Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.
Mycologia 94(1), 2002, pp. 40-48
© 2002 by The Mycological Society of America

Tradeoffs between reproduction and mycelium production in the unit-restricted decomposer Coprinus cinereus


John Paul Schmit 1

     Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 S Lakeshore Dr, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 

A laboratory experiment was performed which examined tradeoffs between production of mycelium and reproduction (using stipe dry weight as an estimator of spore production) in the coprophilous mushroom species Coprinus cinereus. Isolates of the fungus taken from a single dikaryotic mycelium were grown in Petri plates containing yeast extract agar. Plates varied in diameter and resource density, but the total volume of agar was kept constant. Isolates grown in 100 mm and 150 mm diameter plates produced significantly less mycelium compared to isolates grown in 60 mm diameter plates. Within 60 mm plates there was no correlation between the efficiency of mycelium production and fruit body production, but in larger plates there was a significant negative correlation between the two. These results indicate that isolates grown on larger plates were less efficient at using resources than isolates grown on small plates, and that mycelium production is curtailed on larger plates to maintain spore production.

Key words: Coprinus cinereus, fungi, mycelium, resource allocation, tradeoffs, unit-restricted decomposer


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This paper reports the results of an experiment that examined the tradeoffs between mycelium production and reproduction in a unit-restricted fungal decomposer. Unit-restricted species are those in which individuals occupy only a single patch of a discontinuously distributed resource (such as dung, dead wood, or fruits) and are unable to use vegetative growth to colonize new patches (Rayner and Boddy 1988Citation ). Unit-restricted individuals decompose the resources present on their patch. However, since the patch is composed of dead or waste material, there will be no renewal of at least some of the resources on the patch. As a result, "resource density"—the total availability of resources—on the patch will decrease until all of the resources on the patch are decomposed, and the unit-restricted individuals inhabiting the patch die. Propagule dispersal, usually by spores in the case of fungi, is the sole means by which new individuals can become established on new patches.

In recent years, researchers have focused on the ecology of species that inhabit patchy resources (Rhodes and Odum 1996Citation , Hanski and Simberloff 1997Citation , Tilman et al 1997Citation ). In general, a species is considered successful if its population can persist despite the extinction of sub-populations on individual patches. Similarly, a species is considered a successful competitor if it can persist despite the extinction of sub-populations due to competition pressure (Holt 1997Citation ). In the context of unit-restricted decomposers, the long-term success of a population depends on the ability of individuals to colonize new patches, as established individuals will inevitably die when the resources on their patches are depleted. Propagule production is the contribution of an individual to the persistence of a population, as it is only through propagules that new patches will be colonized. Therefore, propagule production is a useful measure of the competitive abilities of an individual unit-restricted decomposer (Schmit 1999Citation ).

Clearly, propagule production is crucial to the survival of unit-restricted species and it is expected that individuals will maximize their propagule production. However, individual fungi also have to allocate resources to growth in order to utilize the resources of the patch they inhabit. Each individual will have access to limited amounts of resources that must be carefully allocated between growth and reproduction in order to maximize total reproductive output. Relatively little research has explicitly examined the relative resource allocation to mycelium and reproduction in unit-restricted fungal decomposers.

To date, research that has focused on mycelium and fruit body production has examined the effects of patch size and nutrient quality. Madelin (1956a)Citation , working with the basidiomycete Coprinus lagopus Fr., demonstrated that isolates given more substrate produce a greater dry weight of fruit bodies. In a laboratory experiment on wood decay fungi, Holmer and Stenlid (1993)Citation demonstrated that the territory size of an individual fungus has a significant effect on its ability to invade the territory of other species. Plunkett (1953)Citation , working with Collybia velutipes (Curt.) Fr. and Madelin (1956a)Citation , working with C. lagopus, demonstrated that the ratio between the dry weight of the fruit bodies and the dry weight of the mycelium is not constant.

In this paper, a simple framework is provided to examine the relative allocation made by unit-restricted fungi to mycelium and fruit body production in order to examine the tradeoff between resource acquisition and spore production. An experiment, which examined the effect of resource density and patch size on resource allocation to mycelium and fruit bodies, is then described.

Theory – The tradeoffs faced by unit-restricted fungi growing on variable patches can be examined by comparing the resource allocation a fungus makes to different structures. For the purposes of this paper, the resources that are captured by an individual can be allocated in two ways:

(1)
where Etotal is the total amount of resource captured, Erepro is the amount of resource allocated to reproduction, and Emyc is the amount of resource allocated to mycelium. Realistically a fungus would also have to allocate resources to other activities such as maintenance and defending its territory against competitors, but these other allocations are not considered here. The total amount of the resource available to an individual is

(2)
where Rinit is the initial resource density of the patch, Rmin is the minimum resource density at which the decomposer can acquire resources and w is the efficiency of the decomposer at acquiring the resource, without regard to how the resource is allocated.

The amount of resource allocated to reproduction is

(3)
where u is the relative resource allocation to reproduction. In theory, this is the proportion of resources allocated to reproduction multiplied by the efficiency of the fungus at converting resource to spores, but in practice, it is extremely difficult to measure these two values separately. Emin is the minimum amount of resource that the fungus must acquire before it will be able to reproduce. Similarly, the amount of resource allocated to mycelium production is

(4)
where v is the relative resource allocation to vegetative growth. Similar to u, this is the proportion of resources allocated to vegetative growth multiplied by the efficiency of the fungus at converting resources to mycelium, but again, it is difficult to measure these two values separately. Equation (4) assumes that the minimum amount of resource that the fungus needs to acquire before it can produce mycelium is so low that it is can be ignored. Previous research has indicated that at least some species of fungi can produce mycelium at extremely low resource densities (0.25% glucose—Madelin 1956aCitation , 1.1 g/L yeast extract agar—Schmit 1999Citation ).

Clearly, this framework only considers a single resource and is only applicable to resources that are not renewed at the scale of individual patches. Resources that fall under this framework include carbon resources, such as lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose, in substrates such as dung or dead wood (Schmit 1999Citation ). These resources are not renewed within patches and will ultimately be limiting for the entire community.

Equations (1)–(4) indicate that the amount of resource allocated to growth and to reproduction depends on the total amount of resource available to the fungus, which in turn is determined by the initial resource density of the patch. This coincides with studies (Plunkett 1953Citation , Madelin 1956aCitation , Schmit 1999Citation ) that have shown that the amount of resource allocated to reproduction is strongly influenced by the amount of resource initially present.

This does not imply, however, that there can be no tradeoffs between mycelium production and fruit body production. While more mycelium may be produced at high resource densities than low resource densities, it may be that percentage of captured resources allocated to mycelium differs for isolates grown at different initial resource densities. Similarly, isolates grown at different initial resource densities may differ in their relative allocation of resources to reproduction.

It is possible to determine if the proportion of resources allocated to these structures changes with initial resource density by estimating u and v over a range of resource densities. This could be a positive relationship if increases in mycelium biomass improve the efficiency of the fungus in capturing resources, or it could be a negative relationship if allocating additional resources to mycelium results in fewer resources available for reproduction.

An experiment was performed to examine the tradeoffs made by unit-restricted fungi between mycelium production and reproduction. In particular, two questions were asked: (i) What is the relationship between the resource density of the substrate and the allocation made by the fungus to mycelium and spore production? (ii) What is the relationship between resource allocation to mycelium production and resource allocation to spore production? The study consisted of isolates of Coprinus cinereus (Schaeff : Fr.) S.F. Gray grown in three different diameter Petri plates on yeast extract agar with six different initial resource densities. The different initial resource density treatments were used to determine the relationship between resource density and mycelium and spore production. It was assumed that isolates growing on the different diameter plates would produce different amounts of mycelium. The differences in mycelium production were then used to characterize the relationship between mycelium and spore production.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Experiments were carried out using the coprophilous mushroom species Coprinus cinereus (isolate: ATCC 66012 x ATCC 66013). The isolate was grown in Petri plates containing 1.1 g/L concentration of yeast extract agar (see Table I ). Plugs of mycelium were taken from these cultures using a 5 mm diameter cork borer to inoculate the Petri plates used in this experiment. The low density agar was chosen to grow the isolate so that the plug of agar transferred with the fungus would not be a significant source of resources.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I. Composition of the yeast extract agar. In all cases, the agar was made with 1 L of water and 16 g of agar

 
Fungi were grown with three plate diameter treatments (60 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm diameter Petri plates) and six "resource density" treatments (yeast extract agar ranging in concentration from 1.1 to 44.0 g/L, Table I ). All plates received 20 mL of agar regardless of treatment. The same amount of agar was added to plates of different sizes in order to insure that the isolate had both the same volume and concentration of substrate available across each resource density treatment.

In order to provide sufficient time to measure the growth rate of the isolate in each treatment, the plugs of mycelium used as inoculum were placed on the edge of the plate. There were eight replicates of each combination of plate diameter and resource density, giving a total of 144 replicates, although due to lack of fruiting or other problems, not all measurements were made for all replicates. All replicates were grown together in a controlled temperature chamber at 27 C, ~69% humidity, and a 12 h light/dark cycle until one week had passed after all isolates had finished fruiting. All Petri plates were sealed with a single layer of Parafilm, which permits gas exchange.

Growth rate – Linear growth rate was estimated for each replicate by marking daily growth rings on the lid of the Petri plates. All replicates had a lag time of approximately two days from the time they were initiated until growth began. There was no evidence for a slowing of growth rate before the entire plate was covered in mycelium. Linear growth was then calculated as the slope of a linear regression between cumulative growth and total time elapsed since the beginning of growth (regression performed through the origin).

Resource density – Rinit was the initial resource density of the agar in g/L from Table I . Rmin was estimated as zero, as there was mycelial growth in all replicates.

Allocation to reproduction – Erepro was estimated from the combined stipe dry weight of the fruiting bodies of each replicate. Stipes were harvested 1 wk after all fruiting had completed. Previous studies have shown that the stipe dry weight of a C. cinereus fruit body is positively correlated with the number of spores it produces (Schmit 1999Citation ). The relative allocation of resources to reproduction, u, was measured as the total stipe dry weight of a plate divided by the initial resource density from Table I .

Allocation to mycelium – Emyc was estimated from the mycelium dry weight of each replicate. After the stipes were harvested, mycelium dry weight was measured by boiling the agar and mycelium from each replicate in water. Once the agar had been liquefied the mycelium and agar were passed through filter paper to collect the mycelium. The mycelium was then dried overnight on a food dehydrator and weighed. This technique allows the mycelium full access to the substrate, and allows the isolate to remain undisturbed until the end of the experiment. A drawback of this technique is that some of the hyphal contents will be lost during the boiling process. Because of this loss, the analyses in this paper only compare mycelium dry weights of a treatment against mycelium dry weights of other treatments; no attempt is made to directly compare the mycelium dry weights with the stipe dry weight. In order to determine the relative allocation of resource to mycelium, v, the mycelium dry weight of each replicate was divided by its initial resource density.

