This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jacobs, A. Articles by Wingfield, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jacobs, A. Articles by Wingfield, M. J. Agricola Articles by Jacobs, A. Articles by Wingfield, M. J.

Phylogenetic relationships among Phialocephala species and other ascomycetes

     Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Martin P. A. Coetzee
Brenda D. Wingfield

     Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Karin Jacobs
Michael J. Wingfield

     Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Phialocephala was established for species in the Leptographium complex that produce conidia from phialides at the apices of dark mononematous conidiophores. Some species previously included in Phialocephala were re-allocated to Sporendocladia because they resembled Thielaviopsis in having ring-wall-building conidial development and conidia with two attachment points that emerge in false chains. Despite this significant realignment of the genus, a great deal of morphological heterogeneity remains in Phialocephala. The objective of this study was to consider the heterogeneity among Phialocephala spp. based on comparisons of sequence data derived from the large and small subunits (LSU and SSU) of the rRNA operon of species in Phialocephala. Phialocephala dimorphospora, the type species of the genus, and P. fortinii grouped with genera of the Helotiales in phylogenetic trees generated based on the LSU and SSU datasets. Phialocephala xalapensis and P. fusca clearly are unrelated to Phialocephala sensu stricto and should represent a new genus in the Ophiostomatales. Phialocephala compacta resides with representatives of the Hypocreales, and we believe that it represents a distinct genus. Phialocephala scopiformis and P. repens are not closely related to the other Phialocephala species and group within the Dothideales. The morphological heterogeneity among species of Phialocephala clearly is reflected by phylogenetic analysis of sequence data from two conserved rRNA gene regions. Appropriate genera now need to be found to accommodate these fungi.

Key words: Leptographium, morphology, Phialophora, phylogeny

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. W. Crous, I. H. Rong, A. Wood, S. Lee, H. Glen, W. Botha, B. Slippers, W. Z. de Beer, M. J. Wingfield, and D. L. Hawksworth How many species of fungi are there at the tip of Africa? Stud Mycol, January 1, 2006; 55: 13 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]