Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.98.2.218
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powers, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powers, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, S. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Powers, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, S. L.
Mycologia, 98(2), 2006, pp. 218-222.
© 2006 by The Mycological Society of America

Protostelids from tropical forests, woodlands and deserts in Australia


Donna Moore Powers 1

     Biology/Chemistry Division, Corning Community College, Corning, New York 14830

Steven L. Stephenson

     Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

Most of what is known about the distribution of protostelids is limited to results from surveys carried out in North and Central America. To increase our knowledge about protostelid diversity and distribution we surveyed protostelids from 12 study sites in northern Queensland and the Northern Territory of Australia during May–Jun 2003. Aerial litter and ground litter samples were randomly collected along a 200 m transect at each site. Study sites ranged from tropical forests to deserts. We recovered 10 species and two apparently undescribed species from samples of aerial (dead but still attached plant parts) and ground litter. Samples from a woodland site characterized by intermediate moisture conditions had the greatest species richness, followed by samples from dry woodland, tropical forest and desert sites. When species richness for a particular microhabitat was considered, samples of aerial litter yielded more species than samples of ground litter. Percentages of samples colonized with protostelids were similar for the aerial and ground litter microhabitats within a given habitat type except for dry woodlands, in which aerial litter samples were characterized by higher numbers of species than ground litter samples. Two species (Protostelium mycophaga and Soliformovum irregularis) that in temperate North America are associated with aerial litter microhabitats also were recovered from aerial litter in dry habitats in Australia. Schizoplasmodiopsis pseudoendospora, a North American temperate ground litter species, was equally abundant in aerial litter and ground litter in Australia. This study is the first of its kind for protostelid ecology in Australia and the most extensive study of protostelids in the southern hemisphere. These data complement ongoing research on protostelid distribution from around the world.

Key words: desert, ecology, mycetozoans, protoctists, slime molds, tropics

1 Corresponding author. E-mail: powers{at}corning-cc.edu






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Mycological Society of America.