Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cavender, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cavender, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cavender, J. C.
Mycologia, 94(6), 2002, pp. 968-979.
© 2002 by The Mycological Society of America

Taxonomy, slime molds, and the questions we ask


Andrew R. Swanson 1
Frederick W. Spiegel

     Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

James C. Cavender

     Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701

Taxonomic treatments often influence the way we both ask and attempt to answer certain biological questions. The classical taxonomy of the dictyostelid cellular slime molds (Dictyosteliales) involves a convenient set of categories that were developed independent of phylogeny. In order to test whether the characters supporting the classical taxonomy hold any phylogenetic signal, we subjected 19 described taxa belonging to two families (Acytosteliaceae and Dictyosteliaceae) and three genera (Acytostelium, Dictyostelium, and Polysphondylium) to rooted cladistic analyses using PAUP* v 4.0b4a. Neither family nor any of the three genera were found to represent monophyletic groups. These results confirm that the classical taxonomy used to delineate families and genera within these slime molds carries very little phylogenetic signal. Taxonomic character sets should be scrutinized phylogenetically in order to determine what information they provide about the relatedness of taxa within a group. Because taxonomy often drives the nature of biological inquiry, caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions regarding the evolution of developmental systems in Dictyostelium.

Key words: Acytostelium, Dictyostelium, Eumycetozoa, Phylogeny, Polysphondylium




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MycologiaHome page
M. Schnittler, M. Unterseher, and J. Tesmer
Species richness and ecological characterization of myxomycetes and myxomycete-like organisms in the canopy of a temperate deciduous forest.
Mycologia, March 1, 2006; 98(2): 223 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The Mycological Society of America.