Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.
Mycologia, 95(3), 2003, pp. 407-415.
© 2003 by The Mycological Society of America

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a mountain grassland II: Seasonal variation of colonization studied, along with its relation to grazing and metabolic host type


Mónica A. Lugo 1
Mirta E. González Maza

     Herbario UNSL, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Ejército de los Andes 950, 5700 San Luis, Argentina

Marta N. Cabello 2

     Instituto Spegazzini, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Ave. 53 No. 477, 1900 La Plata, Argentina

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

The relationships among seasons, host metabolic type, grazing and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization were analyzed in a high South American native grassland. This study investigated seasonal changes and grazing effects on the symbiotic endomycorrhizal interaction in 5 Poaceae [C3 metabolic pathway: Briza subaristata Lam., Deyeuxia hieronymi (Hack.) Türpe and Poa stuckertii (Hack.) Parodi; with C4 metabolic pathway: Eragrostis lugens Nees and Sorghastrum pellitum (Hack.) Parodi; and a Rosaceae (Alchemilla pinnata Ruíz & Pav.)]. All hosts were dominant species in the mountain grassland in central Argentina. It was found that the seasons markedly influenced endomycorrhizal colonization, whereas grazing did not affect this interaction. C4 grasses presented the highest root colonization. Hosts Briza subaristata (C3 metabolic pathway) and Sorghastrum pellitum (C4 metabolic pathway) showed Arum- and Paris-type colonization and intermediate forms.

Key words: AMF, endomycorrhiza, grasses, grazing, mountain grassland, plant metabolic pathway, seasonality


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The association of a plant with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM) greatly improves soil-plant absorption of water and mineral nutrients—mainly phosphorated compounds (Allen et al 1981Citation, Haystead et al 1988Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992cCitation). AM association aids plant growth and biomass enlargement, increasing plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens (Clay 1992Citation, Gehring and Whitman 1994Citation). Fungi also benefit from this association because they obtain carbon compounds, necessary for fungal growth, from plant photosynthetic activity. Moreover, the extraradical mycelium may translocate nutrients from one host to another (Haystead et al 1988Citation, Martins 1992Citation, McNaughton and Oesterheld 1990Citation). AM fungi likely are important wherever soils have little organic matter (Allen et al 1995Citation).

It is known that AM fungi root colonization has seasonal dynamics (Allen 1996Citation, DeMars and Boerner 1995Citation, Rosendahl and Rosendahl 1992Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992bCitation). Hetrick et al (1990)Citation observed a close relationship between the degree of association with AM fungi and the metabolic pathway of the Poaceae host; thus, C3 hosts are considered to be facultatively mycotrophic and C4 obligately mycotrophic. In addition, the fungal symbiont will influence different developmental stages of grasses depending on host type, favoring seedlings in C3 and flowering stages in C4 hosts (Hartnett et al 1993Citation, Wilson and Hartnett 1997Citation). Finally, host growth and colonization by AM fungi are a function of plant/fungus combinations (Sanders and Fitter 1992aCitation).

Bethlenfalvay and Dakessian (1984)Citation and Bethlenfalvay et al (1985)Citation support the idea that colonization and diversity of plant species decline with grazing, while other authors (Gange et al 1993Citation, Gehring and Whitman 1994Citation) have corroborated the opposite. At the same time, Wallace (1987)Citation, Reece and Bonham (1978)Citation, and Allen et al (1989)Citation found no effects.

Even though the degree of association of Gramineae and mycorrhizal fungi varies with the seasons (DeMars and Boerner 1995Citation, Rosendahl and Rosendahl 1992Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992bCitation), intensity and the type of disturbance (Gange et al 1993Citation, Gehring and Whitman 1994Citation, Grime et al 1987Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992aCitation, cCitation), and host metabolic pathway (Hetrick et al 1988Citation, 1990Citation), no field experimental studies in natural ecosystems simultaneously take into account all these factors. Furthermore, only a few field studies have dealt with the morphology of AM colonization (Merryweather and Fitter 1998Citation). Thus, the aim of this research was to study the AM root colonization of C3 and C4 grass hosts in different grazing situations, to analyze their morphological variation in fungi, and to observe seasonal changes and the interactions among them in a native mountain grassland.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Study site – This research was carried out in Pampa de Achala, a granite plateau at 2250 m above sea level, in Sierras de Córdoba, Argentina (31°20'S, 64°45'W). The plant communities and soil characteristics were described by Lugo and Cabello (2002)Citation.

The average winter temperature is 5 C and average summer temperature is 11.4 C. Rain averages 850 mm per year; frost may occur at almost any time, with occasional snowfall (Díaz et al 1994Citation, Pucheta and Cabido 1992Citation). The vegetation is a climatically determined grassland traditionally subjected to pastoral use (cattle, sheep and horses).

Experimental design – To examine the effect of grazing on AM fungal colonization, we examined sites in two conditions: an area protected by fences from large herbivores for at least 20 years (NG: ungrazed) and a nearby area under continuous intense grazing by cattle and horses (G: grazed) with moderate to high stocking rate: ca 0.25 horses and 0.5 cows per hectare (Pucheta et al 1998Citation). Six sampling sites of 1 hectare each, separated by 3 km, were selected. Three of them corresponded to grazed lands and the others to ungrazed ones. They represented the three replicates for each situation, and they were designated as Grazed (1, 2, 3) or Not Grazed (1, 2, 3).

Plant species studied – The Poaceae studied were perennial: Briza subaristata Lam., Deyeuxia hieronymi (Hack.) Türpe, and Poa stuckertii (Hack.) Parodi (with C3 metabolism); and Eragrostis lugens Nees and Sorghastrum pellitum (Hack.) Parodi (with C4 metabolism). Alchemilla pinnata Ruiz & Pav. (Rosaceae with C3 metabolism), frequently present, also were included in this study. All of them are palatable (Pucheta and Cabido 1992Citation).

Methodology – At each site, samples were collected in autumn (May 21, 1996), autumn (June 2–3, 1997), winter (Sept. 8, 1996), winter (Aug. 6–8, 1997), spring (Dec. 8, 1996), spring (Nov. 11–12, 1997), and summer (Feb. 20, 1997). Eight whole (stem and root) individuals per host species and their rhizospheric soil were collected from each site. Samples were kept in plastic bags, at 4 C; roots were separated from rhizospheric soil, washed and fixed in FAA solution.

Roots – Washed and stored in FAA for later clarification and staining, following Phillips and Hayman (1970)Citation and Grace and Stribley (1991)Citation methodology, respectively. Five subsamples of 100 root segments (1 cm long each) for host species were analyzed for each season, in each site and grazing situation. Frequency of colonization (F) and percentage of root length colonized (% RL) were quantified according to the grid-line intercept method (Biermann and Linderman 1981Citation). From Briza subaristata and Sorghastrum pellitum 10 colonized root fragments from each of the five subsamples (n = 50) were placed on slides, and the number of fungal intraradical structures, such as arbuscules, vesicles, coils and entry points, were estimated, according to Ocampo et al (1980)Citation. These host species were chosen because they are the most palatable grasses in this ecosystem and they represent both C3 and C4 metabolic types.

Statistical analysis – The data distribution was not normal (Kolmorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilkins normality tests), and variances were not homogeneously distributed throughout the treatment (Levene Test). Thus data transformation was not suitable for application of parametric analysis. The variables (percentage of root colonized, frequency of colonization, frequency/cm of root arbuscules, vesicles, coils and entry points) were compared by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis by ranks when the factors had more than two levels (season and host species), and Mann-Whitney U-test when factors had only two levels (host metabolic type, grazing conditions) and the Wilcoxon test using SPSS (Systat Co., http://www.spss.com). The various host species, their metabolic pathways (C3 or C4), grazing conditions (grazed or not grazed) and seasons (summer, autumn, winter and spring) were considered factors. All were analyzed at {alpha} = 0.05 and P <= 0.05 significance. When Kruskall Wallis showed significant differences, data were analyzed by an a posteriori test, using the Infostat statistic program (Infostat Beta Version, Department of Statistics and Biometry, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina). Correlation analysis using the Spearman coefficient with {alpha} = 0.05 for frequency/root cm of intraradical structures was performed.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Root colonization – In all cases, the frequency of colonization overestimated the percentage of colonization (Tables I, II, III). This fact agrees with the findings of Giovannetti and Mosse (1980)Citation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Root colonization (frequency and % root length colonized) in different host species, their metabolic type, grazing conditions and seasonsa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II. Seasonal variation of colonization among host species

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE III. Seasonal variation of root colonization among host metabolic pathway and grazinga

 
Among C3 metabolism host species, B. subaristata presented the highest values of colonization, followed by P. stuckertii, A. pinnata, and D. hieronymi (Table I). S. pellitum colonization (F and % RL) was higher than that of E. lugens. In fact, it was the highest of C4 plants. Frequency (F) of colonization and percentage of root length (% RL) colonized varied significantly in the host species studied. Thus, B. subaristata and S. pellitum, both hosts with high F values, were not significantly different, followed by P. stuckertii and E. lugens without significant differences, and A. pinnata with the lowest F value but without significant difference from E. lugens. The percentage of root length colonized was higher and similar among B. subaristata, S. pellitum and P. stuckertii, followed by A. pinnata; D. hieronymi and E. lugens, had the lowest values. These parameters also changed with seasons; the highest values were found in summer, falling gradually to their lowest values in spring. Autumn and winter had similar colonization values without significant difference between them (Table I). Frequency of colonization differed significantly between C3 and C4 plants. On the other hand, % RL values were not significantly different; the highest values were observed in C4 species (Table I). Grazing did not influence root colonization values in any variable studied.

When each season was analyzed separately, both F and % RL showed significant differences among host species (Table II). Thus, F and % RL were found to be influenced by host in summer, autumn, winter and spring. In summer, S. pellitum showed the significantly highest colonization followed by B. subaristata, E. lugens and P. stuckertii (without significant differences among them). The lowest F values were observed in D. hieronymi and A. pinnata. In autumn and winter, B. subaristata and S. pellitum showed the highest F value; the lowest F value was found in E. lugens, P. stuckertii and D. hieronymi (without significant differences among them) in autumn and in E. lugens and D. hieronymi in winter. In spring, B. subaristata had the significantly highest F value, followed by S. pellitum, P. stuckertiii and E. lugens without significant differences among them, followed by D. hieronymi and A. pinnata with the lowest colonization. The % RL showed similar F patterns but with lower values.

When each host was analyzed separately, both F and % RL showed significant differences among host species (Table II). Based on F and % RL, two groups of grasses could be determined: one of them formed by S. pellitum, E. lugens, P. stuckertii and D. hieronymi with the highest colonization in summer; the other with highest values in autumn comprising B. subaristata and A. pinnata.

Taking into account the seasons, in summer F and % RL colonization were significantly different between C3 and C4 host species (Table III). In autumn, F was significantly different between metabolic types with the highest colonization in C4 plants, and % RL did not differ; % RL was significantly higher in hosts with C3 metabolic pathway in winter and spring, whereas F did not change in winter and in spring. Grazing did not influence root colonization (F and % RL, respectively) either in summer, autumn, winter or spring.

Intraradical fungal structures in B. subaristata (C3) and S. pellitum (C4) – Number of intraradical fungal structures by root cm differed significantly with seasons, being higher in summer and lower in winter, autumn and spring. The percentage of vesicles showed the highest value in summer, followed by autumn, winter and spring. The percentage of arbuscles and coils was higher in the period between summer and winter than in the period between autumn and spring, whereas % entry points were highest between summer and winter, falling in autumn and spring. Although % arbuscles showed significant differences between autumn–spring and summer–winter periods, these values were zero or nearly zero. Similar results were found in % entry points between autumn and spring (Table IV). Frequency of structures had no significant differences, related to grazing (Table IV).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE IV. Intraradical structures variation among host species, their metabolic pathway and seasonsa

 
When the percentage of arbuscules, entry points and coils was analyzed for each season separately (Table V), these structures showed significant differences depending on the host metabolic pathway. In summer, autumn and winter all intraradical structures were significantly different, according to the host metabolic type. In spring, % vesicles and % coils showed significant differences. In summer, arbuscules were more abundant in B. subaristata (C3), whereas vesicles, entry points and coils proliferated in S. pellitum (C4). In autumn, the highest values of intraradical structures were found in B. subaristata and, in winter, in S. pellitum. In spring, coils and vesicles had higher frequency in B. subaristata than in S. pellitum, whereas arbuscles and entry points could not be found. The effect of grazing (Table VI) on the amount of arbuscles and entry points was significant in autumn, whereas % vesicles and % coils were not influenced in this season. Intraradical structures were not significantly affected by grazing in summer, winter or spring.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE V. Intraradical structures seasonal variation among C3 and C4 host metabolic typea

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE VI. Intraradical structures seasonal variation among grazing conditions (G: grazed and NG: not grazed)a

 
Entry points-arbuscles, coils-arbuscles, coils-entry points, vesicles-arbuscles, vesicles-entry points and vesicles-coils showed a positive and significant correlation (Table VII).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE VII. Correlation analysis between intraradical fungal structures

 
Morphology of colonization in B. subaristata and S. pellitum The most frequent form of root colonization occurred when an extraradical hypha appressorium or widening contacted the root and intra- and intercellularly penetrated it. Immediately after penetration, the hypha formed intracellular coils. In S. pellitum, colonization through radical hairs also was observed. In both hosts intra- and intercellular hyphae were generally thick, with smooth or rough wall projections. These hyphae were Y ramified, although H ramifications also were found in B. subaristata. In this host, coils, when present, were scarce, long, and lax. On the other hand, S. pellitum coils, constituted by folded hyphae, were abundant and lax, and round or elongated. Vesicles were more abundant in summer, in both hosts. They were intra- or intercellular, regular or irregular, and they were present in terminal or intercalary positions. Intense to clear stained vesicles were found in B. subaristata all year. Subglobose and globose shapes were observed in ungrazed sites, whereas irregular and elongated ones were found in grazed conditions. Arbuscules were generally intercalary in both plants. They exceptionally occupied the entire host cell, and the reduction of first order branches often occurred gradually. B. subaristata constituted an exception; arbuscules were diffused, some of them with sharp decreasing thickness in the first order branches of the hypha.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Soil features and root colonization – Plants form AM associations in arid and semiarid grassland zones where mineral soils are poor in nutrients, mainly phosphorus. In these systems, the hosts studied are often the dominant species. Their endomycorrhizal fungi produce a larger amount of extraradical mycelium that behaves as an ecosystem stabilizer, improving the nutrient flux among community components (Al-Agely and Reeves 1995Citation, Douds 1994Citation, McNaughton and Oesterheld 1990Citation, Miller and Jastrow 1994Citation, Newsham and Watkinson 1998Citation).

Some authors (Gange et al 1993Citation, Grime et al 1987Citation, Wilson and Hartnett 1997Citation, McNaughton and Oesterheld 1990Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992bCitation) hypothesized that, in environments with little phosphorus in the soil, dominant species are those that associate with AM fungi. Pampa de Achala soils have little phosphorus (Lugo 1999Citation). Moreover, the plant species that we analyzed were among the dominant species in these communities (Cabido 1985Citation) and were associated with endomycorrhizae, in agreement with this hypothesis. Root colonization values were found to be similar to those in other grassland communities studied (Dickman et al 1984Citation, Hetrick and Bloom 1983Citation, Wallace 1987Citation).

Seasonality – It is known that fungus colonization is influenced by soil moisture. In the grassland studied, summer is the wet season, while autumn and winter are dry, with occasional rain in spring (Cabido et al 1987Citation). Root colonization, number of arbuscles, and vesicles reached their maximum values in summer. These values might be due to the high metabolic activity of plants and soil moisture. The peaks of colonization observed during spring could be due to the sporadic rains that can activate fungus colonization. Our observations of seasonal changes and their relationship to root colonization, soil moisture and host phenology were similar to the results of other authors (Bentivenga and Hetrick 1992Citation, DeMars and Boerner 1995Citation, Ebbers et al 1987Citation, Rosendahl and Rosendahl 1992Citation, Sanders and Fitter 1992bCitation, Sigüenza et al 1996Citation, Wilson and Hartnett 1997Citation). In the system studied total live root biomass followed a seasonal pattern (Pucheta pers com) and was reflected in F and % RL colonization.

Based on the seasonality of radical colonization, the host species could be separated into two groups: i) greater colonization in autumn-winter (A. pinnata and B. subaristata) and ii) greater colonization in summer-autumn (D. hieronymi, P. stuckertii, E. lugens and S. pellitum). In addition, these patterns among hosts could correlate with seasonal changes in fungal communities in rhizospheric soil (Lugo and Cabello 2002Citation). Thus, in the Pampa de Achala, high root colonization by AM fungi is associated with a low number of spores in soil and vice versa. This fungal behavior and host seasonal patterns would explain the seasonal changes in spore diversity and the little host specificity found in this grassland (Lugo and Cabello 2002Citation).

Grazing effects – Controversial opinions about grazing effects on root colonization abound. Some authors (Bethlenfalvay and Dakessian 1984Citation, Bethlenfalvay et al 1985Citation) have reported that colonization declines with great ungulate herbivory; others supported the idea that herbivory favors colonization (Reece and Bonham 1978Citation); while still others (Allen et al 1989Citation, Wallace 1987Citation) have stated that herbivory does not modify colonization. In this study, results showed that radical colonization was not modified by grazing. This could be due to three factors. First, AMF colonization is related to host phenology (Allen 1991aCitation) and in the Pampa de Achala ecosystem, grazing did not influence host phenology (Díaz et al 1994Citation). Thus, the absence of grazing influence on host phenology could be reflected in root colonization. Second, in soils poor in phosphorus, such as the grassland studied, the extraradical mycelium is more developed and it behaves as a system stabilizer (McNaughton and Oesterheld 1990Citation), interconnecting hosts and diminishing grazed and ungrazed differences. Third, McNaughton (1983)Citation suggested that grazing increases photosynthesis and growth as the plant compensates. Mycorrhiza increase photosynthesis and require carbon from the host (Allen 1991bCitation). Thus, the failure of grazing to affect fungal colonization in the Pampa de Achala is the result of a compensatory response of these grasses. Thus, one might speculate that plants overcome the loss of photosynthetic cells by increasing photosynthesis and nutrition with the help of symbiotic fungi.

In this mountain grassland, B. subaristata (C3 host) and S. pellitum (C4 host) are perennial, long-life cycle, and largely consumed by livestock. Moreover, the ecosystem of Pampa de Achala has a lengthy grazing history (Díaz et al 1994Citation). The failure of grazing to affect B. subaristata and S. pellitum colonization could be an adaptation to its long grazing history.

Host metabolic pathways – Significantly higher values of root colonization in the summer–autumn period in C4 hosts could be due to their capacity to obtain higher profits and root growth at higher temperatures and with abundant rainfall. The opposite was valid for C3 hosts, which showed significant colonization in winter and spring, when temperatures are low and rain is scarce. It is possible that the mycorrhizae provide water to its host, improving survival during dry seasons.

Fungal intraradical structures – In B. subaristata (C3) and in S. pellitum (C4), the fungal structure quantification showed a marked seasonality. This could be related to nutrient exchanges. In both hosts, fungal structures (arbuscules, coils, vesicles and entry points) were more abundant in summer, the season with high moisture, temperature as well as solar radiation. In a previous study (Smith and Read 1997Citation), the abundance of intraradical structure was closely related to host growth, flowering and fruit production. Solar radiation declined in autumn and winter, resulting in a decline in the amount of mycorrhizal structures (Smith and Read 1997Citation). This might explain the few exchange structures found. Considering the amount of these structures, both hosts presented a similar seasonal behavior. In spring and autumn, Briza subaristata showed a large number of coils and arbuscles, due to high radical colonization. On the other hand, Sorghastrum pellitum exchange structures did not change seasonally, suggesting that this host has the same metabolic activity throughout the year.

Colonization morphology – The endomycorrhiza types that colonize B. subaristata and S. pellitum were characterized by their colonization morphology; both hosts showed multiple colonizations. Characteristics of Acaulosporaceae and Glomaceae were recognized in B. subaristata. Thick walls of intercellular hyphae with projections and H connections, as well as intercellular vesicles determining the Arum-type, were abundant. On the other hand, Paris-type colonization was determined by intracellular coils and arbuscules that partially occupy the host cell. In S. pellitum, structures of Acaulosporaceae, Glomaceae and Gigasporaceae were recognized, with coils and intracellular hyphae being the most common. These structures, together with intercellular hyphae and terminal arbuscules, indicate the coexistence of Arum- and Paris-types in the same plant (Barker et al 1998Citation, Smith and Smith 1997Citation). The positive correlation among arbuscules, coils, entry points and vesicles could be related to colonization by several fungi. Then, it was found that in some host species AM fungi might form vesicles. The correlation between entry points-vesicles and entry points-arbuscules suggests AM fungi families Glomaceae and Acaulosporaceae, which form these root colonization structures, while the entry points-coils relationship suggests Gigasporaceae because the vesicles are absent in host roots. The correlation between vesicles-arbuscles and vesicles-coils might be an expression of the symbionts' physiological condition. In fact, the presence of arbuscles and coils, which are considered the exchange structures between symbionts, along with the presence of vesicles, which are storage structures, might be due to the intense exchange activity between the symbionts. The positive correlation between coils-arbuscules could explain multiple colonization because arbuscles are the common structure among all AM fungi and coils are more frequently formed by Gigasporaceae.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank M. Cabido and S. Díaz for their experimental-design suggestions; A. Anton and L. Domínguez for their direction; and N. Tedesco for critical review of the manuscript. We are deeply grateful to L. Galetto and C. Urselay for their help with statistical analysis. The senior author received financial support and a fellowship from CONICET (Argentinean Council of Science and Technology Research) for this study.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Corresponding author. E-mail: lugo{at}unsl.edu.ar Back

2 M.N. Cabello is researcher of the CIC, Bs. As. Prov., Argentina Back

Accepted for publication December 6, 2002.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Al-Algely AK, Reeves FB., 1995 Inland sand dune mycorrhizae: effect of soil depth, moisture and pH on colonization of Oryzopsis hymenoides. Mycologia 87:54-60

Allen EB, Allen MF, Hern DJ, Trappe JM, Molina R, Rincon E., 1995 Patterns and regulation of mycorrhizal plant and fungal diversity. Plant and Soil 170:47-62

Allen MF., 1991a Physiological and population biology. In: Barnes RSK, Birks HJB, Connor EF, Harper JL, Paine RL, eds. The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 43–71

———. 1991b Community ecology. In: Barnes RSK, Birks HJB, Connor EF, Harper JL, Paine RL, eds. The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 72–101

———. 1996 The ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizas: a look back into the 20th Century and a peek into the 21st. Mycological Research 100:769-782

———, Richards JH, Busso CA., 1989 Influence of clipping and soil water status on vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae of two semiarid tussock grasses. Biology and Fertility of Soils 8:285-289

———, Smith WK, Moore TSJr, Christensen M., 1981 Comparative water relations and photosynthesis of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis H.B.K. Lag. ex Steud. New Phytologist 88:683-693

Barker SJ, Tagu D, Delp G., 1998 Regulation of root and fungal morphogenesis in mycorrhizal symbioses. Plant Physiology 116:1201-1207[Free Full Text]

Bentivenga SP, Hetrick BAD., 1992 Seasonal and temperature effects on mycorrhizal activity and dependence of cool and warm-season tallgrass prairie grasses. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:1596-1602

Bethlenfalvay GJ, Dakessian S., 1984 Grazing effects on mycorrhizal colonization and floristic composition of the vegetation on a semiarid range in Northern Nevada. Journal of Range Management 37:312-316

———, Evans RA, Lesperance AL., 1985 Mycorrhizal colonization of crested wheatgrass as influenced by grazing. Agronomic Journal 77:233-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Biermann B, Linderman RG., 1981 Quantifying vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: a proposed method towards standardization. New Phytologist 87:63-67

Cabido MR., 1985 Las comunidades vegetales de la Pampa de Achala, Sierras de Córdoba, Argentina. Documents phytosociologiques 9:431-443

———, Breimer R, Vega G., 1987 Plant communities and associated soil types in a high plateau of the Córdoba mountains, Central Argentina. Mountain Research and Development 7:25-42

Clay K., 1992 Mycophyllas and mycorrhizas: comparations and contrasts. In: Read DJ, Lewis DH, Fitter AH, Alexander IJ, eds. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: CABI. p 13–26

DeMars BG, Boerner REJ., 1995 Mycorrhizal dynamics of three woodland herbs of contrasting phenology along topographic gradients. American Journal of Botany 82:1426-1431

Díaz S, Acosta A, Cabido M., 1994 Grazing and the phenology of flowering and fruiting in a montane grassland in Argentina: a niche approach. Oikos 70:287-295

Dickman LA, Liberta AE, Anderson RC., 1984 Ecological interaction of little bluesterm and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:2272-2277

Douds DDJr., 1994 Relashionships between hyphal and arbuscular colonization and sporulation in a mycorrhiza of Paspalum notatum Fluggë. New Phytologist 126:233-239

Ebbers BE, Anderson RC, Liberta AE., 1987 Aspects of the mycorrhizal ecology of prairie dropseed, Sporobolus heterolepis (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 74:564-573

Gange AC, Brown VK, Sinclair GS., 1993 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a determinant of plant community structure in early succession. Functional Ecology 7:616-622

Gehring CA, Whitman TG., 1994 Interactions between above ground herbivores and the mycorrhizal mutualists of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:251-255

Giovannetti M, Mosse B., 1980 An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytologist 84:489-500

Grace C, Stribley DP., 1991 A safer procedure for routine staining of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycological Research 95:1160-1162

Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ., 1987 Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcoms. Nature 328:420-422

Hartnett DC, Hetrick BAD, Wilson GWT, Gibson DJ., 1993 Mycorrhizal influence on intra- and interspecific neighbour interactions among co-occurring prairie grasses. Journal of Ecology 81:785-787

Haystead A, Malajczuk N, Grove TS., 1988 Underground transfer of nitrogen between pasture plants infected with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 108:417-423

Hetrick BAD, Bloom J., 1983 Vesicular-arbuscular fungi associated with native tall grass prairie and cultivated winter wheat. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:2140-2146

———, Kitt DG, Wilson GWT., 1988 Mycorrhizal dependence and growth habit of warm-season and cool-season tallgrass prairie plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 66:1376-1380

———, Wilson GWT, Todd TC., 1990 Differential responses of C3 and C4 grasses to mycorrhizal symbiosis, phosphorus fertilization, and soil microorganisms. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:461-467

Lugo MA., 1999 Cambios estacionales de endomicorrizas en Gramíneas (Poaceae) C3 y C4 bajo distintas intensidades de pastoreo en pastizales de altura de la zona del centro de Argentina (Doctoral Thesis). Córdoba, National University of Córdoba. 118 p

———, Cabello MN., 2002 Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) from mountain grassland (Córdoba, Argentina) I. Seasonal variation of fungal spore diversity. Mycologia 94:579-586[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martins MA., 1992 The role of external mycelial network of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a study of carbon transfer between plants interconnected by common mycelium. Mycorrhiza 2:69-73

Merryweather J, Fitter A., 1998 The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of Hyacinthoides non-scripta. I Diversity of fungal taxa. New Phytologist 138:117-129

McNaughton JS., 1983 Serengeti grassland ecology: the role of composite environmental factors and contingency in community organization. Ecological Monographs 53:291-320

McNaughton SD, Oesterheld M., 1990 Extramatrical mycorrhizal abundance and grass nutrition in a tropical grazing ecosystem the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Oikos 59:92-96

Miller RM, Jastrow JD., 1994 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and biogeochemical cycling. In: Pfleger TL, Linderman RG, eds. Mycorrhizal and plant health. St. Paul, Minnesota: APS Press. p 186–212

Newsham KK, Watkinson AR., 1998 Arbuscular mycorrhizas and the population biology of grasses. In: Cheplick GP, ed. Population biology of grasses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 286–310

Ocampo JA, Martín J, Hayman DS., 1980 Influence of plant interactions on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection. I. Host and non-host plants grown together. New Phytologist 84:27-35

Phillips JM, Hayman DS., 1970 Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55:158-161

Pucheta E, Cabido M., 1992 Comunidades de pastizales serranos del centro de Argentina y su relación con el uso pastoril. Phytocoenologia 21:333-346

———, ———, Díaz S, Funes G., 1998 Floristic composition, biomass and above ground net plant production in grazed and protected sites in a mountain grassland of central Argentina. Acta Ecologica 19:97-105

Reece PE, Bonham CD., 1978 Frequency of endomycorrhizal infection in grazed and ungrazed bluegrama plant. Journal of Range Management 31:149-151

Rosendahl S, Rosendahl CN., 1992 Seasonal variation in occurrence of VA Mycorrhizal infection types in a Danish grassland community. In: Read DJ, Lewis DH, Fitter AH, Alexander IJ, eds. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Cambridge, UK: CABI. 400 p

Sanders IR, Fitter AH., 1992a Evidence for differential responses between host-fungus combinations of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas from a grassland. Mycological Research 96:415-419

———, ———. 1992b The ecology and functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in co-existing grassland species. I. Seasonal patterns of mycorrhizal occurence and morphology. New Phytologist 120:517-524

———, ———. 1992c The ecology and functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas in co-existing grassland species. II. Nutrient uptake and growth of mycorrhizal plants in a semi-natural grassland. New Phytologist 120:525-533

Sigüenza C, Espejel I, Allen EB., 1996 Seasonality of mycorrhizae in coastal sand dunes of Baja California. Mycorrhiza 6:151-157

Smith SE, Read DJ., 1997 Colonization of roots and anatomy of VA mycorrhizas. In: Smith SE, Read DJ, eds. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. p 46–52

Smith FA, Smith SE., 1997 Structural diversity in (vesicular)-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 137:373-388

Wallace LL., 1987 Mycorrhizas in grasslands: interactions of ungulates, fungi and drought. New Phytologist 105:619-632

Wilson GTW, Hartnett DC., 1997 Effects of mycorrhizae on plant growth and dynamics in experimental tallgrass prairie microcosms. American Journal of Botany 84:478-482[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Jansa, A. Wiemken, and E. Frossard
The effects of agricultural practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 266(1): 89 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
A. Jumpponen and L. C. Johnson
Can rDNA analyses of diverse fungal communities in soil and roots detect effects of environmental manipulations--a case study from tallgrass prairie.
Mycologia, November 1, 2005; 97(6): 1177 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lugo, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cabello, M. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS