| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
USDA, ARS, Southern Regional Research Center, PO Box 19687, New Orleans, Louisiana 70179
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Based on counts of Aspergillus species reported in over 250 studies of microfungi from soils and litter, chi-square analyses were conducted on species occurrence in five biomes and five latitude ranges to determine variations from expected distributions. There was no overall trend in distribution of the members of the entire genus by biome, however, individual sections of the genus appeared to have distinct distribution patterns. Most members of sections Aspergillus, Nidulantes, Flavipedes and Circumdati occurred at greater than expected frequencies in desert soils. There was no distinct pattern of species occurrence for forest, wetland, or cultivated soils, although members of section Nidulantes were quite rare in cultivated soils. Most species occurred at or below expected frequencies in grassland soils. Members of the genus tended to occur at greater than expected frequencies at latitudes in the subtropical/warm temperate zone between 26 and 35 degrees. Most species occurred at expected frequencies in the lower latitudes, and below expected frequencies in latitudes greater than 35 degrees.
Key words: Aspergillus, biome, Emericella, Eurotium, latitude, Neosartorya, species occurrence
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most published work on the global distribution of aspergilli in soils has been descriptive, based on the knowledge and experience of the individual authors (e.g., Domsch et al 1980
, Raper and Fennell 1965
). Christensen and Tuthill (1985)
, however, compiled species diversity data from 62 soil surveys and concluded that the relative percentage of Aspergillus species was greatest in the studies from the tropical and subtropical latitudes, and that many rare species of Aspergillus have been reported only from tropical and subtropical soils.
Mycologists conducting soil microfungal studies are not evenly distributed worldwide. Most published studies are from subtropic to temperate zones (latitudes of 2645 degrees north or south), and in forest and cultivated soil biomes (Fig. 1 ). To assess whether or not the fungi were evenly distributed, the uneven distribution of studies conducted in the various categories had to be taken into account. This was accomplished by converting all of the data to percentages and conducting a chi-square analysis.
|
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A table of reported occurrence of aspergilli was compiled by Klich et al (1992)
in which data from 327 studies from soils and other substrates were used to create a table of reported occurrence of aspergilli, but no statistical analyses were conducted. In that study, 194 reports were from soil and litter, and from these, latitude could be determined for 183 studies. For the present study, soil and litter data from Klich et al 1992
, as well as an additional 60 reports (these are denoted by an asterisk in the Literature Cited) were used. A few of these contained data from more than one biome or latitude range, so for the statistical analysis, some of the studies were counted more than once. In the analysis, there were a total of 270 studies of biome and 243 of latitude.
Biomes and latitude ranges Most of the studies fell into one of the broad biome categories listed in Fig. 1 . In some cases, the authors did not indicate the biome from which their samples came, or the samples were from unusual soils that did not match one of the main categories. These were placed into the category unspecified. Since analysis of data in this category would yield no useful information on the biogeography of the species, these data were not analyzed. Relatively few studies of soil microfungi have been conducted in low latitudes. Therefore, the first latitude category in the analysis includes 015 degrees north and south. The other latitude ranges are in 10 degree intervals up to 45 degrees. Forty six degrees and above are reported as one category because relatively few aspergilli were reported from these latitudes.
Statistical analysis
The Pearson chi-square statistic (Conover 1980
) was used to compare observed occurrence to expected occurrence for each category within each species. Only the 52 species reported in at least 4 publications were included in the analysis. The expected occurrence was the percentage of studies in the given category. For example, 7.4% (18 of 243) of the studies were conducted in latitudes from 015 degrees north or south. If the Aspergillus species were evenly distributed in the world, one would expect 7.4% of the reported occurrences of each species to be in this category. The observed occurrence was the percentage of studies in which a species was reported, out of all of the published reports of that species in that category. For example, Aspergillus giganteus was reported in 10 publications. Six of these, or 60%, were conducted in the 015 degree latitude range. The 60% observed was significantly greater that the expected 7.4% in the chi square test, and is marked in bold in the figure along with a plus sign. Throughout the figure, bold with a plus sign indicates occurrence at greater than the expected frequency and grey italics with a minus sign indicates species occurring at less than expected frequency in the chi-square test at P = 0.05. The figure contains the actual number of studies in which each species was reported in each biome, rather than the percentages used in the statistical analysis, in order to give the reader an idea of how frequently the species have actually been reported. Percentages may be derived from the data given in the figure. Only species reported in at least four studies are included in the figure. As noted above, no analysis was conducted on the unspecified biome group.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 52 species included in Fig. 1 , 22 species occurred with greater than expected frequencies in desert soils, compared to 6 in forest, 2 in grassland, 11 in wetland, 8 in cultivated soils. The biomes with the lowest number of species occurring at less than expected frequencies were the desert and wetland soils (10 and 6, respectively), in contrast to 1417 species in the other three biomes.
In the tropical latitudes, 18 species occurred at greater than expected frequencies and 11 at less than expected frequencies in the 015° latitude range, whereas 11 species occurred in each of those two categories in the 1615° latitude range. In the subtropical to warm-temperate latitudes between 26° and 35°, 30 species occurred at greater than expected frequencies and only 3 at less than expected frequencies. At higher latitudes, the majority of species occurred at less than expected frequencies; 31 and 41 for the 3645° and 46°+ ranges, respectively. Only 7 species occurred at greater than expected frequencies in the 3645° latitude range and only one species in the 46°+ latitude range.
Not all subgeneric sections of the genus followed the overall trends. Although there was no strong overall trend for occurrence of all of the species in any one biome, there were trends for some of the sections within the genus. The xerophilic species in subgenus Aspergillus and many species in sections Nidulantes and Circumdati occurred with greater than expected frequency in desert soils. Unlike most species which occurred at greater than expected frequencies in the 2635° latitude range, most members of sections Cervini and Ornati occurred with greater than expected frequencies above 35 degrees, and most species in sections Flavi and Nigri occurred with greater than expected frequencies in the 015° latitude range.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Why do most aspergilli occur most frequently in the 2535 degree latitudes? This phenomenon is probably the result of a number of interacting factors. The same general biomes occur in other latitude ranges, and the data herein indicate that most aspergilli do not occur at greater than expected frequencies in any one biome, so biome per se is probably not a major overall factor. Temperature may be a factor. Most aspergilli grow optimally at temperatures between 25 and 40 C and have minimum growth temperatures around 10 C (Klich et al 1992
). In the subtropical/warm temperate zone, temperatures probably stay within the optimal ranges for greater periods of time than in the other latitudinal zones. Microhabitat factors such water and nutrient availability, as well as competition and herbivory, may also play a role.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Accepted for publication May 22, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
*Adhikari RS, Tiwari A., 1991 Microbial decomposition of oak leaf litter in temperate forest of Kumaun Himalayas Acta Botanica Indica 19:195-200
*Agarwal AK, Chauhan S., 1988 Influence of fertilizers on the population dynamics of soil microfungi Proc Nat Acad Sci India 58: B 603-610
*Asan A, Ekmekci S., 1994 The determination of Penicillium and Aspergillus species in Edirne soils and their seasonal distribution Tr J Biol 18:291-303
*Bartoli A, Gerdol R, Massari G., 1991 Soil fungi succession in a Mediterranean "macchia" after fire Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol 28:387-402
*Baublis JA, Wharton RA Jr., Volz PA., 1991 Diversity of microfungi in an Antarctic dry valley J Basic Microbiol 31:3-12[Medline]
*Behera N, Mukerji KG., 1984 Seasonal fluctuations of aspergilli in Delhi soils Indian J Mycol Pl Pathol 14:283-285
*Bettucci L, Rodriguez C, Indarte R., 1993 Fungal communities of two grazing-land soils in Uruguay Pedobiologia 37:72-82
*Bilai TI, Zakharchenko VA., 1984 Thermophilic fungi in the soils of various plant associations in the southern UkrainianSSR USSR Mikol Fitopatol 18:433-435
*Chaturvedi AP, Kiran U, Khilari K., 1990 Survival of terrestrial fungi in aquatic habitats Crop Res 3:84-92
Christensen M, Tuthill DE., 1985 Aspergillus: an overview In: Samson RA, Pitt JI, eds. Advances in Pencillium and Aspergillus systematics. New York: Plenum Press. p 195209
Conover WJ., 1980 Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 493 p
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH., 1980 Compendium of Soil Fungi London: Academic Press. 859 p
*Dunn PH, Reynolds DR, Barro S, Okomoto FHN., 1989 Brazilian aspergilli and other fungi from Rio Trombetas basin soils Bol Mus Para Emilio Goeldi, ser Botanica 5:163-173
*Eicker A., 1969 Microfungi from surface soil of forest communities in Zululand Trans Br Mycol Soc 53:381-392
*El-Gindy AA, Saad RR., 1990 Fungi of virgin and cultivated soil of Salhiah desert, Egypt Zentralbl Mikrobiol 145:547-551[Medline]
*El-Morsy E-SM., 1999 Microfungi from the ectorhizosphere-rhizoplane zone of different halophilic plants from the Red Sea Coast of Egypt Mycologia 91:228-236
*El-Said AHM., 1994 Studies on soil mycoflora of Bahreen Microbiol Res 149:263-269
*Fresquez PR., 1990 Fungi associated with soils collected beneath and between pinyon and juniper canopies in New Mexico Great Basin Naturalist 50:167-172
*Ghildiyal JC., 1993 Mycoflora of decomposing leaf litter in a subtropical freshwater swamp Proc Nat Acad Sci India 63: (B)H 207-211
*Gupta M, Jain S, Bohra A., 1991 Rhizosphere mycoflora of some ferns from the Kumaon Hills Utter Pradesh India Indian Fern J 8:95-97
*Hasenekoglu I, Azaz AD., 1991 The microfungi flora of clear-cut forest soils and comparison of it with the flora of nearby normal forest soils in the vicinity of Sarakamis (Turkey) Turkish Journal of Botany 15:214-226
*Hasenekoglu I, Sulun Y., 1990 A study on microfungi flora of the soils polluted by Askali (Erzurum) cement work Turkish Journal of Botany 15:20-27
*Hashem AR., 1991 Studies on the fungal flora of Saudi Arabian soil Crypt Bot 2/3:179-182
*Hashem AR., 1995 Soil analysis and mycoflora of the Jubail industrial city in Saudi Arabia Journal of the University of Kuwait (Sci) 22:231-237
*Hemida SK, Bagy MMK, Khallil AMA., 1993 Fungal flora of cement polluted soils in Egypt Zentralbl Mikrobiol 148:148-157
*Jesenska Z, Pieckova E, Bernat D., 1992 Heat-resistant fungi in the soil Int J Food Microbiol 16:209-214[Medline]
*Joffe AZ., 1967 The mycoflora of a light soil in a citrus fertilizer trial in Israel Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 32:209-230[Medline]
*Kamal Gupta ML, Kumar P., 1979 Aspergilli from soils of Gorakhpur 9: Edaphic factors and distribution in 4 soil types against plane cover Indian J Mycol Plant Pathol 9:56-65
*Keller L, Bidochka MJ., 1998 Habitat and temporal differences among soil microfungal assemblages in Ontario Can J Bot 76:1798-1805
*Khallil AM, Abdel-Sater MA., 1993 Fungi from water, soil, and air polluted by industrial effluents of Manquabad superphosphate factory (Assuit, Egypt) J Basic Microbiol 31:83-100
*Khallil A-RMA, El-Hissy FT, Bagy MMK., 1991 Mycoflora of mangroves of Red Sea in Egypt Folia Microbiol 36:456-464
*Klich M., 1998 Soil fungi of some low-altitude desert cotton fields and ability of their extracts to inhibit Aspergillus flavus Mycopathologia 142:97-100[Medline]
*Klich M., Tiffany LH, Knaphus G., 1992 Ecology of the aspergilli of soils and litter In: Bennett JW, Klich MA, eds. Aspergillus: biology and industrial applications. Boston: Butterworth Heineman. p 329354
*Kurakov AV, Beluchenko IS., 1990 Microfungi of the grazing lands and cotton agruims in southern Tajikistan Bulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, Otdel Biologicheskii 95:118-131
*Maggi O, Persiani AM., 1992 Comparative studies of the microfungi of tropical ecosystems: final report on mycological research of soils Mycologia Helvetica 5:79-98
*Mehrotra BR, Kakkar RK., 1972 Ecological study of soil fungi of an agricultural field in Allahabad Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 47:41-58
*Moharram AM, El-Hissy FT, El-Zayat SA., 1990 Studies on the mycoflora of Aswan High Dam Lake, Egypt: vertical fluctuations J Basic Microbiol 30:197-208[Medline]
*Moubasher AH, Abdel-Hafez SII, Bagy MMK, Abdel-Satar MA., 1990 Halophilic and halotolerant fungi in cultivated desert and salt marsh soils from Egypt Acta Mycologica 26:65-81
*Nagaraja TG., 1990 Rhizosphere mycoflora of Strychnos nux-vomica Linn Indian Bot Reptr 9:32-33
*Orazova MKh, Polyanskaya LM, Zvyagintsev DG., 1999 The structure of the microbial community in the barley root zone Microbiology 68:109-115
*Pandey RR, Chaturvedi AP, Dwivedi RS., 1991 Ecology of microfungi in soil profiles of guava orchard with reference to edaphic factors Proc Nat Acad Sci India 61:97-107
*Rai JN, Chowdhrey HJ., 1978 Microfungi from mangrove swamps of West Bengal, India Geophytology 8:103-110
*Rambelli A, Persiani AM, Maggi O, Lunghini D, Onofri S, Riess S, Dowgiallo G, Puppi G., 1983 Comparative studies on microfungi in tropical ecosystems: mycological studies in south western Ivory Coast forest UNESCO. Man and the Biosphere, Project N. 1. 107 p
*Rambelli A, Persiani AM, Maggi O, Onofri S, Riess S, Dowgiallo G, Zucconi L., 1984 Comparative studies on microfungi in tropical ecosystems: further mycological studies in southwestern Ivory Coast forest. Report N. 2 Giornale Botanico Italiano 118:201-243
Raper KB, Fennell DI., 1965 The genus Aspergillus Baltimore, Maryland: Williams and Wilkins. 686 p
*Rutherford JM, Huang LH., 1994 A study of fungi of remote sediments in West Virginia caves and a comparison with reported species in the literature NSS Bulletin 56:38-45
*Sah R, Shail S, Dubey RC., 1994 Fungistasis and community dynamics of microfungi in soils of banj-oak, chir-pine, and cypress forests of Kumaun, Central Himalaya Int J Tropical Plant Diseases 12:159-169
*Sampo S, Bergero R, Buffa G, Luppi-Mosca AM., 1997 Soil fungal communities in a young and an old Alnus viridis coenosis Mycologia 89:837-845
*Sarma M, Sarma GC, Bora KN, Baishya DN., 1995 Soil fungi of Holongapara Reserve Forest, Assam. Ad Plant Sci 8:197-200
*Saxena Y, Saxena SK., 1990 Rhizosphere and rhizoplane mycoflora of Adiantum incisum Indian Fern J 7:21-23
*Sindhu IR, Singh PN., 1990 Microfungal flora on living and dead leaves of Spinacia oleracea. L Acta Botanica Indica 18:24-33
*Singh S, Sandhu DK., 1985 Thermophilous fungi in Port Blair soils Can J Bot 64:1018-1026
*Singh SP, Pande K, Upadhyay VP, Singh JS., 1990 Fungal communities associated with the decomposition of a common leaf litter (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) along an elevation transect in the Central Himalaya Biol Fertil Soils 9:245-251
*Sizova TP, Baghdadi VKh, Gorlenko MV., 1967 Mycoflora of mukhafez of Damascus and Es-Suveida (Syria) Mikologia Fitopatdogii 1:286-293
*Sorkhoh NA, Ghannoum MA, Ibrahim AS, Stretton RJ, Radwan SS., 1990 Crude oil and hydrocarbon-degrading strains of Rhodococcus rhodochrous isolated from soil and marine environments in Kuwait Environ Poll 65:1-17
*States JS., 1978 Soil fungi of cool-desert plant communities in northern Arizona and southern Utah Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 13:13-17
*Steiman R, Guiraud P, Sage L, Seigle-Murandi F, Lafond J-L., 1995 Mycoflora of soil around the Dead Sea IAscomycetes (including Aspergillus and Penicillium), Basidiomycetes, Zygomycetes System Appl Microbiol 18:310-317
*Sulun Y, Hasenekoglu I., 1993 A study on Aspergillus Mich. ex. Fr. and Penicillium Link ex. Gray flora of the soils of northeast Anatolia, Turkiye DogaTr J Biol 17:49-60
*Tiwari SC, Tiwari BK, Mishra RR., 1994 Succession of microfungi associated with the decomposing litters of pineapple (Anasas comosus) Pedobiologia 38:185-192
*Tokumasu S., 1990 Microfungi from coniferous leaf litter of Chile Bull Natl Sci Mus Tokyo Ser B 16:135-145
*Vardavakis E., 1990 Seasonal fluctuations of soil microfungi in correlation with some soil enzyme activities and V.A. mycorrhizae associated with certain plants of a typical calcixeroll soil in Greece Mycologia 82:715-726
*Wakefield EM, Bisby GR., 1941 List of hyphomycetes recorded for Britain Trans Brit Mycol Soc 25:49-126
*Yaguchi T, Someya A, Udagawa SI., 1994 Fennellia flavipes and Neosartorya stiamenia, two new records from Japan Mycoscience 35:175-178
*Yip HY, Weste G., 1985 Rhizoplane mycoflora of two understory species in the dry sclerophyll forest of the Brisbane Ranges (Australia) Sydowia, Annales Mycologici Ser II 38:383-399
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS 2009 Mycologia, November 1, 2008; 100(6): 985 - 989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Machida, O. Yamada, and K. Gomi Genomics of Aspergillus oryzae: Learning from the History of Koji Mold and Exploration of Its Future DNA Res, August 1, 2008; 15(4): 173 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS 2008 Mycologia, January 1, 2008; 100(1): 164 - 169. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kis-Papo, V. Kirzhner, S. P. Wasser, and E. Nevo Evolution of genomic diversity and sex at extreme environments: Fungal life under hypersaline Dead Sea stress PNAS, December 9, 2003; 100(25): 14970 - 14975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |