Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.
Mycologia, 95(6), 2003, pp. 1141-1154.
© 2003 by The Mycological Society of America

Molecular characterization of Embellisia and Nimbya species and their relationship to Alternaria, Ulocladium and Stemphylium


Barry M. Pryor 1
Donna M. Bigelow

     Department of Plant Pathology, Forbes 204, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0036

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

DNA sequences from rDNA and protein-coding regions were determined for six Embellisia and two Nimbya spp. and were compared to those from Alternaria, Ulocladium and Stemphylium spp. Sequences determined included rDNA from the nuclear internal transcribed-spacer region (ITS1/5.8S/ITS2) and the mitochondrial small-subunit (mt SSU) and a portion of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd) gene. Phylogenetic analyses were performed on each dataset separately and then combined for total evidence analysis using methods of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. Results revealed that Embellisia and Nimbya clustered within a large monophyletic Alternaria-Nimbya-Embellisia-Ulocladium clade with Stemphylium as the sister taxon. Members of the infectoria species-group were the most basal group in this large polygeneric clade. Embellisia and Nimbya were sister taxa of the remaining Alternaria and Ulocladium spp. and were related more closely to Alternaria than was Stemphylium. Four Embellisia spp. formed a monophyletic clade. However, E. allii clustered with the two Nimbya spp. and E. indefessa clustered with Alternaria and Ulocladium spp., revealing that Embellisia, as currently circumscribed, is polyphyletic. Potential revisions of taxonomy for all genera are discussed.

Key words: gpd, ITS, maximum likelihood, mitochondrial SSU, parsimony, phylogeny


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Embellisia Simmons and Nimbya Simmons are anamorphic-based genera of phaeosporic Hyphomycetes described as genera nova in 1971 and 1989, respectively (Simmons 1971Citation, 1989Citation). Species in both genera possess characteristics of conidia that are morphologically reminiscent of both phragmosporic Helminthosporium species and dictyosporic Alternaria species. Moreover, numerous species in both genera are synonyms of earlier described species of Helminthosporium, Alternaria or other morphologically similar genera, which reveals a level of taxonomic ambiguity that historically has shadowed these and related taxa. Additional review using modern systematic methods might be useful in resolving some of the uncertainty regarding true evolutionary relationships.

The genus Embellisia originally was erected to accommodate the atypical Helminthosporium spp., H. allii Campanile, causal agent of garlic bulb canker (Simmons 1971Citation). Simmons recognized that the production of conidiophores as successive sympodial proliferations by H. allii was inconsistent with the erect growth of Helminthosporium conidiophores and was more similar to those produced by Curvularia, Bipolaris, Drechslera, Alternaria and Ulocladium (Shoemaker 1959Citation, 1962Citation; Simmons 1967Citation; Alcorn 1988Citation, 1991Citation). Like Curvularia spp., conidia of H. allii variously can be curved and branched (Campanile 1924Citation). But unlike Curvularia, the curvature is not generated by the inequilateral growth of a single central cell (Simmons 1971Citation). Moreover, the production of significant numbers of dictyoconidia among a majority of phragmoconidia by H. allii was inconsistent with the strict production of phragmoconidia by Curvularia, Bipolaris and Drechslera and more resembled those produced by Alternaria and Ulocladium. Simmons further noticed that conidium septation was particularly thick, dark and rigid in contrast to the external wall of the conidium. Thus, based on a combination of several characters, the placement of H. allii into pre-existing genera was deemed unsuitable and the new genus Embellisia was erected with E. allii (Campanile) Simmons as the type (Simmons 1971Citation).

Since the inception of Embellisia, 19 additional species have been described or transferred from other genera (David et al 2000Citation; de Hoog and Muller 1973Citation; de Hoog et al 1985Citation; Muntanola-Cvetkovic and Ristanovic 1976Citation; Simmons 1971Citation, 1983Citation, 1990Citation). The combination of characters that are diagnostic for Embellisia include: 1) a low percentage of dictyoconidia among the dominant phragmoconidia; 2) variously swollen, smoothly curved or sigmoid conidia as exceptions to the usually straight-elliptical or oblong-elliptical population; 3) umbilicate sites ("pores") of conidium production at conidiophore geniculations; 4) intrahyphal proliferating chlamydospores and hyphal coils in culture (Simmons 1971Citation, 1983Citation). Conidial septation distinctly contrasts with the external wall of the conidium and is a key differentiating character. For most species, conidia generally are borne singly, although the production of secondary conidia is documented for several species. A notable exception to solitary conidia is E. indefessa, in which conidia often are borne in chains up to 10–12 conidia in length (Simmons 1983Citation). In addition, several members have recognized teleomorphic states in the genus Allewia Simmons (Simmons 1990Citation). Characteristics of Allewia ascostroma are indistinguishable from those of Lewia Simmons & Barr, the teleomorphic state of several Alternaria spp. (Simmons 1986Citation), the only difference between the genera being the anamorphic state.

The designation of Nimbya as a new genus followed a similar course as the designation of Embellisia. The genus Nimbya was erected to accommodate the atypical characteristics of Sporidesmium scirpicola Fuckel, a pathogen of river bulrush (Simmons 1989Citation). The taxonomy of this fungus has been controversial and different authors previously have described the species as Sporidesmium, Clasterosporium, Cercospora or Alternaria (Fuckel 1863Citation, Saccardo 1886Citation, Zinderen Bakker 1940Citation, Sivanesan 1984Citation). However, Simmons said, "Sporidesmium scirpicola was the earliest of a few taxa described with a combination of conidium characters suggestive of both Alternaria and Drechslera to modern students of the group. I found the combination of characters too miscellaneous for Drechslera and unacceptable of Alternaria" (Simmons 1989Citation). Isolates of Sporidesmium scirpicola produce solitary conidia, initially long obclavate with a tapered apical region that matures into a long filiform beak. Internal cell-like lumina are delimited by distosepta, which become rarely, partially or completely euphragmoseptate on maturity. No longisepta are present. Based on these characters, Simmons found the placement of this taxon in Sporidesmium unacceptable and genus Nimbya was erected with N. scirpicola (Fuckel) Simmons as the type (Simmons 1989Citation).

Since its inception, 13 additional taxa have been added to Nimbya, several of which formerly were recognized in other genera (Chen et al 1997Citation; Johnson et al 2002Citation; Simmons 1989Citation, 1995Citation, 1997Citation, 2000Citation). Species of Nimbya produce one to several conidia on closely geniculate conidiophores. Conidia generally are solitary or rarely catenate, long obclavate or short to long rostrate. Most conidia are porogenic; however, in some species conidia are holoblastic. Initially the conidia are distophragmoseptate becoming rarely, partially or completely euphragmoseptate, which is a key taxonomic character and clearly distinguishes Nimbya from Drechslera, Alternaria and other related genera (Simmons 1989Citation). Conidia often are distinctly constricted at eusepta. Longitudinal or oblique septa occasionally are produced, similar to Alternaria and Ulocladium. It is interesting to note that the teleomorph of Sporidesmium scirpicola has been recognized as a species of Macrospora Fuckel, a genus morphologically distinct from the Embellisia teleomorph Allewia Simmons or the Alternaria teleomorph Lewia Barr & Simmons (Simmons 1986Citation, 1990Citation). However, the taxonomy of Macrospora scirpicola is not without controversy because some mycologists have treated the fungus as a species of Pleospora (Crivelli 1983Citation), which morphologically is quite similar to Lewia (Simmons 1986Citation).

Descriptions of Nimbya and Embellisia spp. reveal some characters unique and some similar to those of Alternaria and other genera in the Pleosporaceae. Following the description of Embellisia and Nimbya, Simmons (1992)Citation proposed a close relationship of these genera to Alternaria, based on common conidium characteristics. Alternaria, together with Ulocladium and Stemphylium, comprise a large group of closely related phaeodictyosporic Hyphomyetes whose members are plant pathogens (predominantly) or saprobes. Recent phylogenetic analyses, based on nuclear internal-transcribed spacer (ITS), mitochondrial small-subunit (mt SSU), and 18S rDNA sequences, revealed that typical members of these genera comprised a monophyletic group with Stemphylium as the sister group of a large monophyletic clade of Alternaria and Ulocladium spp. (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation). Within the large Alternaria/Ulocladium clade, species were clustered into distinct species-groups, which corresponded fairly well with previously described species-groups based on morphology (Simmons 1992Citation, 1995Citation). Ulocladium, it is interesting to note, was polyphyletic within this clade. Subsequent studies, based on ITS sequences analysis, have supported these findings (de Hoog and Horre 2002Citation, Chou and Wu 2002Citation, Konstantinova et al 2001Citation). Further studies examining relationships based on other genetic regions, such as protein coding genes, would contribute considerably to our confidence in phylogenetic relationships developed thus far. However, such studies are lacking. One potential gene for this purpose is glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpd), which has been used extensively in the resolution of phylogenetic relationships among Cochliobolus/Bipolaris, Pyrenophora/Drechslera, Setosphaeria/Exserohilum spp. (Zhang and Berbee 2001Citation, Berbee et al 1999Citation), genera established as sister taxa of Pleospora/Stemphylium and Lewia/Alternaria spp. (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation, Berbee 1996Citation, Berbee et al 1999Citation). This region has been found to have a similar level of genetic variation as that found in the ITS region. To date, only a few gpd sequences of Alternaria spp. have been determined. No phylogenetic assessment of the suggested relationship among Embellisia, Nimbya and Alternaria spp., based on any gene, has been performed. The objective of this study is to examine the phylogenetic relationships among Embellisia and Nimbya spp. and the genera Alternaria, Ulocladium and Stemphylium, based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences and those of a single-copy protein-coding gene, gpd.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Isolates used in this study – All isolates of Embellisia and Nimbya were obtained from the collection of E. G. Simmons (Table I). Other isolates in this work were obtained from various sources, and many of the isolates have been included in previous phylogenetic work (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation; Table I). All isolates were cultured on 0.05x PDA and PCA, under strictly defined incubation conditions (Pryor and Michailides 2002Citation) and examined for characteristics of the sporulation apparatus and conidium morphology to confirm species identity and compare morphological characters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Isolates used in this study, their sources, and GenBank accession numbers for sequences used in phylogenetic analyses. Sequences that were determined in the course of this study appear in bold

 
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing – DNA extraction and purifications were conducted according to previously established protocol (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation). The DNA concentrations were diluted to a final concentration of 10 ng/µL for PCR reactions. rDNA from the ITS region (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) was amplified via PCR with primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al 1990Citation). rDNA from the mt SSU was amplified via PCR with primers NMS1 and NMS2 (Li et al 1994Citation). DNA from the gpd gene was amplified via PCR with primers gpd1 and gpd2 (Berbee et al 1999Citation). Amplification of the gpd region was carried out for all isolates in this study. Amplification of the ITS and mt SSU region was carried out for all Nimbya and Embellisia species and for several of the Alternaria and Ulocladium species for which ITS and mt SSU sequences had not been determined in previous work (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation). PCR annealing temperature for ITS and mt SSU amplification was 60 C, and annealing temperature for gpd amplification was 50 C. PCR product purifications were carried out as previously described (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation). The sequences of PCR products were determined with FS DyeTerminator reactions and ABI automated DNA sequencers. Sequences were determined for both DNA strands of the PCR products for sequence confirmation.

Phylogenetic analysis – DNA sequences from each isolate were combined with sequences from previously established monophyletic species-groups contained within the Alternaria/Ulocladium clade and the Stemphylium clade (Table I) and were aligned with the PILEUP program of the GCG Sequence Analysis Software Package (version 10.2, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, California). For all amplified regions, manual adjustments of sequence alignments were performed with the data editor program of MacClade Phylogenetic Software (version 4.0, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts). Phylogenetic analyses were performed with programs contained in PAUP Phylogenetic Software (version 4.0 ß, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts). Sequences of Exserohilum pedicillatum were included as outgroup in all analyses. Parsimony analysis heuristic searches for the most-parsimonious trees were conducted with random stepwise addition and branch swapping by tree bisection-reconnection (TBR). Sequence gaps were treated as missing data. To assess the effect of ambiguous regions in the alignment, analysis was repeated after removing ambiguous sections (ambiguous insertion/deletions regions are eliminated to the point where a conserved site is present in all taxa). For maximum-likelihood analysis, parameters of ti/tv ratio, base frequencies, proportion of invariable sites and gamma distribution were estimated from the most-parsimonious tree with the best-likelihood score. For each analysis, 500 bootstrap replicates were performed to assess the statistical support for each tree topology. During maximum-likelihood bootstrap analysis, re-arrangements were limited to 1000 per bootstrap replicate to reduce computational time.

Total evidence analysis – Concordance between datasets was evaluated with the Partition-Homogeneity Test implemented in PAUP. For concordant data, datasets were combined and parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses were run as previously described.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Isolates used in this study – For all isolates, morphological characteristics of conidia produced in cultures grown on 0.05x PDA and PCA generally were consistent with published descriptions of isolates cultured on PCA (Simmons 1967Citation, 1983Citation, 1986Citation, 1989Citation, 1990Citation, 1995Citation; Fig. 1). However, characteristics of E. indefessa conidia were more consistent with those of many Alternaria spp., e.g., conidia shape typically ovoid to short obclavate rather than ovoid to elliptical as previously reported on PCA (Fig. 1F).



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Conidia of (A) Alternaria infectoria, (B) Nimbya caricis, (C) Embellisia allii, (D) E. proteae, (E) E. leptinellae, (F) E. indefessa, (G) Ulocladium alternariae, (H) U. chartarum and (I) A. alternata. Scale bars equal 35 µm

 
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing – PCR resulted in the successful amplification of 591–626 bp fragments using primers ITS5 and ITS4, 639–765 bp fragments using primers NMS1 and NMS2 and 545–606 bp fragments using primers gpd1 and gpd2 for all isolates. All sequences determined in this study have been submitted to GenBank, and accession numbers are listed in Table I.

Phylogenetic analysis – Alignment of the ITS sequences with those of other Alternaria, Ulocladium, Stemphylium and Exserohilum spp. resulted in a 632-character dataset, of which 135 characters (21.4%) were variable and 88 characters (13.9%) were parsimony informative. In the aligned dataset, four regions of numerous indels were apparent and the alignment of characters within these regions was variable. Variable Region 1 (ITS-VR1) spanned characters 55–123. Within this region, a notable indel (characters 88–113) was present in sequences from N. caricis, N. scirpicola and E. allii, members of the infectoria species-group, and members of the brassicicola species-group but not in sequences from any other isolate. Variable regions 2, 3 and 4 (ITS-VR2, ITS-VR3 and ITS-VR4, respectively) spanned characters 236–244, 447–469 and 540–590, respectively.

Alignment of the mt SSU dataset with those of other Alternaria, Ulocladium, Stemphylium and Exserohilum spp. resulted in a 769-character dataset, of which 82 characters (10.7%) were variable and 50 characters (6.5%) were parsimony informative. In the aligned dataset, one very large region of indels was present and spanned characters 365–559. Within this region, numerous indels were present, ranging in size from 3 to 38 bp, and alignment of these indels was variable. However, the presence of specific indels among members of previously established species-groups generally was conserved and sequence identity among members of species-groups was usually >98%.

Alignment of the gpd sequences resulted in a 613-character dataset, of which 237 characters (38.7%) were variable and 168 characters (27.4%) were phylogenetically informative. In the aligned dataset, two regions of indels were present and alignment of sequences within these regions was variable. Variable Region 1 (gpd-VR1) spanned characters 26–93, and Variable Region 2 (gpd-VR2) spanned characters 169–282. Alignments of each dataset have been submitted to TreeBASE for review (SN1412).

Maximum-parsimony analysis of the ITS dataset yielded nine equally most-parsimonious trees (steps = 266, CI = 0.654, RI = 0.834), which differed primarily in minor changes in the relationship among members of the porri species-group and in minor changes in the relationships among members of the Ulocladium group (Fig. 2). Nine principle clades were evident, seven of which corresponded to previously established monophyletic groups: Stemphylium, infectoria species-group, brassicicola species-group, porri species-group, radicina species-group, alternata species-group and Ulocladium group (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation). Most of these groups were supported strongly by bootstrap values of >83%, with the exception of the brassicicola species-group, which was weakly supported by bootstrap values of 56%. Two additional clades were evident, referred to herein as the Nimbya group and the Embellisia group. The Nimbya group comprised N. caricis, N. scirpicola and E. allii. The Embellisia group comprised E. hyacinthi, E. leptinellae, E. novae-zelandiae and E. proteae. These groups were weakly supported by bootstrap values of <50% and 64%, respectively. Within Embellisia, three Embellisia species clustered together and were strongly supported with a bootstrap value of 100%. The inclusion of E. leptinellae as a fourth species within this group was supported only weakly in bootstrap analysis. It is interesting to note that E. indefessa clustered with the Ulocladium species and A. cheiranthi, previously established as the Ulocladium group. This association was strongly supported by a bootstrap value of 83% (Fig. 2). Removal of ITS-VR2, ITS-VR3 and ITS-VR4 had no significant effect on tree topology or tree support (data not shown). Removal of ITS-VR1 resulted in 563-character dataset, of which 96 (17.1%) characters were variable and 60 (10.7%) were parsimony informative. A heuristic search of this dataset resulted in more than 5000 most-parsimonious trees (steps = 178, CI = 0.674, RI = 0.847), which varied primarily in the relationships among Alternaria species-groups but not in the composition of the species-groups (data not shown). Bootstrap analysis of this dataset had only minor effects on the resulting topology of the bootstrap consensus tree compared to that resulting from analysis of the complete ITS dataset, but it resulted in significantly lower bootstrap values (<50%) for most clades previously established, with the exception of the Stemphylium group and alternata species-group (data not shown).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. One of nine most-parsimonious trees generated from maximum-parsimony analysis of ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 sequences from select Alternaria, Embellisia, Nimbya, Ulocladium and related species. Number in the front of "/" represents parsimony bootstrap values from 500 replicates, and number after the "/" represents maximum-likelihood bootstrap values from 500 replicates. Values represented by an "*" were less than 50%. Bootstrap values for terminal nodes are not presented. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions; vertical distances have no significance

 
Maximum-likelihood analysis of the ITS dataset revealed a most-likely tree that had near-identical topology as displayed in Fig. 2 (minor differences in branch lengths), with the exception of the position of E. leptinellae, which did not cluster with any previously described clade and its position was basal to the Embellisia clade (data not shown). Bootstrap support for maximum-likelihood topology was similar to that for parsimony topology (Fig. 2).

Maximum-parsimony analysis of the mt SSU dataset yielded more than 20 000 most-parsimonious trees (steps = 122, CI = 0.869, RI = 0.936), due to the number of large indels and identical or nearly identical sequences within the dataset. Most of these trees had similar topography in terms of species clusters as those revealed in analysis of the ITS dataset (Fig. 3). However, branch lengths often were significantly longer due to the presence of species-group-specific indels of varying lengths (3–38 characters). Similarities included strong bootstrap support (>81%) for infectoria and porri species-groups and the Ulocladium group and moderate support (>70%) for the Stemphylium group. Nimbya and Embellisia groups and the radicina species-group were weakly supported. Moreover, the relationships among the brassicicola, porri, alternata and radicina species-groups and the Ulocladium group were unresolved as a polytomy. The removal of the large variable section resulted in a 574-character dataset, of which 26 (4.5%) of the characters were variable and 13 (2.3%) were parsimony informative. A heuristic search of this dataset resulted in 126 most-parsimonious trees (steps = 33, CI = 0.879, RI = 0.920), most of which were unresolved as polytomies (data not shown). Bootstrap analysis of this dataset also placed most species in unresolved polytomies (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. One of more than 20 000 most-parsimonious trees generated from maximum-parsimony analysis of mitochondrial SSU sequences from select Alternaria, Embellisia, Nimbya, Ulocladium and related species. Number in the front of "/" represents parsimony bootstrap values from 500 replicates, and number after the "/" represents maximum-likelihood bootstrap values from 500 replicates. Values represented by an "*" were less than 50%. Bootstrap values for terminal nodes are not presented. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions; vertical distances have no significance

 
Maximum-likelihood analysis of the mt SSU dataset revealed a nearly identical tree as displayed in Fig. 3 (minor differences in branch lengths), with the exception of a reversal in positions of the porri species-group and Ulocladium group relative to the positions of the remaining clades (data not shown). Bootstrap support for maximum-likelihood topology was similar to that for parsimony topology (Fig. 3).

Maximum-parsimony analysis of the gpd dataset yielded 12 equally most-parsimonious trees (steps = 560, CI = 0.579, RI = 0.788), which differed primarily in the relationships among members of the porri species-group and in the position of the radicina and alternata species-groups relative to the porri species-group (Fig. 4). Similar clades were revealed in analysis of the gpd dataset as were revealed in analysis of the ITS and SSU datasets. Excluding minor differences in branch lengths, the only significant differences in results from parsimony analysis of the gpd dataset compared to the ITS dataset was that E. leptinellae and U. alternariae did not cluster in the Embellisia clade and the brassicicola clade, respectively, or in any of the other previously described clades. Bootstrap analysis revealed strong support (>81%) for all previously described clades, with the exception of the Nimbya clade and the brassicicola clade (A. brassicicola and A. japonica). Removal of gpd-VR1 and gpd-VR2 independently had only minor effects on tree topology but generally reduced bootstrap support for most clades (data not shown). However, removal of both variable regions resulted in a 431-character dataset, of which 93 (21.6%) characters were variable and 33 (7.7%) were parsimony informative. A heuristic search of this dataset resulted in 12 most-parsimonious trees (steps = 187, CI = 0.561, RI = 0.754), which differed from trees derived from the complete dataset in a reversal of polarity (basal versus distal) of nearly all clades in the large Alternaria/Nimbya/Embellisia/Ulocladium clade (i.e., the radicina and Ulocladium clades were most basal and the infectoria and Nimbya clades were most distal; data not shown). The bootstrap consensus tree derived from this dataset did not reflect this reversal in clade position, but bootstrap support was poor (<50%) for most clades that were resolved, with the exception of the Stemphylium group and infectoria species-group (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. One of 12 most-parsimonious trees generated from maximum-parsimony analysis of gpd sequences from select Alternaria, Embellisia, Nimbya, Ulocladium and related species. Number in the front of "/" represents parsimony bootstrap values from 500 replicates, and number after the "/" represents maximum-likelihood bootstrap values from 500 replicates. Values represented by an "*" were less than 50%. Bootstrap values for terminal nodes are not presented. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions; vertical distances have no significance.

 
Maximum-likelihood analysis revealed a nearly identical tree as displayed in Fig. 4 (minor differences in branch lengths), with the exception of a reversal in positions of the porri and radicina clades relative to the positions of the remaining clades. In addition, A. brassicicola and A. japonica did not cluster together or with any other previously described group. Bootstrap support for maximum-likelihood topology was similar to that for parsimony topology (Fig. 4).

Total evidence analysis – Datasets were combined and partitioned by gene in this analysis. Test for concordance in datasets following combination revealed the data were not significantly inconcordant (P = 0.360), therefore, parsimony and maximum-likelihood analysis proceeded on the combined dataset. Maximum-parsimony analysis of the combined dataset yielded two equally most-parsimonious trees (steps = 964, CI = 0.627, RI = 0.810), which differed primarily in the relationship among members of the porri species-group (Fig. 5). Most clades revealed in the analysis of the combined dataset were revealed in analysis of the individual datasets with the exception of the brassicicola group, in which U. alternariae was not included and was resolved separately. Most resolved groups and species-groups previously discussed were strongly supported (>91%) in bootstrap analysis. The Nimbya clade was moderately supported (74%) and brassicicola clade (A. brassicicola and A. japonica) was weakly supported (51%). Removal of all variable regions resulted in a 1493-character dataset, of which 183 (12.3%) characters were variable and 113 (7.6%) were parsimony informative. A heuristic search of this dataset resulted in 18 most-parsimonious trees (steps = 346, CI = 0.613, RI = 0.789), which differed from trees derived from the complete dataset in a reversal in positions of the porri species-group and the Ulocladium group, relative to the positions of the remaining clades (data not shown). In addition, the infectoria species-group and Nimbya group clustered in a single clade, as did the brassicicola species-group and Ulocladium group. Bootstrap analysis of these data resulted in a consensus tree with similar topology as the most-parsimonious trees. Bootstrap support for most clades was somewhat lower, particularly the radicina clade (<50%). In addition, bootstrap support for the infectoria/Nimbya and brassicicola/Ulocladium clusters were poor (<50%; data not shown).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. One of two most-parsimonious trees generated from maximum-parsimony analysis of a combined dataset containing ITS, mt SSU and gpd sequences from select Alternaria, Embellisia, Nimbya, Ulocladium and related species. Number in the front of "/" represents parsimony bootstrap values from 500 replicates, and number after "/" represents maximum-likelihood bootstrap values from 500 replicates. Values represented by an "*" were less than 50%. Bootstrap values for terminal nodes are not presented. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions; vertical distances have no significance

 
Maximum-likelihood analysis revealed a tree nearly identical to that as displayed in Fig. 5, with the exception of a reversal in the positions of the porri and Ulocladium clades relative to the remaining clades (data not shown). Bootstrap support for maximum-likelihood topology was similar to that for parsimony topology (Fig. 5).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This work describes phylogenetic relationships among select species of Embellisia and Nimbya and species of Stemphylium, Alternaria and Ulocladium, based on sequences from three different genetic regions, nuclear ITS rDNA, mitochondrial SSU rDNA, and a single-copy protein-encoding gene, gpd. Although the ITS sequence of N. gomphrenae has been included in a previous phylogenetic analysis of Alternaria and Ulocladium species (Chou and Wu 2002Citation), to date, no further examination of molecular relationships among Nimbya and other genera has been explored. Moreover, no analysis of Embellisia phylogeny has ever been conducted. Thus, this work provides the first systematic examination of these two genera as they relate to the hypothesized related taxa of Alternaria (Simmons 1992Citation).

In general, analysis of the three genetic regions independently resulted in similar phylogenetic conclusions. Although amplified fragments from all regions were roughly similar in size (545–765 bp), the gpd sequences contained almost twice the number of variable sites and parsimonious-informative sites as the ITS sequences, which contained approximately twice the number of variable sites and parsimonious-informative sites as the mt SSU region. The increase in the number of variable sites did not necessarily translate into improved phylogenetic resolution because results from analysis of the gpd sequences were very similar to those of the ITS sequences in terms of tree topology and bootstrap support. Similar results were obtained in comparisons to ITS and gpd phylogenies using Cochliobolus and Pyrenophora sequences as well (Berbee et al 1999Citation, Zhang and Berbee 2002). Furthermore, results from analysis using maximum parsimony were similar to results using maximum likelihood in that clades strongly supported in parsimony were generally strongly supported in likelihood. Results from analysis of the mt SSU sequences were somewhat different from those of ITS and gpd sequences in that many of the intermediate nodes in the resulting tree were poorly resolved or not at all (polytomies). This low resolution was due, in part, to the low number of total variable sites within the dataset and to the paucity of variable sites outside the region of indels described previously. Although analysis of this region was variable with respect to indel alignment, the presence of specific indels was diagnostic for certain groups, such as Ulocladium, in which there was greater than 99% sequence identity among the six representatives of the group. This high degree of sequence identity in mt SSU sequences among members of particular groups resulted in strong support for most of the terminal clades, despite low support for more basal clades.

Perhaps more important in terms of robust phylogenetic conclusions, datasets were not significantly inconcordant and results of the combined datasets were similar in most aspects to those results obtained from independent analysis, often with greater bootstrap support. In regard to Alternaria/Ulocladium phylogeny, this work revealed relationships that were consistent with previous studies; specifically, that Alternaria and Ulocladium spp. composed a strongly supported monophyletic clade with Stemphylium as sister group of this clade (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation, de Hoog and Horre 2002Citation). Within this clade, Ulocladium was polyphyletic. In addition, the primary clade containing most Ulocladium spp., which was strongly supported in all parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses, included an Alternaria and Embellisia spp. and, thus, was paraphyletic. Therefore, support for Ulocladium as a distinct monophyletic genus was not evident, which also had been revealed in previous studies (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation, de Hoog and Horre 2002Citation).

These findings conflict with morphology because all Ulocladium species examined in this study including U. alternariae, which did not cluster with the other Ulocladium spp., possessed similar characteristics. These characteristics included small, heavily pigmented conidia produced in dense clusters on closely geniculate conidiophores. Most important, all isolates produced conidia that typically were ovoid in shape, a key differentiating characteristic of the genus as described by Simmons (1967)Citation. Moreover, E. indefessa and A. cheiranthi, which clustered tightly with most Ulocladium spp. in all three datasets, did not possess this combination of characters. Taken together, these results suggest that the characters that circumscribe Ulocladium are homoplastic, derived from Alternaria progenitors and are not reliable criteria for determining evolutionary relationships.

This work revealed similar findings in regard to the relationship between Embellisia and Alternaria. In the combined dataset, four Embellisia spp. composed a strongly supported monophyletic clade, which was basal to most Alternaria/Ulocladium species, except those within the infectoria species-group. However, the type species of Embellisia, E. allii, did not cluster with this group and clustered with Nimbya spp. with moderate bootstrap support in the combined dataset. In addition, E. indefessa clustered with the Ulocladium/A. cheiranthi clade and was strongly supported in bootstrap analysis of all individual datasets and in the combined dataset. The key character that circumscribes Embellisia—viz. relatively thick, dark, and rigid septation in contrast to the external wall of the conidium—was apparent in all Embellisia spp. examined. These data reveal that the phylogeny of Embellisia is similar to that of Ulocladium in that the genus is polyphyletic and the key differentiating characters of Embellisia are likely homoplastic. Thus, the results of this work questions the phylogenetic status of Embellisia, much as it does the phylogenetic status of Ulocladium.

Although this work revealed that the three datasets were concordant and that results from analysis of each dataset were corroborative, several taxa were problematic in the development of strongly supported phylogenetic trees. The Nimbya group, comprising N. scirpicola, N. caricis and E. allii, was a weakly supported clade in analysis of each of the three datasets. In the phylogram generated from the combined dataset, greater bootstrap support was obtained. However, increased bootstrap values might not necessarily be confirmation of monophyly because these data might be statistically inconsistent or "positively misleading", i.e., estimating an incorrect clade with increasing certainty as the amount of character data increases (Felsenstein 1978Citation, Hendy and Penny 1989Citation). It might be that these taxa are representatives of several distinct but related clades, which might be resolved as distinct when additional related taxa are included in the dataset.

A similar situation was apparent in regard to the Embellisia group. Three Embellisia spp., E. hyacinthi, E. novae-zelandiae and E. proteae, clustered together with strong bootstrap support in analysis of each of the three datasets, establishing a monophyletic core for the Embellisia group. A fourth species, E. leptinellae, clustered with these three species in two of the three datasets but with low bootstrap support. However, when all three datasets were combined, support for the association of E. leptinellae with the remaining taxa in the Embellisia group was increased significantly. Again, this does not necessarily suggest a true relationship because the data might be "positively misleading". Additional related taxa might be needed in the dataset to resolve more firmly the true relationship of E. leptinellae to other Embellisia spp.

A different situation existed for U. alternariae, a particularly problematic taxon. U. alternariae clustered with A. brassicicola and A. japonica in analysis of the ITS region. However, this clade was weakly supported. This relationship was evident in analysis of the mt SSU dataset as well. In analysis of the gpd dataset, U. alternariae did not cluster within the brassicicola species-group, nor did it cluster in any other species-group. Bootstrap support for intermediate nodes generally was weak in analysis of each of the three datasets. So, from these data it was not possible to definitively resolve the relationship of U. alternariae to other clades. In the combined dataset, U. alternariae also did not cluster within the previously defined brassicicola species-group. However, in the combined dataset nearly all intermediate clades were moderately to strongly supported and from these data it was possible to resolve the position of U. alternariae within the large Alternaria/Nimbya/Embellisia/Ulocladium clade, as well as the positions of A. brassicicola and A. japonica, as basal to clades containing exclusively asexual taxa of Alternaria and Ulocladium. Moreover, these data clearly resolve U. alternariae as distinct from the other Ulocladium spp., which is consistent with 18S-based phylogeny of Alternaria and related taxa developed in previous studies (Pryor and Gilbertson 2000Citation).

Data from this work revealed that most genera examined were not natural taxa and were in conflict with the principles of modern phylogenetic systematics (Hennig 1966Citation, Wiley et al 1991Citation). If Alternaria, Nimbya, Embellisia and Ulocladium are not monophyletic clades but are all closely related taxa, how might the taxonomy of all four genera be resolved so that the final taxonomic structure is consistent with contemporary concepts in systematics, i.e., each taxonomic unit be resolved into a monophyletic clade? Several possible solutions exist. The first is to collapse the four genera into one genus, Alternaria. If taxa within the infectoria species-group, which are phylogenetically basal to Nimbya, Embellisia and Ulocladium, are to be maintained within a monophyletic clade containing the remaining Alternaria spp., then all taxa within the clade containing both the infectoria species-group and the remaining Alternaria spp. necessarily would be Alternaria. This would require a significant revision of characters that circumscribe Alternaria to include those of Nimbya, Embellisia and Ulocladium spp., as well as synonymy of species currently described as Nimbya, Embellisia and Ulocladium to newly erected Alternaria taxa.

The second solution would be to maintain all genera as distinct. However, for this solution to be consistent with the premise of monophyly of taxonomic units, the characters that circumscribe most genera would need to be revised. For example, this work revealed that E. allii clustered most closely with Nimbya spp., E. indefessa and A. cheiranthi clustered with Ulocladium spp. and U. alternariae clustered most closely with Alternaria spp. Nomenclatural revision for all these taxa would be needed so that taxonomic status would be consistent with phylogenetic relationships, and all genera would need revisions of diagnostic characters to be consistent with the newly synonymized taxa. The circumscription of Embellisia would be problematic because the type for the genus, E. allii, clustered most closely with Nimbya spp. in a clade distinct from the Embellisia clade resolved in this work. The circumscription of Ulocladium would be equally problematic because Alternaria species occur both basal (e.g., A. brassicicola and A. japonica) and distal (e.g., the alternata and radicina species-groups) to the Ulocladium clade within the large Alternaria/Nimbya/Embellisia/Ulocladium clade. In addition, if the phylogenetic concept of monophyly of genera is upheld, the infectoria species-group, which currently includes approximately 15 species of Alternaria (several of which have known teleomorphs) and is phylogenetically basal to both the Nimbya and Embellisia clade, would require genus designation distinct from Alternaria species-groups that contain strictly asexual taxa.

Both solutions require rather substantial changes to the taxonomic structure of this group of fungi and some significant revisions of how mycologists view these groups. However, the advancement of mycology is best served when such changes are made slowly and carefully because the consequences of erroneous conclusions based on partial data would result in unnecessary confusion in our understanding of a group of fungi already hampered by historical controversy. Results of this study do not suggest an immediate taxonomic revision of Alternaria and related genera. Results of this study do reveal an apparent conflict between the resolved phylogenies of several genes and contemporary taxonomic structure, and this suggests that taxonomic revision might be necessary. For this revision to proceed with confidence, the resolution of addition gene phylogenies is necessary, as well as an evaluation of concordance between those data and data presented in this work. The inclusion of more taxa would be necessary to represent the full range of diversity among species contained in Alternaria, Nimbya, Embellisia and Ulocladium and to assist in the resolution of clades that have been weakly supported to date. In addition, a comprehensive examination of morphological, biochemical and cytological characters of contemporary species would be necessary to develop the biological and ecological basis for revisionary taxonomy and to support the development of meaningful, natural taxonomic keys.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors wish to thank Patricia Figuli and Craig Michoski for their assistance in PCR amplification of target sequences. A Faculty Small Grant Award, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona, supported this research.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Corresponding author. E-mail: bmpryor{at}u.arizona.edu Back

Accepted for publication April 28, 2003.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Alcorn JL., 1988 The taxonomy of "Helminthosporium" species. Ann Rev Phytopathol 26:37-56

———. 1991 New combinations and synonymy in Bipolaris and Curvularia, and a new species of Exserohilum. Mycotaxon 41:329-343

Berbee ML., 1996 Loculoascomycete origins and evolution of filamentous Ascomycete morphology based on 18S gene sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 13:462-470[Abstract]

———, Pirseyedi M, Hubbard S., 1999 Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 91:964-977

Campanile G., 1924 Su di una nuova malattia dell'aglio dovuta ad "Helminthosporium allii" nov. sp. Nuovi Ann dell'Agric 4:86-106

Chen WQ, Lin XF, Zhang TY., 1997 A new species of Nimbya. Mycosystema 2:106-108

Chou HH, Wu WS., 2002 Phylogenetic analysis of internal transcribed spacer regions of the genus Alternaria, and the significance of filament-beaked conidia. Mycol Res 106:164-169

Crivelli PG., 1983 Über die heterogene Ascomycetengattung Pleospora Rabh.: Vorshlag für eine Aufteilung.—Diss. ETH. Nr. 7318. Zürich: ADAG Administration & Druck AG. 213 p

David JC, Coles K, Fisher J, Moss ST., 2000 A new species of Embellisia from soil with high levels of heavy metals. Mycoscience 41:533-537

Felsenstein J., 1978 Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 27:401-410

Fuckel L., 1863 Fungi rhenani exsiccate,. Fasc. I, No. 1–100

Hendy MD, Penny D., 1989 A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst Zool 38:297-309

Hennig W., 1966 Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 263 p

de Hoog GS, Horre R., 2002 Molecular taxonomy of the Alternaria and Ulocladium species from humans and their identification in the routine laboratory. Mycoses 45:259-276[Medline]

———, Muller PJ., 1973 A new species of Embellisia associated with skin disease of hyacinths. Neth J Plant Path 79:85-93

———, Seigle-Murandi F, Steinman R, Eriksson KE., 1985 A new species of Embellisia from the North Sea. J Microbio 51:409-413

Johnson DA, Simmons EG, Miller JS, Stewart EL., 2002 Taxonomy and pathology of Macrospora/Nimbya on some North American bulrushes (Scirpus spp). Mycotaxon 84:413-428

Konstantinova P, Bonants PJM, Gent-Pelzer MPE van, Zouwen P van der, Bulk R van den., 2002 Development of specific primers for detection and identification of Alternaria spp. in carrot material by PCR and comparison with blotter and plating assays. Mycol Res 106:23-33

Li KN, Rouse DI, German TL., 1994 Differentiation of ascomycetes with PCR primers. Appl Environ Microbio 60:4324-4331

Muntanola-Cvetkovic M, Ristanovic B., 1976 A new species of Embellisia isolated from seawater. Mycologia 68:47-51

Pryor BM, Gilbertson RL., 2000 Molecular phylogenetic relationships amongst Alternaria species and related fungi based on analysis of nuclear ITS and mt SSU rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 104:1312-1321

———, Michailides TJ., 2002 Morphological, pathogenic, and molecular characterization of Alternaria isolates associated with Alternaria late blight of pistachio. Phytopathology 92:406-416

Saccardo PA., 1886 Sylloge Fungorum. Vol. IV. Padova: Publ by the author. 807 p

Shoemaker RA., 1959 Nomenclature of Drechslera and Bipolaris, grass parasites segregated from "Helminthosporium". Can J Bot 37:879-887

———. 1962 Drechslera Ito. Can J Bot 40:1143-1150

Simmons EG., 1967 Typification of Alternaria, Stemphylium, and Ulocladium. Mycologia 59:67-92

———. 1971 Helminthosporium allii as type of a new genus. Mycologia 63:380-386

———. 1983 An aggregation of Embellisia species. Mycotaxon 17:216-241

———. 1986 Alternaria themes and variations (22–26). Mycotaxon 25:287-308

———. 1989 Macrospora Fuckel (Pleosporales) and related anamorphs. Sydowia 41:314-329

———. 1990 Embellisia and related teleomorphs. Mycotaxon 38:251-265

———. 1992 Alternaria taxonomy: current status, viewpoint, challenge. In: Chelkowski J, Visconti A, eds. Alternaria biology, plant diseases and metabolites. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. p 1–35

———. 1995 Alternaria themes and variations (112–144). Mycotaxon 55:55-163

———. 1997 Alternaria themes and variations (151–223). Mycotaxon 65:1-91

———. 2000 Alternaria themes and variations (244–286): species on Solanaceae. Mycotaxon 75:1-115

Sivanesan A., 1984 The Bitunicate Ascomycetes. Vaduz: J. Kramer. 701 p

White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J., 1990 Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. London: Academic Press. p 315–322

Wiley EO, Siegel-Causey D, Brooks DR, Funk VA., 1991 The complete cladist. Lawrence: The University of Kansas. 158 p

Zhang G, Berbee ML., 2001 Pyrenophora phylogenetics inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia 93:1048-1063

Zinderen Bakker van EM., 1940 Cercospora scirpicola (Sacc.) nov. comb. Revue de Mycol 5:64-69




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
P. R. Badenoch, C. L. Halliday, D. H. Ellis, K. J. Billing, and R. A. D. Mills
Ulocladium atrum Keratitis.
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 1190 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pryor, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, D. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS