Mycologia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOI: 10.3852/08-034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindner, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Banik, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindner, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Banik, M. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lindner, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Banik, M. T.
Mycologia, 101(1), 2009, pp. 157-165.
© 2009 by The Mycological Society of America

Effects of cloning and root-tip size on observations of fungal ITS sequences from Picea glauca roots


Daniel L. Lindner 1
Mark T. Banik

     U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Forest Mycology Research, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53726

To better understand the effects of cloning on observations of fungal ITS sequences from Picea glauca (white spruce) roots two techniques were compared: (i) direct sequencing of fungal ITS regions from individual root tips without cloning and (ii) cloning and sequencing of fungal ITS regions from individual root tips. Effect of root tip size was investigated by selecting 20 small root tips (SRT, 1.0–2.0 mm long) and 20 large root tips (LRT, 5.0–6.0 mm long). DNA was isolated from each tip and PCR-amplified with fungal-specific primers. PCR reactions were divided into two portions, one of which was sequenced directly and one of which was cloned first followed by sequencing of 12 random clones. With direct sequencing all 20 SRT produced an identifiable sequence, while only 13 of 20 LRT (65%) yielded an identifiable sequence. With cloning and sequencing all 40 tips produced identifiable fungal ITS sequences regardless of size. Failure of direct sequencing in LRT was associated with the presence of multispecies assemblages. Cloning identified 18 taxa overall while direct sequencing identified four. Cloning was not affected by tip size and identified more taxa relative to direct sequencing, although cost and probability of observing lab-based contaminants (e.g. airborne or reagent-based) were higher. We suggest that standardized controls be run whenever clones are sequenced from environmental samples, including positive controls derived from pure cultures and negative controls that cover the entire extraction, amplification and cloning process. Additional studies on larger root segments and bulked samples are needed to determine whether cloning can detect fungi accurately and cost-effectively in complex environmental samples.

Key words: ectomycorrhizal fungi, endophyte, environmental samples, mycorrhiza, species identification


1 Corresponding author. E-mail: dlindner{at}wisc.edu







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The Mycological Society of America.