Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.
Mycologia, 95(6), 2003, pp. 1032-1036.
© 2003 by The Mycological Society of America

Calicioid lichens from European Tertiary amber


Jouko Rikkinen 1

     Department of Ecology and Systematics, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Two species of calicioid lichens (Ascomycota) are reported from Baltic amber dating back 55–35 million years ago. The fossils are very similar to some modern Calicium and Chaenotheca species, but because ascus characteristics and photobiont identities cannot be determined they are not assigned to any extant species. Calicioid lichens seem to show a conservative maintenance of morphological adaptations to successful ecological niches, as do several other groups of ascomycetes. The fossils demonstrate that distinguishing features in the morphology of both genera have remained unchanged for at least tens of millions of years. The palaeohabitat of the fossil lichens, viz. that of conifer trunks in a humid, mixed forest, is consistent with the habitat preferences of many modern Calicium and Chaenotheca species.

Key words: Baltic amber, Calicium, Chaenotheca, fossil fungi, lichen


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Calicioid fungi are a heterogeneous grouping of ascomycetes, with small, usually well-stalked apothecia. Both lichenized and nonlichenized species are involved, and the latter include both parasitic and saprophytic forms (Tibell 1984Citation, 1999aCitation, Wedin and Tibell 1997Citation, Wedin et al 1998Citation, 2000Citation, Tibell and Wedin 2000Citation). Mature ascospores of calicioid lichens tend to accumulate on the upper surfaces of the apothecia, often forming extensive mazaedia.

Here two specimens of calicioid lichens, representing a Calicium Pers. (Caliciaceae) and a Chaenotheca Th. Fr. (Coniocybaceae), are described and illustrated from Baltic amber dating back 55–35 million years ago. Amber is fossilized resin and composed of nonvolatile terpenoid materials, which have been oxidized and polymerized to a point where they can withstand chemical and microbiological attack (Poinar 1992Citation).


    MATERIAL AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Fossilized lichens are contained in two pieces of Baltic amber. Both specimens (V. Arnold 1285 & 1294) originate from deposits in northern Europe and belong to the private collection of Dr. Volker Arnold, Germany. Their exact age is unknown, but the age of Baltic amber generally varies from Late Paleocene to Late Eocene epochs (ca 55–35 MaBP). The forests that produced the resin were in the region of present Fennoscandia. The resin-producing tree usually is referred to as Pinus succinifera (Göppert) Conwentz. Over millions of years, large amounts of solidified conifer resin were transported by rivers to Baltic deposits south of the amber forests (Poinar 1992Citation, Ganzelewski 1997Citation).

The amber specimens have been polished to facilitate screening for inclusions. In this study no further destructive sampling was performed. All measurements and photographs were taken from the intact specimen under transmitted and/or incident light. Optical distortions were neutralized by coating the specimen in vegetable oil. The deep fields of focus in Figs. 1–2 were achieved by combining several optical sections into composite pictures. During this process several stellate hairs and other obscuring debris were removed from Fig. 1. This was done to facilitate a clear view of the fungal ascoma.



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 1–2. Chaenotheca in Baltic amber (V. Arnold, Nr. 1285). 1. Mature ascoma. 2. Cross section of crustose thallus on bark substrate. Scale bars = 200 µm

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Chaenotheca specimen (V. Arnold, Nr. 1285), Baltic amber (Figs. 1–4). The fossilized lichen has a well-developed, 100–200 µm thick thallus, growing over bark. Thallus verrucose, grayish white, with isolated dark spots. Six ascomata, four of them mature, have been preserved. Ascomata well stalked, up to 450 µm high, without obvious pruina. Stalk 50–70 µm diam, smooth. Capitulum obconical, 100–120 µm diam. Excipulum well developed and continuous with the stalk tissue. Mazaedium well developed, compact, with no detached spores in the surrounding amber matrix. Spores spherical, 5–7 µm diam, apparently with a rough surface ornamentation of irregular cracks. Preserved together with detritus and stellate hairs (from flowering plant).

Calicium specimen (V. Arnold, Nr. 1294), Baltic amber (Fig. 5). The specimen consists of a single detached ascoma and numerous spores embedded in solid amber. The ascoma is well stalked, 1.2 µm high, without obvious pruina. Stalk 110–190 µm diam, smooth. Capitulum broadly obconical, 260 µm wide and 120 µm high. Excipulum well developed and continuous with the stalk tissue. Mazaedium well developed, compact. Spores 1-septate, ellipsoidal, 10–15 x µm 5–6 µm diam, apparently with a rough surface ornamentation. Dozens of detached spores occur in a narrow belt extending across the amber specimen, but they are embedded too deeply to be studied or photographed in high magnification. Preserved with detritus and stellate hairs (from flowering plant).



View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Calicium in Baltic amber (V. Arnold, Nr. 1294). The hair-like projection at the stalk base is a fragment of a plant trichome. Scale bar = 250 µm

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The fossils demonstrate that distinguishing features in the morphology of Calicium and Chaenotheca have remained unchanged for at least tens of millions of years. This stasis in evolution confirms that morphological characteristics should be given considerable classificatory significance in calicioid lichens (Tibell 1984Citation). Calicioid fungi, as such, belong to widely different orders among the ascomycetes. Molecular studies have confirmed that Calicium Pers. belongs to the Lecanorales (Caliciaceae) and is closely related to Cyphelium (Sm.) Trevis., Thelomma A. Massal. and Tholurna (Norman) Norman (Wedin and Tibell 1997Citation, Wedin et al 2000Citation). Chaenotheca Th. Fr. is placed in the Coniocybaceae, but its exact position has not been clarified (Tibell 1999aCitation, 2002Citation, Tibell and Beck 2002Citation, Tibell and Koffman 2002Citation).

The fossil Chaenotheca is characterized by its whitish gray, well-developed thallus, relatively stout and short-stalked apothecia, pale stalk, well-developed excipulum, and spherical, relatively large spores. A similar combination of features is found in several modern species, including Chaenotheca cinerea (Pers.) Tibell. However, because many Chaenotheca species are morphologically plastic and distinguishing among them often requires examination of ascus and photobiont characteristics, the fossil cannot safely be assigned to any extant species. The fossilized Calicium ascoma basically is identical to those of several extant taxa, including Calicium viride Pers. However, due to the fragmentary nature of the fossil, it cannot be assigned to any modern species.

Some Chaenotheca species on modern conifers, such as C. ferruginea (Turner ex Sm.) Mig. and C. trichialis (Ach.) Th. Fr., sometimes grow on dry conifer resin. In addition, Calicium viride and Cyphelium inquinans (Sm.) Trevis can grow on old resin. An ability to tolerate dry resin would have made these lichens candidates for preservation in amber. The fossilized Calicium obviously was not entrapped in place but either transported by viscous resin or deposited in stationary exudate, after first becoming detached from a bark or lignum surface. The abrupt cut-off scar suggests that the ascoma was dry when it broke from its original substrate, possibly under the foot of a bird or climbing mammal.

Lichens are unlikely candidates for fossilization and thus very few well-preserved lichen fossils have been found. However, the oldest fossils of both ascomycetes and lichens are known from the early Devonian Period, more than 400 MaBP (Taylor et al 1997Citation, 1999Citation). The first lichen symbioses might have evolved even earlier (Selosse 2002Citation). Recent molecular clock estimates have indicated that the major lineages of Fungi already had evolved 1000 MaBP (Heckman et al 2001Citation). Amber fossils have proven that several extant lichen genera, and possibly even species, already were present in the Tertiary Period. Mägdefran (1957)Citation described a fertile alectorioid lichen from Baltic amber. Two fossil species of Parmelia s. lat. have been described from Dominican amber (Poinar et al 2000Citation), and specimens of Anzia recently were found in European amber (Rikkinen and Poinar 2002). In addition, a 12–24 million-year-old impression of a foliose lichen belonging to Lobariaceae was reported by Peterson (2000)Citation. The thallus morphologies of these fossils are very similar to those of extant forms.

The close relationship between a resinicolous Chaenothecopsis species from European Eocene amber and modern eastern Asiatic taxa suggests that the current distribution of the species is strongly relictual (Rikkinen and Poinar 2000). Another species of resinicolous calicioids, Mycocalicium sequoiae Bonar, grows only on exudates of Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchh. and Sequoia sempervirens (Lamb.) Endl. in western North America (Bonar 1971Citation, Tibell and Titov 1995Citation). This relationship probably dates to the Mesozoic Era, when both paleoendemic hosts were widely distributed. Proposed explanations of the disjunctive distributions of some calicioid lichens among Mediterranean Europe/Macaronesia and SW North America, such as those of Thelomma californicum (Tuck.) Tibell and T. mammosum (Hepp) Massal, as Tethyan relicts would imply slow evolution (Jörgensen 1983Citation, Tibell 1994Citation). Printzen and Lumbsch (2000)Citation used molecular evidence to show that diversification within Biatora (Lecanorales) started in the Late Cretaceous and took place during periods of climate cooling, when many new forest vegetation types evolved and spread in the Northern Hemisphere. Printzen and Ekman (2002)Citation concluded that the strongly disjunctive distribution of Cavernularia hultenii Degel. (Lecanorales) among NW North America, Newfoundland and NW Europe is due to fragmentation of a formerly continuous range.

Many modern species of Calicium and Chaenotheca have wide distributions, ranging from Europe to East Asia and further into the boreal and temperate forests of North America. In subtropical and tropical areas, boreal and temperate species generally occur at higher altitudes and occupy zones corresponding to their latitudinal distribution patterns (Tibell 1975Citation, 1980Citation, 1994Citation). Generally, there is little morphological differentiation among populations in the Calicium and Chaenotheca species, with antitropical distributions in both hemispheres (Tibell 1987Citation, 1994Citation, 1999bCitation). This might indicate continuous gene exchange between the populations and/or that morphological differentiation has been very slow (Tibell 1994Citation). However, recent molecular studies have shown that there is wide sequence variation in some morphologically uniform Chaenotheca species and that such differences can increase with the distance between populations. Thus, some Chaenotheca species as conceived from morphological evidence might contain several cryptic taxa (Tibell 2002Citation, Tibell and Beck 2001).

The palaeoenvironment of the fossil calicioids, namely that of tree trunks in a humid forest, is consistent with the habitat preferences of many modern Calicium and Chaenotheca species. Both amber fragments contain stellate trichomes similar to those on bud scales of extant oaks. Such hairs, which commonly are found in Baltic amber, indicate that hardwoods grew in the vicinity of the calicioids. Extant calicioids occur in a variety of habitat types, ranging from bark and lignum to thin hardwood twigs and rocks. High species diversity often is found on the basal trunks of damaged, old trees, especially in humid, semi-open mixed forests. Many species favor aged forests with long habitat continuity, these being rich in suitable substrates and providing a continuously high atmospheric humidity. On the other hand, many modern species are widely distributed and calicioid communities tend to be uniform over large areas. For example, extant lichen communities with many crustose calicioids are quite similar in species composition over the whole circumpolar belt of boreal coniferous forests and adjoining areas of mixed coniferous-deciduous forest (Tibell 1975Citation, 1992Citation, 1999aCitation).



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGS. 3–4. Chaenotheca in Baltic amber (V. Arnold, Nr. 1285). 3. Stalk. 4. Detached ascospores on thallus. Scale bars = 20 µm

 

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was made possible by financial support from the Academy of Finland. Dr. Volker Arnold is warmly thanked for making his amber specimens available for study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Corresponding author. E-mail: jouko.rikkinen{at}helsinki.fi Back

Accepted for publication April 24, 2003.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIAL AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Bonar L., 1971 A new Mycocalicium on scarred Sequoia in California. Madronõ 21:62-69

Ganzelewski M., 1997 Entstehung und Lagerstätten des Baltischen Bernsteins. In: Ganzelewski M, Slotta R, eds. Bernstein—Tränen der Götter. Glückauf, Bochum. p 11–18

Heckman DS, Geiser DM, Eidell BR, Stauffer RL, Kardos NL, Hedges SB., 2001 Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science 293:1129-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jørgensen PM., 1983 Distribution patterns of lichens in the Pacific region. Aust J Bot Suppl 10:4-66