Analyses – General Linear Model ANOVAs were used to examine the effects of initial resource density, plate diameter and the interaction between the two on growth rates, mycelium dry weight, stipe dry weight, v values and u values. Correlation was used to examine the relationship between stipe dry weight and mycelium dry weight and between v and u values. Separate analyses were carried out for the data set as a whole and for each plate diameter. All analyses were performed using the Minitab statistical package (Minitab 1999Citation ), except for power analyses, which were performed using the online Power Calculator (Statistics UCLA 2001Citation ).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Growth rates – Initial resource density and plate size had a significant effect on growth rate; there was a significant plate size x resource density interaction term (Fig. 1 , Table II ). Isolates grew at similar rates in the 100 and 150 mm plates but isolates growing in the 60 mm plates grew significantly slower than those in larger plates, particularly at high resource densities.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 FIGS. 1–6. Performance of isolates vs log10 initial resource density (g/L). Circles: 60 mm plates, Triangles: 100 mm plates, Squares: 150 mm plates. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation. Data for 100 and 150 mm plates is slightly offset to improve readability. 1. Growth rate (mm h-1) 2. Log10 Mycelium dry weight (g). 3. v values. 4. Proportion of replicates fruiting for each plate size. 5. u values. 6. Stipe dry weight (mg)1/2

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II. ANOVA Tables for the Effects of Plate size and Log10 Initial Resource Density on Growth and Reproduction

 
Allocation to mycelium production – The amount of mycelium the isolate produced varied significantly with plate diameter and initial resource density, and the resource density x plate diameter interaction was significant (Fig. 2 , Table II ). As expected, more mycelium is produced on plates with a higher initial resource density. Furthermore, isolates on smaller plates produced more mycelium, especially at high resource density. Similarly, v values differed significantly between initial resource densities, plate diameters and with the resource density x plate diameter interaction. Isolates on smaller plates were more efficient at producing mycelium, particularly at low resource densities (Fig. 3 , Table II ).

Allocation to reproduction – Both plate diameter and resource density influenced fruit body production. At the two lowest nutrient densities, 1.1 and 2.75 g/L, isolates growing on the 100 and 150 mm plates frequently failed to fruit, while almost all isolates growing on plates with a resource density of 5.5 g/L and higher successfully fruited (Fig. 4 ).

Plate diameter and resource density had a significant impact on both u (Table II , Fig. 5 ) and stipe dry weight (Table II , Fig. 6 ) of the isolates. There was also a significant plate diameter x resource density interaction term in both cases. Stipe dry weight and u were higher on plates with a high initial resource density. Smaller diameter plates had higher stipe dry weights and u values, and this difference was particularly pronounced on plates with a low resource density.

Tradeoffs between mycelium and fruit body production – When all treatments are considered, there is a strong, positive, correlation between mycelium dry weight and stipe dry weight (Fig. 7 ). While there is a negative relationship between relative resource allocation to mycelium (v) and allocation to fruiting (u), it is not significant (Fig. 8 ). A power analysis of this correlation test indicates that it had a power above 0.80 to detect significant correlation coefficients with an absolute value of 0.26 and greater.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 FIGS. 7–8. Scatter plot and correlation for complete data set. 7. Stipe dry weight (g) vs mycelium dry weight (g). 8. u vs v values

 
Considering only fungi that were grown on 60 mm plates, there was a significant positive correlation between mycelium and stipe dry weight (Fig. 9 ) but again no significant relationship between v and u values (Fig. 10 ). A power analysis for the v and u correlation indicates that this test had a power above 0.80 for correlation coefficients with an absolute value of 0.43 and greater. For isolates grown on 100 mm and 150 mm diameter plates, however, there were both significant positive correlations between stipe and mycelium dry weight (Figs. 11, 13 ) and significant negative relationships between v and u values (Figs. 12, 14 ).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 FIGS. 9–14. Scatter plot and correlations. 9. Stipe vs mycelium dry weights on 60 mm Petri plates. 10. u vs v values on 60 mm Petri plates. 11. Stipe vs mycelium dry weights on 100 mm Petri plates. 12. u vs v values on 100 mm Petri plates. 13. Stipe vs mycelium dry weights on 150 mm Petri plates. 14. u vs v values on 150 mm Petri plates

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Resource allocation – For all three Petri plate diameters, isolates growing on agar with a high initial resource density produced both more mycelium and heavier stipes, compared to plates with low initial resource density agar. Isolates growing on plates with a large diameter and a low initial nutrient density often failed to produce fruiting bodies. This contradicts earlier reports that the amount of a substrate a fungus is cultured on has little effect on the initiation of fruiting (Madelin 1956a, bCitation , Ballou and Holton 1985Citation ) When the data from each plate diameter are analyzed separately, there is evidence for a tradeoff between mycelium and fruit body production. Isolates demonstrated a positive correlation between mycelium dry weight and stipe dry weight regardless of the diameter of the plate on which they were grown. When v and u values are examined, however, isolates from 100 and 150 mm plates show a negative correlation, indicating that increases in resource allocation to mycelium came at the expense of allocation to reproduction and vice versa. This is due to changing resource allocation over the gradient of initial resource densities. When grown at low initial resource densities, isolates made a relatively high resource allocation to mycelium compared to those grown at high initial resource densities (Fig. 3 ). Conversely, the resource allocation to reproduction increased with increasing initial resource density (Fig. 5 ).

One possible explanation for the emphasis on mycelium production at low resource densities is that, in nature, more mycelium is produced at low resource densities to enhance foraging ability. By emphasizing mycelium production, fungi may be able to discover resource rich territory. Under this hypothesis, fungi that have resource rich territories would be free to allocate a greater proportion of their resources to reproduction. Thus, the transition from an emphasis on mycelium production to an emphasis on reproduction may be a foraging strategy. This hypothesis assumes that unit-restricted fungi often grow on patches that are heterogeneous and that an increased allocation to mycelium production would allow the fungus to encounter a portion of the patch with a high resource density.

Effects of plate size – When fungi grown on plates with different diameters are compared, those on larger plates produce less mycelium (Fig. 2 ) at all, but particularly at high, resource densities, and produce fewer, lighter fruitbodies, particularly on plates with low initial resource densities (Figs. 4, 6 ). The negative relationship between Petri plate diameter and mycelium dry weight is surprising, as is it was initially expected that the fungus would have to produce more mycelium to cover the larger plates. The fungi growing on the larger plates instead allocated fewer resources to mycelium production, with the result that they were able to allocate almost as much to fruit body production as were the fungi growing in the small sized plates.

This implies that fungi growing on the larger Petri plates were less efficient in making use of the resources, perhaps due to some cost involved in transporting resources across the plates. While this may be relatively unimportant at high initial resource densities, fungi on larger plates were less likely to fruit at low initial resource densities (Fig. 4 ). In a natural setting, many substrates, particularly wood, occur in a variety of shapes and sizes. While many physical characteristics of substrates are known to influence fungal growth and reproduction (Cooke and Rayner 1984Citation , Rayner and Boddy 1988Citation ), the shape of a patch has not been considered among them. This experiment demonstrates that on marginal patches the shape of an individual's territory may determine if it can successfully reproduce.

The differences in mycelium production between plates raises the question as to why the isolate, when grown on the 60 mm plates, produced so much "extra" mycelium instead of allocating more resources to spore production. The data from this experiment cannot answer that question. We do know, however, that the mycelium plays a variety of roles beyond nutrient absorption, including defense, aggression, and exploration for new resources (Cooke and Rayner 1984Citation ). It could be that while the isolate seemed to over-allocate resources to mycelium production in this experiment, in a natural system these resources would be used in territorial defense and/or acquisition, and saving resources for this purpose would enhance the fitness of the individual.

Territory size of unit restricted fungi – Previous ecological studies on decomposer fungi have indicated that territory size can have important implications for reproductive success and competitive ability. Individuals with larger territories are more likely to successfully defend that territory and are more likely to invade the territory of their competitors (Holmer and Stenlid 1993Citation , Holmer et al 1997Citation ). Territory size has also been shown to determine the reproductive output in experiments on unit-restricted individuals showing deadlock interactions while competing for agar both inter-specifically (Schmit 1999Citation ) and intra-specifically (Schmit 2001Citation ).

The current study, however, indicates that it is not territory size per se which is important to the fungi; it is the amount of resources captured. When the amount of resources captured is held constant, larger territories can be detrimental. In previous studies, individuals with a larger territory were more successful as competitors only when compared to individuals grown on an identical substrate and when an increase in territory size led to an increase in resources captured. This could be an important distinction when investigating fungi in nature. When predicting the competitive ability of a fungus, the quality of the territory may be as important as its actual size. It is well known that many species of decomposers show little host specificity (e.g., see Gilbertson and Ryvarden 1986, 1987Citation for the range of tree species decomposed by individual polypore species). When a single decomposer inhabits a variety of host species, the resources of the host species will inevitably differ in ways that are important to the decomposer. Therefore when comparing individual fungi living on different substrates, size of territory alone may not explain differences in competitive ability. Similarly, if a fungus is growing on a heterogeneous substrate, quality of its territory may have a bigger influence on its competitive ability than the size of its territory.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
I would like to thank Greg Mueller, Melinda Brady, Mathew Leibold, Mike Miller, Ellen Simms, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was funded by NSF grant DEB 96-23523.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Corresponding author, Email: jpschmit{at}life.uiuc.edu . Current Address: John Paul Schmit, Dept. of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 265 Morrill Hall, 505 S Goodwin Ave., Urbana Illinois 61801 Back

Accepted for publication May 25, 2001.


    LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Ballou LR, Holton RW., 1985 Synchronous initiation and sporulation of fruit bodies by Coprinus cinereus on a defined medium Mycologia 77:103-108

Cooke RC, Rayner ADM., 1984 Ecology of saprotrophic fungi New York: Longman Inc

Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L., 1986 North American polypores. Vol. 1 Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 433 p

Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L., 1987 North American polypores. Vol. 2 Oslo, Norway: Fungiflora. 885 p

Hanski I, Simberloff D., 1997 The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. San Diego, California: Academic Press. p 5–26

Holmer L, Renvall P, Stenlid J., 1997 Selective replacement between species of wood-rotting basidiomycetes, a laboratory study Mycol Res 101:714-720

Holmer L, Stenlid J., 1993 Competitive hierarchies of wood decomposing basidiomycetes in artificial systems based on variable inoculum sizes Oikos 79:77-84

Holt RD., 1997 From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of spatial heterogeneity In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME, eds. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. San Diego, California: Academic Press. p 149–165

Madelin MF., 1956a Studies on the nutrition of Coprinus lagopus Fr., especially as affecting fruiting Ann Bot (London) 20:307-330[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Madelin MF., 1956b The influence of light and temperature on fruiting on Coprinus lagopus Fr. in pure culture Ann Bot (London) 20:467-481[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Minitab Inc. 1999 Minitab for Windows, release 12.23

Plunkett BE., 1953 Nutritional and other aspects of fruit-body production in pure cultures of Collybia velutipes (Curt.) Fr Ann Bot (London) 17:193-217[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rayner ADM, Boddy L., 1988 Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology New York: John Wiley and Sons. 587 p

Rhodes OE, Odum EP., 1996 Spatiotemporal approaches in ecology and genetics: the road less traveled In: Rhodes OE, Chesser RK, Smith MH, eds. Population dynamics in ecological space and time. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. p 1–7

Schmit JP., 1999 Resource consumption and competition by unit-restricted fungal decomposers of patchy substrates Oikos 87:509-519

Schmit JP., 2001 Intraspecific competition in two unit-restricted fungal decomposers, Coprinus cinereus and C. congregatus Mycol Res 105:112-118

Statistics UCLA. 2001 Power Calculator, based on STPLAN by Barry Brown et al, online at http://ebook.stat.ucla.edu/calculators/powercalc/

Tilman D, Lehman CL, Kareiva P., 1997 Population dynamics in spatial habitats In: Tilman D, Kareiva P, eds. Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p 3–20




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MycologiaHome page
J. P. Schmit
Species richness of tropical wood-inhabiting macrofungi provides support for species-energy theory
Mycologia, July 1, 2005; 97(4): 751 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schmit, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS