| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Apdo. Postal 183. Tlaxcala 90000, México
Thomas W. Gaither
Department of Biology, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania 16507-1325
Dennis L. Miller 1
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology F03.1, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080
Carlos Lado
Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, España
Harold W. Keller
Department of Biology, Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg, Missouri 64093
The genus Schenella has proven difficult to classify since its description as a new genus in 1911. Macbride placed it with the Myxomycetes but it was unclear with which myxomycete, if any, it should be grouped. Recent identification of abundant samples of Schenella has aided a re-evaluation of its classification as a myxomycete. Morphological evidence based on light and scanning electron microscopy of recently collected specimens and on the type specimen of Macbride suggested that it might be synonymous with the gasteromycete Pyrenogaster. Analysis of DNA sequences from freshly isolated samples indicates that the genus Schenella is related closely to an anciently diverged, monophyletic group of fungi that includes several gasteromycete genera, among them Geastrum, Sphaerobolus and Pseudocolus. Comparisons of the morphology and DNA sequences of authentically identified specimens of Pyrenogaster atrogleba indicate that it is synonymous with Schenella simplex. The nomenclatural implications of this discovery are discussed.
Key words: Eumycetozoa, gasteromycete, molecular systematics, Myxomycetes, plasmodial slime molds, Pyrenogaster, Schenella
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |