Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.
Mycologia, 95(3), 2003, pp. 457-466.
© 2003 by The Mycological Society of America

Filamentous ascomycetes inhabiting the rhizoid environment of the liverwort Cephaloziella varians in Antarctica are assessed by direct PCR and cloning


Ari Jumpponen 1

     Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

Kevin K. Newsham

     Biosciences Division, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom

Daniel J. Neises

     Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

We molecularly assesed the ascomycetous fungal communities inhabiting the rhizoid environment of Cephaloziella varians, collected at Rothera Point on the western Antarctic Peninsula. The RFLP-phenotyped and cloned PCR products of a partial small subunit of the ribosomal RNA gene were sequenced and analyzed with neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP). Both analyses identified four bootstrap-supported groups: (i) a sister group to Onygenales, (ii) a well-supported clade with Phialocephala fortinii, (iii) a large group of clones nested within Chaetothyriales, and (iv) a group nested within Eurotiales with a likely affinity to the genus Aspergillus. An additional marginally supported clade, including helotialean Hymenoscyphus fructigenus, was detected in the NJ analysis. Placement of one clone (possibly helotialean) was not supported by either analysis. We included Hymenoscyphus ericae (Helotiales) in our analyses to test for its presence in clone libraries. None of our clones showed strongly supported affinity to H. ericae. The culture-independent technique proved useful for assessing the composition of rhizoid fungal communities, although it remains unknown whether any of these fungi colonize C. varians tissues. Direct-community assays of this kind might be best combined with traditional isolation techniques to get a more holistic view of fungi occupying plant tissues.

Key words: ascomycete, Cephaloziella varians, fungal community structure, fungi, liverwort, rhizoids, rhizosphere


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Roots and closely associated soil—the rhizosphere—form an environment distinct from bulk soil (Lynch and Whipps 1990Citation). This environment provides a microhabitat where soil and root-inhabiting microbes overlap. Many fungi in this environment might be opportunistic, using root exudates, while others might be either facultative or obligate symbionts of plant roots. Rhizosphere fungal communities are thought to have many functions. The benefits of root-associated fungi to their hosts include improved nutrient and water uptake, increased fitness and potential protection from pathogenic or parasitic micro-organisms (Newsham et al 1995Citation, Smith and Read 1997Citation, Jumpponen 2001Citation). The function of opportunistic rhizosphere organisms is less well understood, but these organisms also have been proposed as agents that affect plant health and performance, as well as plant community dynamics (Shivanna et al 1994Citation, Jarosik et al 1996Citation, Westover et al 1997Citation, Holah and Alexander 1999Citation, Packer and Clay 2000Citation, Westover and Bever 2001Citation).

As with roots of higher plants, fungi also are known to be associated with the rhizoids of hepatics (Pocock and Duckett 1985aCitation, Duckett and Clymo 1988Citation, Duckett and Renzaglia 1988Citation). These fungi primarily are ascomycetous, although basidiomycetes (Pocock and Duckett 1985bCitation, Lignore and Duckett 1990Citation) and zygomycetous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Pocock and Duckett 1984Citation, Lignore and Lopez 1989Citation) have been shown to colonize the rhizoids of liverworts in different ecosystems. It also has been shown that rhizoids of hepatics in Antarctica are colonized by ascomycetous fungi (Williams et al 1994Citation). These fungi, which possess septate hyphae, frequently are recorded in the basal walls of rhizoids and adjacent axis cells of Antarctic leafy liverworts belonging to the genus Cephaloziella, which occur in moist habitats in continental and maritime Antarctica (Williams et al 1994Citation). These plants, referred to as Cephaloziella exiliflora (Taylor) Steph., in previous studies (Williams et al 1994Citation, Chambers et al 1999Citation), now are referred to as C. varians (Gottsche) Steph. (Bednarek-Ochyra et al 2000Citation). Recent research has shown that fungi colonizing C. varians from the Bailey Peninsula, continental Antarctica, are conspecific with Hymenoscyphus ericae, the typical mycorrhizal associate of ericaceous plants (Chambers et al 1999Citation). This raises the possibility that the liverwort benefits from endophytic colonization of its rhizoids. However, the presence of endophytes in the rhizoids of C. varians from other locations in the Antarctic has not been confirmed. The rhizoids and surrounding soil of C. varians are likely to host additional fungi, and these broader fungal associates of the liverwort have hitherto remained unstudied.

In this study, we PCR-amplified a partial small subunit (SSU) of the ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) and cloned PCR amplicons to characterize fungal communities inhabiting the rhizoid environment, which we define here as rhizoids and closely associated soil and organic matter, of C. varians from the western Antarctic Peninsula. The techniques allowed an assessment of the fungal communities without potential biases resulting from pure culture techniques and media. We chose to target the conserved SSU of the rDNA to allow a broad taxonomic placement of several potentially unknown taxa for which other genes or rDNA regions might be unavailable. We used a primer set with a known strong bias toward ascomycetes (Smit et al 1999Citation) to get a culture-independent cross section of ascomycetes in the rhizoid environment. To specifically test whether H. ericae was present in our tissue samples, we also sequenced this taxon for our analyses.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Sampling and DNA extraction – Rhizoid tissues from eight discrete colonies (labeled A–H in Tables and Figures) of C. varians were collected at Rothera Point on the Wright Peninsula, Adelaide Island, western Antarctic Peninsula (67° 34' S, 68° 07' W) in January 2000 (Fig. 1). Rothera Point is sparsely vegetated with a vascular plant and cryptogamic flora. The nearest vegetated land is on Anchorage Island, 4.5 km southwest of Rothera Point.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Map shows the sampling location (Rothera Point; arrow) on Adelaide Island, western Antarctic Peninsula. Infilled areas are permanent ice sheets

 
C. varians tissues were dried at 55 C for 48 h and stored until further processing. To avoid airborne contamination, rehydration and DNA extraction were performed under sterile conditions in a biosafety cabinet. Approximately 50 µg of dry rhizoid tissues were transferred into sterile Eppendorf tubes, rehydrated with double distilled water (ddH2O), and surface sterilized with 10% domestic bleach (active ingredient 0.6% sodium hypochlorite). The surface sterilized tissues were rinsed three times with ddH2O to remove residual bleach and homogenized with a micropestle in lysis buffer. DNA was extracted following the protocol provided by the extraction kit manufacturer (Plant DNeasy, Qiagen, Valencia, California). Although this procedure would have inactivated fungi present on rhizoid surfaces it might have failed to denature and remove DNA of these organisms.

PCR parameters – A partial sequence of the SSU of the fungal rDNA was amplified in 50 µl PCR reaction mixtures containing final concentrations or absolute amounts of reagents as follows: 300 nM of each of the forward and reverse primers (EF4 and fung5—Smit et al 1999Citation), 2 µL of the extracted template DNA, 200 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.7 mM MgCl2, 2 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin), and 5 µL of manufacturer's PCR buffer. PCR cycle parameters consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 C for 3 min, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for 1 min, annealing at 48 C for 1 min and extension at 72 C for 3 min, followed by a final extension step at 72 C for 10 min. The PCR reactions were performed in a Hybaid OmniCycler (Hybaid Ltd., Middlesex, U.K.). Possible PCR amplification of airborne and reagent contaminants was determined with two different controls; (i) a blank sample run through the extraction protocol simultaneously with the actual samples; (ii) a negative PCR control in which the template DNA was replaced with ddH2O.

Small-subunit rDNA clone library construction – Due to the specific primers and stringent PCR conditions, we observed amplicons of the expected size (ca 550 bp) when the PCR products were seen on 1.5% agarose gels. The mixed populations of PCR products were ligated into a linearized pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin). The circularized plasmids were transformed into competent JM109 cells (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) by heat shock, and the putative positive transformants were identified by {alpha}-complementation (Sambrook 1989Citation).

Analysis of rDNA clone libraries – All positive transformants in each of the clone libraries were confirmed by PCR amplification of the target product in 15 µL reaction volumes under the same reaction conditions as described above. To select different plasmids for sequencing, PCR products were digested with endonucleases (HinfI, AluI; New England BioLabs, Beverly, Massachusetts) and resolved on 3% agarose gels (Gardes and Bruns 1996Citation). The approach using PCR and restriction fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLP), in addition to allowing efficient screening of clone libraries, made it possible to select different RFLP phenotypes for sequencing. An approximately 550 bp sequence was obtained from one or two representatives of each RFLP phenotype in all clone libraries in one direction, using fluorescent dideoxy-terminators (ABI Prism® BigDyeTM; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) and an automated ABI Prism® 3700 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) at the DNA Sequencing and Genotyping Facility at Kansas State University. In addition to the cloned PCR amplicons from C. varians rhizoids, we sequenced this region of the rDNA from H. ericae (isolate HMER100 maintained at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon). All sequences were determined with primer EF4 (GenBank accession Nos. AF462168–AF462186). Vector contamination was removed with the automated vector trimming function in Sequencher (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, Michigan). The similarities to existing rDNA sequences in the GenBank database were determined at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/—Altschul et al 1997Citation) using standard nucleotide BLAST (version 2.2.1) without limiting queries and Sequence Match (version 2.7) at the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP—http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/html/—Maidak et al 1999Citation).

A total of 16 sequences obtained from C. varians rhizoids, 49 from GenBank, and one from H. ericae, were aligned in 843 positions with Sequencher (GeneCodes Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan) and manually adjusted to maximize conservation. The alignment included a large, 290-bp insert in H. ericae at approximately Position 516, as reported for other ascomycetes in Caliciales and Lecanorales (Gargas et al 1995Citation). The H. ericae insertion did not show close homology to others available at the GenBank, as judged by BLAST searches. The taxonomic relationships among the fungal sequences were inferred with the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum-parsimony (MP) analyses in PAUP* (Swofford 2001Citation). Four species of ascomycetous yeasts belonging to the Saccharomycetales were selected as outgroup because the clone libraries exclusively contained filamentous ascomycetes as a result of our choice of primers with a strong bias in favor of these fungi. In the NJ analyses, rates for variable sites were assumed equal and no sites were assumed invariable. Data matrices were corrected using Jukes-Cantor correction. Sites with missing data—ambiguous nucleotides or gaps—were ignored for the affected pairwise comparisons. The most-parsimonious trees were obtained using a branch swapping algorithm with tree bisection reconnection. The number of equiparsimonious trees was expected to be high, attributable to several closely related sequences in the clone libraries. As a result, the maximum number of retained trees was restricted to 1000. The robustness of inferred NJ and MP topologies was tested by 1000 bootstrap replicates. Because of the large number of possible equiparsimonious trees in MP analyses, stepwise heuristic searches were used in the bootstrapping.

Chimeric sequences might be a frequent phenomenon in environmental samples with diverse, mixed populations of competing templates. To check for possible chimeric sequences, all sequenced clones were analyzed by the Chimera Check program of the RDP database (version 2.7; Maidak et al 1999Citation).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We were able to obtain target-size ascomycetous amplicons (ca 550 bp) from dried C. varians rhizoid tissues (Table I). Seven of the eight samples produced visible amplicons; one failed despite repeated attempts. The two controls included in the PCR reactions consistently failed to produce visible amplicons, indicating that the PCR-products indeed were amplified from the surface-sterilized rhizoid tissues, not from air- or reagent-borne contaminants.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Cloned PCR products obtained from Cephaloziella varians rhizoids from Rothera Point on the western Antarctic Peninsula. Accession numbers of the cloned products and their closest BLAST matches are in parentheses

 
As determined by BLAST (NCBI), our sequence data showed 96–99% similarity to ascomycetous sequences representing Chaetothyriales, Eurotiales and Helotiales in GenBank (Table I); analyses using Sequence Match (RDP) identified the same fungal sequences. Accordingly, we present only the results of the BLAST searches. Most of the fungal sequences obtained from C. varians were distributed among five ascomycete clades (Figs. 2 and 3). (i) Three clones from three different C. varians samples (A–C) formed a well-supported clade (Group I in Figs. 2 and 3) as a sister group of the Onygenales in NJ analysis. This grouping also was detected in MP analysis but received no bootstrap support. The cloned sequences were identical, showing no sequence divergence within the cloned sequence and might represent a conspecific grouping of an abundant rhizosphere fungus. (ii) One clone (E9) formed a strongly supported clade (Group II in Figs. 2 and 3) with Phialocephala fortinii. This clone also was found to be 99% similar to P. fortinii in the BLAST searches (Table I). (iii) A total of nine clones obtained from five of the eight different samples (A, D–F and H) nested within the Chaetothyriales (Group IV in Figs. 2 and 3) and matched Coniosporium sp. in BLAST searches (96% similarity). It remains unclear from our data whether these sequences represent a conspecific group. These clones formed a single, well-supported clade with >85% bootstrap support in both NJ and MP analyses and had sequence divergence ranging only up to 1.8%, equivalent to 10 bp over the entire cloned sequence. (iv) One clone (C4) formed a well-supported clade (Group V in Figs. 2 and 3) nested within the Eurotiales and matched Aspergillus fumigatus and several other aspergilli with 99% similarity in BLAST searches. We estimate that these four groups approximate order-level resolution in our analyses. Finally, one clone (F3) was grouped with H. fructigenus in the NJ analyses with marginal (55%) bootstrap support (Group III in Fig. 2); this grouping was not supported by MP analysis. In one case we were unable to establish a grouping supported by an appreciable bootstrap value in either of the analyses. This clone (H7) was similar to that grouped with H. fructigenus in NJ analysis (F3). Both of these clones were very similar (99%) to helotialean Phacidium coniferarum in BLAST searches (Table I), suggesting an affinity to the Helotiales. Our data analyses did not support monophyletic Helotiales.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. This is a neighbor-joining phylogram of ascomycetes in the rhizoids of the leafy liverwort Cephaloziella varians at Rothera Point on the western Antarctic Peninsula. Branch lengths correspond to pairwise distances from PAUP (Swofford 2001Citation). The PCR-amplified and cloned rhizoid-inhabiting fungi are shown in boldface. Accession numbers of GenBank-obtained sequences are shown in parentheses. Accession numbers of the rhizoid-inhabiting fungi are shown in Table I. Numbers on clades refer to proportion (occurrence >=50%) of bootstrap replicates containing that clade

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Analyses revealed 50% majority rule consensus of 1000 retained equally parsimonious trees of ascomycetes in the rhizoids of the leafy liverwort Cephaloziella varians at Rothera Point on the western Antarctic Peninsula. PCR-amplified and cloned rhizoid-inhabiting fungi are shown in boldface. Accession numbers of GenBank-obtained sequences are shown in parentheses. Accession numbers of the rhizoid-inhabiting fungi are shown in Table I. Numbers on clades refer to proportion (occurrence >=50%) of bootstrap replicates containing that clade

 
To specifically test whether we would be able to detect H. ericae in the sampled C. varians individuals, we sequenced this species (GenBank Accession No. AF462168) for our analyses. Hymenoscyphus ericae contained an approximately 290 bp intron within the sequenced region. This intron was excluded from the analyses because no similar introns were observed in our clone libraries or among the sequences from GenBank. Although five of our clones were 98–99% similar to a member of the Helotiales (P. coniferarum; Table I), none of them grouped with H. ericae in NJ or MP analyses. One clone (F3) grouped with H. fructigenus in the NJ analyses with low-bootstrap support, but this grouping was not supported by MP analyses. Another clone (H7) showed no clear affinity to any of the Helotialean fungi included in these analyses. The remaining three clones (A11, B3, C1) with a BLAST-match within Helotiales formed a sister group with the Onygenales in both MP and NJ analyses. Bootstrapping only in NJ analysis supported this grouping.

The Chimera Check of the RDP indicated that the majority of sequences in our rDNA libraries possibly were chimeric (Table I). Among our sequences, two main-break points of chimeras were found: the first of these was at Position 140 and the second at Position 410 of our approximately 550 bp sequence. To test if these data affected our conclusions, we repeated our NJ analyses after we excluded the portions of the sequence that might have originated from another organism. Exclusion of positions 1–140 resulted in the collapse of groups IV and V (Fig. 2), but no new groupings were observed. Exclusion of positions 410–560 resulted in topologies closely similar to that shown in Fig. 2; four groups (I, II, IV and V) were present and no new rearrangements were observed. In summary, possible chimeric regions do not affect our conclusions on the affinities of the fungal sequences in our rDNA clone libraries.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Our attempt to assess the ascomycetous fungal communities present in the rhizoid environment of Antarctic C. varians by direct PCR and cloning proved to be successful. Seven of the eight samples produced visible amplicons, which could be further analyzed. We also carefully controlled potential air- and/or reagent-borne contamination by two negative controls, which remained free of any visible PCR amplification.

Based on earlier studies (Williams et al 1994Citation, Chambers et al 1999Citation), we expected to detect ascomycetes in the rhizoid environment of C. varians. Our analyses confirmed that ascomycetes indeed are present in this environment: Sequence data showed 96–99% similarity to ascomycetous sequences representing the Chaetothyriales, Eurotiales and Helotiales. In many cases the results of BLAST searches and bootstrapping analyses produced similar results. For example, clone E9 was 99% similar to P. fortinii in BLAST searches and it formed a strongly supported clade with P. fortinii in our analyses. In contrast, results from NJ or MP analyses often did not support the results of BLAST searches. For example, two clones (F3 and H7), which were not supported by bootstrap analyses, were highly (99%) similar to P. coniferarum in BLAST searches. In the light of our results and analyses, BLAST searches appear to provide a useful starting point for determination of unknown taxa in environmental DNA samples, but the reliability of the inferences on relationships among unknown and known taxa need to be tested further.

The majority of our clones from the rhizoid environment of C. varians were placed in three ascomycetous groups that received bootstrap support >50% in MP and NJ analyses. The functional significance of these groups remains unclear but some of the recorded fungi are frequent inhabitants of roots and rhizosphere soil. One of our clones was nested within the Eurotiales and possibly is related to various aspergilli, which are cosmopolitan and commonly encountered in soil and the rhizosphere. Members of the Eurotiales, including aspergilli and penicilli, have been isolated from plant seeds (Yamaji et al 1999Citation, 2001Citation, Sharma and Champawat 2000Citation) and rhizosphere samples (Summerbell 1989Citation, Shivanna et al 1994Citation), and, although many Eurotialean fungi might be saprotrophs in the rhizosphere environment, recent evidence suggests that some species of Aspergillus colonize host root tissues inter- and intracellularly (Barrow and Osuna 2002Citation). Five of the eight samples in this study produced clones that nested within the Chaetothyriales. Affinity to the Chaetothyriales is not surprising because many members of this order are either saprobes or plant parasites. However, we were unable to relate these clones more closely to any known taxa: Our clones were only 96% similar to Coniosporium sp. in BLAST searches. These results hence underline the importance of updating and appending ribosomal databases such as that maintained by RDP (Maidak et al 1997Citation, Maidak et al 1999Citation). Phialocephala fortinii, to which one of the clones in our study showed high affinity, is one of the dark septate endophytes ubiquitous in the roots of higher and lower plants in arctic, tropical, boreal and temperate habitats (Jumpponen and Trappe 1998Citation, Jumpponen 2001Citation). Phialocephala fortinii has been shown to improve the growth of a cool-temperate plant species through enhancement of nutrient uptake from rhizosphere soil (Jumpponen et al 1998Citation), which raises the possibility that at least some of the septate fungi colonizing C. varians tissues in the Antarctic are beneficial to host growth. Some of the clones in our root samples hence are similar or related to fungi known from functional root symbioses, and might represent taxa that influence C. varians growth and performance. Others, however, might be casual, opportunistic inhabitants of the rhizoid environment.

Earlier studies, which relied on isolation and subsequent identification by ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequence comparisons among unknown and authenticated isolates of rhizoid-inhabiting fungi, putatively identified H. ericae from C. varians rhizoids from the Bailey Peninsula, continental Antarctica (Chambers et al 1999Citation). To test whether populations of C. varians from Rothera Point on Adelaide Island hosted helotialean H. ericae, we included two Hymenoscyphus species in our analyses. We found little evidence to support the ubiquitous presence of Hymenoscyphus spp. in our liverwort samples; only one clone formed a marginally supported group with H. fructigenus in NJ analysis. These data corroborate the observation that hyphal coils are not found in rhizoid bases of C. varians from Rothera Point and adjacent islands (K. Newsham pers obs).

We offer several possible explanations for the differences between our observations and those of Chambers et al (1999)Citation. First, it is possible that H. ericae has a heterogeneous distribution in the Antarctic. Our samples were collected at Rothera Point on Adelaide Island in the maritime Antarctic, more than 5000 km from the location at which Chambers et al (1999)Citation collected material. It is recognized that there is little overlap in the species of Acari inhabiting maritime and continental Antarctica (Pugh and Convey 2000Citation), and the same might be true of fungal endophytes inhabiting pan-Antarctic plant species such as C. varians. Second, our sampling was rather limited. With more extensive sampling, either covering a greater geographical range or a greater number of plants, we might have detected a greater diversity of fungi, including H. ericae. Third, endophyte colonization might vary within a growing season (Duckett and Read 1995Citation). Our sampling represents a snapshot in time, and it is possible that we missed the peak of colonization by H. ericae in C. varians rhizoids. However, the seasonal succession of fungi in the tissues of plants exposed to the cold in a short growing season is unlikely to be rapid, and hence this is probably not a plausible explanation for our observations. Fourth, it is possible that an intron might have been present in the small subunit of the ribosomal RNA gene of Hymenoscyphus spp. in C. varians rhizoids, as was observed for the H. ericae isolate that was sequenced in our study. Such introns could have interfered with amplification of fungal DNA from rhizoids. Type I introns frequently are present in ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (Perotto et al 2000Citation) and might be common in other ascomycetes (Holst-Jensen et al 1999Citation, Borneman and Hartin 2000Citation). However, we were able to amplify and sequence DNA from an isolate of H. ericae using the primers that also were used to amplify environmental DNA. This suggests that if strains conspecific or closely related to H. ericae were abundant in our samples, it is likely that we would have detected them. Even in the absence of introns at the priming sites, it is possible that longer templates were discriminated against in the presence of a mixed population of shorter templates. None of the sequences in our rDNA clone libraries contained insertions similar to those observed in H. ericae. Finally, additional factors that might have influenced the assessment of microbial diversity in the environmental samples have been reported. These include PCR and DNA extraction biases, different copy numbers of ribosomal RNA genes, primer specificity, template concentration, chimeric sequences, and/or amplification of contaminants (Kopczynski et al 1994Citation, von Wintzingerode et al 1997Citation, Wilson 1997Citation, Hugenholtz et al 1998Citation, Becker et al 2000Citation, Martin-Laurent et al 2001Citation, Ranjard et al 2001Citation). The results regarding the apparent absence of H. ericae from one location on the western Antarctic Peninsula remain to be confirmed with more widespread sampling and fungal isolation from C. varians rhizoids.

In summary, this study indicates that direct PCR and downstream cloning might be useful tools to assess the ascomycetous fungal communities in the rhizosphere environment of an Antarctic plant species. Using these techniques we tested for the presence of H. ericae in the rhizoid environment of C. varians but were unable to confirm its presence in our samples. However, the presence of other fungi with possible beneficial effects on plant growth, such as P. fortinii, was demonstrated with this approach. The function and ecological role of these fungi remain unclear in this study but will be a focus of forthcoming work. Although direct PCR and cloning appears to be a useful option to estimate organismal diversity (Pace 1997Citation, Hugenholtz et al 1998Citation, Smit et al 1999Citation, Borneman and Hartin 2000Citation, van Elsas et al 2000Citation), it might be necessary to include assessments of culturable organisms as well. Culturing organisms from environmental samples would provide useful reference data to compare with unknown sequences obtained from the same samples.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by Kansas State University BRIEF program, National Science Foundation EPSCoR Grant No. 9874732, matching support from the State of Kansas (to AJ) and the British Antarctic Survey's Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity project (to KKN). We thank Doni McKay of U.S.D.A. Forest Service at Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, for providing the H. ericae isolate. We are grateful to Cameron Cooley for his assistance in the sequence alignment and BLAST searches. Drs. Carolyn Ferguson, Charles L. Kramer and James M. Trappe provided helpful comments on early drafts of this manuscript. Anna MacArthur edited and revised the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Corresponding author. E-mail: ari{at}ksu.edu Back

Accepted for publication October 1, 2002.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ., 1997 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25:3389-3402

Barrow JR, Osuna P., 2002 Phosphorus solubilization and uptake by dark septate fungi in fourwing saltbrush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. J Arid Environ in press

Becker S, Böger P, Oehlmann R, Ernst A., 2000 PCR bias in ecological analysis: a case study for quantitative Taq nuclease assays in analyses of microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4945-4953[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bednarek-Ochyra H, Vána J, Ochyra JVR, Smith RIL, 2000 The liverwort flora of Antarctica. Cracow,. Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany. 236 p

Borneman J, Hartin RJ., 2000 PCR primers that amplify fungal rRNA genes from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4356-4360[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chambers SM, Williams PG, Seppelt RD, Cairney JWG., 1999 Molecular identification of Hymenocyphus sp. from rhizoids of the leafy liverwort Cephaloziella exiliflora in Australia and Antarctica. Mycol Res 103:286-288

Duckett JG, Clymo RS., 1988 Regeneration of bog liverworts. New Phytol 110:119-127

———, Read DJ., 1995 Ericoid mycorrhizas and rhizoid-ascomycete associations in liverworts share the same mycobiont: isolation of the partners and resynthesis of the associations in vitro. New Phytol 129:439-447

———, Renzaglia KS., 1988 Symbiotic ascomycetes associated with the rhizoids of jungermannialian hepatics. Am J Bot 75:2.

Gardes M, Bruns TD., 1996 ITS-RFLP matching for the identification of fungi. In: Methods in molecular biology, Vol. 50: Species diagnostics protocols: PCR and other nucleic acid methods. Clapp JP, ed. Totowa, New Jersey: Humanan Press, Inc. p 177–186

Gargas A, DePriest PT, Taylor JW., 1995 Positions of multiple insertions in SSU rDNA of lichen-forming fungi. Mol Biol Evol 12:208-218[Abstract]

Holah JC, Alexander HM., 1999 Soil pathogenic fungi have the potential to affect the co-existence of two tallgrass prairie species. J Ecol 87:598-608

Holst-Jensen A, Vaage M, Schumacher T, Johansen S., 1999 Structural characteristics and possible horizontal transfer of group I introns between closely related plant pathogenic fungi. Mol Biol Evol 16:114-126[Abstract]

Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR., 1998 Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol 180:4765-4774[Free Full Text]

Jarosik V, Kovacikova E, Maslowska H., 1996 The influence of planting location, plant growth stage and cultivars of winter wheat roots. Microbiol Res 151:177-182

Jumpponen A., 2001 Dark septate endophytes—are they mycorrhizal?. Mycorrhiza 11:207-211

———, Mattson KG, Trappe JM., 1998 Mycorrhizal functioning of Phialocephala fortinii: interactions with soil nitrogen and organic matter. Mycorrhiza 7:261-265

———, Trappe JM., 1998 Dark-septate root endophytes: a review with special reference to facultative biotrophic symbiosis. New Phytol 140:295-310

Kopczynski ED, Bateson MM, Ward DM., 1994 Recognition of chimeric small-subunit ribosomal DNAs composed from genes from uncultivated microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3614-3621

Lignore R, Duckett JG., 1990 Endophytic basidiomycetes in the parasitic achlorophyllous hepatic Cryptothallus mirabilis Malm. and its photosynthetic relative, Aneura pinguis. Giornale Botanico Italiano 124:48.

———, Lopez C., 1989 Cytology and development of a mycorrhiza-like infection in the gametophyte of Concephalum conicum (L.) Dum. (Marchantiales, Hepatophyta). New Phytol 111:423-433

Lynch JM, Whipps JM., 1990 Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1-10

Maidak BL, Cole JR, Parker CTJr, Garrity GM, Larsen N, Li B, Lilburn TG, McCaughey MJ, Olsen GJ, Overbeek R, Pramanik S, Schmidt TM, Tiedje JM, Woese CR., 1999 A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucl Acids Res 27:171-173

———, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeek R, McCaughey MJ, Woese CR., 1997 The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucl Acids Res 25:109-111

Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L, Hallet S, Chaussod R, Germon JC, Soulas G, Catroux G., 2001 DNA extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2354-2359[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR., 1995 Multi-functionality and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas. TREE 10:407-411

Pace NR., 1997 A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276:734-740[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Packer A, Clay K., 2000 Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404:278-281[Medline]

Perotto S, Nepote-Fus P, Saletta L, Bandi C, Young JPW., 2000 A diverse population of introns in the nuclear ribosomal genes of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi includes elements with sequence similarity to endonuclease-coding genes. Mol Biol Evol 17:44-59[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pocock K, Duckett JG., 1984 A comparative ultrastructure analysis of the fungal endophytes in Cryptothallus mirabilis Malm. and other British thalloid hepatics. J Bryol 13:227-233

———, ———. 1985a Fungi in hepatics. Bryological Times 13:2-3

———, ———. 1985b On the occurrences of branched and swollen rhizoids in British hepatics: their relationship with the substratum and associations with fungi. New Phytol 99:281-304

Pugh PJA, Convey P., 2000 Scotia Arc Acari: antiquity and origin. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130:309-328

Ranjard L, Poly F, Lata J-C, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Nazaret S., 2001 Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints: biological and methodological variability. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4479-4487[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sambrook J., 1989 Molecular cloning—A laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Laboratory Press. 999 p

Sharma P, Champawat RS., 2000 Seed mycoflora of Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), their pathogenic potential and control. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 30:398-401

Shivanna MB, Meera MS, Hyakumachi M., 1994 Sterile fungi from zoyziagrass rhizosphere as plant growth promoters in spring wheat. Can J Microbiol 40:637-644

Smit E, Leeflang P, Glandorf B, Van Elsas JD, Wernars K., 1999 Analysis of fungal diversity in the wheat rhizosphere by sequencing of cloned PCR-amplified genes encoding 18S rRNA and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2614-2621[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith SE, Read DJ., 1997 Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Academic Press. 605 p

Summerbell RC., 1989 Microfungi associated with the mycorrhizal mantle and adjacent microhabitats within the rhizosphere of black spruce in boreal Canada. Can J Bot 67:1085-1095

Swofford DL., 2001 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland,. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates

van Elsas JD, Duarte GF, Keijzer-Wolters A, Smit E., 2000 Analysis of the dynamics of fungal communities in soil via fungal-specific PCR of soil DNA followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Journal of Microbiological Methods 43:133-151[Medline]

von Wintzingerode F, Göbel UB, Stackebrandt E., 1997 Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21:213-229[Medline]

Westover KM, Bever JD., 2001 Mechanisms of plant species coexistence: roles of rhizosphere bacteria and root fungal pathogens. Ecology 82:3285-3295

———, Kennedy AC, Kelley SE., 1997 Patterns of rhizosphere microbial community structure associated with co-occurring plant species. J Ecol 85:863-873

Williams PG, Roser DJ, Seppelt RD., 1994 Mycorrhizas of hepatics in continental Antarctica. Mycol Res 98:34-36

Wilson IG., 1997 Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3741-3751[Free Full Text]

Yamaji K, Fukushi Y, Hashidoko Y, Yoshida T, Tahara S., 1999 Characterization of antifungal metabolites produced by Penicillium species isolated from seeds of Picea glehnii. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25:1643-1653

———, ———, ———, ———, ———. 2001 Penicillium fungi from Picea plehnii seeds protect the seedlings from damping-off. New Phytol 152:521-531




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. A. Violi, J. A. Menge, and R. J. Beaver
Chaetomium elatum (Kunze: Chaetomiaceae) as a root-colonizing fungus in avocado: is it a mutualist, cheater, commensalistic associate, or pathogen?
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2007; 94(4): 690 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
C. R. Grunig and T. N. Sieber
Molecular and phenotypic description of the widespread root symbiont Acephala applanata gen. et sp. nov., formerly known as dark-septate endophyte Type 1
Mycologia, May 1, 2005; 97(3): 628 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jumpponen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Neises, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS