| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Skogforsk, Bioteknologi, Avd. 1, Høgskoleveien 12, 1432 Ås, Norway
Kari Korhonen
Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18 (Jokiniemenkuja 1), FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland
Robin Sen
Division of General Microbiology, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 56 (Viikinkaari 9), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
Strains of Ceratobasidium bicorne (anamorph uninucleate Rhizoctonia), causing root dieback in nursery-grown conifer seedlings, were fruited in the laboratory and the pairing interactions among sibling, single-basidiospore progeny were investigated. No mating reactions were observed. Instead, a high frequency of somatic incompatibility was observed in progeny pairings, indicated by a killing reaction in hyphal anastomosis and by formation of a demarcation line. The F1 progeny also could be fruited, and the level of somatic incompatibility within the F2 progeny remained high, even if lower than in the F1 progeny. The interaction types in pairings within a family of progeny were similar in all respects to those between field isolates, indicating that the species is homothallic. The uninucleate condition of vegetative cells and the basidial characteristics would indicate homokaryotic fruiting, but the possibility of pseudohomothallism remains. We currently are not able to provide an explanation for the mechanism promoting somatic incompatibility in this species, but it seems likely that the classic heterogenic model of somatic incompatibility recognized in basidiomycetes is not applicable here. Alternative mechanisms are discussed.
Key words: basidiomycetes, homothallism
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E Falconer, J. L Bown, N. A White, and J. W Crawford Modelling interactions in fungi J R Soc Interface, June 6, 2008; 5(23): 603 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Toda and M. Hyakumachi Heterokaryon formation in Thanatephorus cucumeris anastomosis group 2-2 IV. Mycologia, September 1, 2006; 98(5): 726 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |