Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/mycologia.97.6.1201
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cano, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bago, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cano, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bago, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cano, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bago, A.
Mycologia, 97(6), 2005, pp. 1201-1214.
© 2005 by The Mycological Society of America

Competition and substrate colonization strategies of three polyxenically grown arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi


Custodia Cano
Alberto Bago 1

     Departamento de Microbiología del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain

Intra- and extraradical colonization competition and hyphal interactions among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) Glomus intraradices, Glomus proliferum and Gigaspora margarita were investigated in two in vitro experimental systems. AMF were polyxenically cultured with a Ri T-DNA transformed carrot root organ culture (ROC) in either big Petri plates containing three culture compartments and a common hyphal compartment (i.e. an independent host root for each AMF) or two by two in the culture compartment of regular bicompartmented Petri dishes (i.e. a common host root and a common hyphal compartment). Maps of the extraradical mycelial development of the three AMF were obtained. Two distinct substrate colonization strategies (Glomus-type and Gigaspora-type) were identified, reflecting intrinsic differences among AMF genera/families. Our data reveal a general lack of antagonism between the isolates when extraradical hyphae explore and exploit the substrate outside the root influence zone; however certain growth restrictions were imposed by Gi. margarita extraradical mycelium when developing near the host root and by G. proliferum intraradical hyphae. This work highlights once more the appropriateness of AM in vitro culture systems to perform in vivo studies on the biology of this symbiosis and opens new avenues to the formulation of in vitro AMF inoculants.

Key words: AMF colony development, AM polyxenic cultures, in vitro culture, competition, coloniztion strategies


1 Corresponding author. Email: abago{at}eez.csic.es







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Mycological Society of America.