This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jumpponen, A. Articles by Johnson, L. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jumpponen, A. Articles by Johnson, L. C. Agricola Articles by Jumpponen, A. Articles by Johnson, L. C.

Can rDNA analyses of diverse fungal communities in soil and roots detect effects of environmental manipulations—a case study from tallgrass prairie

     Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

Loretta C. Johnson

     Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

We tested whether fungal communities are impacted by nitrogen deposition or increased precipitation by PCR-amplifying partial fungal rRNA genes from 24 soil and 24 root samples from a nitrogen enrichment and irrigation experiment in a tallgrass prairie at Konza Prairie Biological Station in northeastern Kansas, U.S.A. Obtained fungal sequences represented great fungal diversity that was distributed mainly in ascomycetes and basiodiomycetes; only a few zygomycetes and glomeromycetes were detected. Conservative extrapolated estimates of the fungal species richness suggest that the true richness may be at least twice as high as observed. The effects of nitrogen enrichment or irrigation on fungal community composition, diversity or clone richness could not be unambiguously assessed because of the overwhelming diversity. However, soil communities differed from root communities in diversity, richness and composition. The compositional differences were largely attributable to an abundant, soil-inhabiting group placed as a well-supported sister group to other ascomycetes. This group likely represents a novel group of fungi. We conclude that the great fungal richness in this ecosystem precluded a reliable assessment of anthropogenic impacts on soil or rhizosphere communities using the applied sampling scheme, and that detection of novel fungi in soil may be more a rule than an exception.

Key words: Fungi, soil DNA, environmental change, precipitation, nitrogen, biodiversity

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Porras-Alfaro, J. Herrera, R. L. Sinsabaugh, K. J. Odenbach, T. Lowrey, and D. O. Natvig Novel Root Fungal Consortium Associated with a Dominant Desert Grass Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2008; 74(9): 2805 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pitkaranta, T. Meklin, A. Hyvarinen, L. Paulin, P. Auvinen, A. Nevalainen, and H. Rintala Analysis of Fungal Flora in Indoor Dust by Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis, Quantitative PCR, and Culture Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 74(1): 233 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Fierer, M. Breitbart, J. Nulton, P. Salamon, C. Lozupone, R. Jones, M. Robeson, R. A. Edwards, B. Felts, S. Rayhawk, et al. Metagenomic and Small-Subunit rRNA Analyses Reveal the Genetic Diversity of Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, and Viruses in Soil Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2007; 73(21): 7059 - 7066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sugiyama, K. Hosaka, and S.-O. Suh Early diverging Ascomycota: phylogenetic divergence and related evolutionary enigmas Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 996 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]