Mägdefran K., 1957 Flechten und Moose im baltischen Bernstein. Ber Deut Bot Ges 70:433-435

Peterson EB., 2000 An overlooked fossil lichen (Lobariaceae). Lichenologist 32:298-300

Poinar GO., 1992 Life in Amber. Standford University Press. 350 p

———, Peterson EB, Platt JL., 2000 Fossil Parmelia in New World amber. Lichenologist 32:263-269

Printzen C, Lumbsch T., 2000 Molecular evidence for the diversification of extant lichens in the Late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Mol Phyl Evol 17:379-387[Medline]

———, Ekman S., 2002 Genetic variability and its geographical distribution in the widely disjunct Cavernularia hultenii. Lichenologist 34:101-111

Rikkinen J, Poinar G., 2000 A new species of resinicolous Chaenothecopsis (Mycocaliciaceae, Ascomycota) from 20 million year old Bitterfeld amber, with remarks on the biology of resinicolous fungi. Mycol Res 104:7-15

———, ———. 2002 Fossilized Anzia (Lecanorales, lichen-forming Ascomycota) from European Tertiary amber. Mycol Res 106:984-990

Selosse M-A., 2002 Prototaxites: a 400 myr old giant fossil, a saprophytic holobasidiomycete, or a lichen?. Mycol Res 106:642-644

Taylor TN, Hass H, Kerp H., 1997 A cyanolichen from the Lower Devonian Rhynie chert. Amer J Bot 84:992-1004[Abstract]

———, ———, ———. 1999 The oldest fossil ascomycetes. Nature 399:648.[Medline]

Tibell L., 1975 The Caliciales of boreal North America. Symb Bot Upsal 21:1-128

———. 1980 The lichen genus Chaenotheca in the Northern Hemisphere. Symb Bot Upsal 23:1-65

———. 1984 A reappraisal of the taxonomy of Caliciales. Nova Hedwigia Beih 79:597-713

———. 1987 Australasian Caliciales. Symb Bot Upsal 27:1-279

———. 1992 Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests. Nord J Bot 12:427-450

———. 1994 Distribution patterns and dispersal strategies of Caliciales. Bot J Linn Soc 116:159-202

———. 1999a Calicioid lichens and fungi. Nordic Lichen Flora 1:20-94

———. 1999b Crustose mazaediate lichens and the Mycocaliciaceae in temperate South America. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 71:1-107

———. 2002 Morphological variation and ITS phylogeny of Chaenotheca trichialis and C. xylogena (Coniocybaceae, lichenized ascomycetes). Ann Bot Fennici 39:73-80

———, Beck A., 2002 Morphological variation, photobiont association and ITS phylogeny of Chaenotheca phaeocephala and C. subroscida (Coniocybaceae, lichenized ascomycetes). Nord J Bot 21:651-660

———, Koffman A., 2002 Chaenotheca nitidula, a new species of calicioid lichen from northeastern North America. Bryologist 105:353-357

———, Titov A., 1995 Species of Chaenothecopsis and Mycocalicium (Caliciales) on exudate. Bryologist 98:550-560

———, Wedin M., 2000 Mycocaliciales, a new order for nonlichenized calicioid fungi. Mycologia 92:577-581

Wedin M, Döring H, Nordin A, Tibell L., 2000 Small subunit rDNA phylogeny shows the lichen families Caliciaceae and Physciaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycotina) to form a monophyletic group. Can J Bot 78:246-254.

———, Tehler A, Gargas A., 1998 Phylogenetic relationships of Sphaerophoraceae (Ascomycetes) inferred from SSU rDNA sequences. Pl Syst Evol 209:75-83

———, Tibell L., 1997 Phylogeny and evolution of Caliciaceae, Mycocaliciaceae, and Sphinctrinaceae (Ascomycota), with notes on the evolution of the protunicate ascus. Can J Bot 75:1236-1242




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Rikkinen and G. O. Poinar Jr
A new species of Phyllopsora (Lecanorales, lichen-forming Ascomycota) from Dominican amber, with remarks on the fossil history of lichens
J. Exp. Bot., March 3, 2008; (2008) ern004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rikkinen, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS