al 1997Go, Pascual et al 1997Go, Yu et al 1998Go). After 84 d, the presence of an adequate supply of carbohydrates (exported from the intraradical mycelium) combined with a possible depletion of media nitrogen (through fungal NO3 up-take, Bago et al 1996Go) could explain the observed increase in spore production in the NO3 HC. Although NO3 is the sole nitrogen source in minimal medium HC, this culture medium also contains sucrose; such an exogenous carbon source, which the extraradical fungal structures are unable to acquire and metabolize (Pfeffer et al 1999Go, Bago et al 2002Go), seems to hinder spore production by G. intraradices ERM, as has been shown by St.-Arnaud et al (1996)Go.

When a balanced mix of mineral nutrients is available in the medium (e.g., in minimal medium HC) uptake becomes the principal function of the mycelium, rather than exploration or reproduction. Intensive substrate exploitation probably was achieved by increased hyphal branching and a temporary loss of apical dominance by the runner hyphae in the minimal medium treatment. The fact that hyphae were in an assimilative rather than in a reproductive phase could explain the low spore number in this treatment. When growing in batch culture, fungal growth is unrestricted until nutrient depletion or alteration of other culture conditions inhibit it (Trinci et al 1994Go). It is interesting to note that after a certain time the morphogenesis of some hyphae in the minimal medium compartments changed to resemble those growing in low-nutrient media. This probably is explained by nutrient depletion of the minimal medium.

Although initially adjusted to 6.2, the pH of NH4+ HC fell sharply before fungal development within them. This decline probably was caused by the formation of carbonic acid (CO2 + H2O -> HCO3 + H+) in the NH4+-amended media after a build up of CO2 produced by the roots and hyphae in the culture compartment. Although production of this weak acid was not enough to reduce the pH in the other culture media, the fact that an (NH4)2SO4 solution in water trends to be acidic (as observed in the NH4+ color controls, which spontaneously drop almost 1 pH unit; TABLE IIGo) seemed to be enough to shift the already weak chemical equilibrium of the medium.

Development of external hyphae of G. intraradices in NH4+ HC reflects the adaptive changes of this fungus when growing under adverse conditions. Changes in extraradical fungal morphology (e.g., infrequent and deformed BAS, formation of coiled hyphae and protruded apices and a suppression of sporulation) were observed when NH4+ was the only nitrogen form in the culture medium under acidic conditions. AM colonization has been reported in plants growing in mine spoils at pH 2.7 (Daft et al 1975Go, see also Heijne et al 1996Go). Using monoxenic cultures of G. intraradices Coughlan (1998)Go found that external hyphae stopped growing immediately on reaching HC containing WA medium adjusted to pH 4. Clark and Zeto (1996)Go reported a sharp reduction in intraradical arbuscules or vesicles in Glomus-colonized maize roots when plants were grown in acidic soil, results supported by Tiwari et al (2002)Go using AM monoxenic cultures. Finally, van Aarle et al (2002)Go have shown that low pH negatively influenced both extraradical hyphal spread and (possibly) spore formation in two AM fungi grown in soil, even though the roots of the host plants were not exposed to the same pH. These reports agree with the results obtained in our work. However, it remains unclear whether the morphological changes presented here were caused by low pH alone or whether the nitrogen source also played a role.

In an attempt to clarify this point, we prepared NH4+ HC containing 10 mM of the pH buffer MES. However, the results obtained for this treatment (i.e., loss of apical dominance and profuse runner hyphal growth) suggests that the changes observed were caused by the MES buffer rather than pH stabilization. Vilariño et al (1997)Go observed a slight increase in root colonization and a strong effect on ERM development when AM soil cultures were amended with MES. The authors attributed these results first to a possible effect of the buffer on soil micro-organisms. However, the monoxenic conditions used in the present study indicate that the enhanced growth observed in the MES-buffered medium must be due, at least in part, to other mechanisms. Vilariño et al (1997)Go also suggested that sulfur in the MES buffer (32 g per mol) might be responsible for the increased growth. This hypothesis, supported by previous studies performed in AM fungi grown axenically in the presence of sulfuric compounds (Hepper 1984Go, Bago 1990Go) seems more likely. In our study 2.6 mg sulfur per HC were added as MES. Therefore, it is possible that sulfur has an important effect on ERM development, but more research is needed to prove this.

Branched absorbing structures are formed by extraradical hyphae of AM fungi only after a successful symbiosis has been established with a host root (Bago et al 1998cGo). Our observations support the idea that BAS are intrinsic features of extraradical hyphae because they were formed under all experimental conditions tested. External conditions, however, strongly influenced their morphology. In contrast, spore formation seems to depend on nutrient (mainly nitrogen) availability and/or environmental conditions, with low pH and/or the presence of ammonium suppressing sporulation.

Finally, with regard to sporulation, why did spore production increase threefold in the bromocresol-free WA surrounding the HC, compared to the maximum sporulation rate obser ved within a HC (NO3)? Although a negative effect of bromcresol purple on spore formation cannot be ruled out, it is probable that the extraradical hyphae of AM fungi differentiate into an exploitative (absorptive) mycelium in zones where nutrients are available. The nutrients absorbed then would be moved to older zones of the fungal colony where sporulation can be initiated. Such sporulation likely is a consequence of various nutritional and physiological conditions, such as the above-mentioned increased C:N ratio and/or colony aging.

In conclusion, our results highlight the ability of the ERM of Glomus intraradices to adapt its hyphal morphology and architecture in discrete microsites to efficiently exploit a given substrate. These results should be further tested by using different AM fungal isolates. New studies to clarify the discrete influence of nutrients, pH and environmental conditions on the differential morphogenesis of the AM extraradical mycelium also are needed.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by two postdoctoral grants to B.B. (Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica, Spain, and Ministère de l’Éducation, Québec, Canada). The financial assistance provided by the NSERC to Y.P. also is gratefully acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted for publication November 10, 2003.

Present address: Departamento de Microbiología del Suelo, Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: abago{at}eecs.csic.es


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1985. Formation of external hyphae in soil by four species of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 99:245–255.

———, de Boer G. 1984. The effect of phosphorus on the formation of hyphae in soil by the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus fasciculatum. New Phytol 97:437–446.

Azcón-Aguilar C, Bago B, Barea JM. 1998. Saprophytic growth of AMF. In: Varma A, Hock B, eds. Mycorrhiza: structure, function, molecular biology and biotechnology. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 391–407.

Bago B. 1990. Efecto de distintos compuestos azufrados en el desarrollo independiente del hongo formador de micorrizas vesículoarbusculares Glomus mosseae [Master’s Thesis]. Granada, Spain: Universidad de Granada. 108 pp.

———. 2000. Putative sites for nutrient uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 226:263–274.

———, Azcón-Aguilar C, Piché Y. 1998a. Extraradical mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizae: the concealed extension of roots. In: Flores HE, Lynch JP, Eissenstat D, eds. Radical biology: advances and perspectives on the function of plant roots. Current Topics in Plant Physiology, ASPP Series, 18:502–505.

———, ———, ———. 1998b. Architecture and developmental dynamics of the external mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices grown under monoxenic conditions. Mycologia 90:52–62.

———, ———, Goulet A, Piché Y. 1998c. Branched absorbing structures (BAS): a feature of the extraradical mycelium of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 139:375–388.

———, Shachar-Hill Y, Pfeffer PE. 2000. Carbon metabolism and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Physiol 124:949–957.[Free Full Text]

———, Pfeffer PE, Abubaker J, Jun J, Allen JW, Brouillette J, Douds DD, Lammers PJ, Shachar-Hill Y. 2003. Carbon export from arbuscular mycorrhizal roots involves the translocation of glycogen as well as lipid. Plant Physiol 131:1496–1507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, ———, Douds DD Jr, Brouillette J, Bécard G, Shachar-Hill Y. 1999. Carbon metabolism in spores of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices as revealed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Plant Physiol 121:263–271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, Vierheilig H, Piché Y, Azcón-Aguilar C. 1996. Nitrate depletion and pH changes induced by the extraradical mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices grown in monoxenic culture. New Phytol 133:273–280.

———, Zipfel W, Williams RC, Jun J, Arreola R, Pfeffer PE, Lammers PJ, Shachar-Hill Y. 2002. Translocation and utilization of fungal storage lipid in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol 128:108–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bailey DJ, Otten W, Gilligan CA. 2000. Saprotrophic invasion by the soil-borne fungal plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and percolation thresholds. New Phytol 146:535–544.

Bécard G, Fortin A. 1988. Early events of vesiculararbuscular mycorrhiza formation on Ri T-DNA transformed roots. New Phytol 108:211–218.

Beilby JP, Kidby DK. 1980. Biochemistry of ungerminated and germinated spores of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus caledonium: changes in neutral and polar lipids. J Lipid Res 21:739–750.[Abstract]

Bending GD, Read DJ. 1995. The structure and function of the vegetative mycelium of ectomycorrhizal plants. V. Foraging behaviour and translocation of nutrients from exploited litter. New Phytol 130:401–409.

Bonfante P, Balestrini R, Mendgen K. 1994. Storage and secretion processes in the spore of Gigaspora margarita Becker & Hall as revealed by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution. New Phytol 128:93–101.

Bonfante-Fasolo P. 1984. Anatomy and morphology of VA mycorrhizae In: Powell CL, Bagyaraj DJ, eds. VA mycorrhiza. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p 5–33.

———. 1987. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: fungus-plant interactions at the cellular level. Symbiosis 3:249–268.

Chabot S, Bécard G, Piché Y. 1992. Life cycle of Glomus intraradix in root organ culture. Mycologia 84:315–321.

Clark RB, Zeto SK. 1996. Growth and root colonization of mycorrhizal maize grown on acid and alkaline soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1505–1511.

Coughlan AP. 1998. pH and nutrient availability influence extraradical hyphal morphogenesis and substrate amelioration of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in monoxenic culture [Master’s thesis]. Québec, Canada: Université Laval. 325 pp.

Cui M, Caldwell MM. 1996a. Facilitation of plant phosphate acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizas from enriched soil patches. I. Roots and hyphae exploiting the same soil volume. New Phytol 133:453–460.

———, ———. 1996b. Facilitation of plant phosphate acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizas from enriched soil patches. II. Hyphae exploiting root-free soil. New Phytol 133:461–467.

Daft MJ, Hacskaylo E, Nicolson TM. 1975. Arbuscular mycorrhizas in plants colonizing coal spoils in Scotland and Pennsylvania. In: Sanders FE, Mosse B, Tinker PB, eds. Endomycorrhizas. London: Academic Press. p 581–592.

Delatorre M, Cardenascota HM. 1996. Production of Paecilomyces fumosoroseus conidia in submerged culture. Entomophaga 41:443–453.

Engelkes CA, Nuclo RL, Fravel DR. 1997. Effect of carbon, nitrogen and C:N ratio on growth, sporulation and bio-control efficacy of Talaromyces flavus. Phytopathology 87:500–505.

Fomina M, Ritz K, Gadd GM. 2003. Nutritional influence on the ability of fungal mycelia to penetrate toxic metal-containing domanis. Mycol Res 107:861–871.[Medline]

Friese CF, Allen MF. 1991. The spread of VA mycorrhizal fungal hyphae in the soil: inoculum types and external hyphal architecture. Mycologia 83:409–418.

Heijne B, Vandam D, Heil GW, Bobbink R. 1996. Acidification effects on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) infection, growth and nutrient uptake of established heathland herb species. Plant Soil 179:197–206.

Hepper CM. 1984. Inorganic sulphur nutrition of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus caledonium. Soil Biol Biochem 16:669–671.

Jabaji-Hare S. 1988. Lipid and fatty acid profiles of some vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: contribution to taxonomy. Mycologia 80:622–629.

Jakobsen I. 1995. Transport of phosphorus and carbon in VA mycorrhizas. In: Varma A, Hock B, eds. Mycorrhiza: structure, function, molecular biology and biotechnology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 297–323.

Kendrick B. 1992. The fifth kingdom. Newburyport; Massachusetts: Focus Texts. 406 pp.

Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Rillig M, Allen MF. 1998. Interspecific differences in the response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to Artemisia tridentata grown under elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol 138:599–605.

Marsh BAB. 1971. Measurement of length in random arrangement of lines. J Appl Ecol 8:265.

Neiderhofer MA, Schenck NC. 1987. Morphological diversity within a single vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (VAMF) in a mixed hardwood forest in north Florida. 318. In: Sylvia DM, Hung LL, Graham JH, eds. Mycorrhizae in the next decade, practical application and research priorities. Proceedings of the 7th. NACOM, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Olsson PA, van Aarle IM, Allaway WG, Ashford AE, Rouhier H. 2002. Phosphorus effects on metabolic processes in monoxenic arbuscular mycorrhiza cultures. Plant Physiol 130:1162–1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pascual S, Melgarejo P, Magan N. 1997. Induction of submerged conidiation of the biocontrol agent Penicillium oxalicum. App Microbiol Biotechnol 48:389–392.

Pfeffer PE, Douds DD Jr, Bécard G, Shachar-Hill Y. 1999. Carbon uptake and the metabolism and transport of lipids in and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Phys 120:587–598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ritz K. 1995. Growth responses of some fungi to spatially heterogeneous nutrients. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16:269–280.

Schüssler A, Gehrig H, Schwarzott D, Walker C. 2001. Analysis of partial Glomales SSU rRNA gene sequences: implications for primer design and phylogeny. Mycol Res 105:5–15.

Shachar-Hill Y, Pfeffer PE, Douds D, Osman SF, Doner LW, Ratcliffe RG. 1995. Partitioning of intermediate carbon metabolism in VAM colonized leek. Plant Physiol 108:7–15.[Abstract]

Smith FA, Jakobsen I, Smith SE. 2000. Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago truncatula. New Phytol 147:357–366.

———, Smith SE. 1997. Structural diversity in (vesicular)-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 137:373–388.

Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. San Diego, California: Academic Press. 605 pp.

St-Arnaud M, Hamel C, Vimard B, Caron M, Fortin JA. 1996. Enhanced hyphal growth and spore production of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus G. intraradices in an in vitro system in the absence of host roots. Mycol Res 100: 328–332.

Tiwari P, Prakash A, Adholeya A. 2002. Effect of pH on AM fungus Glomus intraradices and Ri T-DNA transformed carrot roots as host under in vitro. Abstracts of the 7th International Mycological Congress, Oslo, Norway. http://www.uio.no/conferences/imc7/Abstract no. 1191

Trinci APJ, Wiebe MG, Robson GD. 1994. The mycelium as an integrate entity. In: Wessels JGH, Meinhardt F, eds. The Mycota I: growth, differenciation and sexuality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 175–193.

van Aarle IM, Olsson PA, Söderström B. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to the substrate pH of their extraradical mycelium by altered growth and root colonization. New Phytol 155:173–182.

van Bruggen AHC, Termorshuizen AJ, Semenov AM. 2000. Hyphal growth and colony expansion. New Phytol 146: 355–356.

Vilariño A, Frey B, Schuepp H. 1997. MES [2-(N-morpholine)-ethane sulphonic acid] buffer promotes the growth of external hyphae of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in alkaline sand. Biol Fertil Soils 25:79–81.

Yu X, Hallett SG, Sheppard J, Watson AK. 1998. Effects of carbon concentration and carbon-to-nitrogen ratio on growth, conidiation, spore germination and efficacy of the potential bioherbicide Colletotrichum coccodes. J Industrial Microbiol Biotechnol 20:333–338.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MycologiaHome page
C. Cano and A. Bago
Competition and substrate colonization strategies of three polyxenically grown arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Mycologia, November 1, 2005; 97(6): 1201 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bago, B.
Right arrow Articles by Piché, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS